Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
1.
Fertil Steril ; 118(5): 982-984, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154768

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe an approach to fertility preservation by a multidisciplinary team of reproductive endocrinology and infertility, pediatric gynecology and surgery, and genetics experts via ovarian tissue harvesting and cryopreservation for a toddler with galactosemia. Galactosemia is associated with progressive primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) and early intervention with ovarian tissue cryopreservation may help preserve fertility. DESIGN: Video description of a tissue harvesting and cryopreservation technique. SETTING: Academic institution. PATIENT(S): 16-month-old female with classic galactosemia. INTERVENTION(S): At 6 months of age, despite good metabolic control, the infant's antimüllerian hormone (AMH) level was <0.015 ng/ml; luteinizing hormone level was 3.1 mIU/ml; and follicle stimulating hormone level was 30.2 mIU/ml. She was referred by her geneticist to the reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialist for fertility preservation. The AMH levels and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging findings of the patient were monitored over the next 9 months. Although the magnetic resonance imaging exam showed the presence of a dominant follicle in the right ovary and multiple small antral follicles in both ovaries at the age of 8 months, her laboratory assessment at the age of 14 months suggested impending POI (estradiol level <11.80 pg/mL; LH, 3.3 mIU/ml; follicle stimulating hormone, 35.97 mIU/ml; AMH, 0.03 ng/mL). At 16 months of age, given the low AMH levels, right ovary was laparoscopically harvested, so that a sufficient reserve of primordial follicles may be cryopreserved for fertility preservation. We dissected the mesosalpinx initially to separate the ovary from the tube in a manner that minimized the effects of cauterization on the ovary and preserved the fallopian tube. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Successful harvesting and cryopreservation of the ovarian tissue containing primordial follicles. RESULT(S): The right ovary, which measured 20 × 3 × 3mm, was bisected under a stereomicroscope along the hilum, trimmed to the cortical thickness of 1 mm and sliced into eight 4 × 4-mm pieces. These were then frozen with an established slow freezing protocol. The child was discharged the same day and had an uneventful postoperative course. A subsequent histological examination showed presence of primordial follicles, albeit at a reduced density for her age. CONCLUSION(S): Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is feasible in very young female children with rare genetic disorders associated with POI. We illustrated the unique aspects of performing these procedures in very young children.


Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Galactosemias , Infertilidad , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Lactante , Femenino , Preescolar , Ovario/metabolismo , Galactosemias/complicaciones , Galactosemias/diagnóstico , Galactosemias/cirugía , Hormona Antimülleriana/metabolismo , Criopreservación/métodos , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante , Estradiol/metabolismo , Infertilidad/patología , Hormona Luteinizante
2.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 49: e20223368, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36134849

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Brazil is a country with universal health coverage, yet access to surgery among remote rural populations remains understudied. This study assesses surgical care capacity among hospitals providing care for the rural populations in the Amazonas state of Brazil through in-depth facility assessments. METHODS: a stratified randomized cross-sectional evaluation of hospitals that self-report providing surgical care in Amazonas was conducted from July 2016 to March 2017. The Surgical Assessment Tool (SAT) developed by the World Health Organization and the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change at Harvard Medical School was administered at remote hospitals, including a retrospective review of medical records and operative logbooks. RESULTS: 18 hospitals were surveyed. Three hospitals (16.6%) had no operating rooms and 12 (66%) had 1-2 operating rooms. 14 hospitals (77.8%) reported monitoring by pulse oximetry was always present and six hospitals (33%) never have a professional anesthesiologist available. Inhaled general anesthesia was available in 12 hospitals (66.7%), but 77.8% did not have any mechanical ventilation device. An average of 257 procedures per 100,000 were performed. 10 hospitals (55.6%) do not have a specific post-anesthesia care unit. For the regions covered by the 18 hospitals, with a population of 497,492 inhabitants, the average surgeon, anesthetist, obstetric workforce density was 6.4. CONCLUSION: populations living in rural areas in Brazil face significant disparities in access to surgical care, despite the presence of universal health coverage. Development of a state plan for the implementation of surgery is necessary to ensure access to surgical care for rural populations.


Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Embarazo , Recursos Humanos
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(2): e1022-e1024, 2022 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116554

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: We report the case of a 3-year-old boy who presented to the pediatric emergency department in undifferentiated shock with an acute abdomen. Point-of-care ultrasound revealed viscous perforation with a large amount of free fluid. Intraoperatively, a single magnet was discovered as the likely cause of bowel perforation and the resulting state of shock.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo , Cuerpos Extraños , Perforación Intestinal , Abdomen Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Abdomen Agudo/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Ingestión de Alimentos , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Imanes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Sistemas de Atención de Punto
4.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 49: e20223368, 2022. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1406741

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: Brazil is a country with universal health coverage, yet access to surgery among remote rural populations remains understudied. This study assesses surgical care capacity among hospitals providing care for the rural populations in the Amazonas state of Brazil through in-depth facility assessments. Methods: a stratified randomized cross-sectional evaluation of hospitals that self-report providing surgical care in Amazonas was conducted from July 2016 to March 2017. The Surgical Assessment Tool (SAT) developed by the World Health Organization and the Program in Global Surgery and Social Change at Harvard Medical School was administered at remote hospitals, including a retrospective review of medical records and operative logbooks. Results: 18 hospitals were surveyed. Three hospitals (16.6%) had no operating rooms and 12 (66%) had 1-2 operating rooms. 14 hospitals (77.8%) reported monitoring by pulse oximetry was always present and six hospitals (33%) never have a professional anesthesiologist available. Inhaled general anesthesia was available in 12 hospitals (66.7%), but 77.8% did not have any mechanical ventilation device. An average of 257 procedures per 100,000 were performed. 10 hospitals (55.6%) do not have a specific post-anesthesia care unit. For the regions covered by the 18 hospitals, with a population of 497,492 inhabitants, the average surgeon, anesthetist, obstetric workforce density was 6.4. Conclusion: populations living in rural areas in Brazil face significant disparities in access to surgical care, despite the presence of universal health coverage. Development of a state plan for the implementation of surgery is necessary to ensure access to surgical care for rural populations.


RESUMO Objetivo: o Brasil é um país com cobertura universal de saúde, mas o acesso à cirurgia entre populações remotas permanece pouco estudado. Este estudo avalia a capacidade cirúrgica em hospitais que servem populações rurais no estado do Amazonas, Brasil, por meio de avaliações aprofundadas das instalações. Métodos: foi realizada avaliação estratificada randomizada transversal de hospitais que relataram prestar assistência cirúrgica de julho de 2016 a março de 2017. A Ferramenta de Avaliação Cirúrgica desenvolvida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde e o Programa de Cirurgia Global e Mudança Social da Harvard Medical School foi administrada em hospitais remotos, incluindo uma revisão retrospectiva de registros médicos e livros cirúrgicos. Resultados: 18 hospitais foram pesquisados. Três hospitais (16,6%) não tinham salas cirúrgicas e 12 (66%) tinham 1-2. 14 hospitais (77,8%) relataram que a oximetria de pulso estava "sempre presente" e seis hospitais (33%) nunca têm um anestesiologista disponível. A anestesia inalatória estava disponível em 12 hospitais (66,7%), 77,8% não possuíam dispositivo de ventilação mecânica. Em média, 257 procedimentos por 100.000 foram realizados. 10 hospitais (55,6%) não possuem unidade de recuperação anestésica. Para as regiões de abrangência dos 18 hospitais, com população de 497.492 habitantes, a densidade média de força de trabalho cirúrgica, anestesista e obstétrica foi de 6,4. Conclusão: as populações que vivem em áreas rurais no Brasil enfrentam disparidades significativas no acesso à assistência cirúrgica, apesar da presença de cobertura universal de saúde. O desenvolvimento de um plano estadual de cirurgia é necessário para garantir acesso à assistência cirúrgica às populações rurais.

7.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 31(2): 191-198, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32590867

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Children with appendicitis often present with complicated disease. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical management of pediatric appendicitis, and to report how disease severity and operative modality are associated with short- and long-term risks of adverse outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nationwide retrospective cohort study of all Swedish children (<18 years) diagnosed with appendicitis, 2001 to 2014 (n = 38,939). Primary and secondary outcomes were length of stay, surgical site infections, readmissions, 30-day mortality, and long-term risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction (SBO). Implications of complicated disease and operative modality were assessed with adjustment for age, gender, and trends over time. RESULTS: Complicated appendicitis was associated with longer hospital stay (4 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001), increased risk of surgical site infection (5.9 vs. 2.3%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.64 [95% confidence interval, CI: 2.18-3.18], p < 0.001), readmission (5.5 vs. 1.2, aOR: 4.74 [95% CI: 4.08-5.53], p < 0.001), as well as long-term risk of surgery for SBO (0.7 vs. 0.2%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 3.89 [95% CI: 2.61-5.78], p < 0.001). Intended laparoscopic approach was associated with reduced risk of surgical site infections (2.3 vs. 3.1%, aOR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.62-0.89], p = 0.001), but no overall reduction in risk for SBO; however, successful laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with less SBO during follow-up compared with open appendectomy (aHR: 0.27 [95% CI: 0.11-0.63], p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Children treated for complicated appendicitis are at risk of substantial short- and long-term morbidities. Fewer surgical site infections were seen after intended laparoscopic appendectomy, compared with open appendectomy, also when converted procedures were accounted for.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía/clasificación , Apendicitis/clasificación , Apendicitis/mortalidad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Suecia/epidemiología
8.
Int J Surg ; 82: 103-107, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32810595

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is a cost-effective intervention with major public health impact. Yet, five billion people do not have access to surgical and anesthesia care. This overwhelming unmet need has generated a rising interest in scale-up of these services globally. The purpose of this research was to aggregate available guidelines and create a synthesized tool that could provide valuable information at the local, national, and international health system levels. METHODS: A systematic review identified current documents cataloging elements for surgical care provision. Items with a reported frequency of >30% were included in the initial draft of the Surgical Assessment Tool. This underwent two cycles of Delphi-method expert opinion elicitation from providers working in low- and middle-income settings. Finally, the tool underwent vetting by the World Health Organization to create an expert-endorsed survey. RESULTS: Fifteen surgical tools were identified, containing a total of 216 unique elements in the following domains: infrastructure (n = 152), service delivery (n = 49), and workforce (n = 15). The final tool consisted of 169 items in the following domains: infrastructure (n = 35), service delivery (n = 92), workforce (n = 20), information management (n = 10), and financing (n = 12). CONCLUSION: Informed planning is critical to ensure successful expansion of surgical services. Our analysis of current tools shows varying agreement on the essential components of surgical care delivery. This updated tool serves as a crucial method to systematically assess surgical systems as well as monitor, modify, and strengthen in a scalable fashion. Importantly, it has the potential to be used in all settings after adaptation to local context.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos
9.
BMJ Glob Health ; 5(1): e001535, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133161

RESUMEN

Background: The WHO estimates a global shortage of 2.8 million physicians, with severe deficiencies especially in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). The unequitable distribution of physicians worldwide is further exacerbated by the migration of physicians from LMICs to high-income countries (HIC). This large-scale migration has numerous economic consequences which include increased mortality associated with inadequate physician supply in LMICs. Methods: We estimate the economic cost for LMICs due to excess mortality associated with physician migration. To do so, we use the concept of a value of statistical life and marginal mortality benefit provided by physicians. Uncertainty of our estimates is evaluated with Monte Carlo analysis. Results: We estimate that LMICs lose US$15.86 billion (95% CI $3.4 to $38.2) annually due to physician migration to HICs. The greatest total costs are incurred by India, Nigeria, Pakistan and South Africa. When these costs are considered as a per cent of gross national income, the cost is greatest in the WHO African region and in low-income countries. Conclusion: The movement of physicians from lower to higher income settings has substantial economic consequences. These are not simply the result of the movement of human capital, but also due to excess mortality associated with loss of physicians. Valuing these costs can inform international and domestic policy discussions that are meant to address this issue.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Modelos Económicos , Mortalidad/etnología , Médicos , África del Sur del Sahara , Asia Occidental , Países en Desarrollo/economía , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Médicos/economía , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución
10.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(1)2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adverse events from surgical care are a major cause of death and disability, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries. Metrics for quality of surgical care developed in high-income settings are resource-intensive and inappropriate in most lower resource settings. The purpose of this study was to apply and assess the feasibility of a new tool to measure surgical quality in resource-constrained settings. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of surgical quality using a novel evidence-based tool for quality measurement in low-resource settings. The tool was adapted for use at a tertiary hospital in Amazonas, Brazil resulting in 14 metrics of quality of care. Nine metrics were collected prospectively during a 4-week period, while five were collected retrospectively from the hospital administrative data and operating room logbooks. RESULTS: 183 surgeries were observed, 125 patient questionnaires were administered and patient charts for 1 year were reviewed. All metrics were successfully collected. The study site met the proposed targets for timely process (7 hours from admission to surgery) and effective outcome (3% readmission rate). Other indicators results were equitable structure (1.1 median patient income to catchment population) and equitable outcome (2.5% at risk of catastrophic expenditure), safe outcome (2.6% perioperative mortality rate) and effective structure (fully qualified surgeon present 98% of cases). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply a novel surgical quality measurement tool in resource-limited settings. Prospective collection of all metrics integrated within existing hospital structures is recommended. Further applications of the tool will allow the metrics and targets to be refined and weighted to better guide surgical quality improvement measures.


Asunto(s)
Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/instrumentación , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
BMC Med Educ ; 19(1): 136, 2019 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31068165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lack of providers in surgery, anesthesia, and obstetrics (SAO) is a primary driver of limited surgical capacity worldwide. We aimed to identify predictors of entry into Surgery, Anesthesia, and Obstetrics and Gynecology (SAO) fields and preference of working in the public sector in Brazil which may help in profiling medical students for recruitment into these needed areas. METHODS: A questionnaire was applied to all Brazilian medical graduates registered with a Board of Medicine from 2014 to 2015. Twenty-three characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors' influence on outcome. RESULTS: There were 4601 (28.2%) responders to the survey, of which 40.5% (CI 34.7-46.5%) plan to enter SAO careers. Of the 23 characteristics analyzed, eight differed significantly between those who planned to work in SAO and those who did not. Of those eight characteristics, just three were significant predictors in the regression model: preference for working in the hospital setting, having spent more than 70% of their clinical years in practical activities, and valuing the substantial earning potential. These three factors explained only 6.3% of the variance in SAO preference. Within the graduates who preferred SAO careers, there were only two predictors for working in the public sector ("preparatory time before medical school" and valuing "prestige/status"). CONCLUSIONS: Factors affecting specialty and sector choice are multifaceted and difficult to predict. Future programs to fill provider gaps should identify methods other than medical student profiling to assure specialty and sector needs are met.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/educación , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Obstetricia/educación , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Brasil , Selección de Profesión , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Especialización
12.
J Surg Educ ; 76(2): 469-479, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185383

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We endeavored to create a comprehensive course in global surgery involving multinational exchange. DESIGN: The course involved 2 weeks of didactics, 2 weeks of clinical rotations in a low-resource setting and 1 week for a capstone project. We evaluated our success through knowledge tests, surveys of the students, and surveys of our Zimbabwean hosts. SETTING: The didactic portions were held in Sweden, and the clinical portion was primarily in Harare with hospitals affiliated with the University of Zimbabwe. PARTICIPANTS: Final year medical students from Lund University in Sweden, Harvard Medical School in the USA and the University of Zimbabwe all participated in didactics in Sweden. The Swedish and American students then traveled to Zimbabwe for clinical work. The Zimbabwean students remained in Sweden for a clinical experience. RESULTS: The course has been taught for 3 consecutive years and is an established part of the curriculum at Lund University, with regular participation from Harvard Medical School and the University of Zimbabwe. Participants report significant improvements in their physical exam skills and their appreciation of the needs of underserved populations, as well as confidence with global surgical concepts. Our Zimbabwean hosts thought the visitors integrated well into the clinical teams, added value to their own students' experience and believe that the exchange should continue despite the burden associated with hosting visiting students. CONCLUSIONS: Here we detail the development of a course in global surgery for medical students that integrates didactic as well as clinical experiences in a low-resource setting. The course includes a true multilateral exchange with students from Sweden, the United States and Zimbabwe participating regularly. We hope that this course might serve as a model for other medical schools looking to establish courses in this burgeoning field.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Cirugía General/educación , Salud Global/educación , Intercambio Educacional Internacional , Facultades de Medicina , Suecia , Estados Unidos , Zimbabwe
13.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 31(3): 166-172, 2019 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30020489

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Quality of care is an emerging area of focus in the surgical disciplines. However, much of the emphasis on quality is limited to high-income countries. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC). DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Cinahl, Embase and CAB Abstracts using three domains: quality of care, surgery and LMIC. STUDY SELECTION: We limited our review to studies of essential surgeries that pertained to all three search domains. DATA EXTRACTION: We extracted data on study characteristics, type of surgery and the way in which quality was studied. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: 354 studies were included. 281 (79.4%) were single-center studies and nearly half (n = 169, 46.9%) did not specify the level of facility. 207 studies reported on mortality (58.47%) and 325 reported on a morbidity (91.81%), most commonly surgical site infection (n = 190, 53.67%). Of the Institute of Medicine domains of quality, studies were most commonly of safety (n = 310, 87.57%) and effectiveness (n = 180, 50.85%) and least commonly of equity (n = 21, 5.93%). CONCLUSION: We find that while there are numerous studies that report on some aspects of quality of care, much of the data is single center and observational. Additionally, there is variability on which outcomes are reported both within and across specialties. Finally, we find under-reporting of parameters of equity and timeliness, which may be critical areas for research moving forward.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Cirugía General/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía General/normas , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
16.
Surgery ; 164(5): 946-952, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30076026

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide efforts to improve access to surgical care must be accompanied by improvements in the quality of surgical care; however, these efforts are contingent on the ability to measure quality. This report describes a novel, evidence-based tool to measure quality of surgical care in low-resource settings. METHODS: We defined a widely applicable, multidimensional conceptual framework for quality. The suitability of currently available quality metrics to low-resource settings was evaluated. Then we developed new indicators with sufficient supportive evidence to complete the framework. The complete set of metrics was condensed into four collection sources and tools. RESULTS: The following 15 final evidence-based indicators were defined: (1) Safe structure: morbidity and mortality conference; (2) safe process: use of the safe surgery checklist; (3) (4) safe outcomes: perioperative mortality rate and proportion of cases with complications graded >2 on the Clavien-Dindo scale; (5) effective structure: provider density; (6) effective process: procedure rate; (7) effective outcome: rate of caesarean sections; (8) patient-centered process: use of informed consent; (9) patient-centered outcome: patient hospital satisfaction questionnaire; (10) timely structure: travel time to hospital; (11) timely process: time from emergency department presentation to non-elective abdominal surgery; (12) timely outcome: patient follow-up plan; (13) efficient process: daily operating room usage; (14) equitable outcome: comparative income of patients compared with population; and (15) proportion of patients facing catastrophic expenditure because of surgical care. CONCLUSION: This tool provides an evidence-based conceptual tool to assess the quality of surgical care in diverse low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Salud Global , Recursos en Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos
17.
Surgery ; 163(5): 1165-1172, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428152

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe the national epidemiology of burns in Brazil and evaluate regional access to care by defining the contribution of out-of-hospital mortality to total burn deaths. METHODS: We reviewed admissions data for Brazil's single-payer, free-at-point-of-care, public-sector provider and national death registry data abstracted from DATASUS for 2008-2014. Admissions, in-hospital mortality, hospital reimbursement, and total deaths from the death registry were assessed for records coded under ICD-10 codes corresponding to flame, scald, contact, and electrical burns. RESULTS: A total of 17,264 burn deaths occurred between 2008-2014 (mean annual 2,466 [SD 202]). Of all burns deaths 79.1% occurred out of hospital, with marked regional differences in the proportion of out-of-hospital deaths (P < 0.001), the greatest being in the North region. The mean annual number of admissions >24 hours was 18,551 (SD 1,504) with the greatest prevalence of flame burns overall (43.98%) and scalds prevailing in < 5 years (57.8%). Regional differences were found in per-capita admissions (P < 0.001) with the greatest number in the Central-West region. A mean of $1,022 (SD $94) US dollars was reimbursed per burn admission. CONCLUSION: Given that nearly 80% of burns mortalities occurred out of hospital, prevention of burns alongside interventions improving prehospital and access to care have potential for the greatest impact.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Quemaduras/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pobreza , Adulto Joven
18.
Surgery ; 163(2): 463-466, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29221877

RESUMEN

Global surgery is an emerging academic discipline that is developing in tandem with numerous policy and advocacy initiatives. In this regard, academic global surgery will be crucial for measuring the progress toward improving surgical care worldwide. However, as a nascent academic discipline, there must be rigorous standards for the quality of work that emerges from this field. In this white paper, which reflects the opinion of the Global Academic Surgery Committee of the Society for University Surgeons, we discuss the importance of research in global surgery, the methodologies that can be used in such research, and the challenges and benefits associated with carrying out this research. In each of these topics, we draw on existing examples from the literature to demonstrate our points. We conclude with a call for continued, high-quality research that will strengthen the discipline's academic standing and help us move toward improved access to and quality of surgical care worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/organización & administración , Internacionalidad , Investigación/normas
19.
J Pediatr Surg ; 53(7): 1339-1344, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032983

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complicated appendicitis is common in children, yet the timing of surgical management remains controversial. Some support initial antibiotics with delayed operation whereas others support immediate operation. While a few randomized trials have evaluated this question, they have been small, single-center trials with limited follow-up. We present a database analysis of outcomes in early versus late surgical management of complicated appendicitis with one-year follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of children with complicated appendicitis presenting between 2000 and 2013, utilizing a New York State database. We compare children undergoing later versus early appendectomy with a primary outcome measure of any complication within one year as determined from ICD-9 codes. RESULTS: 8840 children were included in the analysis, 7708 of whom underwent early appendectomy. Patients with late appendectomy were significantly more likely to have at least one complication when compared to those undergoing early appendectomy (34.6% vs 26.7%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We present the first population-level study evaluating early versus late appendectomy in children with complicated appendicitis with a one-year follow-up period. Children undergoing late appendectomy were more likely to have a complication than those undergoing early appendectomy. These data corroborated previous studies supporting early operative management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: This study provides level III evidence of a treatment study.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Análisis de Varianza , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , New York , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Espera Vigilante
20.
BMJ Glob Health ; 2(2): e000269, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29225930

RESUMEN

The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery defined six surgical indicators and a framework for a national surgical plan that aimed to incorporate surgical care as a part of global public health. Multiple countries have since begun national surgical planning; each faces unique challenges in doing so. Implementation science can be used to more systematically explain this heterogeneous process, guide implementation efforts and ultimately evaluate progress. We describe our intervention using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. This framework requires identifying characteristics of the intervention, the individuals involved, the inner and outer setting of the intervention, and finally describing implementation processes. By hosting a consultative symposium with clinicians and policy makers from around the world, we are able to specify key aspects of each element of this framework. We define our intervention as the incorporation of surgical care into public health planning, identify local champions as the key individuals involved, and describe elements of the inner and outer settings. Ultimately we describe top-down and bottom-up models that are distinct implementation processes. With the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we are able to identify specific strategic models that can be used by implementers in various settings. While the integration of surgical care into public health throughout the world may seem like an insurmountable challenge, this work adds to a growing effort that seeks to find a way forward.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...