The Role of Bone Marrow Biopsy Evaluation in the Workup for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance: A Diagnosis of Exclusion.

CONTEXT.­: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is a relatively new concept for patients with renal monoclonal protein deposition (RMPD) (except monoclonal cast nephropathy) and has been used as a reason for nephrologists to obtain a bone marrow biopsy (BMB). It takes a team of pathologists and clinicians to determine when RMPD at our institution can be defined as MGRS. OBJECTIVE.­: To identify the proportion of various subtypes of tentative MGRS diagnosed by renal biopsy that can be confirmed as final MGRS after BMB. DESIGN.­: One hundred thirty kidney biopsies with variants of RMPD were identified during the past 10 years. Biopsy cases with known myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, or monoclonal cast nephropathy were separated as a heavy-burden group. The remaining biopsies with RMPD were considered tentative MGRS. Their BMB and clinical indices were further analyzed to determine the final percentage of MGRS diagnoses. RESULTS.­: Among the 130 renal paraprotein deposition cases, 44 (33.8%) were categorized as the heavy-burden group. In the remaining 86 cases, 33 (38.4%) with subsequent identification of myeloma (>10% of monoclonal plasma cells) or lymphoma in BMB were further considered as heavy-burden cases. Eighteen cases (18 of 86; 20.9%) did not receive follow-up BMB; thus, no further analysis was performed. BMBs diagnosed as either nonmalignant (no plasma cells; 8 of 86 cases; 9.3%) or premalignant (<10% plasma cells; 27 of 86 cases; 31.4%) were confirmed to be final MGRS (35 of 86; 40.7%). CONCLUSIONS.­: The data indicate that BMB is an important element in the confirmation of MGRS.

Myeloperoxidase Staining Identifies Endothelial Injury of Peritubular Capillaries and Glomeruli in Renal Antibody-Mediated Rejection.

OBJECTIVE: It remains unclear if C4d staining is related to any peritubular and glomerular injury during antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). The goal of this study was to determine if myeloperoxidase (MPO) staining can highlight endothelial injury in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and glomeruli. METHODS: The study included 12 native negative controls, 19 transplant biopsies with borderline changes (BC) as transplant controls, and one group of renal transplant biopsies with ABMR as the study group (acute/chronic, n=22). All three groups were stained for MPO immunohistochemically, and the MPO expressions in the endothelium of PTC and glomeruli were evaluated and correlated with serum creatinine (SCr). In addition, the ultrastructural layers of the PTC (an index for chronic allograft rejection) were correlated with MPO indices in PTC. RESULTS: The negative control group and the transplant controls showed no MPO expression in the endothelium of glomeruli and PTC. However, in the biopsies with ABMR, there were MPO-positive stains in the endothelial cells of glomeruli (15/21 cases, 71.4 %) and PTC (16/22 cases, 72.7 %). There were significant correlations between the peritubular MPO staining versus SCr (r=0.355 and p=0.0106) and glomerular MPO staining versus SCr (r=0.365 and p=0.0092). Furthermore, the layers of PTC by electron microscopy were significantly correlated with MPO scores in PTC (r=0.696, p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the MPO-positive endothelial injuries are most likely the cause leading to renal graft dysfunction following ABMR.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) Progressing to Collapsing Glomerulopathy in Renal Transplant Recipients With and Without COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Collapsing glomerulopathy (CGN) secondary to HIV or COVID-19 infection mainly occurs in patients of African American descent due to APOL-1 gene mutations, but CGN is occasionally reported in white patients. CGNs are rarely reported in renal transplant biopsies and their association with idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient #1 was a 48-year-old Caucasian white man who had a renal transplant 8 years ago and was recently diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. Two weeks post infection, his serum creatinine (SCr) increased to 2.01 mg/dL from a baseline of 1.40 mg/dL, and he developed concomitant nephrotic range proteinuria. The first renal transplant biopsy showed FSGS. Four weeks later, his sCr level increased to 2.65 mg/dL with worsening proteinuria, and a second renal transplant biopsy revealed CGN. Patient #2 was a 32-year-old African American man whose native renal biopsy revealed primary FSGS. He received a renal transplant with initial post-transplant sCr level at 1.17 mg/dL. Four months later, his sCr and protein-to-creatinine ratio began to rise. Sequential biopsies revealed that the patient had developed recurrent FSGS, which progressed to show features of CGN. The CGN was further confirmed in his transplant kidney graft at autopsy later. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case report of CGN in a white renal recipient with COVID-19 infection. The pathologic presentations of FSGS progressing to collapsing FSGS in our 2 renal transplant recipients suggest that FSGS and GGN may share a common pathophysiologic mechanism of podocytopathy.

Severe necrotizing adenovirus tubulointerstitial nephritis in a kidney transplant recipient.

Adenoviruses (AdV) are emerging pathogens with a prevalence of 11% viruria and 6.5% viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Although AdV infection is common, interstitial nephritis (ADVIN) is rare with only 13 biopsy proven cases reported in the literature. We report a case of severe ADVIN with characteristic histological features that includes severe necrotizing granulomatous lesion with widespread tubular basement membrane rupture and hyperchromatic smudgy intranuclear inclusions in the tubular epithelial cells. The patient was asymptomatic at presentation, and the high AdV viral load (quantitative PCR>2,000,000 copies/mL in the urine and 646,642 copies/mL in the serum) confirmed the diagnosis. The patient showed excellent response to a combination of immunosuppression reduction, intravenous cidofovir, and immunoglobulin therapy resulting in complete resolution of infection and recovery of allograft function. Awareness of characteristic biopsy findings may help to clinch the diagnosis early which is essential since the disseminated infection is associated with high mortality of 18% in kidney transplant recipients. Cidofovir is considered the agent of choice for AdV infection in immunocompromised despite lack of randomized trials, and the addition of intravenous immunoglobulin may aid in resolution of infection while help prevention of rejection.

Primary cilia metaplasia in renal transplant biopsies with acute tubular injury.

Primary cilia are hair-like organelles singly distributed along the apical surface of proximal and distal nephron tubules as mechanosensors. The goal of this study was to use electron microscopy to systemically evaluate cilia changes in acute tubular injury (ATI) from both transplant and native renal biopsies. Three groups of cases were included: control group 1-native biopsies without major changes in renal tubules; study group 2-native biopsies with prominent ATI; and study group 3-renal transplant biopsies with prominent ATI (delayed renal function group). Extensive search for ciliary structures along renal tubules was conducted in each case, focused on proximal tubular areas with injured (diminished) apical microvilli. Singly located cilia were found in 3/19 specimens in control group 1, 4/18 in group 2 (native ATI), and 6/24 in group 3 (transplant ATI). Importantly, there were clusters of cilia in proximal tubules with markedly diminished apical microvilli in 3/24 biopsies from 2 patients in group 3, but none from groups 1 and 2. The clusters of cilia ranged from 6 to 15 individual cilia along the apical surface with diminished apical microvilli. Under high magnifications, the cilia demonstrated 9 pairs of peripheral microtubules without a central pair of microtubules, consistent with primary cilia (9 + 0) rather than motile cilia (9 + 2). In summary, the authors found clusters of cilia in proximal tubules with remarkable apical microvillar injury in 3 renal transplant biopsies with ATI, implying a reactive, or repairing, process following tubular injury, thus they name this finding "cilia metaplasia".

Primary nonfunction of renal allograft secondary to acute oxalate nephropathy.

Primary nonfunction (PNF) accounts for 0.6 to 8% of renal allograft failure, and the focus on causes of PNF has changed from rejection to other causes. Calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition is common in early allograft biopsies, and it contributes in moderate intensity to higher incidence of acute tubular necrosis and poor graft survival. A-49-year old male with ESRD secondary to polycystic kidney disease underwent extended criteria donor kidney transplantation. Posttransplant, patient developed delayed graft function (DGF), and the biopsy showed moderately intense CaOx deposition that persisted on subsequent biopsies for 16 weeks, eventually resulting in PNF. The serum oxalate level was 3 times more than normal at 85 µmol/L (normal <27 µmol/L). Allograft nephrectomy showed massive aggregates of CaOx crystal deposition in renal collecting system. In conclusion, acute oxalate nephropathy should be considered in the differential diagnosis of DGF since optimal management could change the outcome of the allograft.

Adjuvant role of p53 immunostaining in detecting BK viral infection in renal allograft biopsies.

BK virus infection is a significant threat to renal transplant outcome. Detecting viral infection in renal transplant biopsies using SV40 staining is less than ideal. SV40 antibody reacts with the large T-antigen of BK virus only at the early phases of infection and can miss cells in later stages of infection. As p53 is upregulated during both early and late phases of infection, this study set out to determine whether p53 staining could improve detection of BK virus infection in renal transplant patients. The control group consisted of 16 renal allograft biopsies without histologic evidence of BK virus infection, while the BK group consisted of 15 renal allograft biopsies with histologic evidence of BK virus infection. The biopsies from both groups were immunohistochemically stained with both SV40 and p53 antibodies. Dual staining with both markers was also performed to identify their nuclear co-localization. In the BK group, the percent of p53 staining (16.6 ± 4.8 %) was significantly higher than the percent of SV40 staining (5.4 ± 2.7%). BK virus infected cells revealed a unique p53 immunostaining pattern (strong nuclear staining with a central halo). Co-localization of SV40 and p53 was identified in cells that had characteristic nuclear features of BK virus infection by histology. The sensitivity and specificity for using p53 staining to identify BK infected cells was 92% and 86 %, respectively. In conclusion, p53 staining detects a higher percentage of BK virus infected cells than SV40 staining alone. Thus, for diagnosis of BK virus infection in renal allograft biopsies, p53 staining is a sensitive and specific method when used along with SV40 staining.

Updated principles and clinical caveats in the management of infection in renal transplant recipients.

Renal transplantation is now considered the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. In transplant recipients, infection and rejection are entwined and are unavoidable tribulations unless clinical tolerance becomes a reality. Although rejection rates have significantly decreased with the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents, infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and the magnitude of the problem is on the rise. Newer infections are emerging and patterns of known infections are changing. The continuous evolution of donor and recipient characteristics also alters the landscape of infections. In clinical practice, establishing a definite diagnosis of infection in a timely manner remains a challenge in transplant recipients as compared to immunocompetent individuals. Hence a comprehensive knowledge of the principles of management of infections in renal transplant recipients is very essential. In this review, we would like to provide an overview of some of the key principles that we believe are essential in the management of infectious complications in renal transplant recipients with no focus on any individual infection.