Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
1.
Cureus ; 16(6): e63505, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952580

RESUMEN

Bronchopulmonary fistula (BPF) is an abnormal connection between the pleural space and bronchial tree, potentially leading to fatal outcomes if untreated. While BPF commonly arises following lung surgery, it can also be linked to infections. This report details the case of a 47-year-old male with recent untreated bacterial pneumonia, who developed bilateral pneumothoraces with persistent air leaks, Pseudomonas and Aspergillus empyema, culminating in a right-sided BPF necessitating video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) decortication. The agenda of this presentation is to enhance early recognition of BPF, which can be presented subtly, to avert severe complications.

2.
J Thorac Imaging ; 31(2): W13-5, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26891074

RESUMEN

Chest radiographs are sometimes taken before surgeries and interventional procedures on hospital admissions and outpatients. This manuscript summarizes the American College of Radiology review of the literature and recommendations on routinely performed chest radiographies in these settings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Radiología , Estados Unidos
3.
J Thorac Imaging ; 31(1): W1-3, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26656194

RESUMEN

Occupational lung disease is a category of disease entities characterized by a reaction of the lung parenchyma to inhaled aerosolized particles found in the environment. This document summarizes the imaging appropriateness data for silicosis, coal worker pneumoconiosis, and asbestosis. The main points of the document are that computed tomography is more sensitive than radiography, computed tomography without contrast generally suffices for evaluation, and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography may have utility in patients with mesothelioma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review includes an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Radiología/normas , Antracosis/diagnóstico , Asbestosis/diagnóstico , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/normas , Radiofármacos , Silicosis/diagnóstico , Sociedades Médicas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Estados Unidos
4.
J Thorac Imaging ; 30(6): W63-5, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439890

RESUMEN

Portable chest radiography is a fundamental and frequently utilized examination in the critically ill patient population. The chest radiograph often represents a timely investigation of new or rapidly evolving clinical findings and an evaluation of proper positioning of support tubes and catheters. Thoughtful consideration of the use of this simple yet valuable resource is crucial as medical cost containment becomes even more mandatory. This review addresses the role of chest radiography in the intensive care unit on the basis of the existing literature and as formed by a consensus of an expert panel on thoracic imaging through the American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiografía Torácica , Sociedades Médicas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estados Unidos
5.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 12(5): 438-43, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25824254

RESUMEN

Thoracic outlet syndrome is a clinical entity characterized by compression of the neurovascular bundle, and may be associated with additional findings such as venous thrombosis, arterial stenosis, or neurologic symptoms. The goal of imaging is to localize the site of compression, the compressing structure, and the compressed organ or vessel, while excluding common mimics. A literature review is provided of current indications for diagnostic imaging, with discussion of potential limitations and benefits of the respective modalities. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. In this document, we provided guidelines for use of various imaging modalities for assessment of thoracic outlet syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiología/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estados Unidos
6.
J Thorac Imaging ; 30(3): W2-5, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25837591

RESUMEN

The respiratory system is often affected by complications of immunodeficiency, typically manifesting clinically as acute respiratory illness. Ongoing literature reviews regarding the appropriateness of imaging in these patients are critical, as advanced medical therapies including stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune disease continue to keep the population of immunosuppressed patients in our health care system high. This ACR Appropriateness Criteria topic describes clinical scenarios of acute respiratory illness in immunocompromised patients with cough, dyspnea, chest pain, and fever, in those with negative, equivocal, or nonspecific findings on chest radiography, in those with multiple, diffuse, or confluent opacities on chest radiography, and in those in whom noninfectious disease is suspected. The use of chest radiography, chest computed tomography, transthoracic needle biopsy, and nuclear medicine imaging is discussed in the context of these clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or is not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Enfermedades Respiratorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Enfermedad Aguda , Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/inmunología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico por imagen
7.
J Thorac Imaging ; 29(6): 364-6, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25340388

RESUMEN

Rib fracture is the most common thoracic injury, present in 10% of all traumatic injuries and almost 40% of patients who sustain severe nonpenetrating trauma. Although rib fractures can produce significant morbidity, the diagnosis of associated complications (such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, atelectasis, flail chest, cardiovascular injury, and injuries to solid and hollow abdominal organs) may have a more significant clinical impact. When isolated, rib fractures have a relatively low morbidity and mortality, and failure to detect isolated rib fractures does not necessarily alter patient management or outcome in uncomplicated cases. A standard posteroanterior chest radiograph should be the initial, and often the only, imaging test required in patients with suspected rib fracture after minor trauma. Detailed radiographs of the ribs rarely add additional information that would change treatment, and, although other imaging tests (eg, computed tomography, bone scan) have increased sensitivity for detection of rib fractures, there are little data to support their use. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review process include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Fracturas de las Costillas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Radiología/normas , Fracturas de las Costillas/etiología , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicaciones , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(9): 849-56, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25086958

RESUMEN

In order to appropriately manage patients with lung cancer, it is necessary to properly stage the tumor. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Broncogénico/patología , Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Oncología Médica/normas , Radiología/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias
9.
J Thorac Imaging ; 29(3): W19-22, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24717602

RESUMEN

Although hemoptysis is often self-limited and benign in origin, it can be an indicator of serious disease including bronchiectasis, granulomatous infection, and malignancy. Hemoptysis severity can be graded on the basis of the quantity of expectorated blood: <30 mL of hemoptysis as minor, 30 to 300 mL as moderate to severe (major), and >300 to 400 mL in 24 hours as massive. Among patients with hemoptysis, chest radiographs are often abnormal and can guide evaluation. The overall risk for malignancy in patients with normal radiographs is low but may be as much as 5% to 10% in patients with >30 mL of hemoptysis and those who are above 40 years of age and have significant smoking history. A combination of negative computed tomography and bronchoscopy results predicts a very low likelihood of lung malignancy diagnosis over medium-term follow-up (2 to 3 y). Bronchial and nonbronchial systemic arteries are much more frequent sources of hemoptysis than pulmonary arteries. Major or massive hemoptysis can usually be stopped acutely by bronchial arterial embolization. Recurrences, however, are common and often require repeat embolization. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Hemoptisis/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Angiografía , Aortografía , Broncoscopía , Medios de Contraste , Técnica Delphi , Embolización Terapéutica , Hemoptisis/terapia , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
10.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 11(4): 345-51, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24603073

RESUMEN

Imaging is paramount in the setting of blunt trauma and is now the standard of care at any trauma center. Although anteroposterior radiography has inherent limitations, the ability to acquire a radiograph in the trauma bay with little interruption in clinical survey, monitoring, and treatment, as well as radiography's accepted role in screening for traumatic aortic injury, supports the routine use of chest radiography. Chest CT or CT angiography is the gold-standard routine imaging modality for detecting thoracic injuries caused by blunt trauma. There is disagreement on whether routine chest CT is necessary in all patients with histories of blunt trauma. Ultimately, the frequency and timing of CT chest imaging should be site specific and should depend on the local resources of the trauma center as well as patient status. Ultrasound may be beneficial in the detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pericardial hemorrhage; transesophageal echocardiography is a first-line imaging tool in the setting of suspected cardiac injury. In the blunt trauma setting, MRI and nuclear medicine likely play no role in the acute setting, although these modalities may be helpful as problem-solving tools after initial assessment. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiología/normas , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estados Unidos
11.
J Thorac Imaging ; 28(5): W64-6, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23846109

RESUMEN

Dyspnea, described as breathlessness or shortness of breath, is usually caused by cardiopulmonary disease. The role of imaging in chronic dyspnea (>1 mo in duration) with suspected pulmonary origin is reviewed as suggested by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Disnea/diagnóstico , Medios de Contraste , Técnica Delphi , Humanos
12.
J Thorac Imaging ; 28(4): W57-60, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23748650

RESUMEN

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) may be idiopathic or related to a variety of diseases. The diagnosis, accurate assessment of etiology and severity, prognosis, treatment response, and follow-up of PH can be achieved using a diverse set of diagnostic examinations. In this review, the role of imaging in the evaluation of PH as suggested by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has been discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The development and review of the guidelines include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Técnica Delphi , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Odontología Basada en la Evidencia , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pronóstico , Radiofármacos , Relación Ventilacion-Perfusión
13.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(3): 170-4, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23571057

RESUMEN

Daily routine chest radiographs in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been a tradition for many years. Anecdotal reports of misplacement of life support items, acute lung processes, and extra pulmonary air collections in a small number of patients served as a justification for routine chest radiographs in the ICU. Having analyzed this practice, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging has made the following recommendations: • When monitoring a stable patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU, a portable chest radiograph is appropriate for clinical indications only. • It is appropriate to obtain a chest radiograph after placement of an endotracheal tube, central venous line, Swan-Ganz catheter, nasogastric tube, feeding tube, or chest tube. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. The strongest data contributing to these recommendations were derived from a meta-analysis of 8 trials comprising 7,078 ICU patients by Oba and Zaza [1].


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto
14.
J Thorac Imaging ; 28(1): W1-3, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23197285

RESUMEN

The solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is a common medical problem for which management can be quite complex. Imaging remains at the center of management of SPNs, and computed tomography is the primary modality by which SPNs are characterized and followed up for stability. This manuscript summarizes the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for radiographically detected solitary pulmonary nodules and briefly reviews the various imaging techniques available. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Radiología/métodos , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico , Medios de Contraste , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Radiofármacos , Sociedades Médicas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
15.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 9(3): 164-9, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22386161

RESUMEN

The respiratory system is often affected by complications of immunodeficiency, typically manifesting clinically as acute respiratory illness. Ongoing literature reviews regarding the appropriateness of imaging in these patients are critical, as advanced medical therapies such as stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy, and immunosuppressive therapies for autoimmune disease continue to keep high the population of immunosuppressed patients in our health care system today. This ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) topic describes clinical scenarios of acute respiratory illness in immunocompromised patients with cough, dyspnea, chest pain, and fever; in those with negative, equivocal, or nonspecific findings on chest radiography; in those with diffuse or confluent opacities on chest radiography; and in those in whom noninfectious disease is suspected. The use of chest radiography, chest CT, transthoracic needle biopsy, and nuclear medicine imaging are all discussed in the contexts of these clinical scenarios. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen/normas , Huésped Inmunocomprometido/efectos de la radiación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Aguda , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía Torácica/normas , Radiología/normas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Estados Unidos
16.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 9(1): 13-9, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22221631

RESUMEN

Pulmonary and mediastinal masses represent a wide range of pathologic processes with very different treatment options. Although advances in imaging (such as PET and high-resolution CT) help in many cases with the differential diagnosis of thoracic pathology, tissue samples are frequently needed to determine the best management for patients presenting with thoracic masses. There are many options for obtaining tissue samples, each of which has its own set of benefits and drawbacks. The purposes of this report are to present the most current evidence regarding biopsies of thoracic nodules and masses and to present the most appropriate options for select common clinical scenarios. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Torácicas/diagnóstico , Biopsia/métodos , Técnica Delphi , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Enfermedades del Mediastino/diagnóstico , Radiografía Intervencional
17.
J Thorac Imaging ; 26(2): W42-4, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21508726

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory illness is defined as one or more of the following: cough, sputum production, chest pain, or dyspnea (with or without fever). The workup of these patients depends on many factors, including clinical presentation and the suspected etiology. This study reviews the literature on the indications and usefulness of radiologic studies for the evaluation of acute respiratory illness in the immunocompetent patient. The following recommendations are the result of evidence-based consensus by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Radiology. Chest radiographs are usually appropriate in (1) patients with positive physical examination or risk factors for pneumonia, (2) for the assessment of complicated pneumonia, or (3) in cases of emerging infections and biological warfare agents such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, H1N1, and anthrax. Computed tomography, although having a more limited role, is usually appropriate (1) in the assessment of complicated pneumonia and (2) in patients with suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome, H1N1, or anthrax and a normal radiograph.


Asunto(s)
Radiografía Torácica/normas , Enfermedades Respiratorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos
18.
J Thorac Imaging ; 26(1): W1-3, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21258219

RESUMEN

Screening for pulmonary metastatic disease is an important step for staging a patient with a known or recently discovered malignancy. Here we present our recommendations for screening for metastatic disease based on recommendations from the literature and experiences of pulmonary radiologists. In short, chest computed tomographic (CT) screening is the most appropriate tool for evaluation of pulmonary metastasis in the majority of cases. Chest computed tomographic screening is also recommended for follow-up and to determine response to therapy. Other modalities such as chest radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and scintigraphy will also be discussed. Please note that this study is a summary of the complete version of this topic, which is available on the ACR website at www.acr.org. Practitioners are encouraged to refer to the complete version.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Radiología , Sociedades Médicas , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Tamizaje Masivo/tendencias , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiología/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos
20.
J Thorac Imaging ; 25(3): W67-9, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20711032

RESUMEN

Hemoptysis is defined as the expectoration of blood originating from the tracheobronchial tree or pulmonary parenchyma, ranging from 100 mL to 1 L in volume over a 24-hour period. This article reviews the literature on the indications and usefulness of radiologic studies for the evaluation of hemoptysis. The following recommendations are the result of evidence-based consensus by the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Thoracic Radiology: (1) Initial evaluation of patients with hemoptysis should include a chest radiograph; (2) Patients at high risk for malignancy (>40 y old, >40 pack-year smoking history) with negative chest radiograph, computed tomography (CT) scan, and bronchoscopy can be followed with observation for the following 3 years. Radiography and CT are recommended imaging modalities for follow-up. Bronchoscopy may complement imaging during the period of observation; (3) In patients who are at high risk for malignancy and have suspicious chest radiograph findings, CT is suggested for initial evaluation; CT should also be considered in patients who are active or exsmokers, despite a negative chest radiograph; and (4) Massive hemoptysis can be effectively treated with either surgery or percutaneous embolization. Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT before embolization or surgery can define the source of hemoptysis as bronchial systemic, nonbronchial systemic, and/or pulmonary arterial. Percutaneous embolization may be used initially to halt the hemorrhage before definitive surgery.


Asunto(s)
Hemoptisis/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomógrafos Computarizados por Rayos X , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...