Off-label use of rituximab for systemic lupus erythematosus in Europe.

OBJECTIVES: Rituximab (RTX) is a biological treatment used off-label in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This survey aimed to investigate the off-label use of RTX in Europe and compare the characteristics of patients receiving RTX with those receiving conventional therapy. METHODS: Data on patients with SLE receiving RTX were taken from the International Registry for Biologics in SLE retrospective registry and complemented with data on patients with SLE treated with conventional therapy. For nationwide estimates of RTX use in patients with SLE, investigators were asked to provide data through case report forms (CRFs). Countries for which no data were submitted through CRFs, published literature and/or personal communication were used, and for European countries where no data were available, estimates were made on the assumption of similarities with neighbouring countries. RESULTS: The estimated off-label use of RTX in Europe was 0.5%-1.5% of all patients with SLE. In comparison with patients with SLE on conventional therapy, patients treated with RTX had longer disease duration, higher disease activity and were more often treated with immunosuppressives. The most frequent organ manifestations for which either RTX or conventional therapy was initiated were lupus nephritis followed by musculoskeletal and haematological. The reason for treatment was, besides disease control, corticosteroid-sparing for patients treated with conventional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: RTX use for SLE in Europe is restrictive and appears to be used as a last resort in patients for whom other reasonable options have been exhausted.

IgG4-Related Disease: Results From a Multicenter Spanish Registry.

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a rare entity consisting of inflammation and fibrosis that has been described in multiple organs. Concrete diagnostic criteria have been established recently and there is a lack of large series of patients.To describe the clinical presentation, histopathological characteristics, treatment and evolution of a series of IgG4-RD Spanish patients.A retrospective multicenter study was performed. Twelve hospitals across Spain included patients meeting the current 2012 consensus criteria on IgG4-RD diagnosis.Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 38 of whom (69.1%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years. Thirty (54.5%) patients were included in the Histologically Highly Suggestive IgG4-RD group and 25 (45.5%) in the probable IgG4-RD group. Twenty-six (47.3%) patients had more than 1 organ affected at presentation. The most frequently affected organs were: retroperitoneum, orbital pseudotumor, pancreas, salivary and lachrymal glands, and maxillary sinuses.Corticosteroids were the mainstay of treatment (46 patients, 83.6%). Eighteen patients (32.7%) required additional immunosuppressive agents. Twenty-four (43.6%) patients achieved a complete response and 26 (43.7%) presented a partial response (<50% of regression) after 22 months of follow-up. No deaths were attributed directly to IgG4-RD and malignancy was infrequent.This is the largest IgG4-RD series reported in Europe. Patients were middle-aged males, with histologically probable IgG4-RD. The systemic form of the disease was frequent, involving mainly sites of the head and abdomen. Corticosteroids were an effective first line treatment, sometimes combined with immunosuppressive agents. Neither fatalities nor malignancies were attributed to IgG4-RD.

Registry of the Spanish network for systemic sclerosis: clinical pattern according to cutaneous subsets and immunological status.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of clinical and immunological characteristics of a large cohort of Spanish patients with scleroderma (SSc) and identifying factors associated with particular organ manifestations assessed by a nationwide cross-sectional analysis. METHODS: We classified SSc patients in 4 subsets using a modification of LeRoy and Medsger classification that included: "prescleroderma" (pre-SSc), limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc), diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and SSc sine scleroderma (ssSSc). Fourteen Spanish centers participated in patient recruitment. On January 2008, the database included 916 consecutive Spanish SSc patients, 801 women (87.4%) and 115 men (12.6%), all of whom fulfilled the classification criteria proposed by LeRoy and Medsger. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were collected according to a standard protocol. Mean age at diagnosis was 51.2 ± 15.1 years and mean age at disease onset was 44.9.0 ± 15.8 years. lcSSc was the most frequent subset (61.8%) followed by dcSSc (26.5%), ssSSc (7.5%), and preSSc (4%) subsets. Gender ratios were as follows: dcSSc subset, 200 women and 43 men (4.7:1); lcSSc subset, 503 women and 63 men (ratio 7.9:1), and ssSSc subset, 62 women and 7 men (ratio 8.9:1). Digital ulcers, interstitial lung disease (ILD), musculoeskeletal and esophageal involvement, and scleroderma renal crisis were more frequent in dcSSc than lcSSc and ssSSc subsets. The incidence of pulmonary arterial hypertension assessed by echocardiography was similar in all subsets but mean estimated systolic pulmonary arterial pressure was higher in ssSSc than in lcSSc subset (47.3 ± 23.9 mm Hg vs 39.6 ± 19.2 mm Hg; P < 0.03). Cardiac involvement was identified more frequently in ssSSc than in dcSSc and lcSSc subsets (49.3% vs 32.5% and 31.1%, respectively; P = 0.015 and P = 0.004 for both comparisons). Acro-osteolysis (8.2% vs 2.4%, P = 0.049), calcinosis (19.8% vs 7.2%, P < 0.05), and sicca syndrome (37.5% vs 14.5%, P < 0.0001) were more frequent in lcSSc than in ssSSc subsets. The frequency of clinical manifestations related to the presence of anticentromere antibodies or antitopoisomerase I antibodies was very similar to that identified in patients categorized to lcSSc and dcSSc, respectively. However, in multivariate studies, the ranking of the variables according to their overall explanatory effect on the model showed that the contributory effect of the antibody status was not greater than that of the clinical categorization into lcSSc and dcSSc for the majority of disease manifestations, but, in important manifestations, as ILD, absence of anticentromere antibodies was an independent predictor factor. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of SSc into dcSSc, lcSSc, and ssSSc subsets is the one that most closely reflects the natural history of the disease, as they presented clear clinical differences. The immunological profile helps to define important visceral alteration as ILD. Finally, to improve early diagnosis of SSc, patients with preSSc should be considered both to trace the true evolution of the disease and to define which patients could benefit from therapeutic measures able to prevent the appearance of visceral involvements.