Accuracy of Early Neuroprognostication in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Children with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) are at risk for neurological sequelae impacting function. Clinicians are tasked with neuroprognostication to assist in decision-making. We describe a single-center study assessing clinicians' neuroprognostication accuracy. METHODS: Clinicians of various specialties caring for children with sTBI were asked to predict their patients' functioning three to six months postinjury. Clinicians were asked to participate in the study if their patient had survived but not returned to baseline between day 4 and 7 postinjury. The outcome tool utilized was the functional status scale (FSS), ranging from 6 to 30 (best-worst function). Predicted scores were compared with actual scores three to six months postinjury. Lin concordance correlation coefficients were used to estimate agreement between predicted and actual FSS. Outcome was dichotomized as good (FSS 6 to 8) or poor (FSS ≥9). Positive and negative predictive values for poor outcome were calculated. Pessimistic prognostic prediction was defined as predicted worse outcome by ≥3 FSS points. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 107 surveys were collected on 24 patients. Two children died. Fifteen children had complete (FSS = 6) or near-complete (FSS = 7) recovery. Mean predicted and actual FSS scores were 10.8 (S.D. 5.6) and 8.6 (S.D. 4.1), respectively. Predicted FSS scores were higher than actual scores (P < 0.001). Eight children had collective pessimistic prognostic prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians predicted worse functional outcomes, despite high percentage of patients with near-normal function at follow-up clinic. Certain patient and provider factors were noted to impact accuracy and need to be studied in larger cohorts.

Awake Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Concept and Initial Results.

BACKGROUND: In this initial series, we evaluated the use of microvascular decompression (MVD) under an awake anesthesia protocol ("awake" MVD) to assess whether intraoperative pain evaluation can identify and mitigate insufficient decompression of the trigeminal nerve, improving surgical outcomes, and possibly expand the indications of MVD in patients with comorbidities that would preclude the use of general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA). METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study of 10 consecutive adults who underwent MVD for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) was conducted. The primary outcome measure was postoperative TN pain quantified on the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Pain Severity Scale. RESULTS: The median patient age was 65.5 years, with a female:male ratio of 6:4. All 10 patients tolerated the procedure well and did not require GEA intraoperatively or postoperatively. Nine patients had a successful surgical outcome (BNI score I, n = 5; BNI score II, n = 4). One patient did not have pain relief (BNI score IV). This same patient also developed a pseudomeningocele, which was the sole surgical complication observed in this series. One patient experienced recurrence of pain at 11 months, with BNI score increasing from I to II. The median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months. Two patients did not experienced resolution of evoked pain during intraoperative awake testing following decompression. Further intraoperative exploration revealed secondary offending vessels that were subsequently decompressed, leading to resolution of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative awake testing for treatment efficacy may increase the success rate of MVD by rapidly identifying and mitigating insufficient cranial nerve V decompression.