Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Vaccine ; 42(4): 891-911, 2024 Feb 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social networks have an important impact on our health behaviours, including vaccination. People's vaccination beliefs tend to mirror those of their social network. As social networks are homogenous in many ways, we sought to determine in the context of COVID-19 which factors were most predictive of belonging to a mostly vaccinated or unvaccinated social group. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among Canadian residents in November and December 2021. Participants were asked about the vaccination status of their social networks their beliefs relating to COVID-19, and various sociodemographic factors. Respondents were split into three groups based on social network vaccination: low-, medium-, and high-risk. Chi-squared tests tested associations between factors and risk groups, and an ordinal logistic model was created to determine their direction and strength. RESULTS: Most respondents (81.1 %) were classified as low risk (i.e., a mostly vaccinated social network) and few respondents (3.7 %) were classified as high-risk (i.e., an unvaccinated social group). Both the chi-square test (29.2 % difference between the low- and high- risk groups [1.8 % vs. 31.0 %], p < 0.001) and the ordinal logistic model (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 14.45, p < 0.01) found that respondents' perceptions of COVID-19 as a "not at all serious" risk to Canadians was the most powerful predictor of belonging to a predominantly unvaccinated social circle. The model also found that those in mostly unvaccinated social circles also more often reported severe COVID-19 symptoms (odds ratio between the low- and high-risk groups: 2.26, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Perception of COVID-19 as a threat to others may signal communities with lower vaccination coverage and higher risk of severe outcomes. This may have implications for strategies to improve public outreach, messaging, and planning for downstream consequences of low intervention uptake.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Pueblos de América del Norte , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Canadá/epidemiología , Vacunación , Red Social , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Healthc Policy ; 19(1): 99-113, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695711

RESUMEN

Background: This paper aims to assess the extent to which the COVID-19 vaccine's speed to market affected Canadian residents' decision to remain unvaccinated. Method: A cross-sectional survey conducted in late 2021 asked participants whether they had received the vaccine and their reasons for abstaining. Results: Of the 2,712 participants who completed the survey, 8.9% remained unvaccinated. Unvaccinated respondents who selected "They made the vaccine too fast" (59.8%), were significantly more likely to identify as white, believe that the COVID-19 pandemic was not serious and have an unvaccinated social circle. Conclusion: Should the COVID-19 vaccine rapid regulatory process be expanded, more patients may refuse treatment than if traditional timelines are followed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Estudios Transversales , Canadá
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 24(10): 1316-1326, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36125169

RESUMEN

In this study on medication adherence among newly diagnosed patients with uncomplicated, incident hypertension, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using available administrative and laboratory data from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2017 in Alberta, Canada to understand the extent to which baseline laboratory assessment and/or subsequent follow-up was associated with persistence with antihypertensive therapy. We determined the frequency of baseline and follow-up testing and compared the rates of medication persistence by patient-, neighbourhood-, and treatment-related factors. Of 103 232 patients with newly diagnosed, uncomplicated hypertension who filled their first prescription within our study timeframe, 52.5% were non-persistent within 6 months. Persistent patients were more often female and residing in neighbourhoods with higher social status (with exception to rurality). Aside from older age, the strongest predictor of persistence was performance of laboratory testing related to hypertension with an apparent effect in which higher levels of medication persistence were seen with more frequent laboratory testing. We concluded that medication persistence was far from optimal, dropping off considerably after 6 months for more than half of patients. Medication persistence is a substantial barrier to realizing the full societal benefits of antihypertensive treatment. Ongoing follow up with patients, including laboratory testing, may be a critical component of better long term treatment persistence.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Humanos , Femenino , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Datos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación
4.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 102, 2022 08 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35953854

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many jurisdictions healthcare workers (HCWs) are using respirators for aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMPs) performed on adult and pediatric populations with all suspect/confirmed viral respiratory infections (VRIs). This systematic review assessed the risk of VRIs to HCWs in the presence of AGMPs, the role respirators versus medical/surgical masks have on reducing that risk, and if the risk to HCWs during AGMPs differed when caring for adult or pediatric patient populations. MAIN TEXT: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Cochrane SR, CINAHL, COVID-19 specific resources, and MedRxiv for English and French articles from database inception to September 9, 2021. Independent reviewers screened abstracts using pre-defined criteria, reviewed full-text articles, selected relevant studies, abstracted data, and conducted quality assessments of all studies using the ROBINS-I risk of bias tool. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Thirty-eight studies were included; 23 studies on COVID-19, 10 on SARS, and 5 on MERS/ influenza/other respiratory viruses. Two of the 16 studies which assessed associations found that HCWs were 1.7 to 2.5 times more likely to contract COVID-19 after exposure to AGMPs vs. not exposed to AGMPs. Eight studies reported statistically significant associations for nine specific AGMPs and transmission of SARS to HCWS. Intubation was consistently associated with an increased risk of SARS. HCWs were more likely (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.2-3.4) to contract human coronaviruses when exposed to an AGMP in one study. There were no reported associations between AGMP exposure and transmission of influenza or in a single study on MERS. There was limited evidence supporting the use of a respirator over a medical/surgical mask during an AGMP to reduce the risk of viral transmission. One study described outcomes of HCWs exposed to a pediatric patient during intubation. CONCLUSION: Exposure to an AGMP may increase the risk of transmission of COVID-19, SARS, and human coronaviruses to HCWs, however the evidence base is heterogenous and prone to confounding, particularly related to COVID-19. There continues to be a significant research gap in the epidemiology of the risk of VRIs among HCWs during AGMPs, particularly for pediatric patients. Further evidence is needed regarding what constitutes an AGMP.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , Aerosoles y Gotitas Respiratorias , SARS-CoV-2
5.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs ; 73: 103307, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35933249

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the lived experience of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) by patients and their families, and their relationship with intensive care clinicians. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six patients who had received ECMO and with four of their family members. The data were analysed narratively using a constant comparative method. SETTING: Patients were treated at a major acute care hospital in British Columbia between 2014 and 2021. ECMO was used either as a bridge to recovery or to organ transplant. Four had family members bedside throughout, while two had virtual visits due to COVID-19 infection control measures. FINDINGS: ECMO was experienced through a triad of relationships between the patient, key family members and key clinicians. The strength, directionality and focus of these relationships shifted during therapy and realigned once ECMO was removed. The largest shift involved family members. Post-ECMO, patients relied almost entirely on spouses, adult children and clinical team members to reconstruct their experience. The connection between families and clinical team members was limited and changed little. CONCLUSIONS: The lived experience of ECMO was complex in ways yet to be comprehensively reported in the literature. This technology had particular impact on family members when ECMO was used as a bridge to transplant and where run times extended to multiple weeks. COVID-19 infection control restrictions further complicated how this technology was experienced. Findings from this study highlight the importance of intensive care nurses recognising the critical role family members play as witnesses whose experiences later allow patients to make sense of their journey post-discharge.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Niño , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Familia , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233697, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32470099

RESUMEN

There is international interest in monitoring severe events in the obstetrical population, commonly referred to as maternal near miss or severe maternal morbidity. These events can have significant consequences for individuals in this population and further study can inform practices to reduce both maternal morbidity and mortality. Numerous surveillance systems exist but we lack a standardized approach. Given the current inconsistencies and the importance in monitoring these events, this study aimed to identify and compare commonly used surveillance methods. In June 2018, we systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL using terms related to monitoring/surveillance and maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity. We included papers that used at least three indicators to monitor for these events and collected data on specific surveillance methods. We calculated the rate of maternal near miss/severe maternal morbidity in hospitalization data obtained from the 2016 US National Inpatient Sample using five common surveillance methods. Of 18,832 abstracts, 178 papers were included in our review. 198 indicators were used in studies included in our review; 71.2% (n = 141) of these were used in <10% of included studies and only 6.1% (n = 12) were used in >50% of studies included in our review. Eclampsia was the only indicator that was assessed in >80% of included studies. The rate of these events in American hospitalization data varied depending on the criteria used, ranging from 5.07% (95% CI = 5.02, 5.11) with the Centers for Disease Control criteria and 7.85% (95% CI = 7.79, 7.91) using the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Our review highlights inconsistencies in monitoring practices within and between developed and developing countries. Given the wide variation in monitoring approaches observed and the likely contributing factors for these differences, it may be more feasible for clinical and academic efforts to focus on standardizing approaches in developed and developing countries independently at this time. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42018096858.


Asunto(s)
Eclampsia , Hospitalización , Servicios de Salud Materna , Mortalidad Materna , Potencial Evento Adverso , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Eclampsia/mortalidad , Eclampsia/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 14(1): 66-72, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31791922

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is a known risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes; however, appropriate gestational weight gain (GWG) may mitigate these risks. We investigated whether the singular 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) GWG guidelines were appropriate for all women with obesity, or whether separate recommendations were needed by class. METHODS: This cross-sectional study of pregnant women with obesity used 2014 U.S. birth certificate data (N=646,642) and included only term pregnancies. Adjusted log-binomial regression models examined the relative risk of adverse maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes for pregnant women with class I-III obesity who: lost weight during pregnancy, gained below IOM guidelines, or gained above IOM guidelines, compared to women who gained within IOM guidelines. RESULTS: Most women (55.1; 95% CI: 55.0-55.3) gained above IOM guidelines. As BMI severity increased, significantly fewer women had excessive GWG (Class I: 61.6%, 95% CI: 61.4-61.7; II: 50.7%, 95% CI: 50.4-50.9; III: 41.1%, 95% CI: 40.8-41.4). All classes of women with obesity who lost weight during pregnancy or gained below had a significantly decreased risk for caesarean delivery (RR (95% CI) class I: 0.92 (0.90-0.94); II: 0.91 (0.89-0.93); III: 0.92 (0.90-0.93)) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) births (class I: 0.80 (0.77-0.83); II: 0.76 (0.73-0.78); III: 0.73 (0.70-0.75)), but significantly increased risk of small-for-gestational age (SGA) births (class I: 1.34 (1.26-1.43); II: 1.38 (1.28-1.49); III: 1.35 (1.24-1.46)). CONCLUSION: The observed pattern of association was the same for all obese classes, hence evidence supports a possible singular GWG recommendation for all women with obesity, regardless of class.


Asunto(s)
Ganancia de Peso Gestacional , Guías como Asunto , Obesidad/terapia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Atención Prenatal/normas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Obesidad/clasificación , Obesidad/complicaciones , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/clasificación , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(9): 3321-3330, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30613908

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Providing specialized palliative care support to elderly patients in rural areas can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to gain a preliminary understanding of the experience of using mobile web-based videoconferencing (WBVC) for conducting in-home palliative care consults with elderly rural patients with life-limiting illness. METHODS: This was a descriptive, exploratory, proof-of-concept study with a convenience sample of 10 WBVC visits. A palliative care clinical nurse specialist (PC-CNS), in the home with the patient/family and home care nurse (HC-N), used a laptop computer with webcam and speakerphone to connect to a distant palliative care physician consultant (PC-MD) over a secure Internet connection. Data was collected using questionnaires, interviews, and focus groups. RESULTS: Analysis of qualitative data revealed four themes: communication, logistics, technical issues, and trust. Participants reported they were comfortable discussing concerns by WBVC and felt it was an acceptable and convenient way to address needs. Audiovisual quality was not ideal but was adequate for communication. Use of WBVC improved access and saved time and travel. Fears were expressed about lack of security of information transmitted over the Internet. CONCLUSIONS: Using WBVC for in-home palliative care consults could be an acceptable, effective, feasible, and efficient way to provide timely support to elderly rural patients and their families. Having a health care provider in the home during the WBVC is beneficial. WBVC visits have advantages over telephone calls, but limitations compared to in-person visits, suggesting they be an alternative but not replacement for in-person consultations.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Anciano , Comunicación , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Viaje
9.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 339, 2017 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28974195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approaches to screening can influence the acceptance of and comfort with mental health screening. Qualitative evidence on pregnant women's comfort with different screening approaches and disclosure of mental health concerns is scant. The purpose of this study was to understand women's perspectives of different mental health screening approaches and the perceived barriers to the communication and disclosure of their mental health concerns during pregnancy. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken. Fifteen women, with a singleton pregnancy, were recruited from a community maternity clinic and a mental health clinic in Calgary, Canada. Semi-structured interviews were conducted during both the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Preferences for mental health screening approaches varied. Most women with a known mental health issue preferred a communicative approach, while women without a known mental health history who struggled with emotional problems were inclined towards less interactive approaches and reported a reluctance to share their concerns. Barriers to communicating mental health concerns included a lack of emotional literacy (i.e., not recognizing the symptoms, not understanding the emotions), fear of disclosure outcomes (i.e., fear of being judged, fear of the consequences), feeling uncomfortable to be seen vulnerable, perception about the role of prenatal care provider (internal barriers); the lack of continuity of care, depersonalized care, lack of feedback, and unfamiliarity with/uncertainty about the availability of support (structural barriers). CONCLUSIONS: The overlaps between some themes identified for the reasons behind a preferred screening approach and barriers reported by women to communicate mental health concerns suggest that having options may help women overcome some of the current disclosure barriers and enable them to engage in the process. Furthermore, the continuity of care, clarity around the outcomes of disclosing mental health concerns, and availability of immediate support can help women move from providing "the best answer" to providing an authentic answer.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Diagnóstico Prenatal/psicología , Adulto , Canadá , Revelación , Emociones , Miedo , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Investigación Cualitativa
10.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 41(7): 1040-8, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25772686

RESUMEN

AIM: The effect of prenatal mental health on the risk of obstetric interventions is unclear. The present study examined the associations between depressive and anxiety symptoms in the second and third trimesters and mode of delivery, epidural use and labor induction in a large community-based pregnancy cohort, in Alberta, Canada. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women who had singleton pregnancies, delivered in hospital, and had medical data were selected (n = 2825). Obstetric intervention data were obtained from the medical records, and depressive and anxiety symptoms were measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory. Data were evaluated with multivariate multinomial and logistic regression analyses using a hierarchical modeling. RESULTS: After accounting for factors known to increase the risk of each intervention, including demographic variables, smoking, hospital site, gestational age, previous history of cesarean delivery, prepregnancy body mass index, assisted conception, and antepartum risk score, the only mental health variable associated with obstetric interventions was depressive symptoms in the third trimester, which increased the risk of emergency cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-3.29). No associations were found between antenatal depressive and anxiety symptoms and other obstetric interventions. CONCLUSION: The present findings support an association between depressive symptoms and adverse obstetric outcomes and suggest that anxiety and depression may have different effects on obstetric outcomes. Understanding the mechanism in which depression increases the risk of emergency cesarean birth needs further research.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/complicaciones , Depresión/complicaciones , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Adulto , Alberta/epidemiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Cesárea/efectos adversos , Cesárea/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/cirugía , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/cirugía , Resultado del Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , Tercer Trimestre del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...