Can a gastrointestinal pathologist identify microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer with reproducibility and a high degree of specificity?

Clinical features usually initiate evaluation for Lynch Syndrome (LS) but some colorectal cancer (CRC) histopathology findings are compatible with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) that also occurs in LS. This led to the suggestion that pathologists request MSI analysis, which is an expensive addition to routine histology. We aimed to see if a Gastrointestinal Pathologist could identify MSI-H features with reproducibility and high (95%) specificity (MSI-H 95%). Histopathology of all CRCs received during 2005 and 4 MSI-H controls were scored using 2 published methods, "MsScore" and "PathScore". MSI analysis was performed on CRCs scored by either method as probable MSI-H 95% and results compared. To examine reproducibility of histopathology, 100 coded slides, including 25 scored MSI-H 95% and 75 scored low, were re-examined to now identify those needing MSI analysis. Costs were evaluated for identifying MSI-H with or without scoring. All 227 CRCs were scored for possible MSI-H 95%; 24 had high scores and MSI analysis. DNA analysis proved 14 MSI-H, PathScore identified 13 (95%), MsPath identified 9 (64%), histopathology alone identified 7 (50%). Reproducibility for identifying histopathology characteristics of MSI-H at re-examination, without scoring, was "moderate agreement" (Kappa statistic = 0.4615). Costs for identifying MSI-H by PathScore were the lowest, $436/identification. Conclusions; PathScore identified the most proven MSI-H CRCs at lowest cost and even an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist has difficulties identify MSI-H without scoring. So, scoring can be facilitated by a computerized evaluation form for routine CRC histology, prompting score computation and recommendation for MSI analysis with high specificity.

A familial gastrointestinal cancer clinic: organization, aims and activities, 2004-2007.

BACKGROUND: Dedicated, organ-specific screening clinics have been shown to significantly reduce cancer morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To establish a dedicated clinic for Clalit Health Service patients at high risk for hereditary gastrointestinal cancer and to provide them with clinical and genetic counseling, diagnostic screening and follow-up. RESULTS: During the 3 years of the clinic's activity, 634 high risk families, including 3804 at-risk relatives, were evaluated. The most common conditions were hereditary colorectal syndromes, Lynch syndrome (n=259), undefined young-onset or familial colorectal cancer (n=214), familial adenomatous polyposis (n=55), and others (n=106). They entered follow-up protocols and 52 underwent surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent public and professional education is needed to increase awareness of hereditary colorectal cancer and the possibility of family screening, early diagnosis and therapy. The public health services--i.e., the four health management organizations--should provide genetic testing for these patients who, at present, are required to pay for almost all of these available but costly tests. Dedicated colorectal surgical units are needed to provide the specialized therapeutic procedures needed by patients with familial colorectal cancer. Our future plans include adding psychosocial support for these at-risk patients and their families as well as preventive lifestyle and dietary intervention.

An audit of familial juvenile polyposis at the Tel Aviv Medical Center: demographic, genetic and clinical features.

Familial juvenile polyposis (JP) is an uncommon genetic disorder that, if untreated, can lead to gastrointestinal cancer. To evaluate familial JP prevalence, phenotypic manifestations, causative mutations, treatment and compliance for diagnosis and follow-up in our registry. Since 1993 our familial JP patients were registered, followed-up before and/or after surgery and their families encouraged to have mutation analysis, endoscopic screening and treatment. Ten pedigrees were identified, all Jewish, but only one was Ashkenazi, six were Sepharadi and three were Oriental; the only mutation found was BMPR1A in two of six pedigrees examined. Of 139 first-degree relatives at risk for JP, 62 (45%) had JP or cancer; 56 (40.3%) were available for follow-up and 35 entered the registry. Of these, 71% reported rectal bleeding, 40% had <20 colonic polyps, 31% had 20-100 polyps; 2 had >100 gastric polyps. Cancer occurred in 22.9% (6 colonic, 2 gastric) before familial JP diagnosis or during follow-up elsewhere or non-compliance for follow-up; however, 1 gastric cancer developed during our treatment. In 46% the initial clinical-pathological diagnosis was incorrect. Compliance for evaluation and follow-up of pedigree members and individual familial JP patients was inadequate in 20% and 26%, respectively. Familial JP does not occur in the Israeli Ashkenazi Jewish population at the expected proportion; it is often misdiagnosed and is inadequately recognized in Israeli non-Jews. Mutations were identified in only a minority of pedigrees despite comprehensive screening. The inadequate compliance for screening and follow-up needs to be addressed by educating the public, health care workers and health insurances.

Clinical and screening implications of the I1307K adenomatous polyposis coli gene variant in Israeli Ashkenazi Jews with familial colorectal neoplasia. Evidence for a founder effect.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously found the I1307K adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene variant in 5% of Ashkenazi control participants, in 15.4% of those who had familial colorectal neoplasia, but also in 1.6% of non-Ashkenazi control participants. In this study, they evaluated its use in a screening program for familial colorectal neoplasia and examined for a founder effect. METHODS: Consecutive Ashkenazim with a personal and/or family history of colorectal neoplasia had the DNA test. Markers flanking the APC gene were examined in Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi I1307K carriers and noncarriers. RESULTS: Among 718 persons, I1307K occurred in 6.2% of Ashkenazi participants, in 1.5% of non-Ashkenazi control participants (P = 0.02), and in 10.7% of Ashkenazim with familial neoplasia (relative risk, 1.73 [not significant compared with controls]; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-3.2). Colorectal neoplasia was detected in carriers at a younger age (P < 0.05) without excess risk for multiple colorectal neoplasia or noncolorectal neoplasia. I1307K attributable risk for colorectal neoplasia was 0.5-0.6%. Compared with noncarriers, both Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi I1307K carriers had similar flanking polymorphic alleles (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: I1307K is a low-penetrance genetic variant that indicates a 1.7 relative risk for neoplasia in carriers who have familial carcinoma, clinically equivalent to obtaining a family history of sporadic colorectal neoplasia and promoting early screening. I1307K is a founder genetic variant in Jews of different ethnic origin, mainly Ashkenazim, but it explains only partially their higher incidence of colorectal carcinoma.