Endodontic postoperative flare-up: An update.

Endodontic treatment corresponds to a combined chemical and mechanical approach, followed by a three dimensional hermetic obturation, that eliminate the pulpal and periradiculare disease and boost healing and repair of periradiculare tissue. Despite the advances in the endodontic field, the inter-appointment flare up remains a true nightmare that encounters every dentist. This complication commences a few hours or days after root canal procedures and it is characterized by the development of pain and/or swelling, requiring an unscheduled appointment for emergency treatment. Different studies showed that flare-ups represent a multifactorial phenomenon including mechanical, chemical and microbial factors. In addition, a correlation was found between flare-up and age, gender, tooth type, presence of preoperative pain, tooth condition before treatment, irrigation techniques, number of visits as well as intracanal medication. Moreover, some medicine intake was proved to be efficient in controlling this postoperative pain. However, a clear procedure to avoid its occurrence is yet to be established. In this review, we summarize knowledge about the etiology of flare-up and its related factors. This could be effective in helping dentists to adapt some strategies to prevent it.

Supraglottoplasty in the management of laryngomalacia in children with down syndrome: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Children with Down syndrome (DS) who have Laryngomalacia represent a specific management challenge due to their inherent multiple levels of airway obstruction and hypotonia. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the outcome of supraglottoplasty (SGP) in children with DS. DATA SOURCE: A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guideline. Data were collected from online medical databases- CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE in process, PubMed, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: all publications that address the outcome of supraglottoplasty in children who are less than 18 years old with Down syndrome prior to December 2018 were collected. The data were collected on different phases: Screening review using search words and controlled vocabularies during the period of November-December 2018, followed by a detailed review of screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, then a full review that included screening the references of selected articles. RESULTS: Nine articles were included in the qualitative analysis. These articles included 231 subjects, out of which 32 children with DS met the inclusion criteria. Twenty patients (62.5%) were considered successfully treated and 12/32 failed including 1/32 (3.1%) mortality in the postoperative period. The duration of follow-up was 12-102 days. All of the patients whose treatment failed had significant comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Although the success of SPG in children with DS is less than in otherwise healthy children, it remains an option especially in patients without comorbidities. Preoperative counseling of the families and thorough assessment are necessary to determine candidacy for SPG in children with DS.

National Board of Medical Examiners and Curriculum Change: What Do Scores Tell Us? A Case Study at the University of Balamand Medical School.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the results of NBME (National Board of Medical Examiners) implementation in Balamand Medical School (BMS) from 2015 to 2019, after major curricular changes were introduced as of 2012. BMS students' performance was compared with the international USMLE step 1 (United States Medical Licensing Examination, herein referred to as step 1) cohorts' performances. The BMS students' NBME results were analyzed over the successive academic years to assess the impact of the serial curricular changes that were implemented. METHODS: This longitudinal study describes the performance of BMS preclinical second year medicine (Med II) students on all their NBME exams over 4 academic years starting 2015-2016 to 2018-2019. These scores were compared with the step 1 comparison group scores using item difficulty. The t test was computed for each of the NBME exams to check whether the scores' differences were significant. RESULTS: Results revealed that all BMS cohorts scored lower than the international USMLE step 1 comparison cohorts in all disciplines across the 4 academic years except Psychiatry. However, the results were progressively approaching step 1 results, and the difference between step 1 scores and BMS students' NBME scores became closer and not significant as of year 4. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study are promising. They show that the serial curricular changes enabled BMS Med II students' scores to reach the international cohorts' scores after 4 academic years. Moreover, the absence of statistical difference between cohort 4 scores and step 1 cohorts is not module dependent and applies to all clinical modules. Further studies should be conducted to assess whether the results obtained for cohort 4 can be maintained.