RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The EMCOVID project conducted a multi-centre cohort study to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in MS patients enrolled in the EMCOVID database. The DMTs were used to manage MS by reducing relapses, lesion accumulation, and disability progression. However, concerns arose regarding the susceptibility of pwMS to COVID-19 due to potential interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and the immune system, as well as the immunomodulatory effects of DMTs. METHODS: This prospective observational study utilized data from a Multiple Sclerosis and COVID-19 (EMCOVID-19) study. Demographic characteristics, MS history, laboratory data, SARS-CoV-2 serology, and symptoms of COVID-19 were extracted for pwMS receiving any type of DMT. The relationship between demographics, MS phenotype, DMTs, and COVID-19 was evaluated. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over a 6-month period was also assessed. RESULTS: The study included 709 pwMS, with 376 patients providing samples at the 6-month follow-up visit. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was higher among pwMS than the general population, with Interferon treatment being significantly associated with greater seroprevalence (16.9% vs. 8.4%; p 0.003). However, no other specific DMT showed a significant association with antibody presence. A total of 32 patients (8.5%) tested positive for IgG, IgM, or IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, but then tested negative at 6 months. Most of the pwMS in the cohort were asymptomatic for COVID-19 and, even among symptomatic cases, the prognosis was generally favourable. CONCLUSION: pwMS undergoing DMTs exhibited a higher seroprevalence of COVID-19 than the general population. Interferon treatment was associated with a higher seroprevalence, suggesting a more robust humoral response. This study provides valuable insights into the seroprevalence and persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pwMS and contributes to our understanding of the impact of COVID-19 amongst this population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) are subjected to immunomodulatory disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). As a result, immune responses to COVID-19 vaccinations could be compromised. There are few data on cellular immune responses to the use of COVID-19 vaccine boosters in pwMS under a broad spectrum of DMTs. METHODS: In this prospective study, we analysed cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA booster vaccinations in 159 pwMS with DMT, including: ocrelizumab, rituximab, fingolimod, alemtuzumab, dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, natalizumab and cladribine. RESULTS: DMTs, and particularly fingolimod, interact with cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccination. One booster dose does not increase cellular immunity any more than two doses, except in the cases of natalizumab and cladribine. SARS-CoV-2 infection combined with two doses of vaccine resulted in a greater cellular immune response, but this was not observed after supplementary booster jabs. Ocrelizumab-treated pwMS who had previously received fingolimod did not develop cellular immunity, even after receiving a booster. The time after MS diagnosis and disability status negatively correlated with cellular immunity in ocrelizumab-treated pwMS in a booster dose cohort. CONCLUSIONS: After two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, a high response yield was achieved, except in patients who had received fingolimod. The effects of fingolimod on cellular immunity persisted for more than 2 years after a change to ocrelizumab (which, in contrast, conserved cellular immunity). Our results confirmed the need to find alternative protective measures for fingolimod-treated people and to consider the possible failure to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2 when switching from fingolimod to ocrelizumab.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Natalizumab/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Prospectivos , Cladribina , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Inmunidad Celular , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores intracraneales se diagnostican con una frecuencia muy baja durante el embarazo. Entre los síntomas iniciales destacan: cefalea, náuseas y vómitos frecuentes que, a su vez, son característicos del embarazo, de ahí la necesidad de establecer un diagnóstico diferencial correcto. CASO CLÍNICO: Paciente primigesta, de 25 años, 11+4 semanas de embarazo, con un cuadro de vómitos, cefalea, vértigo e inestabilidad, de inicio subagudo en los últimos dos meses. Antecedentes de interés: cefalea de características tensionales en comparación con migraña crónica no estudiada previamente. Durante la exploración se advirtió enlentecimiento en el lenguaje, nistagmo evocado por la mirada de manera bilateral y dolor periocular izquierdo, junto con vómitos incoercibles que no cedían, pese a la dieta absoluta y administración pautada de metoclopramida y pantoprazol. La resonancia magnética nuclear cerebral con contraste mostró una masa tumoral centrada en el cuarto ventrículo. Con base en lo anterior se procedió a la craniectomía suboccipital con exéresis subtotal del tumor y diagnóstico anatomopatológico de ependimoma de fosa posterior grupo A. Se propuso, y la paciente aceptó, la interrupción del embarazo con el propósito de completar el tratamiento coadyuvante con radioterapia. La intervención quirúrgica le dejó importantes secuelas neurológicas que ameritaron un proceso de rehabilitación. CONCLUSIONES: El momento del diagnóstico es decisivo para indicar el tratamiento de las tumoraciones intracraneales, sobre todo si son de naturaleza maligna, puesto que habrá que establecer un equilibrio entre la salud de la madre y la viabilidad de la gestación. En tanto se trata de pacientes con una afección compleja, su atención médica debe ser multidisciplinaria para disminuir los riesgos para la madre y el feto.
Abstract BACKGROUND: Intracranial tumours are diagnosed very rarely during pregnancy. The initial symptoms include headache, nausea and frequent vomiting, which are characteristic of pregnancy, so a correct differential diagnosis is necessary. CLINICAL CASE: Primigravida patient, 25 years old, 11+4 weeks pregnant, with a history of vomiting, headache, dizziness and instability of subacute onset in the last two months. History of interest: tension-type headache compared with chronic migraine, not previously studied. On examination, slowed speech, bilateral gaze-evoked nystagmus and left periocular pain were noted, together with incoercive vomiting that did not resolve despite a strict diet and prescribed metoclopramide and pantoprazole. A contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain showed a tumour mass centred in the fourth ventricle. Based on the above, a suboccipital craniectomy was performed with subtotal excision of the tumour and anatomopathological diagnosis of group A posterior fossa ependymoma. The interruption of pregnancy was proposed and accepted by the patient to complete the adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy. The surgical intervention left her with significant neurological sequelae that merited rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The time of diagnosis is crucial in the management of intracranial tumours, especially if they are malignant, as a balance must be struck between the health of the mother and the viability of the pregnancy. As these are patients with a complex condition, their medical care must be multidisciplinary in order to reduce the risks to the mother and foetus.
RESUMEN
Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) alter the immune system and therefore increase the risk of infection. There is growing concern about the impact of COVID-19 on patients with MS (pwMS), especially those treated with DMTs. Methods: This is a single-center prospective observational study based on data from the Esclerosis Múltiple y COVID-19 (EMCOVID-19) study. Demographic characteristics, MS history, laboratory data and SARS-CoV-2 serology, and symptoms of COVID-19 in pwMS treated with any DTM were extracted. The relationship among demographics, MS status, DMT, and COVID-19 was evaluated. Results: A total of 259 pwMS were included. The administration of interferon was significantly associated with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (26.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.006). Although patients taking interferon were significantly older (49.1 vs. 43.5, p = 0.003), the association of interferon with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was still significant in the multivariate analysis (OR 2.99 (1.38; 6.36), p = 0.006). Conclusions: According to our data, pwMS present a higher risk of COVID-19 infection compared with results obtained from the general population. There is no evidence of a worse COVID-19 outcome in pwMS. DMTs did not significantly change the frequency of COVID-19, except for interferon; however, these findings must be interpreted with caution given the small sample of pwMS taking each DMT.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Serious complications after ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia can be devastating for the patient. The pathogenesis of postoperative neurological complications (PONC) is multifactorial and includes mechanical, vascular and chemical factors besides the nerve puncture itself. The primary aim of this study was to assess the incidence of PONC after brachial plexus block (BPB). METHODS: This is an observational retrospective single-centre study conducted at the regional anaesthesia unit of a teaching hospital. All BPBs performed from January 2011 to November 2019 were included. The outcomes analysed were the incidence, aetiology and diagnosis of PONCs and the incidence of other postoperative complications such as local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), pneumothorax, wrong-side block, etc. The performance of trainees and experienced anaesthesiologists was compared across all the outcomes. RESULTS: From a total of 5340 BPBs included, 15 cases developed PONC, yielding a rate of 2.81:1000 (95% CI 1.70-4.63). Thirteen patients underwent neurophysiological exams which confirmed nine neuropathies. The rate of PONCs for supervised trainees was 1.80:1000 (95% CI 0.701-4.62), not statistically different from that of experienced anaesthesiologists (p = 0.241). Three cases were considered to present with a PONC probably related to BPB [0.562:1,00 (95% CI 0.191-1.65)]. The incidence of long-term PONCs was 1.12:1000 (95% CI 0.515-2.45). Such complications proved irreversible in 2 cases. The incidences of LAST, pneumothorax and other complications observed were 0.749:1000 (95% CI 0.291-1.92), 0.187:1000 (95% CI 0.0331-1.06) and 4.31:1000 (95% CI 2.87-6.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This survey suggests that complications after ultrasound-guided BPB, including blocks performed by trainees, are uncommon. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04451642.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial , Plexo Braquial , Anestésicos Locales , Plexo Braquial/diagnóstico por imagen , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
Sensory neuronopathies are heterogeneous disorders of dorsal root ganglia. The clinical and laboratory features in a single-centre series, including response to treatment and outcome have been described. They retrospectively included 54 patients meeting Camdessanché et al (2009) criteria for sensory neuronopathy. The patients were classified according to their likely aetiology and analysed their demographic, clinical, neurophysiological, histological and spinal MRI features. The outcome with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was evaluated, and the response to treatment was assessed. About 54 patients were included (18 male; median age 54.5 years). The most common initial symptoms were hypoaesthesia, paraesthesia, ataxia and pain. Half of patients had a slow onset, greater than 12 months before seeing a neurologist. The aetiology as possibly inflammatory (meaning nonspecific laboratory evidence of immune abnormality) in 18 patients (33%), paraneoplastic 8 (15%), autoimmune 7 (13%) and idiopathic 6 (11%) was classified. About 31 patients received immune therapy of which 11 (35%) improved or stabilised. Corticosteroids were the most used treatment (24 patients) and cyclophosphamide had the highest response rate (3/6, 50%). At the final follow up (median 24 months) 67% had mRS ≥3 and 46% mRS ≥4, including 15% who died. Worse outcome was associated with generalised areflexia and pseudoathetosis by logistic regression, and with motor involvement and raised CSF protein by univariate analysis. Sensory neuronopathies caused severe disability, especially in patients with generalised areflexia and pseudoathetosis. Of those without an obvious cause, most had some evidence of dysimmunity. Some patients had a positive response to immunotherapy, but rarely enough to improve disability much.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/farmacología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ganglios Espinales , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Trastornos de la Sensación , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ganglios Espinales/patología , Ganglios Espinales/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos de la Sensación/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Sensación/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de la Sensación/etiología , Trastornos de la Sensación/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) typically present with respiratory symptoms, but little is known about the disease's potential neurological complications.We report a case of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, in association with leptomeningeal enhancement. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old woman presented with recent unsteadiness and paraesthesia in both hands. Fifteen days earlier, she complained of fever, dry cough and shortness of breath. Her chest X-ray showed a lobar consolidation and PCR was positive for SARS-CoV-2; she was admitted due to mild COVID-19 pneumonia.In the first 48 hours of hospitalisation, she started to experience lumbar pain and weakness of the proximal lower extremities, progressing to bilateral facial nerve palsy, oropharyngeal weakness and severe proximal tetraparesis with cervical flexion 2/5 on the MRC scale. Full spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a brainstem and cervical leptomeningeal enhancement. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed albumin-cytological dissociation. Microbiological studies on CSF, including SARS-CoV-2, were negative. Nerve conduction studies were consistent with demyelinating neuropathy. She was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin, with significant neurological improvement noted over the next 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Leptomeningeal enhancement is an atypical feature in GBS, but could be a marker of its association with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/virología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Vértebra Cervical Axis , Tronco Encefálico/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19 , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conducción Nerviosa , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Trombosis Intracraneal/complicaciones , Trombosis Intracraneal/terapia , Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Inmunidad Humoral/efectos de los fármacos , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Trombofilia/complicaciones , Angiografía Cerebral/métodosRESUMEN
Introducción. La gran vulnerabilidad a la isquemia de la región estriatocapsular hace que la trombectomía mecánica tenga sus limitaciones en las oclusiones de vaso de gran calibre a la hora de evitar que la región estriatocapsular se infarte. Objetivos. Analizar el efecto del tratamiento endovascular en la incidencia de infarto estriatocapsular aislado (IECa) y describir sus características clínicas. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo en el que se analiza la incidencia de IECa tras el tratamiento de reperfusión cerebral. Se describen las características basales y clínicas de los pacientes identificados con IECa y se compara la incidencia del IECa entre dos grupos según la disponibilidad de trombectomía mecánica: uno (grupo pretrombectomía) que recibió fibrinólisis intravenosa como único tratamiento de reperfusión cerebral disponible en ese momento, y otro (grupo postrombectomía) que recibió trombectomía mecánica con o sin fibrinólisis intravenosa. Resultados. Del total de 390 pacientes reperfundidos, un 8,2% tuvo un IECa. De 135 pacientes tratados con fibrinólisis intravenosa, un 4,4% (n = 6) desarrolló un IECa (grupo pretrombectomía), y de 255 pacientes tratados en el grupo postrombectomía, se visualizó IECa en un 10,2%. El análisis estadístico de la incidencia de IECa entre ambos grupos mostró diferencias significativas (p = 0,034). La clínica sensomotora fue la más frecuente entre los pacientes con IECa (63,33%), con una frecuencia de síntomas corticales de un 55,17%. Conclusiones. Según los datos, hemos presenciado un aumento en la incidencia de IECa en nuestro medio tras la instauración de la trombectomía mecánica
Introduction. The great vulnerability of the striatocapsular region to ischaemia means that mechanical thrombectomy has its limitations in occlusions of large-calibre vessels when it comes to preventing the striatocapsular region from undergoing infarction. Aims. To analyse the effect of endovascular treatment on the incidence of isolated striatocapsular infarction (iSCI) and to describe its clinical characteristics. Patients and methods. We conducted a retrospective study to analyse the incidence of iSCI following treatment of cerebral reperfusion. The baseline and clinical characteristics of the patients identified with iSCI and the incidence of iSCI is compared between two groups according to the availability of mechanical thrombectomy: one (pre-thrombectomy group) that received intravenous fibrinolysis as the only treatment for cerebral reperfusion available in that moment; and another (post-thrombectomy group) that received a mechanical thrombectomy with or without intravenous fibrinolysis. Results. Of the 390 patients who received reperfusion, 8.2% had iSCI. Of the 135 patients treated with intravenous fibrinolysis, 4.4% (n = 6) developed iSCI (pre-thrombectomy group), and of the 255 patients treated in the post-thrombectomy group, iSCI was observed in 10.2%. The statistical analysis of the incidence of iSCI between the two groups showed significant differences (p = 0.034). A sensory-motor clinical picture was the most frequent among the patients with iSCI (63.33%), with a frequency of cortical symptoms of 55.17%. Conclusions. According to the data, there has been an increase in the incidence of iSCI in our setting following the establishment of mechanical thrombectomy