RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To know the characteristics of medical education and identify its strengths and weaknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A transversal and quantitative study of the characteristics of medical education in 29 medical schools in Mexico was carried out, between April and September 2017. Questionnaire with Likert scale was applied to explore context, regulation, structure, process, results and impact of medical education. Bivariate analysis was performed with a Chi square test and the significance level was equal to or less than 0.05. RESULTS: The political context obtained 64%, economical context 10% and mechanisms of regulation 31%. The educational structure was 61% and the social impact was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Public policies, regulatory mechanisms and public investment must be strengthened to improve the quality of medical education.
OBJETIVO: Conocer las características de la educación médica e identificar sus fortalezas y debilidades. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio transversal y cuantitativo para conocer las características de la educación médica en 29 escuelas de medicina en México, entre abril y septiembre de 2017. Se utilizó un cuestionario con escala tipo Likert para explorar el contexto, la regulación, la estructura, el proceso, los resultados y el impacto de la educación médica. Se realizó un análisis bivariado con ji cuadrada y una significancia estadística de p igual o menor a 0.05. RESULTADOS: El contexto político obtuvo 64%, el contexto económico 10%, los mecanismos de regulación 31%, la estructura educativa 61% y el impacto social 93%. CONCLUSIONES: Se requiere fortalecer las políticas públicas, la regulación y la inversión pública, para mejorar la calidad de la educación médica.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/normas , Sector Privado/normas , Sector Público/normas , Facultades de Medicina/normas , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Curriculum , Educación Médica/economía , Educación Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación Médica/organización & administración , México , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Sector Privado/economía , Sector Privado/organización & administración , Probabilidad , Política Pública , Sector Público/economía , Sector Público/organización & administración , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To gather opinions from medical schools regarding the existence of public policies on the health workforce (human resources for health) and whether sufficient public financing and regulatory mechanisms are in place for undergraduate medical education; and to identify areas of opportunity to improve the availability of general practitioners in the Region of the Americas. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted with 105 medical schools (51 public and 54 private) in 17 countries. A questionnaire with a Likert scale was used to explore three dimensions (political, economic, and regulatory contexts) composed of 4, 2, and 4 variables each, respectively, and validated with the Delphi method. Frequencies of responses to the questions were estimated. A frequency analysis was performed, as well as a bivariate analysis to identify differences between public and private schools, applying the Chi-square test to compare percentages. RESULTS: The political context was considered favorable by 64% of the schools; the economic context, by 37%; and the regulatory context, by 23%. The only significant differences between public and private schools were in the financial resources they administer. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to strengthen public policies, public investment, and the regulation of medical education in order to improve the education and availability of general practitioners in the countries of the Region.
OBJETIVO: Conhecer a opinião das faculdades de medicina sobre o volume de políticas públicas e financiamento público e mecanismos reguladores para graduação médica e identificar áreas que possibilitem aumentar o número de clínicos gerais na Região das Américas. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal descritivo realizado com 105 faculdades de medicina (51 públicas e 54 particulares) em 17 países. Um questionário com uma escala tipo Likert foi usado para explorar três dimensões (contexto político, contexto econômico e regulamentação), contendo 4, 2 e 4 variáveis cada, e foi validado com o método Delphi. As frequências de respostas às perguntas do questionário foram calculadas e analisadas. A fim de identificar diferenças entre as faculdades públicas e particulares, uma análise bivariada com teste qui-quadrado foi realizada para comparar porcentagens. RESULTADOS: O contexto político foi considerado favorável por 64% das faculdades; o contexto econômico por 37%; e a regulamentação por 23%. Apenas foi observada diferença significativa entre as faculdades públicas e particulares na variável recursos financeiros geridos. CONCLUSÕES: É necessário fortalecer as políticas públicas, o investimento público e a regulamentação da educação médica para melhorar a formação e aumentar o número de clínicos gerais nos países da Região.
RESUMEN
[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Conocer la opinión de las escuelas de medicina sobre la existencia de políticas públicas y la suficiencia de financiamiento público y mecanismos regulatorios para la formación médica de pregrado e identificar áreas que permitan mejorar la disponibilidad de médicos generales en la Región de las Américas. Métodos. Estudio transversal, descriptivo realizado con 105 escuelas de medicina, 51 públicas y 54 privadas, de 17 países. Se utilizó un cuestionario con una escala tipo Likert para explorar tres dimensiones (contextos político, económico y regulatorio) integradas por 4, 2 y 4 variables cada una, respectivamente, y validado con el método Delphi. Se estimaron frecuencias de respuestas a las preguntas del cuestionario. Se realizó un análisis de frecuencias, y para identificar diferencias entre escuelas públicas y privadas se efectuó un análisis bivariante aplicando la prueba de Chi cuadrado para comparar porcentajes. Resultados. El contexto político fue favorable para 64% de las escuelas, el contexto económico, para 37% y la regulación, para 23%. Sólo hubo diferencias significativas entre escuelas públicas y privadas en la variable recursos financieros que ellas administran. Conclusiones. Es necesario fortalecer las políticas públicas, la inversión pública y la regulación de la educación médica, para mejorar la formación y disponibilidad de médicos generales en los países de la Región.
[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To gather opinions from medical schools regarding the existence of public policies on the health workforce (human resources for health) and whether sufficient public financing and regulatory mechanisms are in place for undergraduate medical education; and to identify areas of opportunity to improve the availability of general practitioners in the Region of the Americas. Methods. Cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted with 105 medical schools (51 public and 54 private) in 17 countries. A questionnaire with a Likert scale was used to explore three dimensions (political, economic, and regulatory contexts) composed of 4, 2, and 4 variables each, respectively, and validated with the Delphi method. Frequencies of responses to the questions were estimated. A frequency analysis was performed, as well as a bivariate analysis to identify differences between public and private schools, applying the Chi-square test to compare percentages. Results. The political context was considered favorable by 64% of the schools; the economic context, by 37%; and the regulatory context, by 23%. The only significant differences between public and private schools were in the financial resources they administer. Conclusions. It is necessary to strengthen public policies, public investment, and the regulation of medical education in order to improve the education and availability of general practitioners in the countries of the Region.
[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Conhecer a opinião das faculdades de medicina sobre o volume de políticas públicas e financiamento público e mecanismos reguladores para graduação médica e identificar áreas que possibilitem aumentar o número de clínicos gerais na Região das Américas. Métodos. Estudo transversal descritivo realizado com 105 faculdades de medicina (51 públicas e 54 particulares) em 17 países. Um questionário com uma escala tipo Likert foi usado para explorar três dimensões (contexto político, contexto econômico e regulamentação), contendo 4, 2 e 4 variáveis cada, e foi validado com o método Delphi. As frequências de respostas às perguntas do questionário foram calculadas e analisadas. A fim de identificar diferenças entre as faculdades públicas e particulares, uma análise bivariada com teste qui-quadrado foi realizada para comparar porcentagens. Resultados. O contexto político foi considerado favorável por 64% das faculdades; o contexto econômico por 37%; e a regulamentação por 23%. Apenas foi observada diferença significativa entre as faculdades públicas e particulares na variável recursos financeiros geridos. Conclusões. É necessário fortalecer as políticas públicas, o investimento público e a regulamentação da educação médica para melhorar a formação e aumentar o número de clínicos gerais nos países da Região.
Asunto(s)
Recursos Humanos , América Latina , Recursos Humanos , Educación Médica , Cobertura Universal de Salud , América Latina , Educación Médica , Cobertura Universal de Salud , Educación Médica , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de SaludRESUMEN
Resumen: Objetivo: Conocer las características de la educación médica e identificar sus fortalezas y debilidades. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal y cuantitativo para conocer las características de la educación médica en 29 escuelas de medicina en México, entre abril y septiembre de 2017. Se utilizó un cuestionario con escala tipo Likert para explorar el contexto, la regulación, la estructura, el proceso, los resultados y el impacto de la educación médica. Se realizó un análisis bivariado con ji cuadrada y una significancia estadística depigual o menor a 0.05. Resultados: El contexto político obtuvo 64%, el contexto económico 10%, los mecanismos de regulación 31%, la estructura educativa 61% y el impacto social 93%. Conclusiones: Se requiere fortalecer las políticas públicas, la regulación y la inversión pública, para mejorar la calidad de la educación médica.
Abstract: Objective: To know the characteristics of medical education and identify its strengths and weaknesses. Materials and methods: A transversal and quantitative study of the characteristics of medical education in 29 medical schools in Mexico was carried out, between April and September 2017. Questionnaire with Likert scale was applied to explore context, regulation, structure, process, results and impact of medical education. Bivariate analysis was performed with a Chi square test and the significance level was equal to or less than 0.05. Results: The political context obtained 64%, economical context 10% and mechanisms of regulation 31%. The educational structure was 61% and the social impact was 93%. Conclusions: Public policies, regulatory mechanisms and public investment must be strengthened to improve the quality of medical education.
Asunto(s)
Facultades de Medicina/normas , Sector Público/normas , Sector Privado/normas , Educación Médica/normas , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Curriculum , Educación Médica/economía , Educación Médica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Educación Médica/organización & administración , México , Programas Nacionales de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Carry out the projection of medical specialists in the Health Sector Mexico by 2030. METHOD: A predictive approach was developed to project the number of medical specialists by 2030, according to a trend, a desired goal and two conventional scenarios of increased demand for health services. The methodology was developed based on the General Framework to Assess the Future Supply and Demand of Health Personnel, published in 2013 by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and a mathematical model and a software were designed to make projections about the number of specialists. RESULTS: According to the trend, between 2013 and 2030, the number of specialists will be increased by 90,554 to 124,558 and the rate will be change of 77/100.000 population to 91/100,000 population. If is necessary to achieve a goal of 120/100,000, will be necessary to train 40,420 additional specialists to the trend number and if the demand for services increases 15% or 30%, will require further training specialists 65,166 and 89,913, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Even with the trend increase, in the 2030 Mexico will not achieve the desired goal of 126/100,000 population, that the OECD countries had in 2011. The results of the projections made, can help to planning the training of specialists in the medium term.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica/organización & administración , Predicción , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Médica/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Medicina/tendencias , México , Modelos Teóricos , Especialización/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying the level of culture and awareness on patient safety is essential in order to improve the quality of care. The objective of our research was to assess patient safety culture in healthcare professionals. METHODS: Derived from the implementation of a survey on patient safety to 174 health professionals, data related to demographic characteristics were analyzed. Scores were determined on the 12 dimensions of the scale including additional items on perception and degree of overall patient safety, frequency and number of events reported, as well as Cronbach's alpha for the different dimensions. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: Overall perception on safety was 51%. The lowest dimension was communication openness (38%), whereas organizational learning had the highest scores (68%). Analysis showed low Cronbach's alpha for dimensions of overall perception on safety (0.35), non-punitive response to error (0.55) and staff allocation (0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A low overall perception on patient safety indicates the need for increased institutional actions for improvement. Low Cronbach's alpha in some measurements may suggest the need for adjustments to the instrument. Results on the overall perception on patient safety, nonpunitive response to error and staff allocation (staffing) should be interpreted with caution, given the low reliability of such dimensions.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Administración de la Seguridad , Estudios Transversales , Cultura , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical care is not a harmless practice. It involves intrinsic risks for those who receive it. Risk assessment in health care has been a common practice for several decades; however, evaluation for comprehensive risk management in health care facilities is a more recent practice. This paper proposes that patient safety results from measures at different levels: public health, health care facilities and clinical practice. In each of these, it is possible to assess and manage risks towards improvements in patient safety in order to reduce both incidents and related adverse events. METHODS: We designed a method to assess risk in terms of hospital patient safety based on theoretical models used in public administration, health systems in industrialized countries and the General System Theory. We evaluated risk in a general hospital of 170 beds with four basic services and 16 medical and surgical specialties. The evaluation was conducted by an external body with the participation of local managers and staff. RESULTS: The evaluation revealed that the structural and outcome components had a moderate risk, with overall scores of 73.3% and 70.0%, respectively. The process component had a high risk, with an overall score of 41.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology proved to be a useful tool for the assessment of risks and risk management strategies related to medical care. Available information at the hospital facilitated implementation of the method.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Salud/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To carry out the epidemiological analysis of 122 influenza A (H1N1) deaths confirmed by laboratory and help to improve the diagnosis and timely managing of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 122 clinical records were analyzed of patients with confirmed influenza A (H1N1) virus infection who died. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were female and 49% were male. A total of 45.l% who died were between 20 and 39 years old. Overall fatality was 2.2% and ranged between 0.3% for the l0 to l9 year-old group to 6.3% for the 50 to 59 year-old group. Forty-three percent of deaths were concentrated in only two of the thirty-two states and 5l% received medical attention in social security institutions. Only l7% received hospital attention within 72 hours and 42% died within 72 hours of hospital attention. DISCUSSION: Novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus produces higher mortality in young people whereas seasonal influenza has a greater impact on young children and older people. Delay in medical care and the associated morbidity were relevant factors for death.
Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Efectuar el análisis epidemiológico de 122 defunciones por influenza A (H1N1) confirmadas por laboratorio y contribuir a mejorar el diagnóstico y atención oportuna de casos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se Analizaron 122 expedientes de pacientes fallecidos por influenza A (H1N1). RESULTADOS: Una proporción de 51 por ciento correspondió a mujeres y 49 por ciento a varones. Hasta 45.1 por ciento ocurrió entre los 20 y 39 años. La letalidad general fue de 2.2 por ciento y varió entre 0.3 por ciento en el grupo de 10 a 19 años y 6.3 por ciento en el de 50 a 59. Una cifra de 43 por ciento de las defunciones se concentró en dos de las 32 entidades federativas y 5l por ciento se atendió en instituciones de seguridad social. Sólo 17 por ciento recibió atención hospitalaria en las primeras 72 horas y 42 por ciento falleció en las primeras 72 horas de hospitalización. En 58.2 por ciento de los fallecidos había algún padecimiento asociado. DISCUSIÓN: El Nuevo virus A (H1N1) produce mayor mortalidad en personas jóvenes, al contrario de lo que sucede con la influenza estacional que muestra un mayor impacto en niños pequeños y personas de edad avanzada. El retraso de la atención médica y la morbilidad asociada fueron factores relevantes del fallecimiento.
OBJECTIVE: To carry out the epidemiological analysis of 122 influenza A (H1N1) deaths confirmed by laboratory and help to improve the diagnosis and timely managing of cases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 122 clinical records were analyzed of patients with confirmed influenza A (H1N1) virus infection who died. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of patients were female and 49 percent were male. A total of 45.l percent who died were between 20 and 39 years old. Overall fatality was 2.2 percent and ranged between 0.3 percent for the l0 to l9 year-old group to 6.3 percent for the 50 to 59 year-old group. Forty-three percent of deaths were concentrated in only two of the thirty-two states and 5l percent received medical attention in social security institutions. Only l7 percent received hospital attention within 72 hours and 42 percent died within 72 hours of hospital attention. DISCUSSION: Novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus produces higher mortality in young people whereas seasonal influenza has a greater impact on young children and older people. Delay in medical care and the associated morbidity were relevant factors for death.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , México/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze medical complaints over a period of 11 years, for making recommendations for prevention and improving planning for responding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied the medical complaints at the National Medical Arbitration Commission (Conamed, per its acronym in Spanish) between 1996 and 2007 using descriptive statistics to identify their general profile in relation to the variables of time, place and person. We also studied the frequency of evident medical malpractice as well as the severity of the damage it produces. RESULTS: The request for responses to medical complaints increased between 1996 and 2007 and there was less demand between July and December. Two states in the country account for 69.7% of the complaints and 74.0% are from public institutions. Fifty-eight percent come from women and the 25-34 and 65+ age groups have the highest percentage. We found in 27.0% of the complaints there is evidence of medical malpractice and obstetrics and gynecology have the highest percentage of complaints, physical harm and severity of injury. Complaints about treatment are nearly four times more than diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to improve the quality of diagnosis and treatment and identify cost-effective measures to reduce medical malpractice and the severity of physical damage in patients.
Asunto(s)
Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Negociación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Ginecología , Instituciones de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Medicina , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstetricia , Embarazo , Estaciones del Año , Especialización , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze medical complaints over a period of 11 years, for making recommendations for prevention and improving planning for responding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied the medical complaints at the National Medical Arbitration Commission (Conamed, per its acronym in Spanish) between 1996 and 2007 using descriptive statistics to identify their general profile in relation to the variables of time, place and person. We also studied the frequency of evident medical malpractice as well as the severity of the damage it produces. RESULTS: The request for responses to medical complaints increased between 1996 and 2007 and there was less demand between July and December. Two states in the country account for 69.7 percent of the complaints and 74.0 percent are from public institutions. Fifty-eight percent come from women and the 25-34 and 65+ age groups have the highest percentage. We found in 27.0 percent of the complaints there is evidence of medical malpractice and obstetrics and gynecology have the highest percentage of complaints, physical harm and severity of injury. Complaints about treatment are nearly four times more than diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to improve the quality of diagnosis and treatment and identify cost-effective measures to reduce medical malpractice and the severity of physical damage in patients.
OBJETIVO: Analizar las quejas médicas atendidas en un periodo de 11 años con el fin de formular recomendaciones para prevenirlas y mejorar la planeación para su atención. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se estudiaron las quejas de la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico (Conamed) recibidas entre 1996 y 2007 y se utilizaron medidas de estadística descriptiva para conocer su perfil general en relación con las variables de tiempo, lugar y persona. También se determinó la frecuencia de mala práctica médica evidente, así como la gravedad del daño que producen. RESULTADOS: La solicitud de atención de quejas se incrementó entre 1996 y 2007, y existió menor demanda de atención en julio y diciembre. Dos estados del país concentran 69.7 por ciento de las quejas y 74 por ciento proviene de instituciones públicas. El 58 por ciento son de mujeres y los grupos de 25 a 34, y de 65 y más años tienen el mayor porcentaje. En 27 por ciento de las quejas atendidas hay evidencia de mala práctica médica y ginecología y obstetricia presenta el mayor porcentaje de quejas, daño físico y gravedad del daño. Las quejas por tratamiento son casi cuatro veces más que las de diagnóstico. CONCLUSIONES: Es necesario mejorar la calidad del diagnóstico y el tratamiento e identificar medidas efectivas para el costo que reduzcan la mala práctica médica y la gravedad del daño físico en los pacientes.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Mala Praxis/estadística & datos numéricos , Negociación , Ginecología , Instituciones de Salud , México/epidemiología , Obstetricia , Estaciones del Año , Medicina , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
La acreditación de hospitales es una de las acciones más importantes para garantizar la calidad de los servicios de salud. No obstante que en otros paises la acreditación de hospitales se viene efectuando desde hace ya 4 decadas, en los países de América Latina se incorporó como un proceso sistematizado hasta principios de esta decada. Para encontrar una mayor aceptación por la acreditación, es indispensable tener claro que no se trata de un procedimiento de auditoria y mucho menos de caracter punitivo para clausurar establecimientos. Al mismo tiempo es necesario distinguirla de otros procesos semejantes como la habilitación, la categorización y la autoevaluación. La experiencia lograda en los diversos países donde se ha implantado, permite distinguir tres etapas en su implantación. La primera es una etapa política o de concertación entre las diferentes instituciones de los subsectores público y privada. La segunda tiene un componente técnico-administrativo que concluye con la formulación de manuales, instructivos y guia para operacionalizar la acreditación. Por último, la tercera etapa es la instrumentación operativa de la acreditación mediante equipos técnicos debidamente capacitados, de acuerdo a los lineamientos que dicte un comite o comisión "ad-hoc"
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hospitales/normas , Acreditación/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Se investigarón las características del proceso educativo del internado en el IMSS, mediante un cuestionario que fue resuelto en 82 unidades aplicativas, analizándose las actividades de enseñanza y los recursos disponibles para dicho educativo. Se identificó que el 90 por ciento de las unidades cuenta con los elementos estructurales para la enseñanza del internado y en la mayoría de éstas, el cumplimiento del programa es superior al 80 por ciento, existiendo buen desenpeño docente, pero no óptimo, por falta de disposición del profesorado o por falta de tiempo de éstos, debido a la demanda asistencial; siendo las actividades de supervisión y evaluación de los alumnos, los más deficientes. El desinterés, nivel de preparación e inconsistencia técnicas de estudio de los alumnos, son factores que también se evidenciaron como elementos que impieden el buen desarrollo del aprendizaje. No obstante se proporcionan a los alumnos suficientes y variadas experiencias clínicas, que permiten la consolidación de criterios, actitudes y habilidades psicomotoras que complementan su formación profesional