Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: An Initial Report.

OBJECTIVES: The extent and timing of surgery in severely injured patients remains an unsolved problem in orthopaedic trauma. Different laboratory values or scores have been used to try to predict mortality and estimate physiological reserve. The Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality (PTIM) has been validated as an electronic medical record-integrated algorithm to help with operative timing in trauma patients. The aim of this study was to report our initial experience with PTIM and how it relates to other scores. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of level 1 and level 2 trauma patients admitted to our institution between December 2020 and November 2022 was conducted. Patients scored with PTIM with orthopaedic injuries were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18 years. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy-four patients (246 female patients) with a median age of 40.5 (18-101) were included. Mortality was 3.1%. Patients in the PTIM high-risk category (≥0.5) had a 20% mortality rate. The median PTIM was 0.075 (0-0.89) and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 9.0 (1-59). PTIM (P < 0.001) and ISS (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in surviving patients. PTIM was mentioned in 7.6% of cases, and in 1.7% of cases, providers indicated an action in response to the PTIM. PTIM and ISS were significantly higher in patients with documented PTIM. CONCLUSION: PTIM is better at predicting mortality compared with ISS. Our low rate of PTIM documentation in provider notes highlights the challenges of implementing a new algorithm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Risk Factors and Characteristics of Recalcitrant Osteomyelitis After Initial Surgical and Antibiotic Treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the injury, patient, and microbiological characteristics that place patients at risk for recalcitrant fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis despite appropriate initial treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Three level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients undergoing surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis from 2003 to 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were categorized as having undergone serial bone debridement if they had 2 separate procedures a minimum of 6 weeks apart with a full course of appropriate antibiotics in between. Patient records were reviewed for age, injury location, body mass index, smoking status, comorbidities, and culture results including the presence of multidrug-resistant organisms and culture-negative osteomyelitis. RESULTS: A total of 257 patients were identified; 49% (n = 125) had a successful single course of treatment, and 51% (n = 132) required repeat debridement for recalcitrant osteomyelitis. At the index treatment for osteomyelitis, the most common organisms in both groups were methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). There was no significant difference in incidence of polymicrobial infection between the 2 groups (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.49). The most common organisms cultured at the time of repeat saucerization remained MRSA and MSSA; however, the same organism was cultured from both the index and repeat procedures in only 28% (n = 37) of cases. Diabetic patients, intravenous drug use status, delay to diagnosis, and open fractures of the lower leg are independent risk factors for failure of initial treatment of posttraumatic osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: Successful eradication of fracture-related infection and posttraumatic osteomyelitis is difficult and fails 51% of the time despite standard surgical and antimicrobial therapy. Although MRSA and MSSA remain the most common organisms cultured, patients who fail initial treatment for osteomyelitis often do not culture the same organisms as those obtained at the index procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A systematic review of ankle fracture treatment modalities in diabetic patients.

AIM: This systematic review evaluated the surgical outcomes of various ankle fracture treatment modalities in patients with Diabetes Mellitus as well as the methodological quality of the studies. METHODS: For our review, four online databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). The overall methodological quality of the studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. Data regarding diabetic ankle fractures were pooled into three outcomes groups for comparison: (1) the standard fixation cohort with management of diabetic ankle fractures using ORIF with small or mini fragment internal fixation techniques following AO principles, (2) the minimally invasive cohort with diabetic ankle fracture management utilizing percutaneous cannulated screws or intramedullary fixation, and (3) the combined construct cohort treated with a combination of ORIF and another construct (transarticular or external fixation). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 2228 potential studies from the four databases and 11 were included in the final review. Compared to the standard fixation cohort, the minimally invasive cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration and the combined constructs cohort had increased risk of hardware breakage or migration, surgical site infection and nonunion. Limb salvage rates were similar for the standard fixation and minimally invasive cohorts; however, the combined constructs cohort had a significantly lower limb salvage rate compared to that of the standard fixation cohort. The mean Coleman Methodology Score indicated the quality of the studies in the review was poor and consistent with its limitations. DISCUSSION: The overall quality of published studies on operative treatment of diabetic ankle fractures is low. Treating diabetic ankle fractures operatively results in a high number of complications regardless of fixation method. However, limb salvage rates remain high overall at 97.9% at a mean follow-up of 21.7 months. To achieve improved limb salvage rates and decrease complications, it is critical is to follow basic AO principles, respect the soft tissue envelope or utilize minimally invasive techniques, and be wary that certain combined constructs may be associated with higher complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Does Size Matter for Cephalomedullary Nails in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the need for reoperation of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with 10-mm cephalomedullary nails versus those treated with nails larger than 10 mm. DESIGN: Retrospective review at a single institution. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All patients age 60 and over treated with cephalomedullary fixation for an intertrochanteric femur fracture at a single institution. INTERVENTION: Cephalomedullary fixation with variable nail diameters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Reoperation rates of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures treated with a size 10-mm diameter cephalomedullary nail compared with patients treated with nails larger than 10 mm. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in reoperation rates when the 10-mm cohort was compared with an aggregate cohort of all nails larger than 10 mm (P = 0.99). This result was true for both all-cause reoperation and noninfectious reoperation. There was no difference between cohorts in regards to age, gender, or fracture pattern. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-mm cephalomedullary nail can be used in lieu of a larger diameter fixation in patients age 60 and older with intertrochanteric femur fractures while still maintaining a comparable rate of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trauma in the Diabetic Limb.

Poorly controlled diabetes with comorbid manifestations negatively affects outcomes in lower extremity trauma, increasing the risk of short-term and long-term complications. Management strategies of patients with diabetes that experience lower extremity trauma should also include perioperative management of hyperglycemia to reduce adverse and serious adverse events.