Second Chance for Cure: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease.

PURPOSE: Local ablative therapy, such as radiotherapy or surgery, plays a key role in treatment of patients with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) comes to the fore as a safe and effective treatment for patients with a limited number of metastases, even those located in hard-to-reach body sites. Many researchers have suggested that metastatsis-directed therapy could improve long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study conducted between July 2015 and February 2022. In our institute, 60 patients with controlled primary tumors and one to five metastases were treated with SABR. Prescribed radiation doses ranged from 12 to 60 Gy administered in one to seven fractions. We aimed to determine whether metastatic-directed therapy using SABR for all oligometastases affects OS and PFS and whether the primary tumor or metastatic site influences OS/PFS. RESULTS: The most common primary malignancy types were prostate (n = 14), colorectal (n = 10), lung (n = 7), and breast cancers (n = 6). The median follow-up was 30 months, ranging from 9 to 79. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 54.9%, 37.0%, and 37.0% and 98.3%, 84.4%, and 73.8%, respectively, and the median time to first progression was 15 (range, 2-32) months. Twenty-four (40%) patients had no recurrence. In our analysis, primary tumor site was not an independent prognostic factor. The metastatic site may influence on patient outcome in cases of localized bone and liver metastases. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective analysis, SABR was associated with favorable levels of PFS and OS in patients with oligometastases. The limitations of our study were lacking high-level evidence, and randomized studies to compare SABR and palliative standard of care are mandatory.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: A case report.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy worldwide. Surgical intervention and radiation therapy (RT) are the primary treatment options. Given the complexity and cosmetic discomfort associated with eye enucleation, this method is less frequently used. As a result, RT, including photon therapy, proton therapy and brachytherapy, has become the treatment of choice. Traditionally, plaque brachytherapy has been the most commonly used in clinical practice. However, the question of which type of radiation therapy is the most effective, safe, commonly available and cost-effective remains open. The present study provided a follow-up analysis of a patient with UM who was treated using the image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (IG-VMAT) technique. A complete response without complications and symptom relief were noted one and a half years after treatment. The present findings suggest that photon external beam radiotherapy using the IG-VMAT technique may offer a viable and safe alternative for the management of UM. This approach potentially sidesteps the complex and morbid aspects of surgical intervention and plaque brachytherapy. Owing to the limited sample size, a more robust understanding of the efficacy and safety of this treatment will require the analysis of additional cases. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to validate these preliminary observations.

Off-isocentric VMAT technique for breast cancer: Effective dose reduction to organs at risk and its applicability based on patient anatomy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to explore the off-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (offVMAT) technique for breast cancer and determine its applicability based on patient anatomical parameters. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 44 breast cancer patients with varied lymph node involvement using different arc designs. Off-isocentric techniques were benchmarked against previously published arc techniques: classic arcs (clVMAT), tangential arcs (tVMAT), and split arcs (spVMAT). During optimization, target coverage was made for all plans as close as possible to the criteria D99% > 95% and Dmax < 110% of the prescribed dose. A novel patient categorization, based on anatomical parameters (auxiliary structures) rather than lymph node involvement, is introduced. This categorization considers the volume of ipsilateral organs at risk (OARs) adjacent to the target. A binary regression model was developed on these anatomical parameters. It predicts the likelihood of offVMAT (P[offVMAT]) achieving better criteria. RESULTS: Using the regression model, patients were divided into two groups: P(offVMAT) > 0.5 and P(offVMAT) < 0.5. For the P(offVMAT) > 0.5 group, most tVMAT plans are unable to achieve the clinical objectives. Comparing offVMAT with spVMAT, offVMAT exhibited better dose parameters for the heart (V20, V10, and D2 are 7.1, 2.4, and 1.5 times lower respectively), ipsilateral lung (V20, V10, V5 and the mean dose are 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.2 times lower respectively). The average doses to the contralateral side are consistent. In the P(offVMAT) < 0.5 group, the tVMAT technique showed increased doses at medium and high levels, yet reduced doses in contralateral OARs compared to spVMAT and offVMAT. spVMAT showed lower doses in the contralateral lung relative to the offVMAT technique, while clVMAT trailed in both groups. Validation of the model yielded a 90% accuracy rate. CONCLUSIONS: The new off-isocentric breast planning technique effectively reduces doses to ipsilateral OARs, maintaining acceptable contralateral mean doses. This technique has an advantage over other techniques for patients with intricate anatomies. It is evaluated using anatomical parameters, which are also used to build binary regression model, which shows the dependence of anatomical parameters on whether offVMAT is preferred for individual patients. Also, such anatomical parameters provide a more objective and precise comparison between different planning techniques.

Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT).

PURPOSE: Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one. METHODS: We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) . RESULTS: VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (Dmean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (Dmean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average Dmean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (Dmean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (Dmean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest  Dmean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (Dmean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy). CONCLUSION: VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower Dmean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system.

Stereotactic radiosurgery as a successful method to control meningeal metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland: A case report.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the lacrimal gland is a rare tumor. In addition, considering the lack of data on large groups of patients there is no standard of care to treat patients with multiple meningeal metastases of ACC. A two-year analysis of the course of the disease in a patient with synchronous oligometastatic ACC of the lacrimal gland that was treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is presented. The aim of the present case report was to evaluate the effect of SRS in the treatment of a patient with ACC. Preliminary results confirmed that this method was highly effective in this patient. The patient is currently living with a good quality of life, normal vision and with no evidence of disease or complications. SRS exhibited reliable local tumor control and insignificant radiation-related complications, rendering it an encouraging treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic ACC.

Prospective comparative study of intraoperative balloon electronic brachytherapy versus resection with multidisciplinary adjuvant therapy for recurrent glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative balloon electronic brachytherapy (IBEB) may provide potential benefit for local control of recurrent cerebral glioblastomas (GBMs). METHODS: This is a preliminary report of an open-label, prospective, comparative cohort study conducted in two neurosurgical centers with ongoing follow-up. At recurrence, patients at one center (n = 15) underwent reresection with IBEB while, at the second center (n = 15), control subjects underwent re-resection with various accepted second-line adjuvant chemoradiotherapy options. A comparative analysis of overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) following re-resection was performed. Exploratory subgroup analysis based on postoperative residual contrast-enhanced volume status was also done. RESULTS: In the IBEB group, median LPFS after re-resection was significantly longer than in the control group (8.0 vs. 6.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.93, P = 0.026, P < 0.05). In addition, the median OS after second resection in the IBEB group was also significantly longer than in the control group (11.0 vs. 8.0 months; log rank χ2 = 4.23, P = 0.04, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These hypothesis-generating results from a small cohort of subjects suggest putative clinical benefit in OS and LPFS associated with maximal safe re-resection of recurrent GBM with IBEB versus re-resection and standard adjuvant therapy, a hypothesis that deserves further testing in an appropriately powered clinical trial.

Repeat Resection and Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Malignant Gliomas of the Brain: A History and Review of Current Techniques.

The degree of primary resection of malignant brain gliomas (MBGs) has correlated positively with progression-free and overall survival. The indications for surgery and reoperation in MBG relapse remain controversial. Surgery will not be curative and should be followed by adjuvant treatment. We reviewed the reported studies with respect to repeat resection and the various methods of intraoperative radiotherapy for MBGs from the initial experience with high-energy linear accelerators in Japan to modern, integrated brachytherapy solutions using solid and balloon applicators. Because of the findings from our review, we have begun to research into the use of intraoperative balloon brachytherapy for recurrent MBGs.

Automated Volumetric Analysis of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastomas (GBMs) are primary brain tumors that are very difficult to treat. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the reference tool for diagnosis, postoperative control, and follow-up of GBM. The MRI tumor contrast enhancement part serves as a target for surgery. However, there are controversial data about the influence of pre- and postoperative tumor volumetric MRI parameters on overall survival (OS). METHODS: Data of 57 patients with GBM were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had maximum safe resection and standard adjuvant treatment. All patients underwent 1.5-T MRI with contrast in the first 24 hours postoperatively. The data of pre- and postoperative volumetric parameters were analyzed using the original software. RESULTS: Correlation analysis between the postoperative volume of the tumor contrast enhancement part and the patient's OS revealed a significant level (on the Chaddock scale) of inverse correlation. Residual tumor volume associated with OS of >6 months was determined as <2.5 cm3. The mortality risk in the first 6 months after tumor resection is 3.4 times higher when the tumor remnant is >2.5 cm3 (risk ratio, 3.4; P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of MRI contrast-enhancing GBM remnants after surgery, automatically measured by the software, was a significant predictor for early postoperative progression and death.