Potentially under-recognized late-stage physical and psychosexual complications of non-therapeutic neonatal penile circumcision: a qualitative and quantitative analysis of self-reports from an online community forum.

The removal of non-pathogenic foreskin from the penis of healthy neonates and infants for non-religious reasons is routinely practiced in many parts of the world. High level data from well-designed randomized controlled trials of circumcision in neonates and infants does not guide clinical practice. Reliable counts of immediate and short term circumcision complications are difficult to estimate. Emerging evidence suggests routine neonatal circumcision could lead to long term psychological, physical, and sexual complications in some men. The stigma associated with discussing circumcision complications creates a prevalence paradox where the presence of significant circumcision complications is higher than reported. Prior to the Internet, there were very few forums for men from diverse communities, who were troubled about their circumcision status, to discuss and compare stories. To investigate the long term consequences of circumcision, we reviewed 135 posts from 109 individual users participating in a circumcision grief subsection of Reddit, an internet discussion board. We identified three major categories of complications: physical such as pain during erections and lost sensitivity, psychological such as anxiety and violation of autonomy, and sexual such as feeling that the sexual experience was negatively altered or being unable to complete a sexual experience. We also identified a "discovery process" where some men described coming into awareness of their circumcision status. These findings suggest that neonatal circumcision can have significant adverse consequences for adult men. The removal of normal foreskin tissue should be limited to adult men who choose the procedure for cosmetic reasons or when medically indicated.

Increased Risk of Hypogonadal Symptoms in Shift Workers With Shift Work Sleep Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between shift work sleep disorder (SWSD), a primary circadian rhythm disorder characterized by excessive day-time sleepiness associated with shift work, and hypogonadal symptoms in shift workers. METHODS: Men presenting to an andrology clinic between July 2014 and June 2017 completed questionnaires assessing shift work schedule, SWSD risk, and hypogonadal symptoms ([quantitative] Androgen Deficiency in the Aging Male [qADAM, ADAM]). The impact of nonstandard shift work and SWSD on responses to qADAM and ADAM was assessed using ANOVA and linear regression. RESULTS: About 24.1% (619/2571) of men worked nonstandard shifts. Of those, 196 (31.7%) were considered to have SWSD. Controlling for age, comorbidities, and testosterone (T) levels, nonstandard shift workers had qADAM scores 1.12 points lower than day-time workers (P <.01). Subgroup analysis of nonstandard shift workers showed that those with SWSD had qADAM scores 5.47 points lower than men without SWSD (P <.01). In this same subgroup analysis, SWSD was independently associated with lower T levels (mean decrease 100.4 ng/dL, P <.01) when controlling for age, comorbidities, and prior T supplementation. CONCLUSION: Nonstandard shift workers with SWSD have even worse hypogonadal symptoms and lower T levels than day-time workers and nonstandard shift workers without SWSD. This suggests that poor sleep habits, as identified by SWSD, may contribute to the more severe hypogonadal symptoms seen in nonstandard shift workers.

To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review discusses factors affecting outcomes during ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy (LL), explores specific clinical challenges to the efficacy of URS LL, and reviews the available literature comparing the dusting and basketing approaches to URS LL. RECENT FINDINGS: Data show high stone-free rates with URS LL in all locations of the urinary tract and with all stone types and sizes. Recent data comparing LL with dusting versus basketing suggest higher rates of residual fragments with dusting but less utilization of ureteral access sheaths and potentially shorter operative times. Differences in postoperative complications, re-intervention rates, and other outcome parameters are not yet clear. Interpretation of published data is problematic due to variability in laser settings, follow-up intervals, and definitions for what constitutes stone-free status. URS has overtaken shock wave lithotripsy in the last decade as the most commonly utilized surgical approach for treating urolithiasis. Two primary strategies have emerged as the most common techniques for performing LL: dusting and basketing. There is a relative paucity of data examining the difference in these techniques as it pertains to peri-operative outcomes and overall success. We attempt to synthesize this data into evidence-based and experience-based recommendations.