Anaplastic large cell lymphomas with the 6p25.3 rearrangement are a heterogeneous group of tumours with a diverse molecular background.

ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cases with 6p25.3 rearrangement are characterized by peculiar morphological and immunohistochemical features compare to 6p25.3-negative ALK-negative ALCL cases. A subgroup of 6p25.3-positive ALK-negative ALCL cases show the t(6,7) (p25.3;q32.3) rearrangement. Aims: To analyse the differences between 6p25.3-rearranged cases with and without t(6,7) (p25.3;q32.3). Using RNA-sequencing we studied a series of 17 samples showing 6p25.3-rearrangement, identified by FISH, consisting of seven systemic and eight primary cutaneous cases including two examples of secondary skin involvement by systemic ALCL. RNA-sequencing exclusively detected a translocation involving a gene in the 6p25.3 region (either IRF4 or DUSP22) in 7/14 cases (50%). In six of these seven cases the partner proved to be the LINC-PINT region in chromosome 7, while an EXOC2::DUSP22 rearrangement was found in one case. All cases but one were primary cutaneous ALCLs. They all were CD3 positive and BCL2 negative, while most of them expressed p-STAT3. On the contrary, cases without the t(6,7) (p25.3;q32.3) were mainly systemic (71%, 5/7) against just two pcALCL. In general, they lose CD3 (50% positive) and p-STAT3 (25% positive) expression, being all of them BCL2 positive. Moreover, in 60% of them other gene fusions were found. At the transcriptional level, they were characterized by the overexpression of TCF3 (TCF7L1/E2A), DLL3, CD58 and BCL2 genes 75%(6/8) of pcALCL with 6p25.3 rearrangement featured the so-called "biphasic morphologic pattern, which was not found in cutaneous involvement from systemic ALCL. 83% (5/6) of the pcALCL cases with the "biphasic morphologic pattern" showed the t(6,7) (p25.3;q32.3) rearrangement. ALK-negative ALCL cases with 6p25.3 rearrangement are a subgroup of tumours that are heterogeneous with respect to the presence or absence of the t(6,7) (p25.3;q32.3) translocation.

Redefining the high-grade B cell lymphoma with double/triple rearrangements of MYC and BCL2/BCL6 genes. Learning from a case report.

We report a patient initially diagnosed with a triple hit high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL-TH), in which further morphologic, immunohistochemical, and next-generation sequencing studies of subsequent specimens disclosed it to be a germinal center diffuse large B cell lymphoma (GC-DLBCL) with BCL2/BCL6 gene translocations, PVT1-deletion, and gain of MYC genes evolving from a previous follicular lymphoma. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies with the break-apart probe for MYC gene showed a fusion and two separated signals (red and green, respectively) leading to the interpretation of MYC gene translocation and a false diagnosis of a TH-lymphoma, according to the recent WHO classification. Nevertheless, PVT1 deletion plus MYC gain/amplification has been described as a cause of the double-hi transcription profile. These data highlight the need for new criteria to identify these highly aggressive lymphomas.

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Progression or divergent evolution?

AIM: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is an indolent mature B-cell-neoplasm with involvement of the bone marrow. At least 90% of LPLs carry MYD88-L265P mutation and some of them (~10%) transform into diffuse large B-cell-lymphoma (DLBCL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over the past 15 years we have collected 7 cases where the both LPL and DLBCL were diagnosed in the same patient. Clinical records, analytical data and histopathological specimens were reviewed. FISH studies on paraffin-embedded tissue for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 genes were performed, as well as MYD88-L265P mutation and IGH rearrangement analysis by PCR. A mutational study was done by massive next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: There were 4 women and 3 men between 36-91 years of age. Diagnoses were made simultaneously in 4 patients. In two cases the LPL appeared before the DLBCL and in the remaining case the high-grade component was discovered 5 years before the LPL. In 6 cases both samples shared the MYD88-L265P mutation. IGH rearrangement analysis showed overlapping features in two of 6 cases tested. Mutational study was evaluable in three cases for both samples showing shared and divergent mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest different mechanisms of DLBCL development in LPL patients.

Inflammatory Cells in Atypical Eruption of Lymphocyte Recovery Carry the Same Mutations as Neoplastic Myeloid Cells.

Cutaneous eruption of lymphocyte recovery (ELR) during bone marrow (BM) aplasia recovery after intensive chemotherapy has been reported in very few patients. The presence of skin rashes in patients with acute leukemia who are undergoing intensive chemotherapy and BM transplantation is a diagnostic challenge because of the clinical similarity between drug eruptions, infiltrates related to the relapse of the underlying disease, cutaneous graft-versus-host disease, and ELR. IDH1 mutations have been identified as a recurrent genetic anomaly in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. However, until now, this IDH1 mutation has not been reported as being shared by myeloid cells and non-neoplastic inflammatory cells in this clinical setting. Here, we present the rare case of a woman diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome that evolved into an acute myelogenous leukemia with leukemic cutaneous infiltrate. The patient developed ELR after the intensive chemotherapy administered before BM transplantation. The IDH1 mutation was identified in BM cells and in myeloid and inflammatory cells in skin biopsies before allogeneic BM transplantation. We discuss the main aspects of the differential diagnosis of these cutaneous reactions in leukemic patients and the biological significance of the IDH1 mutation.