When is transanal endoscopic surgery appropriate?

Rectal cancer is a complex medical diagnosis which requires critical decision-making on the part of physician and patient. Organ preservation with local excision for early stage rectal cancer, if done under the correct circumstances, allows for oncologically sound surgery with good patient outcomes. However, locally advanced disease as well as tumor location and size can change potential long-term outcomes. This article will investigate the technical and clinical aspects of transanal surgery and the decision-making algorithms for clinicians and patients.

Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the distribution of defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated female patients and to correlate these dysfunctions with the mode of delivery. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-five female patients who underwent defecography for constipation from 2001 to 2008 were reviewed and pelvic floor abnormalities were assessed. The patients were divided into three groups: group I had 50 nulliparous women, mean age 40.2 (+ or - 15.3), group II had 165 vaginally parous women, mean age 57 (+ or - 13.3), and group III had 40 patients delivered by cesarean section, mean age 50.6 (+ or - 11.9). RESULTS: Significant rectocele was identified in group I (36%), group II (35.8%), and group III (20%) without any statistically significant differences among the groups (p > 0.05). Intussusception was identified in group I (48%), group II (70.3%), and in group III (67.5%; p = 0.014). Intussusception associated with significant rectocele was more common in vaginally parous patients (p = 0.043). Abnormalities on puborectalis relaxation associated or not associated with rectocele were similar among the groups (p = 0.47). Vaginally parous patients had more abnormal exams as compared to other patients (p = 0.005). Significant rectocele was identified in (39%) patients with age > or = 50 years and in (26.3%) patients with age <50 years (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: There was no specific correlation between distribution of pelvic floor disorders and mode of delivery in this study. Patients of age greater than 50 years had a higher incidence of significant rectocele.

What are the outcomes of reoperative restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery?

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the current surgical treatment of choice for most patients with ulcerative colitis. Complications of the ileal pouch may necessitate additional operations to salvage the pouch. The aims of this study were to review the outcomes of reoperative restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery and to define any predictors of successful pouch salvage surgery. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent reoperative ileoanal pouch surgery for either pouch salvage or pouch excision between 1988 and 2007 were reviewed. Successful ileoanal pouch salvage was considered to be an intact functioning pouch, after resolution of problem, with a follow-up of at least six months and good to excellent patient satisfaction and continence. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients underwent reoperation for pouch-related complications (44 mucosal ulcerative colitis, 6 familial adenomatous polyposis, and 1 indeterminate colitis), in addition to 8 patients with Crohn's disease. An additional 17 patients had primary pouch excision. Thirty-eight (74.4 percent) of the 51 patients who underwent pouch salvage had a successful outcome. Twenty-three patients had pouch reconstruction or revision via an abdominal approach with a 69.5 percent success rate. The remainder of patients had local perineal procedures for control of perianal sepsis, with 75 percent success rate. Patients required a mean of 2.1 procedures to achieve pouch salvage; there was no correlation between the number of ileoanal pouch salvage procedures and failure. Crohn's disease was ultimately diagnosed in more than half of the patients who underwent primary pouch excision. Among the patients with Crohn's disease who underwent pouch salvage only three retained their pouches, for a success rate of only 37 percent. CONCLUSION: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis salvage surgery can save a considerable number of patients from pouch excision and permanent ileostomy. Both local perineal and abdominal approaches yield acceptable results. The choice of procedure is based on the etiology and anatomy of the problem and the surgeon's preference and patient-related factors such as diagnosis.

Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome?

BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy can be expected in a variable percentage of surgeries. Patients who experience conversion to a laparotomy may have a worse outcome than those who have a successfully completed laparoscopic procedure. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of converted cases based on whether the case was a reactive conversion (RC, due to an intraoperative complication such as bleeding or bowel injury) or a preemptive conversion (PC, due to a lack of progression or unclear anatomy). METHODS: All laparoscopic colorectal procedures converted to a laparotomy were retrospectively reviewed from data prospectively entered into an institutional review board-approved database. Patients who underwent an RC were matched with patients who underwent a PC according to age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Patients who underwent a laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR) were taken as the control group. The incidence and nature of postoperative complications, the time to liquid or regular diet, and the length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: Of 962 laparoscopic procedures performed between 2000 and 2007, 222 (23.1%) converted to a laparotomy were identified. The 30 patients who had undergone an RC were matched with 60 patients who had undergone a PC and 60 patients who had undergone an LCR. The reasons for RC were bleeding in 14 cases, bowel injury in 6 cases, ureteric damage in 3 cases, splenic injury in 3 cases, and other complications in 4 cases. The patients who had undergone RC were more likely to have experienced a postoperative complication (50% vs 27%; p = 0.028), required longer time to toleration of a regular diet (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.03), and stayed longer in the hospital (8.1 vs 7.1 days; p = 0.080). CONCLUSION: Preemptive conversion is associated with a better outcome than reactive conversion. Based on this finding, it appears preferable for the surgeon to have a low threshold for performing PC rather than awaiting the need for an RC.

Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure?

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications such as leakage and bleeding remain among the most serious complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. No perfect method exists for accurate and reliable avoidance of these catastrophes. This study aimed to study the usefulness of routine intraoperative endoscopy (RIOE) by comparing the surgical outcomes for RIOE patients with those for selective intraoperative endoscopy (SIOE) patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal resections with distal anastomosis between January 2004 and May 2007. One surgeon performed RIOE, whereas the other three surgeons performed SIOE as necessary. All the abnormalities of IOE patients were managed with a subsequent salvage procedure, and the postoperative outcomes were compared between the RIOE and SIOE groups. RESULTS: The study included 107 patients in the RIOE group and 137 patients in the SIOE group. Abnormalities were detected in 11 RIOE patients (10.3%) (six with staple line bleeding, three with positive air leak test results, and two with additional pathology identified). All but one abnormality was laparoscopically managed without conversion to laparotomy. Whereas one patient experienced postoperative staple line bleeding that required a second operation, the remaining 10 patients recovered uneventfully. The mean hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4-9) days. The RIOE group had overall rates of 0% for anastomotic leakage and 0.9% for staple line bleeding. Intraoperative endoscopies were performed for 30 (21.9%) of the 137 patients in the SIOE group. The postoperative outcomes comparison between the RIOE and SIOE groups showed a tendency toward more overall anastomotic complications (0.9% vs. 5.1%) in the SIOE group, which due to the small sample size did not translate into significant differences in terms of staple line bleeding and anastomotic leakage. There also were no significant differences in other outcomes such as ileus, abdominal or pelvic sepsis, reoperation, positive distal margin, distance from distal margins, length of hospital stay, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Routine IOE for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery with distal anastomosis can detect abnormalities at or around the anastomosis. Although the RIOE group had fewer postoperative anastomotic complications, due to the small sample size, the 5.7-fold increase in anastomotic failure did not translate into significantly better postoperative outcomes than the SIOE group experienced. A larger-scale single or multicenter prospective randomized study or a metaanalysis including similar studies is necessary for further investigation of this issue.

Surgery and sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence.

Fecal continence is a complex bodily function, which requires the interplay of sensation, rectal capacity, and anal neuromuscular function. Fecal incontinence affects approximately 2% of the population and has a prevalence of 15% in elderly patients. Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. The variety of symptoms and risk factors suggest a multifactorial origin. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma.

Anorectal physiologic evaluation of constipation.

Chronic constipation is a widespread problem which affects approximately 63 million people in North America alone. Although the majority of patients respond to changes in dietary fiber and water intake, as well as the judicious use of laxatives, a small portion will not and as a result, will be evaluated by gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons. These patients most frequently have slow transit constipation, pelvic floor dysfunction, or some combination of the two. The physiologic evaluation of these patients comprises colonic transit studies, anorectal manometry, cinedefecography, electromyography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. In this article, the authors describe the physiologic basis for these studies and review the techniques used in diagnosing these conditions.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare disorder often misdiagnosed as a malignant ulcer. Histopathological features of SRUS are characteristic and pathognomonic; nevertheless, the endoscopic and clinical presentations may be confusing. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes in patients who suffer from SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was undertaken, from January 1989 to May 2005 for all patients who were diagnosed with SRUS. Data recorded included: patient's age, gender, clinical presentation, past surgical history, diagnostic and preoperative workup, operative procedure, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 23 patients were diagnosed with SRUS. Seven patients received only medical treatment, and in three patients, the ulcer healed after medical treatment. Sixteen patients underwent surgical treatment. In four patients, the symptoms persisted after surgery. Two patients presented with postoperative rectal bleeding requiring surgical intervention. Three patients developed late postoperative sexual dysfunction. One patient continued suffering from rectal pain after a colostomy was constructed. Median follow-up was 14 (range 2-84) months. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show clearly that every patient with SRUS must be assessed individually. Initial treatment should include conservative measures. In patients with refractory symptoms, surgical treatment should be considered. Results of anterior resection and protocolectomy are satisfactory for solitary rectal ulcer.

Surgical management of pouch-vaginal fistula after restorative proctocolectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pouch-vaginal fistula (PVF) is a devastating complication after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical management of PVF. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, all patients treated for PVF between 1988 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Success of treatment was defined as the complete absence of symptoms or no radiologic evidence of fistula. RESULTS: The study included 23 female patients; indications for IPAA were mucosal ulcerative colitis in 20 (87%), indeterminate colitis in 1 (4.3%), and familial adenomatous polyposis in 2 (8.7%) patients. Seven patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis were postoperatively diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Mean time interval from initial IPAA to development of symptomatic fistula was 17.2 months. Mean number of surgical treatments was 2.2. Overall, success was achieved in 17 (73.9%) patients at a mean followup of 52.3 months. Fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease occurred relatively late after IPAA (p = 0.015) and required a median of three (p = 0.001) surgical procedures, compared with patients without Crohn's disease. Pelvic sepsis after original IPAA occurred in eight (35.8%) patients, four (50%) of whom ultimately required pouch excision. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal diversion and local procedures are effective in the majority of patients with PVF after IPAA. Patients with Crohn's disease tend to have a delayed onset of fistula occurrence and require more extensive surgical management. Pelvic sepsis can be a predictive factor of poor outcomes.

Colorectal malignancies in HIV-positive patients.

Due to the development of more effective medications, those infected with HIV are living longer. Consequently, more tumors and infections have been added to the AIDS-defining criteria in the last decade. Our aim was to review the occurrence and clinical course of colorectal (CR) malignancies in HIV infected/AIDS patients from a single institution. A retrospective review of HIV/AIDS patients with colorectal malignant tumors was undertaken. We included adult patients, with ELISA and Western blot test positive for HIV, and primary malignant tumors located in the colon or rectum. Malignant neoplasms of the anus were excluded for the purposes of this study. Twelve patients (9 males and 3 females), mean age 41 years, were identified with the following neoplasm: 6 adenocarcinomas (ACA), 5 non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), and 1 small-cell carcinoma. Intravenous drug abuse was the main risk factor for HIV. No patient had identified risk factors for colorectal neoplasm. Five out of six patients with ACA had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. One patient with stage II ACA developed early liver metastases after colonic resection. Seven out of 12 patients underwent surgery. Six (85.7%) of these sustained postoperative complications, primarily wound infection. The overall survival in our series was dismal, averaging 20 months. For NHL average survival was 29 months, and 12 months for CR-ACA. This is the largest series of cases of colorectal cancer in the HIV/AIDS patient population published in the English language and the largest number of colorectal ACA reported in this unique population. Early in our experience, tumors frequently found in immunoincompetent patients were detected (NHL). More recently, we have only treated patients with colorectal ACA; none of them had no risk factors for colorectal cancer (family history, IBD, FAP, HNPCC). These patients developed tumors at earlier ages and were diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therefore, these tumors may be associated with the grade of immunosuppression induced during the course of the HIV infection and with a tumorigenic effect of the HIV on the colonic epithelium. Consequently, a high index of suspicion when evaluating chronic abdominal complaints in such patients is warranted. The use of the new antiretroviral therapy regimens should be further evaluated to know its impact in the survival.