Posterior lamellar keratoplasty--comparison of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the same patients: a patient's perspective.

AIM: To evaluate patients' perspectives on endothelial keratoplasty and to compare the outcomes of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), performed in the same patients. METHODS: A fellow eye, comparative retrospective case series. The records of 14 patients (28 eyes) who underwent DLEK in one eye and DSAEK surgery in their fellow eye between 2003 and 2007 were reviewed. Two patients were excluded from the study. Both these techniques were compared for intra- and postoperative complications, visual and refractive outcomes including higher-order ocular aberrations (HOA). Patient satisfaction for both procedures was prospectively evaluated using a subjective questionnaire. RESULTS: Nine (75%) of the 12 patients perceived better vision in the DSAEK operated eye. Eight (66.6%) of the patients reported faster recovery following DSAEK. Ten (83%) of them preferred the outcomes of the DSAEK surgery. The intra- and postoperative complications were comparable between both procedures. There was no significant difference in visual outcomes between the procedures. However, the DLEK procedure was associated with a significantly higher degree (p<0.05) of HOA. Endothelial cell loss was similar following DLEK and DSAEK. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that most patients prefer the DSAEK operation, although there are no differences in visual outcomes between DLEK and DSAEK. Avoidance of surgery-induced hyperopia and HOA is the main benefit of the DSAEK technique.

Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty.

AIM: To compare the outcomes of IntraLase-enabled top hat penetrating keratoplasty (IEK) versus retrospective results of manual top hat penetrating keratoplasty (TH-PKP) and conventional PKP. PATIENTS/METHODS: This non-randomised prospective study included 94 eyes: 23 eyes underwent IEK, 36 TH-PKP and 35 conventional PKP. Preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction, uncorrected and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), high-order ocular aberrations (HOA), endothelial cell counts and complications were analysed. RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, the mean log MAR BSCVA was 0.32 (SD 0.31) in the IEK group, 0.53 (0.36) in the TH PKP group (p = 0.03) and 0.39 (0.30) in the conventional PKP group (p = 0.4). The mean spherical equivalent was similar between the groups and was less than -2.2 dioptres. The mean cylinder was similar in the IEK and conventional PKP group (3.6 (1.9) dioptres and 4.1 (1.8) dioptres, respectively), and was significantly lower than the TH-PKP group (5.1 (3.2) dioptres, p = 0.04). The complications rate and high-order ocular aberrations were similar between the three groups studied. The mean endothelial cell loss was significantly lower at 12 months of follow-up in the IEK and the TH-PKP groups versus conventional PKP (32.4% and 22.3% vs 40.8%, respectively) (p = 0.05). The mean time to suture removal was 4.1 (1.2) months in the IEK group and 3.9 (1.5) months in the TH-PKP group versus 9.7 (1.1) months in the conventional PKP group (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: IEK is a safe and stable procedure. It results in higher endothelial counts and faster suture removal in comparison with the conventional PKP, and has less astigmatism and better BSCVA in comparison with the manual TH-PKP.