Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
2.
J Telemed Telecare ; : 1357633X221139630, 2022 Dec 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36567435

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Rural communities often face chronic challenges of high rates of serious health conditions coupled with inadequate access to health care services-challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. One strategy with the potential to mitigate these problems is the increased use of telehealth technology. A feature of telehealth applications-collaboration between health care providers for consultation and other purposes-referred to herein as Rural Provider-to-Provider Telehealth (RPPT), introduces important expertise that may not exist locally in rural communities. Literature indicates that RPPT is operationalized through many methods with an array of purposes. While RPPT is a promising strategy that brings additional expertise to patient-centered rural care delivery, there is limited evidence addressing important considerations, including how patient access and outcomes, provider satisfaction and performance, and payment may be affected by its use. METHODS: Recognizing the significant potential of RPPT and the need for more information associated with its use, the National Institutes of Health convened a Pathways to Prevention (P2P) workshop to further understand RPPT's effectiveness and impact on improving health outcomes in rural settings. The P2P initiative, supported by several federal health agencies, engaged rural health stakeholders and experts to examine four key questions, identify related knowledge gaps, and provide recommendations to advance understanding of the use and impact of RPPT. RESULTS: Included in this report is a description of the process used to generate information about RPPT, the identification of key knowledge gaps, and specific recommendations to further build needed evidence. DISCUSSION: The emerging use of RPPT is an important tool for bridging gaps in access to care that impacts rural populations. However, to fully understand the value and effects of RPPT, new research is needed to fill the knowledge gaps identified in this report. Additionally, this report should help engage providers, payors, and policymakers interested in supporting evidence-informed RPPT practice, policy, and payment, with the ultimate aim of improving access to health care and health status of rural communities in the United States and worldwide.

3.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 13(4): 849-856, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of improving transitions across care, literature is very limited on inpatient "Communication about Medicines" (ComMed) by staff across United States (U.S.) hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ComMed quality variations by hospital characteristics. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, retrospective study of publicly available U.S. Medicare's Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health Care Plans Survey (HCAHPS) data (January 2013-September 2014), ComMed quality (high = above average/excellent vs. low = average/below average/poor star ratings) of 3125 hospitals were compared across region, rural-urban location, and health information technology (HIT) infrastructure giving providers access to patients' electronic medical records. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted with adjusting for confounders (hospital - bed size, ownership, type, ED services, the number of completed HCAHPS surveys). RESULTS: After adjusting for other characteristics, Midwest versus Western region hospitals (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.21-1.98, p=<0.0001), hospitals with HIT infrastructure (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.59, p = 0.02) were more likely while Northeast vs. Western region hospitals (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.89, p=<0.0001) and hospitals in metropolitan areas with 1 million or more population vs. Nonmetro area with less than 2500 population were less likely (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.95, p=<0.0001), to be associated with high ComMed quality. Hospitals' small bed-size, physician/non-profit ownership, critical-access type, absent ED services, and 100-299 HCAHPS completed surveys were more likely to be associated with high ComMed quality. CONCLUSIONS: One of the first national studies found significant variations in ComMed quality across U.S. hospitals by location (high in Midwest and low in Northeast regions and urban areas) and by access to HIT infrastructure (high) after controlling for other hospital characteristics. With this baseline data, hospital providers and policymakers can design, implement, and evaluate service programs with pharmacists and HIT to enhance ComMed quality in the future delivery of patient-centered care.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información en Farmacia Clínica/normas , Comunicación , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/normas , Hospitales/normas , Farmacéuticos/normas , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/normas , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
4.
Crit Care Med ; 43(12): 2527-34, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26457751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy in adult ICUs in the United States. Our secondary objective is to examine the relationship between the prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy rate and certain ICU characteristics. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational, 72-hour snapshot study. SETTING: Sixty-seven ICUs from 32 hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: Nine hundred ninety-eight patients admitted to the ICU between midnight on June 20, 2011, and June 21, 2011, were included in the study. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Antibiotic orders were categorized as prophylactic, definitive, empiric, or prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy. Prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy was defined as empiric antibiotics that continued for at least 72 hours in the absence of adjudicated infection. Standard definitions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used to determine infection. Prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy rate was determined as the ratio of the total number of empiric antibiotics continued for at least 72 hours divided by the total number of empiric antibiotics. Univariate analysis of factors associated with the ICU prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy rate was conducted using Student t test. A total of 660 unique antibiotics were prescribed as empiric therapy to 364 patients. Of the empiric antibiotics, 333 of 660 (50%) were continued for at least 72 hours in instances where Centers for Disease Control and Prevention infection criteria were not met. Suspected pneumonia accounted for approximately 60% of empiric antibiotic use. The most frequently prescribed empiric antibiotics were vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. ICUs that utilized invasive techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia had lower rates of prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy than those that did not, 45.1% versus 59.5% (p = 0.03). No other institutional factor was significantly associated with prolonged empiric antibiotic therapy rate. CONCLUSIONS: Half of all empiric antibiotics ordered in critically ill patients are continued for at least 72 hours in absence of adjudicated infection. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine the risks and benefits of prolonged empiric therapy in the critically ill.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
J Pharm Pract ; 28(3): 238-48, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24399573

RESUMEN

The study objectives were to evaluate the correlates and outcomes of a parenteral (IV) to oral (PO) antimicrobial conversion program at a Midwest US Academic Medical Center with the hypothesis that it will be associated with reduced drug costs. Patient-level data (n = 237; sex, race, admission source, admission status, admission severity, risk of mortality [relative expected, admission], and early death) were extracted from the Clinical Data Base/Resource Manager. Medication-level, drug-encounter data (n = 317; antibiotic/dose/route/frequency/duration, conversion status, 10-day IV/PO switch-eligibility criteria) were extracted from patient's hospital medical records. Univariate analyses using chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables showed patients not converted (n = 149) versus converted (n = 88) at some point from IV to PO were more likely to be of white race and had higher risk of relative expected mortality. By applying the unit drug cost (derived from 2010 Thomson Reuters RED BOOK(TM)) and labor costs for IV/PO administration, both per dose, the overall 1-month drug cost-saving estimates in 2010 in US dollars were US$5242 from converting and US$8805 savings missed from not converting 518 and 1387 switch-eligible antibiotic doses, respectively. Despite sample-size limitations, this study demonstrated correlates and missed opportunities to convert antimicrobials from IV to PO, which warrants providers' attention.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 14(5): 741-9, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25059290

RESUMEN

Objectives were to evaluate correlates, and economic outcomes of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use by route in the intensive care unit from an institutional-payer perspective. A 13-month retrospective study of electronic medical records was conducted of 534 adult (≥19 year-old) intensive care unit patients receiving a PPI (39% enteral-only, 34% parenteral-only, 27% both-route) in a Midwest USA academic medical center. Possible cost-savings with sensitivity analysis were estimated as differences in drug costs (US dollars) between switch eligible parenteral and alternate enteral-PPI medication doses. In multivariate logistic-regression of switch criteria (any oral-medication, orogastric-tube, nothing by oral route), significant correlate for enteral versus parenteral PPI-use was any oral-medication use but not orogastric-tube. Using enteral esomeprazole/lansoprazole instead of parenteral (esomeprazole/pantoprazole) PPI (in 37% i.e. 696 of 1895 switch-eligible doses) would have saved US$2384.17 or US$3564.86, respectively. By switching eligible patients on oral-medications or on orogastric-tube from parenteral- to enteral-PPI, institutions can realize significant drug cost-savings.


Asunto(s)
Costos de los Medicamentos , Costos de Hospital , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/economía , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Modelos Económicos , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 14(2): 301-13, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24625041

RESUMEN

Because of limited literature from rural states of the United States like Nebraska, we evaluated the association of patient's age, Office of Management and Budget residence-county categories (rural-nonmetro, micropolitan-nonmetro, urban), and significant interactions between confounding-variables with colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. This retrospective 1998-2003 study of 6561 CRC patients from the Nebraska Cancer Registry showed median patient survival in colon and rectal cancer in urban, rural and micropolitan counties were 33, 36, and 46 months and 41, 47, 49 months, respectively. In Cox proportional-hazards analyses, after adjusting for significant demographics (age, race, marital status in colon cancer; age, insurance status in rectal cancer), cancer stage, surgery and radiation treatments; 1) no-chemotherapy urban colon cancer patients had significantly shorter survival (rural vs urban; adjusted hazard ratio, HR: 0.78 or urban vs rural HR: 1.28; micropolitan vs urban, HR: 0.78) and 2) no-surgery urban (vs rural, HR: 1.49); micropolitan (vs rural, HR: 2.01) rectal cancer patients had significantly shorter survival. Colon cancer (≥65 years) and rectal cancer (≥75 years) elderly each versus patients aged 19-64 years old had significantly shorter survival (all p < 0.01). The association of patients' age and treatment/residence-county interactions with CRC survival warrant decision-makers' attention.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebraska/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF
8.
Telemed J E Health ; 20(10): 893-901, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24611489

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated a telepharmacy service model using a conceptual framework to compare documented remote pharmacist interventions by year, hospital, and remote pharmacist and across rural hospitals with or without an on-site rural hospital pharmacist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Documented remote pharmacist interventions for patients at eight rural hospitals in the Midwestern United States during prospective prescription order review/entry from 2008 to 2011 were extracted from RxFusion(®) database (a home-grown system, i.e., internally developed program at The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC) for capturing remote pharmacist-documented intervention data). The study authors conceptualized an analytical framework, mapping the 37 classes of remote pharmacist interventions to three broader-level definitions: (a) intervention, eight categories (interaction/potential interaction, contraindication, adverse effects, anticoagulation monitoring, drug product selection, drug regimen, summary, and recommendation), (b) patient medication management, two categories (therapy review and action), and (c) health system-centered medication use process, four categories (prescribing, transcribing and documenting, administering, and monitoring). Frequencies of intervention levels were compared by year, hospital, remote pharmacist, and hospital pharmacy status (with a remote pharmacist and on-site pharmacist or with a remote pharmacist only) using chi-squared test and univariate logistic regression analyses, as appropriate. RESULTS: For 450,000 prescription orders 19,222 remote pharmacist interventions were documented. Frequency of interventions significantly increased each year (36% in 2009, 55% in 2010, and 7% in 2011) versus the baseline year (2008, 3%) when service started. The frequency of interventions also differed significantly across the eight hospitals and 16 remote pharmacists for the three defined intervention levels and categories. Remote pharmacist interventions at hospitals with an on-site and remote pharmacist (n=12,141) versus those with a remote pharmacist alone (n=7,081) were significantly more likely to be (1) patient-centered, (2) related to "actionable" medication management recommendations (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.12), and (3) related to the "transcribing" (OR=1.47) and "prescribing" (OR=1.40) steps of the health system-centered medication use process level (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to demonstrate the patient- and health system-centered nature of pharmaceutical care delivered via a telepharmacy service model by evaluating documented remote pharmacist interventions with an analytical framework.


Asunto(s)
Internet , Modelos Organizacionales , Farmacéuticos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Hospitales Rurales , Humanos , Masculino , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Nebraska , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programas Informáticos
9.
Telemed J E Health ; 20(2): 182-5, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24205837

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study explores the patient-centered demand for mobile phone-based health (mobile health [m-health]) services in the rural United States by documenting rural patients' access to mobile phones and patients' willingness to receive m-health services. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An anonymous institutional review board-approved survey was completed by patients visiting two rural pharmacies in Nebraska from August to October 2011. Patients who volunteered to complete the survey provided their demographic data, disease state information, health status, mobile phone access, and willingness to receive (in terms of using and giving time to) m-health services. RESULTS: The majority of the 24 survey respondents were 19-40 years old (52%), female (88%), married (63%), with excellent to very good health status (63%), with no comorbidities (83%), with ≤$100 monthly medication expenses (80%), with private insurance (78%), living within 5 miles of their pharmacy (71%), and reporting that m-health services are important to them (75%; 12/16). Approximately 95%, 81%, 73%, and 55% of respondents reported access to a mobile phone, voice mails, text messaging, and mobile phone applications, respectively. Of the respondents, 65%, 57%, 52%, and 48% were willing to receive prerecorded messages for appointment reminders from the doctor, disease information, medication use/self-care information, and symptom monitoring information, respectively. In total, 70%, 63%, 61%, 54%, and 50% were willing to receive prerecorded messages from the pharmacist containing contact requests, new/refill prescription reminders, information on medication problems, reviewing/monitoring of medication use, and medication self-management/preventive screenings/immunizations, respectively. Of 44% (7/16) respondents willing to give time for m-health services, 83% were willing to give 15 min, and 17% were willing to give 30 min every month. CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating rural patients' demand for m-health (including pharmacy) services, this is one of the first pilot studies showing rural patients have access to mobile phones and may be willing to use and give time to m-health services. Further research is needed on delivery and coordination of transitions in patient-centered care in the United States with m-health services.


Asunto(s)
Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Citas y Horarios , Recolección de Datos , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Nebraska , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Sistemas Recordatorios , Población Rural , Autocuidado , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Adulto Joven
10.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 6(6): 703-29, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24164616

RESUMEN

Inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents could result in antimicrobial resistance that could impact clinical cure outcomes (by increasing morbidity in terms of increased adverse events and risk of secondary and hospital-acquired infections and mortality) and increase costs to health care institutions. Thus, appropriate antimicrobial use has become vital for balancing patient safety and costs and is therefore a focus for health care institutions. This is often achieved through efforts of antimicrobial stewardship programs that include intravenous to oral conversion initiatives with clinical pharmacists playing an instrumental role in their development and implementation with medical staff approval. However, the delivery and effectiveness of these programs are quite variable. Therefore, for guiding the successful delivery and evaluations of these programs in the future, the objective of this literature review is to document the impact of intravenous to oral conversion programs in terms of clinical and economic outcomes at various institutions worldwide along with the pharmacist's role in these programs.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Antibacterianos/economía , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Farmacéuticos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
11.
Am J Manag Care ; 19(3): e74-84, 2013 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23534946

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine patient, clinical, and hospital factors associated with receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. METHODS: Hospital discharge records with a principal diagnosis of hip fracture and primary hip arthroplasty or no surgery were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data set of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Patient (age, sex, race, income, payer), clinical (comorbidities, severity, fracture type), hospital (region, location, teaching status, bed size, ownership), and outcome (receipt of THA or HA) variables were extracted and weighted for the analyses. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted and significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 92,861, 15,489, and 9863 discharges occurred for HA, no surgery, and THA, respectively. Compared with no surgery, THA or HA was significantly more likely in patients who were aged > 50 years, white, and female; had > $39,000 income; lived in a medium-metro or noncore county; had comorbidities (anemia, hypertension); and had intracapsular fracture. THA or HA was significantly more likely in urban, privately owned hospitals with > 249 beds. Compared with no surgery, THA was significantly more likely in nonteaching hospitals, the Northeast region, and in private insurance or self-pay patients with moderate to severe fractures; HA was more likely in teaching hospitals, in the South and West, and in Medicare patients with minor fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Similarities and differences in patient, clinical, and hospital factors associated with surgical treatments of hip fracture warrant the attention of providers and payers.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Support Care Cancer ; 20(2): 245-52, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21174129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study's purpose was twofold: (1) to establish adherence rates to a behavioral therapy (BT) sleep intervention and (2) to identify psychological and physical symptom predictors of adherence to the intervention in women undergoing breast cancer chemotherapy. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial began 48 h before the first of four chemotherapy treatments. Women with stages I-IIIA breast cancer (n = 113) received a BT sleep intervention composed of stimulus control, modified sleep restriction (MSR), relaxation therapy (RT), and sleep hygiene counseling components. A BT plan was developed by a research nurse and each participant, reinforced on day 8, and repeated for chemotherapy cycles 2, 3, and 4. Adherence to the BT plan was measured daily; total adherence score was computed at each chemotherapy cycle by combining adherence estimates of all BT plan components. Psychological and physical symptoms over the past 7 days were measured 2 days prior to and 7 days after each chemotherapy treatment. RESULTS: Total adherence rates to the BT plan were 51-52% at all four treatments but adherence varied by component. Sleep disturbance, pain, and anxiety significantly decreased whereas depression significantly increased across chemotherapy. Structural equation modeling revealed a good model fit with decreasing sleep disturbances (0.409) and increasing depression (-0.711) contributing to lower total adherence rates. Increasing depression predicted lower MSR adherence (-0.203) and decreasing sleep disturbances predicted lower RT adherence (1.220). CONCLUSIONS: Sleep disturbance and depression significantly impacted adherence rates during chemotherapy. Results warrant attention when promoting adherence to BT sleep interventions during chemotherapy treatment.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Conductista/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Cooperación del Paciente , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/terapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dolor/epidemiología , Dolor/etiología , Terapia por Relajación/métodos , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología
13.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 8(3): 228-39, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21856247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on immunosuppressant adherence of community-dwelling adult solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) from rural populations in the United States are limited. Therefore, understanding the association of rurality and other factors of immunosuppressant adherence will help providers design and deliver patient-centered adherence enhancing interventions. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine factors associated with a previously validated 4-item Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS) score in community-dwelling adult SOTRs who received a transplant from an academic center in the Midwestern United States. METHODS: For this observational study, cross-sectional survey data (patient demographic, medical condition, immunosuppressant therapy, and self-reported ITAS) received from adult SOTRs aged 19 years or older with other data from an academic transplant center's database were merged. Using multivariate logistic regression, significant SOTR characteristics associated with being adherent (ITAS score=12) versus nonadherent (ITAS score <12) were examined. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 30% (n=556/1827). Those SOTRs responding (n=556) had a kidney (48%), liver (47%), or other (4.5%) transplant. They were more likely to be 50- to 64-year olds (52%), men (55%), white (90%), metroresident (59%), with an annual income less than $55,000. The SOTRs were living with a transplant for 6.3 years (median), reported excellent-to-good health status (77%), and received different immunosuppressant regimens. More than half of the SOTRs (58%) were adherent. In multivariate analyses, compared with patients aged 65 years or older, younger patients, nonmetro rural- versus metroresident, and those having more (≥6) versus less (<6) comorbidities were significantly less likely to report adherence. SOTRs receiving tacrolimus-based combination immunosuppressant versus tacrolimus alone were more likely to report adherence. CONCLUSIONS: When designing and delivering patient care-centered interventions including those that use technology to increase immunosuppressant adherence, providers need to consider rural residence besides other well-established patient factors (younger age, immunosuppressant drug, and comorbidities) of nonadherence.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Trasplante de Órganos , Servicios de Salud Rural , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Oportunidad Relativa , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Características de la Residencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 10(5): 509-12, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20950066

RESUMEN

EVALUATION OF: Schwappach DL, Wernli M. Chemotherapy patients' perceptions of drug administration safety. J. Clin. Oncol. 28(17), 2896-2901 (2010). During the process of medication administration, patients can participate in their own care by engaging in error prevention behaviors. Patients' safety behaviors are important patient-reported outcomes that can reduce medication errors, and by it, improve treatment effectiveness and safety. This article discusses the exploratory study of patients' perceptions of chemotherapy drug administration safety and the association between patients' perceptions of risk, harm and staff safety practices with patients' safety behaviors. The authors found that patients are concerned and ready to engage in safety behaviors for preventing errors in chemotherapy administration. The study findings call for improved communication and collaboration between providers and patients in clinical practice to engage patients in their chemotherapy treatments in real-time, which can have a major impact on cost and quality of care delivered in cancer.

15.
Am J Manag Care ; 16(4): 265-73, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20394462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and rural patients are less likely to undergo surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: A total of 6561 patients with CRC between January 1998 and December 2003 were identified by incident International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes from the Nebraska Cancer Registry. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, we studied the association of age and residence county (rural vs urban and micropolitan) with each of 3 CRC treatments by anatomic site. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient demographics, insurance payer, ratio of providers to population, and cancer stage, patients with colon cancer living in micropolitan counties were more likely to receive chemotherapy than those living in rural counties (P <.001). Compared with patients aged 19 to 64 years, patients with colon cancer 85 years and older (P <.001) and patients with rectal cancer 75 years and older (P <.05) were less likely to undergo surgery. Patients with CRC 75 years and older were less likely to receive radiation, and patients with colon cancer 65 years and older and patients with rectal cancer 75 years and older were less likely to receive chemotherapy (P <.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In Nebraska, older patients with CRC were less likely to undergo surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Patients with colon cancer in rural counties were less likely to undergo chemotherapy than those in micropolitan counties. Decision makers need to consider issues of age and rural residence in patient access to CRC treatments.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebraska/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
16.
Value Health ; 13(1): 18-24, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19807903

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Public programs finance a large share of the US pharmaceutical expenditures. To date, there are not guidelines for estimating the cost of drugs financed by US public programs. The objective of this study was to provide standards for estimating the cost of drugs financed by US public programs for utilization in pharmacoeconomic evaluations. METHODS: This report was prepared by the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices-Use of Drug Costs for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Medicare, Medicaid, and other US Government Payers Subgroup. The Subgroup was convened to assess the methodological and practical issues confronted by researchers when estimating the cost of drugs financed by US public programs, and to propose standards for more transparent, accurate and consistent costing methods. RESULTS: The Subgroup proposed these recommendations: 1) researchers must consider regulation requirements that affect the drug cost paid by public programs; 2) drug cost must represent the actual acquisition cost, incorporating any rebates or discounts; 3) transparency with respect to cost inputs must be ensured; 4) inclusion of the public program's perspective is recommended; 5) high cost drugs require special attention, particularly when drugs represent a significant proportion of health-care expenditures for a specific disease; and 6) because of variations across public programs, sensitivity analyses for actual acquisition cost, real-world adherence, and generics availability are warranted. Specific recommendations also were proposed for the Medicare and Medicaid programs. CONCLUSIONS: As pharmacoeconomic evaluations for coverage decisions made by US public programs grows, the need for precise and consistent estimation of drug costs is warranted. Application of the proposed recommendations will allow researchers to include accurate and unbiased cost estimates in pharmacoeconomic evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Industria Farmacéutica/economía , Economía Farmacéutica/normas , Medicaid/economía , Medicare/economía , Seguro de Costos Compartidos , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Cobertura del Seguro/normas , Medicaid/normas , Medicare/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Honorarios por Prescripción de Medicamentos/normas , Estados Unidos
17.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 9(1): 9-14, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20021290

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Higher vancomycin concentrations are thought necessary for treatment of deep-seated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, yet this may result in greater risk of nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the relationship of serum vancomycin trough concentration with clinical outcomes and nephrotoxicity for patients with deep-seated MRSA infection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated adults with MRSA pneumonia, endocarditis or osteomyelitis who received vancomycin for > or = 5 days from June 2005 to June 2007. Patients were stratified by mean vancomycin trough level [low (< 15 mg/l), high (> or = 15 mg/l)]. Outcomes were clinical response, mortality, length of stay (LOS) and nephrotoxicity. Three definitions of nephrotoxicity were used: i) rise in serum creatinine (SCr) > or = 0.5 mg/dl; ii) 50% increase in SCr; and iii) 25% decrease in estimated creatinine clearance. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients experiencing MRSA pneumonia (n = 28), endocarditis (n = 9), osteomyelitis (n = 20) and multiple infections (n = 2) were stratified into low (n = 39) and high (n = 16) groups. High group patients were more likely to be septic (p = 0.01) and have a higher APACHE II score (p = 0.01). After adjustment for APACHE II score, clinical response rates among survivors did not differ significantly. Risk of death was not significantly different between the high (19%) and low (5%) group patients (p = 0.1). LOS did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.7). Nephrotoxicity occurred in the low and high groups, respectively, for 10 and 31% (p = 0.04) with definition 1, 10 and 31% (p = 0.04) with definition 2, and 13 and 25% (p = 0.1) with definition 3. After adjustment for APACHE II score, odds of nephrotoxicity based on definitions 1 or 2 were increased among the high versus low groups (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 0.7 - 15.25, p = 0.1), although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between high and low trough groups for deep-seated MRSA infections. Nephrotoxicity was consistently higher in the high trough group, regardless of the definition used.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Creatinina/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Estafilocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Rural Health ; 25(4): 358-65, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19780915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There are no studies of rurality, and other determinants of colorectal cancer (CRC) stage at diagnosis with population-based data from the Midwest. METHODS: This retrospective study identified, incident CRC patients, aged 19 years and older, from 1998-2003 Nebraska Cancer Registry (NCR) data. Using federal Office of Management and Budget classifications, we grouped patients by residence in metropolitan, micropolitan nonmetropolitan, or rural nonmetropolitan counties (non-core based statistical areas). In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we examined the association of the county classification and of other determinants with early (in situ/local) versus late (regional/distant) stage at CRC diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 6,561 CRC patients identified, 45% were from metropolitan counties, 24% from micropolitan nonmetropolitan counties and 31% from rural nonmetropolitan counties, with 32%, 38%, and 33%, respectively, being diagnosed at an early stage. Multivariate analysis showed micropolitan nonmetropolitan residents were significantly more likely than rural nonmetropolitan residents to be diagnosed at an early stage (adjusted OR, 1.22; 95% CI: 1.05-1.42, P < .05). However, rural nonmetropolitan and metropolitan residents did not significantly differ in the likelihood of early diagnosis. Residents with Medicare rather than those with private insurance (P < .0001), married rather than unmarried residents (P < .01), and residents with rectal cancer rather than those with colon cancer (P < .0001) were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage. CONCLUSIONS: Early CRC diagnosis needs to be increased in rural (non-core) non-metropolitan residents, unmarried residents, and those with private insurance.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Adulto , Anciano , Diagnóstico Tardío , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Civil , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebraska/epidemiología , Población , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
19.
Support Care Cancer ; 16(2): 181-91, 2008 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17943327

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine oncologists' current practice patterns for antibiotic management of low-risk fever and neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A self-administered survey was developed to query management practices for low-risk FN patients and sent to 3,600 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology physician members; hypothetical case scenarios were included to assess factors influencing decisions about outpatient treatment. RESULTS: Of 3,560 actively practicing oncologists, 1,207 replied (34%). Outpatient antibiotics are used by 82% for selected low-risk FN patients (27% used in them >65% of their patients). Oral levofloxacin (50%), ciprofloxacin (36%), and ciprofloxacin plus amoxicillin/clavulanate (35%) are common outpatient regimens. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is used by 45% of oncologists, in a subset of afebrile patients at low risk for FN; growth factors are used adjunctively by 48% for treating low-risk FN. Factors associated with choosing outpatient treatment were: frequency of use in oncologists' own practices, absence of hematologic malignancy, lower patient age, no infiltrate on X-ray, no prior serious infection, shorter expected FN duration, lower creatinine levels, and shorter distance of patient's residence from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: US oncologists, who responded are willing to prescribe outpatient oral antibiotic treatment for low-risk FN, although practices vary considerably and are based on favorable clinical factors. However, practices are often employed that are not recommended for low-risk patients by current guidelines, including fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, adjunctive and/or prophylactic growth factors, and use of levofloxacin for empiric therapy. Educational efforts are needed to better guide cost-effective and supportive care.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Fiebre/prevención & control , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Fiebre/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Clin Ther ; 29(4): 723-41, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17617297

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective analysis was conducted to derive national estimates of typical, atypical, and combination (typical-atypical) antipsychotic use and to examine factors associated with their use at adult (age >>-18 years) ambulatory care visits by patients with mental health disorders in the United States. METHODS: Data on adult visits with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code for a mental health disorder were extracted from the office-based National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the outpatient facilitybased National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 1996 through 2003. The visits were categorized according to whether use of a typical, atypical, or combination antipsychotic was mentioned (either prescribed, supplied, administered, ordered, or continued at the visits). Total weighted visit estimates, weighted visit percentages, and 95% CIs were calculated across the 3 types of visit groups. Bivariate analysis was performed on the association between selected characteristics and the 3 visit groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on factors associated with atypical versus typical antipsychotic use. RESULTS: During the 8-year period, there were an estimated 47.7 million adult ambulatory care visits involving a mental health disorder and mention of an antipsychotic (weighted percent: 0.83%; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93). From 1996/1997 to 2002/2003, visits involving atypical and combination antipsychotics increased by 195% and 149%, respectively, and visits involving typical antipsychotics decreased by 71%. Men, blacks, and those with public insurance made more visits in which combination antipsychotics rather than typical or atypical antipsychotics were mentioned. Relative to typical or combination antipsychotic visits, more atypical antipsychotic visits involved antide-pressants (weighted percent: 61.23% atypical, 37.29% typical, and 38.32% combination). Fewer atypical antipsychotic visits compared with typical or combination antipsychotic visits involved psychotic disorders (weighted percent: 32.94%, 51.23%, and 69.93%, respectively) and medications for extrapyramidal symptoms (weighted percent: 6.69%, 29.95%, and 36.64%). In multivariate analyses controlling for sex, race, diagnosis of schizophrenia, region, diagnosis of anxiety, and recent years, atypical versus typical antipsychotic use was significantly less likely at visits by those aged 41 to 64 years compared with those aged 18 to 40 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.84; P = 0.002); significantly less likely at visits by those with public compared with private insurance (Medicare OR = 0.59 [95% CI, 0.40-0.88], P = 0.010; Medicaid OR = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.28-0.69], P < 0.001); and significantly more likely at visits associated with depression compared with those not associated with depression (OR = 1.92; 95% CI, 1.26-2.93; P = 0.003) and those associated with bipolar disorder compared with those not associated with bipolar disorder (OR = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.32-3.36; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis found more atypical than typical or combination antipsychotic use at US ambulatory care visits by adults with mental health disorders other than schizophrenia or psychoses in the period studied. Atypical versus typical antipsychotic use was significantly less likely at visits by adults aged 41 to 64 years and those with public insurance, but significantly more likely at visits by those with depression or bipolar disorder.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antipsicóticos/economía , Estudios Transversales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...