Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Health Commun ; 16 Suppl 2: 94-106, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21916717

RESUMEN

As world leaders prepare for the United Nations High Level Meeting on Noncommunicable Diseases, to take place in September 2011, international organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and economic and business fora have created new alliances and initiatives to accelerate research, advocacy, and political commitment. This article argues that the time is propitious to reflect on the social nature of the most common behavioral noncommunicable disease determinants, including tobacco and alcohol use, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet. Evidence is presented related to the fact that these diseases are profoundly rooted in social and community ties and points to the need for a modern communication strategy to serve as a linchpin of any successful action to address these public health threats. Several proposals, aimed at promoting health literacy, strengthening health workforce skills, capturing the power of new media and technologies, and targeting vulnerable groups, are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Comunicación en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Obesidad/prevención & control , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Conducta Social , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica , Dieta/psicología , Alfabetización en Salud , Humanos , Informática Médica , Servicios de Salud del Trabajador , Conducta Sedentaria , Fumar/psicología , Poblaciones Vulnerables
2.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 92(6): 453-8, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20819330

RESUMEN

This report is based on a Hygienist Panel Meeting held at St Anne's Manor, Wokingham on 24-25 June 2009. The panel agreed that greater use should be made of antiseptics to reduce reliance on antibiotics with their associated risk of antibiotic resistance. When choosing an antiseptic for clinical use, the Biocompatibility Index, which considers both the microbiocidal activity and any cytotoxic effects of an antiseptic agent, was considered to be a useful tool. The need for longer and more proactive post-discharge surveillance of surgical patients was also agreed to be a priority, especially given the current growth of day-case surgery. The introduction of surgical safety checklists, such as the World Health Organization's Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative, is a useful contribution to improving safety and prevention of SSIs and should be used universally. Considering sutures as 'implants', with a hard or non-shedding surface to which micro-organisms can form biofilm and cause surgical site infections, was felt to be a useful concept.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Antisepsia/métodos , Adhesión Bacteriana , Biopelículas , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Suturas
3.
Burns ; 34(7): 975-81, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18472221

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the economic burden (direct and indirect costs) of burn victims and the impact of burn on health-related quality of life in Spain. METHODS: In 2003, a cross-sectional study was carried out with 898 burned people. Data regarding demographic features, health resource use, informal care, indirect costs and quality of life were prospectively collected through hospital admission databases and questionnaires filled out by burn victims and caregivers. RESULTS: The mean annual cost (direct and indirect) per burn patient was US$ 99,773. The most important categories of costs were those of in-patient care and temporary and permanent disability. Direct healthcare costs of burn patients represented 19.6% of the total. Total annual cost for burn patients in Spain was US$ 313 million. The mean health-related quality of life measured by European Quality of Life 5-Dimension score was 0.84 and the mean visual analogue score was 67. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of burn are higher than those of many other conditions, and a cost-effectiveness assessment of the different interventions for burn should become a priority in health policy.


Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Quemaduras/rehabilitación , Cuidadores/economía , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , España , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
Arch Surg ; 142(1): 50-7; discussion 57, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17224500

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To discover the total costs and quality of life of burn patients in a specialist center classified by diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). DESIGN: Prospective study of 5-year follow-up from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2001. SETTING: Burn Center of Valencia. PATIENTS: A total of 898 patients treated at the Burn Center of Valencia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital, extrahospital, caregiving, labor, and social costs of the burn patients grouped by DRG (code 457: extensive burns without operating room procedure; code 458: nonextensive burns with skin graft; code 459: nonextensive burns with wound debridement or other operating room procedure; code 460: nonextensive burns without operating room procedure; or code 472: extensive burns with operating room procedure) were studied. The costs were compared with those that the DRG system assigns. The quality of life of the patients at the end of the follow-up period was also studied. To measure quality of life, the EuroQol 5-Dimensions survey was used. Utility calculations and cost-utility analysis were undertaken according to life expectancy. RESULTS: The number of quality-adjusted life-years produced by the center was 13 577, with a mean quality-of-life level on release from the study of 0.87. The mean cost per patient, including the social and labor costs, was $95 551, with health care costs amounting to only 10%. The mean cost per quality-adjusted life-year was $686. CONCLUSIONS: The labor costs were the most important and amounted to 56%; together with the social costs, these constituted 85% of the total costs. The DRG code 456 was an option dominated by the remaining DRG codes 458 through 460 and 472. Given the high costs of treating burn patients, a clear health care policy is urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Quemados/economía , Quemaduras/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Técnicos Medios en Salud/economía , Quemaduras/epidemiología , Quemaduras/terapia , Niño , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de Vida , España/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...