Consensus document on the management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This document was approved by a panel of experts from the AIDS Working Group (GESIDA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.), and the Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC). The quality of evidence and the level of recommendation were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist and provides indications for renal biopsy. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The information provided in this document should enable clinicians to optimize the evaluation and management of HIV-infected patients with renal disease.

Executive summary of the consensus document on the management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients.

The aim of this article is to update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document provides indications for renal biopsy and advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed.

Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la patología renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana / Executive summary of the recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

El objetivo de este documento es actualizar las recomendaciones sobre la evaluación y el manejo de la afectación renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) del año 2010. La función renal debe monitorizarse en todos los pacientes y debe incluir la medida de la concentración sérica de creatinina, la estimación del filtrado glomerular (ecuación CKD-EPI), la medida del cociente proteína/creatinina en orina, y un sedimento urinario. El estudio básico de la función tubular debe incluir la concentración sérica de fosfato y la tira reactiva de orina (glucosuria). En ausencia de alteraciones, el cribado será anual. En pacientes tratados con tenofovir o con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) se recomienda una evaluación más frecuente. Se debe evitar el uso de antirretrovirales potencialmente nefrotóxicos en pacientes con ERC o factores de riesgo para evitar su progresión. También se revisan las indicaciones de la biopsia renal, cuándo enviar el paciente al nefrólogo, y las indicaciones, la evaluación y el manejo del paciente en diálisis o del trasplante renal

The aim of this article is to update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glycosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir, or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document provides indications for renal biopsy and advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed

[Executive summary of the recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients]. / Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la patología renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

The aim of this article is to update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glycosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir, or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document provides indications for renal biopsy and advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed.

Documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la patología renal en pacientes con infección por VIH / Consensus document on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients

Objetivo: Actualizar las recomendaciones sobre la evaluación y el manejo de la afectación renal en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Métodos: Este documento ha sido consensuado por un panel de expertos del Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA) de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC), de la Sociedad Española de Nefrología (S.E.N.) y de la Sociedad Española de Química Clínica y Patología Molecular (SEQC). Para la valoración de la calidad de la evidencia y la graduación de las recomendaciones se ha utilizado el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Resultados: La evaluación renal debe incluir la medida de la concentración sérica de creatinina, la estimación del filtrado glomerular (ecuación chronic kidney disease epidemiological collaboration [CKD-EPI]), la medida del cociente proteína/creatinina en orina y un sedimento urinario. El estudio básico de la función tubular ha de incluir la concentración sérica de fosfato y la tira reactiva de orina (glucosuria). En ausencia de alteraciones, el cribado será anual. En pacientes tratados con tenofovir o con factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), se recomienda una evaluación más frecuente. Se debe evitar el uso de antirretrovirales potencialmente nefrotóxicos en pacientes con ERC o factores de riesgo para evitar su progresión. En este documento se revisan las indicaciones de derivación del paciente a Nefrología y las de la biopsia renal, así como las indicaciones y la evaluación y el manejo del paciente en diálisis o del trasplante renal. Conclusiones: La función renal debe monitorizarse en todos los pacientes con infección por el VIH y este documento pretende optimizar la evaluación y el manejo de la afectación renal (AU)

Objective: To update the 2010 recommendations on the evaluation and management of renal disease in HIV-infected patients. Methods: This document was approved by a panel of experts from the AIDS Working Group (GESIDA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), the Spanish Society of Nephrology (S.E.N.), and the Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC). The quality of evidence and the level of recommendation were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: The basic renal work-up should include measurements of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate by CKD-EPI, Urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, and urinary sediment. Tubular function tests should include determination of serum phosphate levels and urine dipstick for glucosuria. In the absence of abnormal values, renal screening should be performed annually. In patients treated with tenofovir or with risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), more frequent renal screening is recommended. In order to prevent disease progression, potentially nephrotoxic antiretroviral drugs are not recommended in patients with CKD or risk factors for CKD. The document advises on the optimal time for referral of a patient to the nephrologist and provides indications for renal biopsy. The indications for and evaluation and management of dialysis and renal transplantation are also addressed. Conclusions: Renal function should be monitored in all HIV-infected patients. The information provided in this document should enable clinicians to optimize the evaluation and management of HIV-infected patients with renal disease (AU)

Construction and phenotypic characterization of HIV type 1 functional envelope clones of subtypes G and F.

Subtype G has been estimated to represent the fourth most prevalent clade in the HIV-1 pandemic and subtype F is widely circulating in parts of South America (frequently within BF recombinant forms) and in Romania. However, functional envelope clones of these subtypes are lacking, which are needed for studies on antibody-mediated neutralization, coreceptor usage, and efficiency of viral entry inhibitor drugs. Here we report the construction, neutralization properties, and coreceptor usage of HIV-1 functional envelope clones of subtypes G (n = 15) and F (n = 7). These clones were obtained through RT-PCR amplification of HIV-1 gp160 from plasma RNA, and were used for pseudovirus production. All 15 subtype G-enveloped pseudoviruses were resistant to neutralization by gp120-targeted broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) b12 and 2G12, while a majority were neutralized by gp41-targeted MAbs 2F5 and 4E10. With regard to the subtype F envelopes, all seven pseudoviruses were resistant to 2F5 and b12, six were resistant to G12, and six were neutralized by 4E10. Coreceptor usage testing revealed that 21 of 22 envelopes were CCR5-tropic, including all 15 subtype G envelopes, seven of which were from patients with CD4(+) T cell counts <200/ml. These results confirm the broadly neutralizing activity of 4E10 on envelope clones across all tested group M clades, including subtypes G and F, reveal the resistance of most subtype F-enveloped pseudoviruses to broadly neutralizing MAbs b12, 2G12, and 2F5, and suggest that, similarly to subtype C, CXCR4 tropism is uncommon in subtype G, even at advanced stages of infection.

Characteristics and outcome of HIV infection in gypsies in the Spanish VACH Cohort

Objective To study the characteristics of HIV infection in the gypsy (Roma) population in Spain, as compared with those of the Caucasian, non-gypsy majority. Design Cross-sectional, historical cohort study from the Spanish VACH Cohort. Methods Patients attending VACH clinics between 1 June 2004 and 30 November 2004 were classified according to their racial and ethnic origin as “gypsies”, Caucasian non-gypsy Spanish natives (CNGN), and “other” (the last being excluded from this study). Their sociodemographic and clinico-epidemiological characteristics were compared, as well as the Kaplan–Meier curves of time to AIDS, or death, or disease progression (either of the 2 outcomes).Results4819 (48%) of 10,032 cases included in the VACH database were eligible: 210 (4.2%) were gypsies and 4252 (84.8%) were CNGN. Differences were observed in age, household, academic, inmate, marital, and employment history. Injecting drug use had been the most frequent mechanism of transmission in both groups, but to a greater extent among gypsies (72% versus 50%; P<0.000). Sex distribution, CD4 cell counts, and viral loads at the first visit were similar in the 2 groups, as was the percentage of patients with previous AIDS, percentage receiving antiretrovirals, and percentage subsequently starting antiretroviral therapy. Up to 1 April 2005, 416 new AIDS cases and 85 deaths were recorded. The percentage of these outcomes did not differ between groups, but log-rank test showed a shorter time to AIDS and disease progression among gypsies. Conclusions The sociodemographic characteristics of gypsies, the largest minority in the VACH Cohort, show differences relative to those of CNGN. HIV-related outcomes suggest that gypsies have a poorer prognosis (AU)

Objetivo estudiar las características de la infección por el VIH en gitanos en España, en comparación con las de la mayoría caucásica no gitana (CNG).Métodos estudio transversal y de cohortes históricas en la Cohorte VACH. Clasificamos a los pacientes que acudieron a las clínicas participantes en VACH entre el 1 de junio de 2004 y el 30 de noviembre de 2004 de acuerdo a su raza y etnia, como «gitanos», «nativos españoles CNG» u «otros» (estos, excluidos de este estudio). Comparamos sus características sociodemográficas y clinicoepidemiológicas, así como sus curvas de Kaplan–Meier del tiempo hasta sida, muerte o progresión de la enfermedad (cualquiera de ambos).Resultados4819 (48%) de 10.032 casos recogidos en la base de datos de VACH fueron incluidos en el estudio: 210 (4,2%) eran gitanos y 4.252 (84,8%) eran nativos CNG. Observamos diferencias en sus distribuciones por edad, domicilio, estudios, antecedentes penales, situación laboral y marital. La inyección de drogas había sido el mecanismo de transmisión del VIH más frecuente en los dos grupos, pero más marcadamente en los gitanos (72% frente a 50%; p<0,000). La distribución por sexos, los recuentos de linfocitos CD4 y las cargas virales en la primera visita fueron similares en ambos grupos, así como las proporciones de pacientes con sida previo y las de quienes estaban ya en, o iniciaron entonces, tratamiento antirretroviral. Hasta el 1 de abril de 2005 se registraron 416 nuevos casos de sida y 85 muertes. La proporción de ambos resultados fue similar en ambos grupos, pero la prueba del rango logarítmico demostró una evolución más rápida a sida y a progresión de la (..) (AU)

Characteristics and outcome of HIV infection in gypsies in the Spanish VACH Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of HIV infection in the gypsy (Roma) population in Spain, as compared with those of the Caucasian, non-gypsy majority. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, historical cohort study from the Spanish VACH Cohort. METHODS: Patients attending VACH clinics between 1 June 2004 and 30 November 2004 were classified according to their racial and ethnic origin as "gypsies", Caucasian non-gypsy Spanish natives (CNGN), and "other" (the last being excluded from this study). Their sociodemographic and clinico-epidemiological characteristics were compared, as well as the Kaplan-Meier curves of time to AIDS, or death, or disease progression (either of the 2 outcomes). RESULTS: 4819 (48%) of 10,032 cases included in the VACH database were eligible: 210 (4.2%) were gypsies and 4252 (84.8%) were CNGN. Differences were observed in age, household, academic, inmate, marital, and employment history. Injecting drug use had been the most frequent mechanism of transmission in both groups, but to a greater extent among gypsies (72% versus 50%; P<0.000). Sex distribution, CD4 cell counts, and viral loads at the first visit were similar in the 2 groups, as was the percentage of patients with previous AIDS, percentage receiving antiretrovirals, and percentage subsequently starting antiretroviral therapy. Up to 1 April 2005, 416 new AIDS cases and 85 deaths were recorded. The percentage of these outcomes did not differ between groups, but log-rank test showed a shorter time to AIDS and disease progression among gypsies. CONCLUSIONS: The sociodemographic characteristics of gypsies, the largest minority in the VACH Cohort, show differences relative to those of CNGN. HIV-related outcomes suggest that gypsies have a poorer prognosis.

[A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir]. / Ensayo clínico comparativo, aleatorizado y abierto sobre la efectividad de indinavir, ritonavir y saquinavir.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: HIV protease inhibitors (PI) were licensed without a direct evidence of their relative efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 137 patients attending our clinics between November 1997 and March 1998, to whom treatment with a PI was recommended, were randomized to receive indinavir (IDV), saquinavir (SQV) or ritonavir (RTV). Main outcome variables were one-year mean changes in HIV-RNA plasma concentrations and CD4 cells counts and proportion of patients with HIV viral load below level of detection. RESULTS: Mean HIV viral load reductions were 0.95 for SQV, 0.72 for IDV and 0.65 for RTV (p = 0.44), equaling losses and changes to failures. In a standard intent-to-treat analysis, mean changes in viral load were 1.16, 1.01 and 1.50 (p = 0.21), respectively. The proportion of patients with undetectable viral load was 50%, with no differences between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the effectiveness of SQV, IDV and RTV.

Ensayo clínico comparativo, aleatorizado y abierto sobre la efectividad de indinavir, ritonavir y saquinavir / A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of indinavir, ritonavir and saquinavir

FUNDAMENTO Y OBJETIVO: Los inhibidores de la proteinasa del virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) fueron introducidos en la clínica sin datos directos de sus eficacias relativas. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Ciento treinta y siete pacientes atendidos entre noviembre de 1997 y marzo de 1998 en quienes se indicó tratamiento con un inhibidor de la proteinasa fueron asignados aleatoriamente a recibir indinavir, ritonavir o saquinavir. Las variables principales fueron los cambios medios respectivos en las concentraciones plasmáticas de VIH-ARN y en los recuentos de linfocitos CD4 y la proporción de pacientes con carga viral indetectable después de 12 meses. RESULTADOS: Los cambios respectivos del log10 de la carga viral fueron: saquinavir, 0,97; indinavir, 0,72 y ritonavir 0,65 (p = 0,44), equiparando pérdidas y cambios a fracaso. En un análisis estándar por intención de tratar, los cambios fueron 1,16, 1,01 y 1,50, respectivamente (p = 0,21). La proporción de pacientes con carga viral indetectable fue del 50 por ciento, sin diferencias entre los 3 grupos. CONCLUSIONES: No se observaron diferencias en la efectividad de saquinavir, indinavir y ritonavir para reducir la carga viral del VIH (AU)

[Incidence of bacteremia among histologic groups of hematologic malignancies]. / Incidencia de bacteriemia en grupos histológicos de neoplasias hematológicas.

INTRODUCTION: Subgroups having dissimilar prognoses are being identified among cancer patients with infection. Previous studies have suggested that these differences may be related to the histologic diagnosis, but this issue has not as yet been demonstrated. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients admitted with acute leukemia (AL) or lymphoma (ML) from 1988 to 1998. Incidence of bacteremia was calculated for the following subgroups: acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), AML following refractory anaemia with excess blasts (AML-RAEB), high-grade ML (HGML), intermediate-grade ML (IGML), low-grade ML (LGML) and indeterminate ML (IML). Kaplan-Meier curves of time to the first positive blood culture were constructed and compared by means of log-rank test. RESULTS: In the period covered there were 244 new diagnoses of AL or ML: 62 AML, 32 ALL, 20 AML-RAEB, 78 HGML, 7 IGML, 37 LGML and 6 IML. At the end of the study period, 44 patients were alive, 147 were known to have died at a certain date and 53 had been formally lost to follow-up (most of them, transferred for hospice care). Among 684 blood cultures, there were 51 contaminations and 155 significant isolates. Among the latter, gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 74 and gram-negative bacteria in 47; in 27 cases more than 1 bacterial species were recovered. Fungi were isolated in 7 cases. The incidence of bacteremia expressed as cases per 1000 patient-days was 5.80 for AML, 5.03 for AML-RAEB, 1.56 for ALL, 0.21 for HGML and 0.40 for the remaining ML. Time to the first positive blood culture was significantly shorter for AML than for any other group, and was shorted for ALL and AML-RAEB than for ML. CONCLUSION: Differences in the incidence of bacteremia were observed among histologically-defined groups of unselected patients with hematologic malignancies.

[A cross-sectional study on the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of HIV-1 infection in gypsies and in other minorities in Bilbao, Northern Spain]. / Estudio transversal sobre las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de la infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en gitanos y otras minorías en Bilbao.

BACKGROUND: The health status and needs of gypsies have been insufficiently studied. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We studied the clinicoepidemiological characteristics of all HIV-1 infected patients attending in our outpatients clinic and hospitalized who were classified according to their ethnic origin as <>, <> (Caucasian non-gypsy Spanish natives) or <>. RESULTS: Overall, there were 563 patients out of 674 previously appointed (83%). Intravenous drug use (IVDU) was the HIV acquisition mechanism in 70%, 95% and 25% (p < 0.000) and attendance was considered regular in 89%, 48% and 89% payos, gypsies and immigrants (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVDU as the HIV transmission mechanism and lower clinic attendance rates were the most relevant differences observed between gypsy and payo subjects.