Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Infection ; 52(2): 535-543, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060067

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The oral cavity and, in particular, potential oral foci might pose a risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this cohort study was to determine whether practical preoperative dental screening would reduce the prevalence of early PJI in the first month after surgery. METHODS: Patients attending a specialized endoprosthesis implantation clinic between 2018 and 2022 were recruited. Two groups were examined. The test group consisted of patients attending the clinic between 2020 and 2022 and who were referred to their family dentist using a standardized form. The comparison group consisted of patients who were treated in the clinic between 2018 and 2020. They were not referred to their family dentist. The two groups were compared for the prevalence of PJI. Univariate analysis followed by multiple logistic regression was performed to confirm risk factors for PJI in this cohort. RESULTS: 2560 individuals (test group: 1227, comparison group: 1333) were included. The prevalence of PJI was significantly lower in the test group (0.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.04). Multiple logistic regression with PJI as the dependent variable showed that a dental referral was a strong predictor of a lower prevalence of PJI (OR: 0.43, CI95 0.205-0.917, p = 0.03). Male gender was also strongly associated with a higher frequency of PJI (OR: 2.68, CI95 1.32-5.42, p = 0.01). Age (OR: 1.06, CI95 1.01-1.10, p = 0.01) and BMI (OR: 1.11, CI95 1.05-1.17, p < 0.01) had little effect on the risk of PJI. CONCLUSION: Dental referral using a standardized form can reduce the prevalence of early PJI. Accordingly, orthopedists and dentists should collaborate in this practical way.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulación de la Rodilla , Factores de Riesgo , Artritis Infecciosa/complicaciones , Prótesis e Implantes , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos
2.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 51(10): 644-648, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813773

RESUMEN

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of alveolar cleft osteoplasty using single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis versus a prolonged antibiotic regimen. The primary endpoints assessed were the incidence of infection, failure of surgical correction, and antibiotic-related side effects. Patients with orofacial clefts affecting the alveolar ridge who underwent alveolar cleft osteoplasty at a tertiary care center between 2015 and 2021 were included. The prolonged antibiotic group received extended antibiotic treatment, while the single-shot group received preoperative antibiotics only. Among 83 patients (mean age 12.8 years), 51 interventions were performed under prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis (mean duration 5.82 days) whereas in 40 interventions only single-shot prophylaxis was administered. There were no significant differences in infection frequency, surgical correction failure, implant loss, or adverse events between the groups. However, after single-shot antibiotic regimen, patients had significantly shorter hospital stays, being discharged on average one day earlier. The study suggests that single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis does not have drawbacks compared to prolonged antibiotic treatment in alveolar cleft osteoplasty. Considering increasing antibiotic resistance and potential side effects, omitting prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for patients undergoing alveolar cleft osteoplasty.


Asunto(s)
Injerto de Hueso Alveolar , Labio Leporino , Fisura del Paladar , Humanos , Niño , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Labio Leporino/cirugía , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Trasplante Óseo
3.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg ; 22(2): 410-418, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37122781

RESUMEN

Introduction: Congenital mandibular hypoplasia (CMH) remains challenging because of the underlying combined hard and soft tissue deficiency. Treatment options include craniofacial distraction, orthognathic surgery, and autologous grafts, although the latter produces inadequate results after distraction and autologous grafting. Unsatisfactory long-term stability may cause relapse, necessitating reoperation. Material and Methods: We investigated the feasibility of using alloplastic total joint replacement (TJR) in growing and young adult CMH patients. The primary outcome was long-term reconstruction stability, without implant failure. Secondary outcomes were TMJ function and pain, and jaw movements achieved during surgery. Results: Three patients (age: 9-22 years) were treated by the same surgeon at one institution during 2018-2021. Anamnesis and clinical parameters were obtained from patient records. Preoperative 3D-scans were superimposed with postoperative 3D-scans and preoperative plans, including TJR-implant STL files, to measure jaw movement. All patients underwent prior reconstructive surgery. Mandibular movement of 16.4-20.1 mm in the sagittal direction was achieved. Post-TJR follow-up ranged from 24 to 42 months. No long-term complications occurred. At the latest follow-up, the maximal interincisal opening was between 21 and 40 mm, and all implants were functioning, without failure. Conclusion: In selected CMH cases, alloplastic TJR can deliver satisfactory medium-term results with predictable and stable outcomes, even in growing patients.

4.
J Clin Med ; 11(10)2022 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35628994

RESUMEN

Open treatment of condylar head fractures (CHF) is considered controversial. In this retrospective cohort study our primary objective was therefore to assess bone resorption and remodeling as well as patients function after open treatment of CHF in a medium-term follow-up (15.1 ± 2.2 months). We included 18 patients with 25 CHF who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, between 2016 and 2021, in our analysis. The clinical data and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) datasets were analyzed. The condylar processes were segmented in the postoperative (T1) and follow-up (T2) CBCT scans. Volumetric and linear bone changes were the primary outcome variables, measured by using a sophisticated 3D-algorithm. The mean condylar head volume decreased non-significantly from 3022.01 ± 825.77 mm3 (T1) to 2878.8 ± 735.60 mm3 (T2; p = 0.52). Morphological alterations indicated remodeling and resorption. The pre-operative maximal interincisal opening (MIO) was 19.75 ± 3.07 mm and significantly improved to 40.47 ± 1.7 mm during follow-up (p = 0.0005). Low rates of postoperative complications were observed. Open reduction of CHF leads to good clinical outcomes and low rates of medium-term complications. This study underlines the feasibility and importance of open treatment of CHF and may help to spread its acceptance as the preferred treatment option.

5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(3): e305-e308, 2021 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941222

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic affects basic health care in maxillofacial surgery (MFS) due to the shift in resources and the change in patient disorders treated during the pandemic. This paper aims to elucidate the medical and financial consequences driven by the measures for COVID-19 treatment in a tertiary care centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To evaluate the impact of pandemic measures on daily routines of MFS, the surgical schedule during the first 2 weeks after the onset of the curfew (March 2020), and to compare it with the schedule of the same period of time 1 year earlier. Furthermore, postponed surgeries as well as cancelled follow-ups are listed. The loss of earning was calculated as well as the number and kind of postponed procedures. RESULTS: The number of surgeries decreased by 45% (n = 163 in 2019 vs n = 89 in 2020), and the duration of the surgeries decreased from 94.2 minutes to 62.1 minutes. No elective surgeries, such as implantology, aesthetic surgery, or orthognathic surgery, took place. Furthermore, also trauma cases decreased from 9 to 3 cases. Considering all variables, the financial loss can be calculated as approximately 100,256.50 Euros per week. CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 on MFS is certainly of medical and economic importance and is related to the duration of the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Cirugía Bucal , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 26(5): 1471-6, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26163838

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) position after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible by the help of pre- and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A collective of n = 78 patients was investigated between 2009 and 2011 before and after BSSO of the mandible in mono- or bimaxillary orthognathic surgery procedures. No intraoperative fixation of the condyles was administered. CBCT scans were performed in all patients before and immediately after surgery with the KaVo 3DeXam device in the position of terminal occlusion. Subsequently, all scans were analyzed by help of the eXam Vision program and the ImageJ image processing software. Alterations of the TMJs were quantified by determining pre- to postoperative differences of the intercondylar distance, the mandibular angle on both sides, and the condylar angles in the transversal plane. RESULTS: The difference between pre- and postoperatively ascertained values was minimal (means: lateral condylar distance -0.17  mm; distance of condylar centers -0.32  mm; medial condylar distance -0.49  mm; left mandibular angle +1.06°; right mandibular angle +2.06°; condylar angles in relation to a reference line: left -2.93, right -0.75; angle of cutting +3.42). There is no apparent tendency toward a positional change in any of the 3 examined planes. Between bi- and monomaxillarily operated patients there was no difference either, except for the osteotomy plane. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-dimensional analysis of CBCT data of the TMJ seems to be appropriate to determine the condylar position pre- and postoperatively. Performed by an experienced orthognathic surgeon, BSSO of the mandible does not effectuate any relevant changes of the TMJ-position, thus making an intraoperative condyle-fixation unnecessary.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Cóndilo Mandibular/cirugía , Cirugía Ortognática/métodos , Osteotomía/métodos , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Articulación Temporomandibular/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Oclusión Dental , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...