Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU): Trial Satisfaction and Attitudes towards Future Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial satisfaction is increasingly important for future trial designs and is associated with treatment adherence and willingness to enroll in future research studies or to recommend trial participation. In this post-trial survey, we examined participant satisfaction and attitudes toward future clinical trials in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU). METHODS: We developed an anonymous, participant satisfaction survey tailored to participants enrolled in the DIAN-TU-001 double-blind clinical trial of solanezumab or gantenerumab and requested that all study sites share the survey with their trial participants. A total of 194 participants enrolled in the trial at 24 study sites. We utilized regression analysis to explore the link between participants' clinical trial experiences, their satisfaction, and their willingness to participate in upcoming trials. RESULTS: Survey responses were received over a sixteen-month window during 2020-2021 from 58 participants representing 15 study sites. Notably, 96.5% of the survey respondents expressed high levels of satisfaction with the trial, 91.4% would recommend trial participation, and 96.5% were willing to enroll again. Age, gender, and education did not influence satisfaction levels. Participants reported enhanced medical care (70.7%) and pride in contributing to the DIAN-TU trial (84.5%). Satisfaction with personnel and procedures was high (98.3%). Respondents had a mean age of 48.7 years, with most being from North America and Western Europe, matching the trial's demographic distribution. Participants' decisions to learn their genetic status increased during the trial, and most participants endorsed considering future trial participation regardless of the DIAN-TU-001 trial outcome. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that DIAN-TU-001 participants who responded to the survey exhibited high motivation to participate in research, overall satisfaction with the clinical trial, and willingness to participate in research in the future, despite a long trial duration of 4-7 years with detailed annual clinical, cognitive, PET, MRI, and lumbar puncture assessments. Implementation of features that alleviate barriers and challenges to trial participation is like to have a high impact on trial satisfaction and reduce participant burden.

Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia: Quantitative assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: Currently there is no tool to quantify buccophonatory apraxia to stratify, compare and monitor patients longitudinally in an objective manner. Our aim in this study is to create a quantitative scale for buccophonatory apraxia and evaluate it in patients with the non-fluent/grammatical variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and other neurodegenerative diseases that occur with speech and/or language problems. METHODS: The scale was designed based on useful elements in the assessment of buccophonatory apraxia and the total was quantified in seconds. The scale was administered to 64 participants with diagnoses of: nfvPPA, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA), Huntington's disease, Parkinson's disease, as well as a group of healthy controls. RESULTS: Patients showed a significantly higher score compared to controls. The nfvPPA group had the highest mean score on the scale (429 seconds ± 278). The scale was useful to differentiate vnfPPA from svPPA and Parkinson's disease (area under curve [AUC] of 0.956 and 0.989, respectively), but less to differentiate it from Huntington's disease (AUC = 0.67) and lvPPA. There was a statistically significant relationship between total score and disease severity in nfvPPA (P < .029). CONCLUSIONS: The Barcelona scale for buccophonatory apraxia could be useful to quantitatively evaluate buccophonatory apraxia in different neurodegenerative diseases, and compare patients, especially in nfvPPA.

Clinical applicability of diagnostic biomarkers in early-onset cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several diagnostic biomarkers are currently available for clinical use in early-onset cognitive impairment. The decision on which biomarker is used in each patient depends on several factors such as its predictive value or tolerability. METHODS: There were a total of 40 subjects with early-onset cognitive complaints (<65 years of age): 26 with Alzheimer's disease (AD), five with frontotemporal dementia and nine with diagnostic suspicion of non-neurodegenerative disorder. Clinical and neuropsychological evaluation, lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD core biochemical marker determination, medial temporal atrophy evaluation on magnetic resonance imaging, amyloid-positron emission tomography (PET) and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET were performed. Neurologists provided pre- and post-biomarker diagnosis, together with diagnostic confidence and clinical/therapeutic management. Patients scored the tolerability of each procedure. RESULTS: Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and amyloid-PET increased diagnostic confidence in AD (77.4%-86.2% after CSF, 92.4% after amyloid-PET, P < 0.01) and non-neurodegenerative conditions (53.6%-75% after CSF, 95% after amyloid-PET, P < 0.05). Biomarker results led to diagnostic (32.5%) and treatment (32.5%) changes. All tests were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker procedures are well tolerated and have an important diagnostic/therapeutic impact on early-onset cognitive impairment.

Adaptación y validación de la Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) al castellano / Adaptation and validation of a Spanish-language version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS)

Introducción: La Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) es una escala diseñada para facilitar la estadificación clínica y la evaluación de la progresión de pacientes con demencia frontotemporal (DFT). Objetivo: Realizar un estudio multicéntrico de adaptación y validación al castellano de la FTD-FRS. Metodología: La adaptación se realizó mediante 2 procesos de traducción y retrotraducción inglés-español español-inglés y se verificó con los autores originales. El proceso de validación se llevó a cabo en una muestra consecutiva de pacientes diagnosticados de DFT. Se evaluó la consistencia interna, se determinó la unidimensionalidad con el método Rasch, se analizaron la validez de constructo y la validez discriminante, y se calculó el grado de acuerdo entre la Clinical Dementia Rating scale y la FTD-FRS para los casos con DFT. Resultados: Se incluyeron 60 pacientes con DFT. La puntuación media de la FTD-FRS fue de 12,1 puntos (DE = 6,5; rango = 2-25) mostrando diferencias intergrupos (F = 120,3; gl = 3; p < 0,001). El α de Cronbach = 0,897, el análisis de componentes principales de los residuos produjo un aceptable autovalor para 5 contrastes (1,6-2,7) y una varianza respecto al origen del 36,1%. La FTD-FRS correlacionó con el Mini-mental test (r = 0,572; p < 0,001) y capacidad funcional (DAD; r = 0,790; p < 0,001). La FTD-FRS correlacionó significativamente con la Clinical Dementia Rating scale (r = −0,641; p < 0,001) pero se observó variabilidad entre la distribución de la gravedad, siendo valorados como más leves según la Clinical Dementia Rating scale que con la FTD-FRS (kappa = 0,055). Conclusiones: El estudio de traducción y validación al español mostró resultados de validez y unidimensionalidad (gravedad) satisfactorios para el uso de la FTD-FRS en el estudio de la gravedad en pacientes con DFT (AU)

Introduction: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) is a tool designed to aid with clinical staging and assessment of the progression of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-FRS). Objective: Present a multicentre adaptation and validation study of a Spanish version of the FRS. Methodology: The adapted version was created using 2 translation-back translation processes (English to Spanish, Spanish to English) and verified by the scale's original authors. We validated the adapted version in a sample of consecutive patients diagnosed with FTD. The procedure included evaluating internal consistency, testing unidimensionality with the Rasch model, analysing construct validity and discriminant validity, and calculating the degree of agreement between the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) and FTD-FRS for FTD cases. Results: The study included 60 patients with DFT. The mean score on the FRS was 12.1 points (SD = 6.5; range, 2-25) with inter-group differences (F = 120.3; df = 3; P < .001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.897 and principal component analysis of residuals delivered an acceptable eigenvalue for 5 contrasts (1.6-2.7) and 36.1% raw variance. FRS was correlated with the Mini-mental State Examination (r = 0.572; P < .001) and functional capacity (DAD; r = 0.790; P < .001). FTD-FRS also showed a significant correlation with CDR (r = −0.641; P < .001), but we did observe variability in the severity levels; cases appeared to be less severe according to the CDR than when measured with the FTD-FRS (kappa = 0.055). Conclusions: This process of validating the Spanish translation of the FTD-FRS yielded satisfactory results for validity and unidimensionality (severity) in the assessment of patients with FTD (AU)

Adaptation and validation of a Spanish-language version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS). / Adaptación y validación de la Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) al castellano.

INTRODUCTION: The Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) is a tool designed to aid with clinical staging and assessment of the progression of frontotemporal dementia (FTD-FRS). OBJECTIVE: Present a multicentre adaptation and validation study of a Spanish version of the FRS. METHODOLOGY: The adapted version was created using 2 translation-back translation processes (English to Spanish, Spanish to English) and verified by the scale's original authors. We validated the adapted version in a sample of consecutive patients diagnosed with FTD. The procedure included evaluating internal consistency, testing unidimensionality with the Rasch model, analysing construct validity and discriminant validity, and calculating the degree of agreement between the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) and FTD-FRS for FTD cases. RESULTS: The study included 60 patients with DFT. The mean score on the FRS was 12.1 points (SD=6.5; range, 2-25) with inter-group differences (F=120.3; df=3; P<.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.897 and principal component analysis of residuals delivered an acceptable eigenvalue for 5 contrasts (1.6-2.7) and 36.1% raw variance. FRS was correlated with the Mini-mental State Examination (r=0.572; P<.001) and functional capacity (DAD; r=0.790; P<.001). FTD-FRS also showed a significant correlation with CDR (r=-0.641; P<.001), but we did observe variability in the severity levels; cases appeared to be less severe according to the CDR than when measured with the FTD-FRS (kappa=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: This process of validating the Spanish translation of the FTD-FRS yielded satisfactory results for validity and unidimensionality (severity) in the assessment of patients with FTD.

Decreased striatal dopamine transporter uptake in the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) may develop atypical parkinsonian syndromes. However, there is no current biomarker to assess which patients are at high risk of developing parkinsonism. 123I-2ß-carbomethoxy-3ß-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)-nortropane (123I-FP-CIT)-SPECT detects striatal dopamine dysfunction in vivo. The objective of the present study was to study whether non-fluent/agrammatic patients without parkinsonism at baseline present decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. METHODS: Visual and semi-quantitative assessments of the striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio were carried out in 15 patients with nfvPPA, eight patients with the logopenic variant of PPA (lvPPA) and 18 controls. To rule out progranulin mutations or underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD), serum progranulin levels and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of AD (Aß42 , total-tau, phosphorylated-tau181 ) were determined. A second 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT analysis in the biomarker-enriched groups was also carried out. RESULTS: Patients with nfvPPA presented reduced striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding, especially in the left hemisphere (P = 0.002), compared with controls. All lvPPA patients had normal striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake. 123I-FP-CIT striatal binding in nfvPPA patients with normal progranulin and CSF biomarker levels (nfvPPA/bio-) was also significantly reduced (P < 0.05) compared with lvPPA patients with positive AD biomarkers. Sixty-four per cent (9/14) of nfvPPA patients and 80% of nfvPPA/bio- patients (8/10) showed a diminished individual left striatal 123I-FP-CIT uptake ratio. On follow-up, seven nfvPPA/bio- patients developed parkinsonism (median 1.9 years; range 1.2-2.9), six of them with baseline reduced 123I-FP-CIT uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced striatal tracer uptake in nfvPPA patients prior to clinical parkinsonism can be detected by 123I-FP-CIT-SPECT, especially in those with nfvPPA/bio-, suggesting subclinical nigrostriatal degeneration. Decreased striatal 123I-FP-CIT binding might identify PPA patients at increased risk of developing atypical parkinsonian syndromes, probably related to tau-pathology.

Neuroimaging and biochemical markers in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate in variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) the association between current clinical and neuroimaging criteria and biochemical/genetic markers at the individual level. METHODS: Thirty-two PPA patients were classified as non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA), semantic (svPPA), or logopenic variant (lvPPA) or as unclassifiable (uPPA). In all patients, we evaluated the neuroimaging criteria (magnetic resonance imaging and/or single photon emission computed tomography/positron emission tomography) of each variant and studied serum progranulin levels, APOE genotype and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Cases with a first-degree family history of early-onset dementia were genetically tested. RESULTS: Ten of 15 (66%) nfvPPA, 5/5 (100%) svPPA and 7/7 (100%) lvPPA patients showed at least one positive neuroimaging-supported diagnostic criterion. All lvPPA and 3/5 (60%) uPPA patients presented AD-CSF biomarkers, which were absent in nfvPPA and svPPA cases. Four (27%) nfvPPA patients had dementia-causing mutations: 2 carried a GRN mutation and 2 the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide expansion. CONCLUSIONS: There was an excellent association between clinical criteria and neuroimaging-supported biomarkers in svPPA and lvPPA, as well as with AD-CSF biochemical markers in the lvPPA. Neuroimaging, biochemical and genetic findings in nfvPPA were heterogeneous. Incorporating biochemical/genetic markers into the PPA clinical diagnosis would allow clinicians to improve their predictions of PPA neuropathology, especially in nfvPPA and uPPA cases.

Hirano body-rich subtypes of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

BACKGROUND: In definite Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), morphological and immunohistochemical patterns are useful to identify molecular subtypes. Severe cerebellar pathology and hippocampal involvement helps to identify VV subtypes. The rare VV1 variant (<1%), more frequent in young individuals, is additionally characterized by the presence of ballooned neurones in affected areas. In 1985, Cartier et al. described a family cluster of three individuals with an ataxic CJD form, showing, in addition to severe cerebellar and hippocampal involvement, the presence of frequent Hirano bodies (HB) in CA1 pyramidal neurones. HB are frequently found in aged individuals with Alzheimer pathology although they are not a specific finding. AIMS AND METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the presence of HB in hippocampi of 54 genetically and molecularly characterized CJD cases, aiming to elucidate whether additional morphological features could be helpful to point to molecular subtypes. RESULTS: We identified nine cases (four VV1, one out of three MV2K, three out of six MV2K+2C and one MV carrying a 96-base pair insertion) with abundant, partly bizarre and clustered HB in CA1 sector, not observed in other subtypes. The presence of HB was independent of hippocampal involvement by the disease itself. CONCLUSIONS: Clusters of abundant HB might be found in rare CJD subtypes such as VV1, MV2K/MV2K+2C and some genetic cases. In addition to histopathological and PrP immunohistochemical deposition patterns, their presence might be a useful additional morphologic feature that could point to the molecular subtype, especially when genetic and/or Western blot analyses are not available.

Clinical features and APOE genotype of pathologically proven early-onset Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVES: Early-onset Alzheimer disease (EOAD) diagnosis often represents a challenge because of the high frequency of atypical presentations. Our aim was to describe the clinical features, APOE genotype, and its pathologic correlations of neuropathologic confirmed EOAD. METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical data (age at onset, family history, clinical presentation, diagnostic delay, diagnosis) and APOE genotype of patients with neuropathologically confirmed EOAD (<60 years). RESULTS: Forty cases were selected. Mean age at onset was 54.5 years (range 46-60). The mean disease duration was 11 years with a mean diagnostic delay of 3.1 years. A total of 37.5% had a nonmemory presentation. Behavioral/executive dysfunction was the most prevalent atypical presentation. Incorrect initial clinical diagnoses were common (53%) in patients with atypical presentations, but rare when anterograde amnesia was the presenting symptom (4%). The incorrect initial clinical diagnoses were 2 behavioral variant frontotemporal lobar degeneration, 2 normal pressure hydrocephalus, 1 semantic dementia, 1 primary progressive aphasia, 1 corticobasal degeneration, 1 pseudodementia with depression, and 1 unclassifiable dementia. APOE genotype was ε3/ε3 in 59%, with no significant differences between typical and atypical presentations. APOE ε4 was 3.3 times more frequent in subjects with family history of AD. A total of 97.5% of the cases presented advanced neurofibrillary pathology. A total of 45% of the patients had concomitant Lewy body pathology although localized in most cases and without a significant clinical correlate. CONCLUSION: One third of patients with pathologic confirmed EOAD presented with atypical symptoms. Patients with EOAD with nonamnestic presentations often receive incorrect clinical diagnoses.

PICOGEN: experiencia de 5 años de un programa de asesoramiento genético en demencia / PICOGEN: Five years experience with a genetic counselling program for dementia

Introducción: Describimos la experiencia del Programa de Información y Consejo Genético para demencias familiares (PICOGEN) en sus 5 a˜nos de funcionamiento. Métodos: Todos los sujetos fueron asesorados por un neurólogo que seleccionó los candidatos a estudio genético según la historia familiar y el diagnóstico (enfermedad de Alzheimer [EA], degeneración lobular frontotemporal [DLFT] o enfermedad priónica). Los sujetos asintomáticos que decidieron conocer su estatus genético siguieron un protocolo estructurado de evaluación antes y después de la realización del test genético. Resultados: Ochenta y siete pacientes de 72 familias fueron candidatos a estudio genético, 20 de 72 familias presentaban historia familiar autosómica dominante de inicio precoz (HADp). En 22 se detectó una mutación patogénica (8 PSEN1, 1 PSEN2, 1 APP, 4 MAPT, 8 PRNP), 5 no descritas previamente. Todos los casos con mutación, excepto uno PSEN1 (12,5%) y 4 PRNP (50%) presentaban HADp. En 3 casos con HADp (15%) no se encontró ninguna mutación. 24 de 54 sujetos asintomáticos de familias con mutación conocida decidieron realizarse el estudio presintomático, 10 resultaron portadores. En el seguimiento de los sujetos que realizaron el estudio predictivo no se observó ninguna complicación psiquiátrica mayor. Conclusiones: En nuestra serie la HADp resultó un criterio sensible para la detección de mutaciones patogénicas en EA y DLFT, pero no en enfermedades priónicas. Un 15% de los casos HADp no presentaron alteraciones genéticas causales en estudios diagnósticos convencionales. El 43% de los sujetos en riesgo que recibieron asesoramiento genético individual realizaron el estudio presintomático. El estudio presintomático resultó seguro en este contexto (AU)

Introduction: We describe the 5 year experience of a genetic counselling program for familial dementias (the PICOGEN program). Methods: The neurologist selected the candidates for genetic testing in the screening visit based on family history and phenotype (Alzheimer disease-AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-FTLD, or prion disease). Asymptomatic subjects who decided to know their genetic status were evaluated within a structured protocol by the psychiatrist and psychologist prior to entering the program and followed up afterwards. Results: A total of 87 patients from 72 families were candidates for the genetic study, 20 of the 72 families had a family history of autosomal dominant early-onset dementia (ADEOD). A pathogenic mutation was found in 22 patients (8 PSEN1, 1 PSEN2, 1 APP, 4 MAPT, 8 PRNP), 5 of which had not been previously described. All positive cases, except for 1 PSEN1 (12.5%) and 4 PRNP (50%) showed ADEOD. In 3 ADEOD cases (15%) no pathogenic mutation was found. After individual genetic counselling, 24/54 asymptomatic subjects at risk decided to have the presymptomatic study, of whom 10 (42%) were carriers of the pathogenic mutation. In the follow up, no major psychiatric complication was observed. Conclusions: In our series, family history of ADEOD was a sensitive criterion for the detection of pathogenic mutations in AD and FTLD but not in prion diseases. No genetic anomalies were detected in 15% of the ADEOD cases using conventional diagnostic procedures, and 43% of presymptomatic subjects at risk who received individual genetic counselling decided to have the study. The pre-symptomatic diagnosis proved to be safe under these conditions (AU)

PICOGEN: five years experience with a genetic counselling program for dementia.

INTRODUCTION: We describe the 5 year experience of a genetic counselling program for familial dementias (the PICOGEN program). METHODS: The neurologist selected the candidates for genetic testing in the screening visit based on family history and phenotype (Alzheimer disease-AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration-FTLD, or prion disease). Asymptomatic subjects who decided to know their genetic status were evaluated within a structured protocol by the psychiatrist and psychologist prior to entering the program and followed up afterwards. RESULTS: A total of 87 patients from 72 families were candidates for the genetic study, 20 of the 72 families had a family history of autosomal dominant early-onset dementia (ADEOD). A pathogenic mutation was found in 22 patients (8 PSEN1, 1 PSEN2, 1 APP, 4 MAPT, 8 PRNP), 5 of which had not been previously described. All positive cases, except for 1 PSEN1 (12.5%) and 4 PRNP (50%) showed ADEOD. In 3 ADEOD cases (15%) no pathogenic mutation was found. After individual genetic counselling, 24/54 asymptomatic subjects at risk decided to have the pre-symptomatic study, of whom 10 (42%) were carriers of the pathogenic mutation. In the follow up, no major psychiatric complication was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, family history of ADEOD was a sensitive criterion for the detection of pathogenic mutations in AD and FTLD but not in prion diseases. No genetic anomalies were detected in 15% of the ADEOD cases using conventional diagnostic procedures, and 43% of pre-symptomatic subjects at risk who received individual genetic counselling decided to have the study. The pre-symptomatic diagnosis proved to be safe under these conditions.

[New mutation in the PSEN1 (E120G) gene associated with early onset Alzheimer's disease]. / Nueva mutación en el gen PSEN1 (E120G) asociada a enfermedad de Alzheimer de inicio precoz.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel mutation in exon 5 of the presenilin 1 gene (E120G)associated with early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (AD). PATIENT AND METHODS: The proband was a man who began with memory loss and progressive cognitive decline at the age of 34. His father and his sister suffered from early-onset cognitive decline. The genetic study performed on the blood sample using the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique did not detect any abnormality suggestive of the presence of a mutation in PSEN1, PSEN2, and APP. In the last stage of the disease the patient had seizures and gait alteration. He died at the age of 44. Coding exons 3-12 of PSEN1 were studied by direct sequencing using isolated DNA from frozen brain tissue of the proband. RESULTS: The neuropathological examination showed the presence of frequent amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles and severe amyloid angiopathy. The direct sequencing of the PSEN1 gene disclosed the presence of the E120G mutation. CONCLUSIONS: E120G is a novel mutation in PSEN1 that probably causes early-onset autosomal dominant AD. Absence of genetic alterations in screening techniques (SSCP) does not rule out the presence of mutations. We recommend direct sequencing for the genetic study of patients with early-onset autosomal dominant AD.

A novel PSEN1 mutation (K239N) associated with Alzheimer's disease with wide range age of onset and slow progression.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel mutation (K239N) in the PSEN1 associated with familial Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS AND RESULTS: The proband was a man who developed cognitive decline with marked behavioural abnormalities at age 57. At age 70, he was admitted into a psychiatric facility because of aggressiveness and a suicide attempt. Family history was consistent with autosomal dominant AD. One of the two other family members studied presented also with prominent behavioural symptoms at age 42 and has also been forced into a psychiatric facility because of aggressiveness at age 56. The remainder patient has presented a prototypical AD, but starting at age 71. Direct sequencing of PSEN1 in the three living affected members disclosed a heterozygous G to C transition in exon 7 of PSEN1 leading to the K239N mutation. CONCLUSION: The K239N mutation is associated with autosomal dominant AD with a wide range of age of onset and incomplete penetrance at the age of 65, prominent behavioural features and slow progression.

Nueva mutación en el gen PSEN1 (E120G) asociada a enfermedad de Alzheimer de inicio precoz / New mutation in the PSEN1 (E120G) gene associated with early onset Alzheimer's disease

Objetivo: Describir una nueva mutación en el exón 5 del gen PSEN1 (E120G) asociada a enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) de inicio precoz y patrón de herencia autosómico dominante. Paciente y métodos: El probando era un varón en el que se inició la enfermedad a los 34 años con problemas de memoria y deterioro cognitivo progresivo. Su padre y una hermana presentaron deterioro cognitivo de inicio precoz. El estudio genético por single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) de una muestra sanguínea del probando no detectó anormalidades que indicaran mutaciones en PSEN1, PSEN2 y APP. En los estadios finales de la enfermedad, el paciente presentó crisis epilépticas y alteración de la marcha. El paciente falleció a los 44 años. Los exones 3-12 del gen PSEN1 fueron analizados por secuenciación directa utilizando ADN aislado del tejido cerebral congelado del probando. Resultados: El examen neuropatológico reveló abundantes placas seniles y ovillos neurofibrilares, junto con una angiopatía amiloidea severa. El nuevo estudio genético del gen PSEN1 realizado mediante secuenciación directa detectó la mutación E120G. Conclusiones: E120G es una nueva mutación en PSEN1, probable causa de EA de inicio precoz con patrón autosómico dominante. La ausencia de mutaciones en estudios genéticos de cribado (SSCP) no descarta que haya mutaciones. Se recomienda el estudio genético mediante secuenciación directa en los casos de EA de inicio precoz y patrón de herencia autosómico dominante (AU)

Objective: To describe a novel mutation in exon 5 of the presenilin 1 gene (E120G)associated with early-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Patient and methods: The proband was a man who began with memory loss and progressive cognitive decline at the age of 34. His father and his sister suffered from early-onset cognitive decline. The genetic study performed on the blood sample using the single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) technique did not detect any abnormality suggestive of the presence of a mutation in PSEN1, PSEN2, and APP. In the last stage of the disease the patient had seizures and gait alteration. He died at the age of 44. Coding exons 3-12 of PSEN1 were studied by direct sequencing using isolated DNA from frozen brain tissue of the proband. Results: The neuropathological examination showed the presence of frequent amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles and severe amyloid angiopathy. The direct sequencing of the PSEN1 gene disclosed the presence of the E120G mutation. Conclusions: E120G is a novel mutation in PSEN1 that probably causes early-onset autosomal dominant AD. Absence of genetic alterations in screening techniques (SSCP) does not rule out the presence of mutations. We recommend direct sequencing for the genetic study of patients with early-onset autosomal dominant AD (AU)

The memory alteration test (M@T) discriminates between subjective memory complaints, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

This work aimed at establishing the memory alteration test (M@T), which is a memory screening test, capable for discriminating between subjects with subjective memory complaints (SMC) (without objective memory impairment) and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (A-MCI) and with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD). The discriminative validity was assessed in a sample of 37 subjects with SMC, 50 patients with A-MCI according to the Petersen-criteria, and 66 patients with mild AD (global deterioration scale: 4 stage) according to the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. M@T mean scores were significantly different among groups: 39.7 + or - 5.1 (+ or - S.D.) in the SMC group, 31.5 + or - 3.9 in the A-MCI group, and 21.8 + or - 4.9 in mild AD. A cut-off score of 37 points had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 70% to differentiate A-MCI from SMC (ABC = 0.88). A cut-off score of 33 points had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 86% to differentiate mild AD from SMC sample (AUC = 0.99). We conclude that the M@T provides efficient and valid discrimination between SMC subjects and A-MCI, and between SMC subjects and mild AD.

Validez discriminativa y asociación del test minimental (MMSE) y del test de alteración de memoria (T@M) con una batería neuropsicológica en pacientes con deterioro cognitivo leve amnésico y enfermedad de Alzheimer / Discriminatory validity and associationof the mini-mental test (MMSE) and the memory alteration test (M@T) with a neuropsychological battery in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impariment and alzeimer´s disease

Objetivos. Establecer la validez discriminativa del test minimental (MMSE) y del test de alteración de memoria (T@M) para el diagnóstico del deterioro cognitivo leve amnésico (DCLa) y la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA) probable, y estudiarla asociación entre los resultados obtenidos en pruebas de cribado, una batería neuropsicológica y un cuestionario funcional en personas sanas y en pacientes con DCLa y EA. Sujetos y métodos. Se evaluó a 27 controles normales, 27 pacientes con DCLa y 35 pacientes con EA con el MMSE y con un test de cribado de memoria, el T@M, una batería neuropsicológica y un cuestionario de actividades funcionales de la vida diaria. Los coeficientes de correlación de Pearson se utilizaron para evaluar las relaciones entre las puntuaciones del T@M y el MMSE y los test neuropsicológicos. Se calcularon las áreas bajo la curva, la sensibilidad y la especificidad para los test de cribado. Resultados. En los pacientes con DCLa, las puntuaciones en el T@M y el MMSE resultaron estar fuertemente asociadas con el rendimiento de test de memoria episódica de las pruebas frontales y con las puntuaciones del cuestionario funcional, pero no con pruebas que evaluaban praxias y funciones perceptivas. En los pacientes con EA, las puntuaciones en el T@M y el MMSE se asociaron con resultados en memoria semántica, lenguaje, funciones ejecutivas y praxias, pero no con pruebas perceptivas y cuestionarios funcionales. Conclusiones. En pacientes con DCLa y EA, la asociación entre el MMSE y el T@M solamente correlaciona con algunas funciones cognitivas, sin que exista asociación con otras funciones cognitivas. Por lo tanto, los test de cribado no pueden utilizarse como único instrumento para evaluar el estado cognitivo en pacientes con sospecha de demencia (AU)

Aims. To establish the discriminatory validity of the mini-mental test (MMSE) and the memory alteration test (M@T) for the diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and also to study the association between the results obtained in screening tests, a neuropsychological battery and a functional questionnaire in healthy persons and in patients with aMCI and AD. Subjects and methods.We evaluated 27 normal controls, 27 patients with aMCI and 35 patients with AD using the MMSE and a memory screening test, the M@T, a neuropsychological battery and a questionnaire on functional activities of daily living. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relations between the scores on the M@T and the MMSE and the neuropsychological tests. The area below the curve, the sensitivity and the specificity were calculated for the screening tests. Results. In patients with aMCI, the scores on the M@T and the MMSE were strongly associated with the performance in the episodic memory tests in frontal tests and with the scores on the functional questionnaire, but not with tests that evaluated praxias and perceptive functions. In patients with AD, the scores on the M@T and the MMSE were associated with results in semantic memory, language, executive functions and praxias, but not with perceptive tests and functional questionnaires. Conclusions. In patients with aMCI and AD, the association between MMSE and M@T only correlate with some cognitive functions, without there being any association with other cognitive functions. Therefore, screening tests cannot be used as the only instrument for evaluating the cognitive status in patients with suspected dementia (AU)

Naming is associated with left temporal pole metabolite levels in neurodegenerative diseases.

AIM: To investigate the relationship between performance in language tests and levels of brain metabolites in two selected left temporal lobe regions. METHODS: Ninety-five subjects were included: 26 controls, 30 amnestic mild cognitive impairment subjects, 27 Alzheimer's disease and 12 frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) patients. Language was assessed by a naming test: Boston Naming Test (BNT) and by a semantic verbal fluency test. Other cognitive functions: verbal and visual memory, visual perception, attention and executive function, and praxis were also assessed. Single voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy was obtained in the left temporal pole (L-TPOLE), and in the left posterior temporoparietal region (L-TPAR). RESULTS: BNT scores were significantly associated with N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratios (r = 0.45; p < 0.001) and choline/creatine ratios (r = 0.33; p < 0.005) in the L-TPOLE. No significant associations were found between BNT and metabolite levels in the L-TPAR. No significant associations were found between the semantic verbal fluency test and other cognitive tests and metabolite levels either in the L-TPOLE or in the L-TPAR. CONCLUSION: Naming performance is related to metabolite levels in the anterior L-TPOLE.