Stepping into small shoes: Gaining user perspective on appropriate administration devices for paediatric medication in India.

A cross sectional pan-India study about use of administration devices for paediatric oral and inhalation medicines was conducted with a diverse pool of participants of various age groups. Via 634 respondents from more than 15 states in India, this study has identified the administration devices commonly used by parents/caregivers for children 0 to 18 years and by children over 10 years. It has provided insights on device ease of use, challenges faced and recommendations to facilitate the correct use of administration devices for paediatric oral and inhalation medicines. Ethics approval (DPSRU-BREC/2020/A/008)) was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University. The survey was completed by parents only (n = 514) and jointly by both parents and children (n = 120). The mean age of the child was 7.2 ± 4.96 years. 72% of the respondents reported that an oral medicine had been taken recently, 6.3% reported that an inhaled medicine had been taken and the remaining 21.9% reported that both an oral and inhaled medicine had been taken. The use of measuring cup was most prevalent followed by household spoons. The mean of the score for ease of use was found to be highest 4.6 ± 0.50 for oral syringe and lowest (3.8 ± 0.76) for measuring cups. The majority of them found the oral device easy to use. Difficulties were reported mostly for measuring cups and household spoons and were related to a lack of user instructions and measuring difficulties. The respondents who found the device easy to use had mostly received clear instructions from healthcare professionals. Compared to oral devices, there were very limited responses for inhalation devices (n = 175/634). Nebulisers with facemasks were most frequently used followed by manually actuated Metered dose inhalers with and without spacer. The mean of the ease-of-use score for dry powder inhalers was found to be highest (4.2 ± 0.37) followed by mist inhalers (4.0 ± 0) and manually actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers (4.0 ± 0.71). The nebulisers with facemask were reported to be difficult to use by most of the respondents despite receiving clear instructions from healthcare professionals. The study findings add evidence to the understudied area of user experiences and perspectives on administration devices for oral and inhalation medicines in India. It highlights a need for initiatives to improve the usability, availability, and affordability of administration devices for children in India. Awareness on the importance of proper use of devices needs to be raised and sustained about the existence of affordable administration devices.

Survey-based investigation into the current use of paediatric medicines and administration devices in China.

The accurate, rapid and convenient administration of medicines to children is not possible without the use of appropriate administration devices. However, due to the unique nature of this patient population, inappropriate paediatric medication administration has been widely observed worldwide. According to previous surveys carried out in other countries including the UK and Japan, there has been a wide variation in the handling of paediatric devices among children. To date, little is known about the current situation in China where the variety of available paediatric administration devices is more limited than in Europe and the UK. The aim of this study was therefore to conduct a China-wide survey to gain a better understanding of the perspectives of children and their caregivers on paediatric medicines and devices. This study was conducted throughout China with 215 children as well as 749 caregivers of paediatric year groups from 1 to less than 18 years old. The majority of participants (83%) took oral dosage forms where granules, syrup and tablets were ranked as the Top 3 commonly used oral dosage forms. The most commonly used devices, i.e., measuring cups (47.3%) and household spoons (41.1%) were both well accepted by the vast majority of children. More instruction and demonstration by the healthcare professionals were provided to inhalation devices users with the nebuliser and facemask being the most commonly used. In particular, the role of pharmacists in China is expected to be better defined, which may in turn help with the education provided to paediatric users in operating medical devices. The data collected varied considerably with the age of children but not statistically significantly with the region in which the survey was conducted.

Navigating the complexities of medicating paediatric patients: Insights from an enteral feeding tube workshop.

Enteral feeding tubes (EFT) are used to administer nutrition into the gastrointestinal tract of patients who are unable to take nutrition via mouth. A wide range of children may require enteral feeding through EFT which are also used to administer medication. However, many medicines are not licensed for administration via this route. Numerous factors can impact EFT medicine administration, including for example, dosage form properties and composition, EFT size, design and material, and operational aspects such as tube flushing. As a result, the risk of sub-optimal dosing and medication error is much higher in patients with EFT compared to those without. EuPFI organised a preconference workshop to review the current state of knowledge around aspects to be considered in the verification of EFT administration of medications to children, and considerations for EFT use, and to highlight the areas that remain challenging. Healthcare professional, pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agency perspectives were shared, and case studies discussed. It was agreed that simple and clear standardised global procedures are required for the evaluation and administration of medicines via EFT, and collaboration between all key stakeholders is recommended.

Putting children first: Understanding caregivers' and children's perspectives on the usability of oral and respiratory administration devices for paediatric medication.

A multi-national online survey was developed to obtain feedback on users' experiences of administration devices for oral and inhaled paediatric medicines. The questionnaire was divided into two identical parts: 1) for caregivers looking after children aged 0-18 years, and 2) for children aged 10 years and above, with parental consent. Each part of the questionnaire consisted of a section regarding oral devices and the other about respiratory devices. All data were anonymous and handled and stored in compliance with GDPR. Ethics approval (REC4612-016) was obtained. The study involved eight countries: Albania, Italy, Israel, the Netherlands, Romania, Spain, UK, and USA. A total of 206 adults and 43 children agreed to take part in the survey. Oral dosage forms were more used than inhaled medicines. For oral liquid medicines, oral syringe was the device mostly used by European and Israeli participants. Measuring spoon was the second most common device used, and was also often used in the USA. For respiratory devices, manually actuated and breath actuated metered dose inhalers were the most common everywhere. All devices were deemed easy to use by most of respondents and instructions clear. However, a recurrent suggestion was to simplify device instructions by adding explanatory images and to summarise or highlight key points. Moreover, respondents proposed other improvements related to device appearance and design that would make the device more acceptable for them to use. Understanding paediatric patients and caregivers' experiences about oral and respiratory devices is key to provide industry with information that can help improve the use and acceptability of administration devices. Aspects that device suppliers and healthcare professionals would need to prioritise are the provision of simpler instructions in the form of images and key summaries, and to provide adequate training on device use. These improvements are essential to ensure that children and caregivers are able to use the device appropriately.

A review of paediatric injectable drug delivery to inform the study of product acceptability - An introduction.

AIM: The EMA defines acceptability as "the overall ability and willingness of the patient to use, and their caregiver to administer, the medicine as intended" [1]. This paper seeks to outline issues of acceptability in relation to injectable therapy, namely intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) administration routes, and to lay a foundation to identify a minimum set of data that would satisfy Regulatory Authorities when discussing the acceptability of an injectable product. In addition, it will alert drug product developers to other factors that might contribute to good practice, alternative administration strategies and overall adherence to achieve successful treatment. Whilst the term 'parenteral' means "outside the intestine" [2,3] and so potentially covers a range of administration routes including intranasal and percutaneous administration, this review focuses on IV, IM and SC administration by injection. The use of indwelling canulae or catheters to reduce venepuncture and facilitate prolonged treatment is common and may impact acceptability [4]. This may be influenced by information provided by the manufacturer but is not always in their direct control. Other injectable products suitable for routes such as intradermal, intra-articular, intraosseous and intrathecal, share the requirement to be acceptable but are not specifically covered in this paper [2,5].

Uncovering caregiver concerns: 5 key issues that still remain unresolved in administration of oral medicines for children in India.

INTRODUCTION: Administration devices play a very crucial role in achieving a drug's therapeutic effect. Children are often dosed with oral liquids, but dosing devices don't have the accuracy needed, putting them at risk of inaccurate and suboptimal dosing. The availability and use of administration devices may vary throughout the world. Multiple surveys in UK, Europe and Japan have shown diverging practices by parents/caregivers. The aim of the present investigation was to conduct a larger Pan-India study through a series of workshops to understand the use and challenges of traditional devices and assess the need of innovative administration devices for liquid orals in India. METHODS: The methodology used for the workshop was contextual inquiry and survey questionnaire were used to record the responses. Parents for the workshop were recruited by advertising the survey on various social media platforms. Informed consent was taken from the parents or caregivers for their participation in the survey. Workshops were conducted pan India and both middle class and urban worker families in the occupational category were included in the study. During the workshop, the parents were briefed about the background and purpose of the study. Certain global innovative devices such as oral syringes, syringes with pacifiers were shown to the parents. Their views and opinions were taken through survey questionnaire and via interactive sessions. The questions were themed for the interactive session on 1) challenges faced, 2) willingness to use innovative devices and 3) the factors influencing their decision on the use of innovative devices. RESULTS: Across the four regions (4 metro cities) involved in the study, 271 caregivers agreed to participate in the workshops. 17.7 % administered solid dosage forms, 81.2 % administered liquid dosage form and the remaining 1.1 % opted for others. TRADITIONAL DEVICES: Caregivers reported the use of measuring cups (41.4 %) followed by household spoons (25.8 %), droppers (15.3 %), measuring spoons (2.6 %), and other dosing devices (5.5 %) for measuring oral liquids. 8.0 % did not use any of the dosing devices as they were administrating tablets and/or capsules. The ease-of-use score was the highest for the dropper (2.67 ± 0.68) and the lowest for the measuring spoon (2.00 ± 1.00). The reported challenges were categorised into five categories which also influences the preference of using administration devices. This includes device design, user experience and usability, sociocultural factors, such as beliefs, knowledge and education, regulatory, and market/distribution. INNOVATIVE DEVICES: The majority of the caregivers (86.7 %) were not aware of any of the innovative devices shown to them. 58.7 % were willing to use it if was recommended by the doctor, 1.5 % of caregivers would use it on pharmacists' recommendation and 37.6 % parents would use it if came along with the medicine. The criteria considered by the parents for use of the innovative devices in the descending order were Doctor's recommendation > Quality > Cost > Packed in medicine > Ease of use > Availability/accessibility. There were no differences observed among the low and high socioeconomic status of caregviers regarding the use of traditional devices, challenges faced and awareness about innovative devices. Overall, the study revealed heterogeneity in the SES for the use of administration devices in the four zones. The association of SES and opinion on the use of administration devices was demonstrated with no statistically significant interaction between caregiver SES and the use of administration devices. CONCLUSION: The workshop revealed the prevalence of traditional dosing devices like measuring cups, household spoons among the caregivers. It highlighted key issues with the use of appropriate administration devices for correct and accurate dosing in children that remain unresolved and prevalent in India. This study reflects on the needs of the target community; thus hope will help facilitate the development of locally sustainable solutions to improve the administration of medicines in children in India.

Oral drug delivery strategies for development of poorly water soluble drugs in paediatric patient population.

Selecting the appropriate formulation and solubility-enabling technology for poorly water soluble drugs is an essential element in the development of formulations for paediatric patients. Different methodologies and structured strategies are available to select a suitable approach and guide formulation scientists for development of adult formulations. However, there is paucity of available literature for selection of technology and overcoming the challenges in paediatric formulation development. The need for flexible dosing, and the limited knowledge of the safety of many formulation excipients in paediatric subjects, impose significant constraints and in some instances require adaptation of the approaches taken to formulating these drugs for the adult population. Selection of the best drug delivery system for paediatrics requires an efficient, systematic approach that considers a drug's physical and chemical properties and the targeted patient population's requirements. This review is a step towards development of a strategy for the design of solubility enhancing paediatric formulations of highly insoluble drugs. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of different approaches and strategies to consider in order to assist development of paediatric formulation for poorly water-soluble drugs with the provision of examples of some marketed products. In addition, it provides recommendations to overcome the range of challenges posed by these strategies and adaptations of the adult approach/product presentation required to enable paediatric drug development and administration.

Usability of administration devices for oral and respiratory medicines: Views from a UK primary school.

The correct use of medicine administration devices is pivotal for optimal drug therapy in children. Little is known about end users' perspectives on administration device use. Thus, the aim of this study was to conduct a survey to gain information and opinions from caregivers and children regarding the usability of paediatric medicine administration devices. A survey was conducted at a primary school in the United Kingdom in children aged 10-12 years and their caregivers. It focused on oral and respiratory devices and comprised two identical parts: 1) for the caregivers, 2) for the children with parental consent. Ethics approval (REC4612-016) was obtained. A total of 57 caregiver-child pairs accessed the survey and it was completed by parents only (n = 4), children only (n = 31) or jointly (n = 22). Most participants (65 %) had taken liquid dosage forms (e.g., syrups/suspensions) compared to solid dosage forms (34 %). Oral devices most frequently used were oral syringes (42 %), measuring spoons (22 %), and household spoons (18 %), with parents most frequently demonstrating device use to their children. Respiratory devices were used less frequently, and pressurised metered-dose inhalers with/without spacer (pMDIs) were the most commonly used devices (11/13). Instructions on use were provided by healthcare professionals to both caregivers and children. Generally, oral and respiratory devices were considered easy to use and instructions were clear. However, for both oral and respiratory devices, some suggestions for device improvement were provided by participants. Education/training by healthcare professionals and clear supplier instructions (e.g., pictograms) may be especially effective in ensuring that caregivers and children are able to use administration devices appropriately and receive sufficient information on their correct use.

The Current States, Challenges, Ongoing Efforts, and Future Perspectives of Pharmaceutical Excipients in Pediatric Patients in Each Country and Region.

A major hurdle in pediatric formulation development is the lack of safety and toxicity data on some of the commonly used excipients. While the maximum oral safe dose for several kinds of excipients is known in the adult population, the doses in pediatric patients, including preterm neonates, are not established yet due to the lack of evidence-based data. This paper consists of four parts: (1) country-specific perspectives in different parts of the world (current state, challenges in excipients, and ongoing efforts) for ensuring the use of safe excipients, (2) comparing and contrasting the country-specific perspectives, (3) past and ongoing collaborative efforts, and (4) future perspectives on excipients for pediatric formulation. The regulatory process for pharmaceutical excipients has been developed. However, there are gaps between each region where a lack of information and an insufficient regulation process was found. Ongoing efforts include raising issues on excipient exposure, building a region-specific database, and improving excipient regulation; however, there is a lack of evidence-based information on safety for the pediatric population. More progress on clear safety limits, quantitative information on excipients of concern in the pediatric population, and international harmonization of excipients' regulatory processes for the pediatric population are required.

A Survey to Understand Parent/Caregiver and Children's Views on Devices Used for the Administration of Oral Pediatric Medicines in Japan.

Administration devices are crucial for the correct dosing of medicines to children. In countries outside Japan, oral droppers and syringes are reported to be preferred for the administration of oral liquid medicines to neonates and infants, whilst spoons and cups are more frequently used for older children. However, in Japan the majority of oral medicines are powders and the use of dosing devices in each pediatric age group is not well known. This study was performed as an observational anonymous questionnaire survey on devices for oral medicines in children aged 10 to less than 18 years and parents/caregivers on behalf of children aged from birth to less than 18 years. The results from 336 respondents showed that powders were most frequently prescribed in children aged less than 10 years old followed by liquids. Unlike previous reports, droppers were most frequently used in patients less than 12 months old, while household spoons were most frequently used in older children. Oral syringes were perceived as easy to use, which was in line with previous studies. Further cross-regional multi-countries study for establishment the guidelines on the choice of device will be needed.

Proposed Tool to Compare and Assess the Applicability of Taste Assessment Techniques for Pharmaceuticals.

Palatability is amongst the most important determinants of whether or not a child will take a medicine. In order to increase concordance with treatment regimens it is often necessary to utilise a range of formulation techniques to improve the palatability of medicines. These can include selecting a different molecule or version of a molecule (such as a different polymorph or salt form), various taste masking techniques and/or the inclusion of flavours and sweeteners. In order to be able to understand the taste of the Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API) and to validate the formulation approach used, it is necessary to be able to use the most reliable taste evaluation method possible. Multiple in vivo and in vitro methods exist nowadays or are proposed in the literature but are often little understood by the pharmaceutical product development community. In particular, different methods may be more relevant at different stages of product development. The aim of this article is to propose a tool to guide the selection of the most appropriate method for the desired evaluation. A spreadsheet-based tool is proposed that is designed to allow the systematic assessment of the applicability of any taste assessment technique existing or new to the users proposed application. A series of criteria are defined that will allow the user to assess the analytical, usability and availability factors for the technique that is being considered. Such a systematic review will help the user to understand the benefits and risks of using each methodology for that application. The use of the tool is illustrated based on currently available data and literature. As new/existing methods are developed/improved, the outcomes of the tool may change.

Acceptability of different oral dosage forms in paediatric patients in hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: The understanding of acceptability of existing dosage forms is limited in most of the world and hinders the development of acceptable, age-appropriate medicines. The attributes of paediatric medicine acceptability may differ from country to country based on culture, healthcare infrastructure and health policies. This study was designed to map the acceptability of oral medicines in paediatric patients treated in hospital in India. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged below 18 years and taking any form of oral medication. Acceptability scores were obtained using CAST-ClinSearch Acceptability Score Test tool. FINDINGS: 490 patients were recruited and 193 evaluations of different pharmaceutical products available in 20 dosage forms and 7 routes of administration were studied. Oral liquids (50%) and tablets (35%) were the most commonly prescribed and administered forms. Regardless of the therapeutic class and age, the oral liquids were 'positively accepted' in infants and toddlers. Acceptability of tablets improved with age and appeared to be generally good from the age of 6. CONCLUSION: This study indicates the limited progress towards adoption of age-appropriate dosage forms in India and thus impact on the acceptability of existing oral dosage forms. The key challenges posed by the adoption of age-appropriate formulations in India are (1) awareness of importance of appropriate administration and acceptability of medicines to children in India, (2) availability of age-appropriate dosage forms and (3) lack of child-appropriate medicine policies.

Exploring Acceptability Drivers of Oral Antibiotics in Children: Findings from an International Observational Study.

Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in children. Adherence to the treatment with these drugs is of the utmost importance to prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria, a global health threat. In children, medicine acceptability is likely to have a significant impact on compliance. Herein we used a multivariate approach, considering simultaneously the many aspects of acceptability to explore the drivers of oral antibiotic acceptability in children under twelve, especially in toddlers and in preschoolers. Based on 628 real-life observer reports of the intake of 133 distinct medicines, the acceptability reference framework highlighted the influence of many factors such as age and sex of patients, previous exposure to treatment, place of administration, administration device, flavor agent in excipients and active pharmaceutical ingredient. These findings from an international observational study emphasize the multidimensional nature of acceptability. Therefore, it is crucial to consider all these different aspects for assessing this multi-faceted concept and designing or prescribing a medicine in order to reach adequate acceptability in the target population.

Best practices for selection of excipients for paediatrics - Workshop reflection.

The development of age appropriate formulations for the paediatric population has become one of the key areas of focus for the pharmaceutical industry - with a subsequent influence on excipient use. Selection of excipients with appropriate safety and tolerability is a major hurdle in paediatric formulation development. Various factors influence selection of excipients, including target age group, route of administration and dosage form. Evaluation of these factors and a clear rationale and justification is expected by the regulators when it comes to selecting excipients for paediatric formulation. Scientists are encouraged to apply the principle of benefit to risk balance to assess the suitability of excipients to the specific paediatric population for whom the formulation is intended. In order to understand how scientists approach the task of establishing the risk to benefit analysis, a workshop was organised by the European Paediatric Formulation Initiative (EuPFI) to reflect on the current scenario and the different practices employed by formulation scientists in the selection of excipients for paediatric formulations. Aspects assessed by regulators were also canvassed. Finally, the participants were asked to comment on how selecting excipients for use in paediatric formulations may differ from the considerations applied in selecting excipients for formulations for other age groups. Based on the workshop discussion, some recommendations and questions to consider emerged regarding the selection of excipients in paediatric drug development. These best practice recommendations provided a good starting point for a more systematic strategy for selecting excipients for paediatric formulation development.

Bitter-blockers as a taste masking strategy: A systematic review towards their utility in pharmaceuticals.

Acceptable palatability of an oral dosage form is crucial to patient compliance. Excipients can be utilised within a formulation to mask the bitterness of a drug. One such category is the bitter-blockers. This term is used inconsistently within the literature and has historically been used to describe any additive which alters the taste of an unpleasant compound. This review defines a bitter-blocker as a compound which interacts with the molecular pathway of bitterness at a taste-cell level and compiles data obtained from publication screening of such compounds. Here, a novel scoring system is created to assess their potential utility in a medicinal product using factors such as usability, safety, efficacy and quality of evidence to understand their taste-masking ability. Sodium acetate, sodium gluconate and adenosine 5'monophophate each have a good usability and safety profile and are generally regarded as safe and have shown evidence of bitter-blocking in human sensory panels. These compounds could offer a much needed option to taste-mask particularly aversive medicines where traditional methods alone are insufficient.

European Paediatric Formulation Initiative workshop report: Improving the administration of oral liquid medicines in paediatrics using dosing syringes and enteral accessories.

Accurate dosing of the right medicine to the right patient is a key element of safe and efficacious pharmacotherapy, yet prone to technical challenges and human error when dosing involves the administration of small volumes of liquid medicines. For this reason, the topic has gained increased attention over the last decade from multiple stakeholder parties e.g. academia, hospital pharmacy, the medical device and pharmaceutical industry, and regulatory agencies. It is now well acknowledged that spoons and cups are not suitable for the measurement of small volumes of oral liquid medicines and that syringes are a better alternative, but syringes for parenteral use should not be used for oral dosing in order to avoid accidental parenteral delivery of oral products. However, dosing accuracy of very small volumes of liquid medicines to young children, and especially pre-term neonates, is still not sufficiently ensured. A workshop was organised in 2018 by the European Paediatric Formulation Initiative to reflect on current status and challenges (first part) and possible strategies to improve the present situation (second part). A voting system (n = 24) was used to consider the most favourable solutions. The harmonisation and/or standardisation of the technical design of oral syringes (including e.g. female/male connection) was considered a key priority.

Innovations in Pediatric Drug Formulations and Administration Technologies for Low Resource Settings.

Despite advances in regulations and initiatives to increase pediatric medicine development, there is still an unmet need for age-appropriate medicines for children. The availability of pediatric formulations is particularly lacking in resource poor areas, due to, for example, area-specific disease burden and financial constraints, as well as disconnected supply chains and fragmented healthcare systems. The paucity of authorized pediatric medicines often results in the manipulation and administration of products intended for adults, with an increased risk of mis-dosing and adverse reactions. This article provides an overview of the some of the key difficulties associated with the development of pediatric medicines in both high and low resource areas, and highlights shared and location specific challenges and opportunities. The utilization of dispersible oral dosage forms and suppositories for low and middle-income countries (LMICs) are described in addition to other platform technologies that may in the future offer opportunities for future pediatric medicine development for low resource settings.

Challenges and strategies to facilitate formulation development of pediatric drug products: Safety qualification of excipients.

A public workshop entitled "Challenges and strategies to facilitate formulation development of pediatric drug products" focused on current status and gaps as well as recommendations for risk-based strategies to support the development of pediatric age-appropriate drug products. Representatives from industry, academia, and regulatory agencies discussed the issues within plenary, panel, and case-study breakout sessions. By enabling practical and meaningful discussion between scientists representing the diversity of involved disciplines (formulators, nonclinical scientists, clinicians, and regulators) and geographies (eg, US, EU), the Excipients Safety workshop session was successful in providing specific and key recommendations for defining paths forward. Leveraging orthogonal sources of data (eg. food industry, agro science), collaborative data sharing, and increased awareness of the existing sources such as the Safety and Toxicity of Excipients for Paediatrics (STEP) database will be important to address the gap in excipients knowledge needed for risk assessment. The importance of defining risk-based approaches to safety assessments for excipients vital to pediatric formulations was emphasized, as was the need for meaningful stakeholder (eg, patient, caregiver) engagement.