Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 256-260, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508478

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Debate continues regarding the usefulness and benefits of wide prescription of antibiotics in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: All patients hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France between 27 February and 30 April 2020 with confirmed COVID-19 were included in this study. Clinical, biological and radiological data were collected, as well as treatment and outcome data. An unfavourable outcome was defined as death or transfer to the intensive care unit. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not receive antibiotic therapy using propensity score matching. FINDINGS: Among the 222 patients included, 174 (78%) received antibiotic therapy. The univariate analysis showed that patients who received antibiotic therapy were significantly older, frailer and had more severe presentation at admission compared with patients who did not receive antibiotic therapy. Unfavourable outcomes were more common in patients who received antibiotic therapy [hazard ratio (HR) 2.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-8.11; P = 0.04]. Multi-variate analysis and propensity score matching indicated that antibiotic therapy was not significantly associated with outcome (HR 1.612, 95% CI 0.562-4.629; P = 0.37). CONCLUSION: Antibiotics were frequently prescribed in this study and this was associated with more severe presentation at admission. However, antibiotic therapy was not associated with outcome, even after adjustment. In line with recent publications, such data support the need to streamline antibiotic therapy in patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión
2.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(4): 316-322, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035719

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibacterial molecules. Imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are the two main molecules used in French healthcare services. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two molecules by considering their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, microbiological, and clinical properties. We demonstrated that imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are not alike. METHOD: Review of the literature by querying the MEDLINE network. RESULTS: Imipenem-cilastatin is the first marketed molecule of the carbapenem class. It is more effective against Gram-positive cocci. Its stability does not allow for long infusions and its main adverse effect on the central nervous system limits its use. Meropenem is more effective against Gram-negative bacilli. Its stability and its milder adverse effects distinguish it from imipenem-cilastatin. CONCLUSION: Meropenem is preferred for daily use in healthcare services when carbapenems are to be used.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/farmacología , Meropenem/farmacología , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Biotransformación , Niño , Preescolar , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/efectos adversos , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/farmacocinética , Combinación Cilastatina e Imipenem/uso terapéutico , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Lactante , Fallo Hepático/metabolismo , Meropenem/efectos adversos , Meropenem/farmacocinética , Meropenem/uso terapéutico , Estructura Molecular , Especificidad de Órganos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Unión Proteica
4.
Med Mal Infect ; 46(7): 346-354, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230822

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Hajj is the largest annual mass gathering event in the world, thus favoring the transmission of various infections: 183 different nationalities, high temperatures, coincidence with the start of the flu season in the Northern hemisphere, a long barefoot walk, tent-type accommodation, communal toilet facilities, absence of food control, and sharing of razors. Infections are the first cause of hospital admission, which often occurs in the home country of pilgrims. METHODS: Literature review on PubMed from 1952 to November 2015 on the epidemiology and prevention of infections contracted during the Hajj, using the keywords "Hajj" and "infections". RESULTS: Respiratory tract infections, ENT infections, influenza, pyogenic pneumonia, whooping cough, and tuberculosis are most frequently observed during the Hajj. Outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis have been reported in pilgrims and their contacts. Waterborne infections such as gastroenteritis and hepatitis A are common, despite the improvement of health conditions. Pyoderma and furuncles are also frequently observed. Recently, dengue fever, Alkhumra hemorrhagic fever, and Rift Valley fever have emerged but no case of MERS-coronavirus, appeared in Saudi Arabia in 2012, have yet been observed during the 2012-2014 Hajj. CONCLUSION: Prevention is based on compulsory meningococcal vaccination, vaccination against seasonal influenza and pneumococcal infections for pilgrims at high risk of contracting the infection, and on vaccination against hepatitis A. Updating immunization for diphtheria/tetanus/poliomyelitis/pertussis and measles/mumps is also crucial and pilgrims must comply with hygiene precautions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Islamismo , Enfermedad Relacionada con los Viajes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/etiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/prevención & control , Francia , Guías como Asunto , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Higiene , Control de Infecciones , Conceptos Meteorológicos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arabia Saudita , Condiciones Sociales , Vacunación
6.
Soins ; (626): 26-7, 1998 Jun.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9739725

RESUMEN

PIP: 11 patients and 14 staff members including 4 nurses were interviewed in a study of guilt felt by abortion patients and the role of nurses in its management. All patients experienced guilt feelings that were expressed in psychological, physical, or relational symptoms. 65% of the staff members believed that guilt is a normal reaction to the experience of abortion. Guilt may arise from personal factors or the abortion procedure itself, or it may be provoked by such elements of the social system as the education of young girls and religious culture. The attitude of health personnel is of utmost importance. Staff should not judge or influence their abortion patients. 93% of the staff interviewed believed that patients should be aided in managing their guilt feelings.^ieng


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Culpa , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA