Rechallenge with Anti-EGFR Treatment in RAS/BRAF wt Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in Real Clinical Practice: Experience of the GITuD Group.

BACKGROUND: There are few third- and fourth-line therapeutic options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) mCRC previously treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) (first-line) and relapsed after a good response, retreatment with anti-EGFR (rechallenge) emerges as a therapeutic alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to show the activity and safety of anti-EGFR rechallenge in RAS/BRAF wt mCRC in real-world practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study (six hospitals of the Galician Group of Research in Digestive Tumors) was conducted. Adult patients with RAS/BRAF wt mCRC, evaluated by liquid biopsy, were included. They received anti-EGFR rechallenge (cetuximab, panitumumab) as monotherapy, or combined with chemotherapy, in third- or subsequent lines. Efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], disease control rate [DCR], overall survival [OS], and progression-free survival [PFS]) and safety (incidence of adverse events [AEs]) were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Rechallenge (median 6 cycles [range 1-27], mainly cetuximab [80.7%]), started at a median anti-EGFR-free time of 18.4 months (1.7-37.5 months) after two (38.7%) or more (61.3%) lines of treatment; 64.5% of patients received a full dose. Median OS and PFS were 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2-11.4) and 2.6 months (95% CI 1.7-3.4), respectively. ORR was 10%, and DCR was 30%. The most common AEs were diarrhea (35.5%), anemia (29%), emesis (6.4%), and neutropenia (6.4%); < 5% grade ≥ 3; 48.4% of patients reported anti-EGFR-related skin toxicity (grade > 1). Hypomagnesemia required supplements in 29% of patients. Dose delays (≥ 3 days) and reduction (≥ 20%) were reported in 11 (35.5%) and seven patients (22.6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In RAS/BRAF wt mCRC patients, an anti-EGFR rechallenge provides a feasible therapeutic option with clinical benefit (survival) and a manageable safety profile.

Sequential RAS mutations evaluation in cell-free DNA of patients with tissue RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the PERSEIDA (Cohort 2) study.

PURPOSE: RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status on a tumor biopsy is mandatory to guide the best treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Determining the RAS mutational status by tumor-tissue biopsy is essential in guiding the optimal treatment decision for mCRC. RAS mutations are negative predictive factors for the use of EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution. METHODS/PATIENTS: PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing cfDNA RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations (using Idylla™) in first-line mCRC, RAS wild-type (baseline tumor-tissue biopsy) patients (cohort 2). Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. RESULTS: 117 patients were included (103 received panitumumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment). At baseline, 7 (6.8%) patients had RAS mutations, 4 (3.9%) BRAF mutations and no EGFR mutations were detected (cfDNA, panitumumab + chemotherapy subpopulation [panitumumab + Ch]). The baseline RAS mutational status concordance between tissue and liquid biopsies was 94.0% (93.2%, panitumumab + Ch). At 20 weeks, only one patient in the study (included in the panitumumab + Ch) had an emerging cfDNA RAS mutation. No emerging BRAF or EGFR mutations were reported. At disease progression, 6 patients had emergent mutations not present at baseline (RAS conversion rate: 13.3% [6/45]; 15.0% [6/40], panitumumab + Ch). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance rate between liquid and solid biopsies at baseline was very high, as previously reported, while our results suggest a considerable emergence of RAS mutations during disease progression. Thus, the dynamics of the genomic landscape in ctDNA may provide relevant information for the management of mCRC patients.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: The VELOUR study showed the benefit of FOLFIRI-Aflibercept (FA) versus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in second-line treatment. However, only 36% of the included patients were ≥65 years. Thus, we seek to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FA in the elderly population in the context of routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter, observational study of patients ≥70 years with mCRC treated with FA after progression to oxaliplatin chemotherapy in routine clinical practice in 9 hospitals of the GITuD group. RESULTS: Of 388 patients treated with FA between June 2013 and November 2018, 75 patients ≥70 years were included. The median number of cycles was 10 and the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 33.8% and 72.0%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, median Progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months and median Overall Survival (OS) was 15.1 months. One third fewer metastasectomies were performed in the ≥75 years' subgroup (24 vs. 52%, p = 0.024) and more initial FOLFIRI dose reductions (68 vs. 36%, p = 0.014). ORR (23.8% vs. 38.3%), DCR (42.8% vs. 85.1%), and PFS (4 vs. 7.8 months; p = 0.017) were significantly less, without difference in OS (9.9 vs. 17.1 months; p = 0.129). The presence of prior hypertension (HT) (PFS 7.9 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.049) and HT ≥ grade 3 during treatment (PFS 7.6 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.024) were associated with longer PFS. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were: asthenia (21.3%), neutropenia (14.7%), and diarrhea (14.7%). 57.3% required FOLFIRI dose reduction; 34.7% of aflibercept, including discontinuation (5.3% and 18.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: FA combination is effective in patients ≥70 years. The occurrence of HT is predictive of efficacy. Close monitoring of toxicity and initial dose adjustment is recommended.

Dynamic perspective of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an accessible marker from a routine blood test. This study explored the prognostic and predictive value of a change in NLR (c-NLR) after chemotherapy, baseline NLR (bNLR) and chemotherapy response, in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients. METHODS: A total of 116 mGC patients treated between 2009 to 2019 at seven hospitals from Galician Research Group on Digestive Tumors (GITuD) were reviewed in a multicentre, ambispective and observational study. NLR was calculated and the optimal cut-off was defined as NLR=3.96 based on ROC method. NLR was determined at baseline and after two chemotherapy cycles in first line treatment. Change NLR was calculated as NLR after two chemotherapy cycles minus bNLR. The relation of bNLR and c-NLR to overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Dynamic Score (DScore) based on c-NLR and baseline NLR were correlated with OS and radiological response. Univariate, multivariate and chi-square analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 68.7 years, and 66% were male. Univariate analysis showed OS correlation for bNLR ≥3.96 (5.97 vs 10.87 months, p=0.001), c-NLR increase (6.63 vs 10.34 months, p=0.021) and DScore (12.74 vs 7.68 vs 2.43 months, p<0.001). High DScore was associated with radiological progression after two cycles (x2=10.26, p=0.006). Multivariate analysis: bNLR ≥3.96 (HR=2.16, p=0.003) and c-NLR increase (HR= 2.36, p=0.003) were prognostic factors of poor OS. CONCLUSION: High bNLR and increased NLR after chemotherapy were associated with worse outcome. Dynamic measurement of NLR provides information for stratifying patients to guide optimal treatment.

Do Clinical Trials Meet Current Care Needs? Views of Digestive Oncology Specialists in Galicia (Spain) Using the Delphi Method.

Background: In recent years, abundant scientific evidence has been generated based on clinical trials (CT) in the field of oncology. The general objective of this paper is to find out the extent to which decision making is based on knowledge of the most recent CT. Its specific objectives are to pinpoint difficulties with decision making based on the CT performed and find out the motivations patients and clinicians have when taking part in a CT. Methodology: Combined, prospective study, based on the Delphi method. A lack of correspondence between the people who take part in CT and patients who come for consultation has been identified. A need for training in analysing and interpreting CT has also been identified and a lack of trust in the results of CT financed by the pharmaceutical industry itself has been perceived. Conclusions: There is a difficulty in selecting oncological treatment due to the lack of correspondence between the patients included in the CT and patients seen in consultation. In this process, real world data studies may be highly useful, as they may provide this group with greater training in interpreting CT and their results.

Effect of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF v600-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are poorer in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations than those without it, but the effect of these mutations on treatment response is unclear. This real-world study assessed the effects of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC. METHODS: This real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC treated in eight hospitals in Spain. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also assessed. The effect of first- and second-line treatment type on OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were evaluated, plus the impact of systemic inflammatory markers on these outcomes. A systemic inflammation score (SIS) of 1-3 was assigned based on one point each for platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥200, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, and serum albumin < 3.6 g/dL. RESULTS: Of 72 patients, data from 64 were analyzed. After a median of 69.1 months, median OS was 11.9 months and median first-line PFS was 4.4 months. First-line treatment was triplet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (12.5%), doublet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (47.2%), doublet chemotherapy-anti-EGFR (11.1%), or doublet chemotherapy (18.1%). Although first-line treatment showed no significant effect on OS, antiangiogenic-based regimens were associated with prolonged median PFS versus non-antiangiogenic regimens. Negative predictors of survival with antiangiogenic-based treatment were NLR, serum albumin, and SIS 1-3, but not PLR. Patients with SIS 1-3 showed significantly prolonged PFS with antiangiogenic-based treatment versus non-antiangiogenic-based treatment, while those with SIS=0 showed no PFS benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Antiangiogenic-based regimens, SIS, NLR, and albumin were predictors of survival in patients with mCRC, while SIS, NLR and serum albumin may predict response to antiangiogenic-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GIT-BRAF-2017-01.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFOX plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 circulating tumour cells: the randomised phase III VISNÚ-1 trial.

PURPOSE: 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab is more effective than doublets plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, but is not widely used because of concerns about toxicity and lack of predictive biomarkers. This study was designed to explore the role of circulating tumour cell (CTC) count as a biomarker to select patients for therapy with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VISNÚ-1 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III study in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma and ≥3 CTC/7.5 mL blood. Patients received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg plus FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 165 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 3200 mg/m2) or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 then 2400 mg/m2) by intravenous administration every 2 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 349 patients (FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab, n=172; FOLFOX-bevacizumab, n=177). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI 11.2 to 14.0) with FOLFOXIRI bevacizumab and 9.3 months (95% CI 8.5 to 10.7) with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (stratified HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.82; p=0.0006). Grade≥3 adverse events were more common with FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab 85.3% vs 75.1% with FOLFOX-bevacizumab (p=0.0178). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 8 (4.7%) and 6 (3.4%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: First-line FOLFOXIRI-bevacizumab significantly improved PFS compared with FOLFOX-bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and ≥3 CTCs at baseline, which indicate a poor prognosis. CTC count may be a useful non-invasive biomarker to assist with the selection of patients for intensive first-line therapy.

First-line panitumumab plus capecitabine for the treatment of older patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The phase II, PANEL study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high morbidity and mortality of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in older patients, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and their optimal treatment is yet to be determined. This open-label phase II study evaluated the benefits of panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in older patients with wild-type [WT] RAS mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (≥70 years; ECOG≤2) received 3-week cycles of panitumumab (9 mg/kg on day 1) plus capecitabine (850 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated every 9 weeks according to RECIST_1.1. Outcome measures were: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression (TTP) and treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (11 women; median age: 78 years; ECOG: 0 [26%], 1 [67%], 2 [7%]) were evaluated. Median follow-up was 17.7 months. Confirmed ORR (95%CI) was 44.4% (25.7-63.2), with 25.9% of patients achieving at least stable disease. Median (95%CI) DoR was 8.7 (5.5-10.4) months, and median TTR was 2.2 (1.9-2.8) months. Median TTP was 9.6 (4.8-11.5) months, with a median TTF of 5.2 (2.8-7.2) months. The median PFS was 7.5 (4.4-10.4) months, and the median OS was 23.7 (7.4-27.5) months. Seventeen (63%) patients reported panitumumab and/or capecitabine-related adverse events grade 3-4, with skin toxicity (18.5%) being the most common. Two (7.4%) deaths were treatment-related. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that panitumumab plus capecitabine is a safe and effective regimen in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.

Sustained Stable Disease with Capecitabine plus Bevacizumab in Metastatic Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.

In a patient who had been diagnosed in 2006 with appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases after an incomplete surgery, palliative chemotherapy was administered. First-line treatment with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) and second-line treatment including 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus panitumumab showed inefficiency in controlling disease progression. Third-line chemotherapy combining capecitabine plus bevacizumab was started, achieving good control of the tumour growth and a minor response in the second computed tomography scan. We decided to maintain the treatment, although forced bevacizumab "breaks" were necessary due to unexpected adverse events, with the patient suffering disease progression every time bevacizumab was stopped and reaching minor response again once the antiangiogenic treatment was reintroduced. During more than 10 years after starting third-line treatment, the patient maintained good performance status and disease stability with this "up and down" management until January 2019, when a neurological adverse event during bevacizumab infusion drove us to abandon it definitely.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world population: Prognostic and predictive markers.

PURPOSE: The phase III VELOUR trial demonstrated efficacy with combined FOLFIRI-aflibercept in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with oxaliplatin with or without bevacizumab versus placebo. The effect of FOLFIRI-aflibercept in routine clinical practice was evaluated. METHODS/PATIENTS: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response and safety were analysed for 78 patients treated with FOLFIRI-aflibercept at six GITuD institutions. Exploratory analyses of prognostic and predictive markers of efficacy were performed. RESULTS: Patients had good general status (PS 0-1 96.2%), tumours were mostly RAS-mutant (75.6%), synchronous (71.8%), and left-sided (71.8%). Prior therapy included bevacizumab (47.4%) and anti-EGFR agents (12.8%). PFS was longer for metachronous than synchronous tumours (11.0 vs 5.0 months, P = 0.028), and for left-colon tumours (7.0 vs 3.0 months, P = 0.044). RAS-mutant status, first-line treatment and primary tumour surgery did not impact PFS. The disease control rate was 70.5%. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (15.3%), asthenia (10.3%), diarrhea and mucositis (6.4% each). Dysphonia was reported in 39.7% of patients, and grade 3 hypertension in 3.8%. Development of hypertension (any grade) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of progression by multivariate analysis (HR = 2.7; 95%CI 1.3-5.4; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy with FOLFIRI-aflibercept in a real-life population was in line with results from the pivotal trial and toxicity was manageable with treatment adaptation. Survival outcomes were not impacted by primary tumour location, RAS-mutant status, first-line treatment or primary tumour surgery. Hypertension may be a surrogate marker of efficacy in this patient population.

Aflibercept for metastatic colorectal cancer: safety data from the Spanish named patient program.

OBJECTIVE: Aflibercept increased overall survival with acceptable tolerability in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) when it was used in combination with FOLFIRI after progression on a first-line oxaliplatin regimen (VELOUR study). The safety profile of aflibercept in day-to-day clinical practice was assessed. DESIGN AND METHODS: A named patient program provided early access to aflibercept to mCRC patients in Spain before its commercialization. Patients received aflibercept 4 mg/kg intravenous + FOLFIRI every 2 weeks as second-line treatment. A descriptive safety analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Data from 89 mCRC patients were analyzed (male: 61.8%; median age: 62 years [interquartile range: 55, 67]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 - 1: 95.5%). Fifty four (60.7%) patients presented ≥ 2 metastasis [liver (83.1%), lung (44.9%) or lymph nodes (33.7%)]. Most patients had previously received bevacizumab (60.7%) or anti-EGFR (19.1%) therapy. Patients received a median of 6.0 (interquartile range: 4, 13) cycles of FOLFIRI + aflibercept. Most grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were reported during the initial cycles of treatment. AEs possibly related to treatment occurred in 39 (43.8%) patients. Common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (7.9%), diarrhea (4.5%) and hypertension (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, aflibercept + FOLFIRI is well tolerated, with a manageable toxicity profile. The safety results confirm the findings from the confirmatory VELOUR trial.

Tumor ovárico de células de la granulosa de tipo adulto. A propósito de un caso / Adult granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. Apropos of a case

Se describe un tipo de carcinoma ovárico inusual y poco frecuente, con características definitorias propias. Se presenta el caso de una mujer diagnosticada de este tipo de neoplasia y se realiza un comentario sobre los datos publicados hasta el momento. Se analiza el comportamiento de este tumor en relación con otros tumores ováricos, su manejo clínico y tratamiento. En conclusión, el tumor de células de la granulosa es una entidad clinicopatológica diferente al adenocarcinoma o tumor mucinoso. Su tratamiento no se realiza según los parámetros determinantes en otros cánceres ováricos. Su evolución y comportamiento biológico son más favorables

To describe an unusual and infrequent type of ovarian carcinoma with specific defining characteristics. We present the case of a woman with granulosa cell tumor and review the literature published on this entity to date. The behavior of this tumor in relation to other ovarian carcinomas, as well as its clinical management and treatment, are analyzed. Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary is a distinct clinicopathological entity from adenocarcinoma and mucinous tumor. Its treatment is not based on parameters that are determinant in other cancers of the ovary. Its outcome and biological behavior are more favorable

[Breast metastasis as initial presentation of a renal carcinoma]. / Metástasis mamaria como manifestación inicial de un carcinoma renal.

OBJECTIVES: To report the case of a breast metastasis as initial presentation of renal carcinoma. METHODS: 72-year-old male patient who consulted for a painful right breast tumor. We describe clinical history, complementary tests, biopsy and treatment. RESULTS: Pathologic study confirmed a metastasis of a renal clear cell carcinoma. A CT scan confirmed the existence of bilateral renal tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Breast metastases are exceptional as initial presentation of a renal carcinoma. We performed a bibliographic review on the topic.

Metástasis mamaria como manifestación inicial de un carcinoma renal / Breast metastasis as initial presentation of a renal carcinoma

OBJETIVO: Presentación de un caso de metástasismamaria como primera manifestación de un carcinomarenal.MÉTODO: Paciente varón de 72 años que consultó por tumoracióndolorosa en mama derecha. Descripción de la historiaclínica, exploraciones complementarias , resultados de labiopsia, y tratamiento posterior.RESULTADOS: El estudio anatomopatológico confirmó el resultadode metástasis de carcinoma de células claras. Por TACse confirmó la presencia de un tumor renal bilateral.CONCLUSIONES: Las metástasis en mama como presentaciónde un carcinoma renal son excepcionales. Se realizauna revisión de la literatura al respecto

OBJECTIVES: To report the case of a breastmetastasis as initial presentation of renal carcinoma.METHODS: 72-year-old male patient who consulted fora painful right breast tumor. We describe clinical history,complementary tests, biopsy and treatment.RESULTS: Pathologic study confirmed a metastasis of arenal clear cell carcinoma. A CT scan confirmed theexistence of bilateral renal tumors.CONCLUSIONS: Breast metastases are exceptional asinitial presentation of a renal carcinoma. We performeda bibliographic review on the topic

Tumor de Wilms del adulto / Adults Wilms' tumor

OBJETIVO: Presentar un nuevo caso de tumor de Wilms (TW) en un adulto. MÉTODO: Se revisa el caso clínico de una tumoración renal en un adulto, cuya anatomía patológica reveló la existencia de un nefroblastoma. RESULTADOS: Se trata de un varón de 23 años que consulta por hematuria. La exploración física y las pruebas complementarias (Eco y TAC) objetivaron la presencia de una tumoración sólida en riñón derecho. El paciente fue sometido a cirugía radical, siendo el diagnóstico definitivo de nefroblastoma bifásico (TW), con infiltración de la grasa del hilio renal (estadío II). Posteriormente a la cirugía, recibió Quimioterapia adyuvante con VincristinaActinomicina D, durante 60 semanas. CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de su rareza en adultos, el tumor de Wilms debe considerarse en el diagnóstico diferencial de toda tumoración renal. El tratamiento habitual incluirá cirugía y quimioterapia con o sin radioterapia según el estadío (AU)