Endosalpingiosis: More than just an incidental finding at the time of gynecologic surgery?

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with endosalpingiosis (ES) and examine its association with endometriosis and gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: We queried the medical record for patients who underwent gynecologic surgery (Gynecologic Surgery Cohort (GSC), n=58,161) from 1998 to 2013 at a single institution for the presence of "endosalpingiosis" (ES). Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected for patients with pathologically confirmed ES (n=838). Within GSC, we compared the frequency of endometriosis and gynecologic malignancies with and without ES. We estimated the expected distribution of ovarian cancer subtypes using cases from the New England Case Control Study (NECC). We used chi-square tests to test for significant differences in frequency distributions and unconditional logistic regression to calculate multivariate odds ratios for the association between ES and ovarian cancer subtypes. RESULTS: We observed concurrent endometriosis (p<0.0001), uterine cancer (p<0.0001), and ovarian cancer (p<0.0001) more frequently in women with ES. Women from the GSC with ES and ovarian cancer were more likely to have serous borderline (OR=10.2, 95% CI=5.1-20.7), clear cell (OR=3.0, 95% CI=1.1-8.0), and invasive mucinous tumors (OR=5.0, 95% CI=1.5-16.6) as compared to ovarian cancer cases from the NECC without ES, after accounting for age, race, menopausal status, parity, tubal ligation, and endometriosis. CONCLUSION: Women with ES are more likely to also be diagnosed with endometriosis, uterine, and ovarian cancers. Further study is needed to understand these associations so we may appropriately counsel patients with ES diagnosed at time of gynecologic surgery.

Molecular changes in endometriosis-associated ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is frequently associated with and thought of having propensity to develop into ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), although the molecular transformation mechanism is not completely understood. METHODS: We employed immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for marker expression along the potential progression continuum. Expression profiling of microdissected endometriotic and OCCC cells from patient-matched formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples was performed to explore the carcinogenic pathways. Function of novel biomarkers was confirmed by knockdown experiments. RESULTS: PTEN was significantly lost in both endometriosis and invasive tumour tissues, while oestrogen receptor (ER) expression was lost in OCCC relative to endometriosis. XRCC5, PTCH2, eEF1A2 and PPP1R14B were significantly overexpressed in OCCC and associated endometriosis, but not in benign endometriosis (p ⩽ 0.004). Knockdown experiments with XRCC5 and PTCH2 in a clear cell cancer cell line resulted in significant growth inhibition. There was also significant silencing of a panel of target genes with histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation, a signature of polycomb chromatin-remodelling complex in OCCC. IHC confirmed the loss of expression of one such polycomb target gene, the serous ovarian cancer lineage marker Wilms' tumour protein 1 (WT1) in OCCC, while endometriotic tissues showed significant co-expression of WT1 and ER. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of PTEN expression is proposed as an early and permissive event in endometriosis development, while the loss of ER and polycomb-mediated transcriptional reprogramming for pluripotency may play an important role in the ultimate transformation process. Our study provides new evidence to redefine the pathogenic programme for lineage-specific transformation of endometriosis to OCCC.