Co-expression of TNF receptors 1 and 2 on melanomas facilitates soluble TNF-induced resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of MAPK pathway inhibitors (MAPKi) used to treat patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma is limited by a range of resistance mechanisms, including soluble TNF (solTNF)-mediated NF-kB signaling. solTNF preferentially signals through type-1 TNF receptor (TNFR1), however, it can also bind to TNFR2, a receptor that is primarily expressed on leukocytes. Here, we investigate the TNFR2 expression pattern on human BRAFV600E+ melanomas and its role in solTNF-driven resistance reprogramming to MAPKi. METHODS: Flow cytometry was used to test TNFR1, TNFR2 and CD271 expression on, as well as NF-kB phosphorylation in human BRAF-mutant melanoma. The ability of melanoma cell lines to acquire MAPKi resistance in response to recombinant or macrophage-derived TNF was evaluated using the MTT cytotoxicity assay. Gene editing was implemented to knock out or knock in TNF receptors in melanoma cell lines. Knockout and knock-in cell line variants were employed to assess the intrinsic roles of these receptors in TNF-induced resistance to MAPKi. Multicolor immunofluorescence microscopy was utilized to test TNFR2 expression by melanoma in patients receiving MAPKi therapy. RESULTS: TNFR1 and TNFR2 are co-expressed at various levels on 4/7 BRAFV600E+ melanoma cell lines evaluated in this study. In vitro treatments with solTNF induce MAPKi resistance solely in TNFR2-expressing BRAFV600E+ melanoma cell lines. TNFR1 and TNFR2 knockout and knock-in studies indicate that solTNF-mediated MAPKi resistance in BRAFV600E+ melanomas is predicated on TNFR1 and TNFR2 co-expression, where TNFR1 is the central mediator of NF-kB signaling, while TNFR2 plays an auxiliary role. solTNF-mediated effects are transient and can be abrogated with biologics. Evaluation of patient specimens indicates that TNFR2 is expressed on 50% of primary BRAFV600E+ melanoma cells and that MAPKi therapy may lead to the enrichment of TNFR2-expressing tumor cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that TNFR2 is essential to solTNF-induced MAPKi resistance and a possible biomarker to identify melanoma patients that can benefit from solTNF-targeting therapies.

Poorer survival outcomes in patients with multiple versus single primary melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Given equivocal results related to overall survival (OS) for patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) compared with those with single primary melanomas (SPMs) in previous reports, the authors sought to determine whether OS differs between these 2 cohorts in their center using their UPCI-96-99 database. Secondary aims were to assess the differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS). In a subset of patients, transcriptomic profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was performed to assess disease-associated genes of interest. METHODS: This retrospective case-controlled study included patients with MPMs and age-, sex-, and stage-matched controls with SPMs at a 1:1 ratio. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of MPMs on death and recurrence. NanoString PanCancer Immune Profiling was used to assess peripheral blood immune status in patients. RESULTS: In total, 320 patients were evaluated. The mean patient age was 47 years; 43.8% were male. Patients with MPMs had worse RFS and OS (P = .023 and P = .0019, respectively). The presence of MPMs was associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 4.52, P = .0006), and increased risk of disease recurrence (HR, 2.17; P = .004) after adjusting for age, sex, and stage. The degree of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was different between the first melanoma of MPMs and SPMs. Expression of CXCL6 and FOXJ1 was increased in PBMCs isolated from patients with MPMs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MPMs had worse RFS and OS compared with patients with SPMs. Immunologic differences were also observed, including TIL content and expression of CXCL6/FOXJ1 in PBMCs of patients with MPMs, which warrant further investigation.

Indoor tanning exposure in association with multiple primary melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk for subsequent new primary melanomas. Indoor tanning is a recognized risk factor for melanoma. This study was aimed at determining the association between indoor tanning and the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study of cases with multiple primary melanoma and sex-matched controls with single primary melanoma retrieved at a 1:2 ratio from the Biological Sample and Nevus Bank of the Melanoma Center of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between multiple primary melanoma and risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 330 patients (39.1% men) with a median age of 51 years were enrolled. Compared with patients who had a single primary melanoma, patients with multiple melanomas were younger at the diagnosis of their first primary melanoma and were more likely to be discovered at stage 0 or I and to have had indoor tanning exposure, a family history of melanoma, atypical moles, dysplastic nevi, and a Breslow thickness less than 1 mm. Compared with patients' first melanomas, subsequent melanomas were more likely to be thinner or in situ. The estimated probability of the locus for the second primary being the same as that for the first primary melanoma was 34%. In a multivariate analysis after adjustments for age, a family history of melanoma, the presence of atypical and dysplastic nevi, and recreational sun exposure, indoor tanning remained significantly associated with the occurrence of multiple primary melanoma (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-7.08; P = .0356). CONCLUSIONS: Indoor tanning is associated with an increased risk of second primary melanoma. Subsequent melanomas are more likely to be thin or in situ and to occur in different anatomic locations.

CD56dim CD16- Natural Killer Cell Profiling in Melanoma Patients Receiving a Cancer Vaccine and Interferon-α.

Natural killer (NK) cells are innate cytotoxic and immunoregulatory lymphocytes that have a central role in anti-tumor immunity and play a critical role in mediating cellular immunity in advanced cancer immunotherapies, such as dendritic cell (DC) vaccines. Our group recently tested a novel recombinant adenovirus-transduced autologous DC-based vaccine that simultaneously induces T cell responses against three melanoma-associated antigens for advanced melanoma patients. Here, we examine the impact of this vaccine as well as the subsequent systemic delivery of high-dose interferon-α2b (HDI) on the circulatory NK cell profile in melanoma patients. At baseline, patient NK cells, particularly those isolated from high-risk patients with no measurable disease, showed altered distribution of CD56dim CD16+ and CD56dim CD16- NK cell subsets, as well as elevated serum levels of immune suppressive MICA, TN5E/CD73 and tactile/CD96, and perforin. Surprisingly, patient NK cells displayed a higher level of activation than those from healthy donors as measured by elevated CD69, NKp44 and CCR7 levels, and enhanced K562 killing. Elevated cytolytic ability strongly correlated with increased representation of CD56dim CD16+ NK cells and amplified CD69 expression on CD56dim CD16+ NK cells. While intradermal DC immunizations did not significantly impact circulatory NK cell activation and distribution profiles, subsequent HDI injections enhanced CD56bright CD16- NK cell numbers when compared to patients that did not receive HDI. Phenotypic analysis of tumor-infiltrating NK cells showed that CD56dim CD16- NK cells are the dominant subset in melanoma tumors. NanoString transcriptomic analysis of melanomas resected at baseline indicated that there was a trend of increased CD56dim NK cell gene signature expression in patients with better clinical response. These data indicate that melanoma patient blood NK cells display elevated activation levels, that intra-dermal DC immunizations did not effectively promote systemic NK cell responses, that systemic HDI administration can modulate NK cell subset distributions and suggest that CD56dim CD16- NK cells are a unique non-cytolytic subset in melanoma patients that may associate with better patient outcome.

Serologic evidence of autoimmunity in E2696 and E1694 patients with high-risk melanoma treated with adjuvant interferon alfa.

We evaluated Eastern Cooperative Group phase II and III trials E2696 and E1694 to assess the incidence and prognostic significance of autoimmunity induced by adjuvant high-dose interferon-α2b (HDI). In E2696, patients with resectable high-risk melanoma were randomized to receive vaccination with GM2-KLH/QS-1 (GMK) plus concurrent HDI, GMK plus sequential HDI, or GMK alone. E1694 randomized patients to either HDI or GMK. Sera from 103 patients in E2696 and 691 patients in E1694 banked at baseline and up to three subsequent time points were tested by ELISA for the development of five autoantibodies. In E2696, autoantibodies were induced in 16 patients (23.2%; n=69) receiving HDI and GMK and two patients (5.9%; n=34) receiving GMK alone (P=0.031). Of 691 patients in E1694, 67 (19.1%) who received HDI (n=350) developed autoantibodies, but only 16 patients (4.7%) developed autoantibodies in the vaccine group (n=341; P<0.001). Almost all induced autoantibodies were detected at ≥12 weeks after the initiation of therapy. A 1-year landmark analysis among resected stage III patients treated with HDI in E1694 showed a trend toward a survival advantage associated with HDI-induced autoimmunity (hazard ratio=0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-1.98; P=0.33). Therefore, adjuvant HDI therapy is associated with the induction of autoimmunity that should be further investigated prospectively as a surrogate marker of adjuvant therapeutic benefit. This potential biomarker develops over the course of up to 1 year, and cannot be used to alter the course of therapy. Studies of the genetic determinants of this response may better discriminate patients more likely to benefit from HDI immunomodulatory therapy.

Pitfalls in retrospective analyses of biomarkers: a case study with metastatic melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Reliable prognostic biomarkers of survival and response to treatment are clearly important in oncology, and many studies have been carried out with the objective of identifying new prognostic biomarkers. Retrospective analysis of blood banked from patients is a frequently used paradigm for these studies. We describe a new study of the association of serum biomarker level with overall survival in melanoma patients, and the problems encountered in carrying it out. METHODS: Blood samples from 56 patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma were drawn prior to initiation of any treatment for their disease. Sera from the samples were stored for up to 94 months at -80°C, and were subsequently thawed at the same time and tested by multiplex Luminex assay for 30 analytes (cytokines, chemokines and growth factors). Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between these analytes and time-to-death. RESULTS: Of the 30 analytes, 17 were associated with survival, most strongly so, and in all cases, a higher analyte level was associated with increased survival. In addition, the correlations of the levels of all possible pairs of analytes were all positive and in almost all cases highly significant. However, these results are artifacts that arise from the combination of two peculiarities of the data: the apparent decrease in analyte level with storage time, and the uniformly shorter storage times of the samples from censored patients than the storage times of the samples from patients who died. CONCLUSIONS: All retrospective studies can have hidden biases, and thus investigators should not claim new findings before examining the data in detail with the goal of determining whether the findings could be spurious. There were several suspicious findings in our initial analyses: too many analytes found significant, too many very small p-values, a uniformly positive association of analyte level with survival, and a uniformly positive correlation between analyte levels. We were convinced that these findings must be artifacts, and further analyses showed that the findings could be explained by an apparent decrease of analyte level storage time.

Pharmacodynamic (phase 0) study using etaracizumab in advanced melanoma.

AlphaVbeta3 (alphavbeta3) is an important molecule for tumor-induced angiogenesis and is upregulated in metastatic melanoma (MM). We proposed to study the mechanism of action of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting alphavbeta3, in MM. Patients with MM and biopsiable tumor were treated with etaracizumab in 3 dose cohorts starting from 8 mg/kg. Tumor saturation by etaracizumab using LM609 immunohistochemical staining of tumor sections was the primary endpoint. Subsequent dose cohorts were defined based on the tumor saturation by etaracizumab. Secondary end points were analysis of clinical benefit and changes from baseline of several tumor and peripheral blood biomarkers. Eighteen patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels. Etaracizumab showed better melanoma cell saturation at the 8mg/kg and 1 mg/kg dose compared with the 4 mg/kg dose and better vascular endothelial cell saturation at 8 mg/kg compared with lower dose groups. Etaracizumab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The optimal biologic dose out of those selected for investigation was 8 mg/kg. Patients treated at the highest dose may have had better clinical benefit secondary to suppression of the activated immediate downstream effector of alphavbeta3 signaling, FAK, in melanoma cells, but this alone did not ultimately affect melanoma cell proliferation or apoptosis. No apparent antiangiogenic or immunomodulatory effects of etaracizumab were noted.