Iatrogenic Menopause After Treatment for Cervical Cancer.

The ever-improving prognosis of women diagnosed with cervical cancer has meant that survivorship and treatment-related sequelae are being brought more into the spotlight in an attempt to try to reduce morbidity and improve women's long-term health. However, there are many issues surrounding an iatrogenic menopause in cervical cancer, a variety of potential management options and barriers to treatment. Women who have become menopausal under the age of 45 years as a result of cervical cancer are significantly less likely to start hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or continue it long term as compared with those who have undergone a surgical menopause for a benign reason. High profile media reports raising concerns about the safety of HRT use have left many women reluctant to consider HRT as a therapeutic option for menopausal symptoms and many are seeking to use complementary/alternative medicine, including non-pharmacological interventions, to alleviate symptoms. The benefits of HRT in this population have been shown to reduce these effects, although adherence to treatment regimens is a challenge due to poor compliance, which is in part due to the fear of a second malignancy. The development of non-HRT-based interventions to ameliorate menopausal symptoms and reduce the long-term health consequences are needed for women who choose not to take HRT.

Is conservative treatment for adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix safe?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long term results of treatment of adenocarcinoma in situ by conisation of the cervix using survival analysis. DESIGN: A retrospective study in six teaching hospitals in North West Thames. POPULATION: Eighty-five women with a histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix in punch or cone biopsy were identified from pathology and clinical databases. RESULTS: In one patient a small focus of adenocarcinoma in situ was found in a cervical polyp. Subsequent cytology was normal and no further treatment was undertaken. The 84 remaining women underwent diathermy loop, cold knife cone biopsy, laser cone biopsy, or needle excision of the transformation zone. A hysterectomy or second conisation was performed in 31/84 women (36.9%) as part of the initial treatment. In all, nine (10.6%) had early invasive lesions of which four were squamous. Fifty-nine patients were treated conservatively following one or two conisations (median follow up 78 weeks, range 0-543 weeks). One had a subsequent hysterectomy for menorrhagia. Five women have undergone treatment for suspected recurrence, a 21.5% cumulative rate of further treatment by four years. The cumulative rate of histologically proven recurrence after conservative management was 4.3% at one year and 15% at four years. CONCLUSIONS: In those cases with clear margins in the cone biopsy, there is a place for conservative management of a selected group of patients who wish to preserve fertility. However, 16.7% of these will require further treatment after four years because of recurrent cytological abnormalities. Women who opt for conservative management should undergo regular, long term surveillance in a colposcopy clinic. Among those women with involved margins in the initial cone biopsy, there is a high incidence of residual disease. A second cone biopsy may be appropriate 'definitive treatment' for young women who wish to preserve their fertility if the margins of the second biopsy are clear and there is no evidence of invasion. Even among those for whom a hysterectomy is the proposed 'definitive treatment', a second cone biopsy may be required before hysterectomy to avoid inappropriate treatment of an occult invasive lesion.

Association of glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Epithelial ovarian cancer is generally associated with a poor outcome, although the mechanisms that determine survival and progression-free interval (PFI) are unclear. Data from ovarian tumors showing associations between (a) null genotypes at the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 loci and expression of p53 protein and (b) outcome and expression of p53 suggest that polymorphism at these loci is a factor determining outcome. Accordingly, we have studied the association between the GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes and survival and PFI in 148 women with epithelial ovarian cancer. Although we did not find an association between individual genotypes and outcome, women with both GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes demonstrated poorer survival (P = 0.001) and reduced PFI (P = 0.003). Thus, no cases with both these genotypes survived past 42 months postdiagnosis. In contrast, 43% of the women without this combination survived beyond this time. Because response to chemotherapy is a major factor determining outcome in ovarian cancer, we also examined the data for associations between the glutathione S-transferase genotypes and response to such treatment. Thus, in 78 patients treated with chemotherapy, the combination of GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null was associated with unresponsiveness to primary chemotherapy (P = 0.004); none of the eight patients with both these genotypes responded, compared with 38 of 70 (54%) of patients with other genotype combinations. The effect of the combination of genotypes on survival and PFI was lost in a multivariate model that included response to chemotherapy as a confounding factor. This suggests that the combination of GSTM1 null/GSTT1 null is associated with outcome because of its influence on response to chemotherapy. These preliminary findings may provide a basis for the selection of patients for treatment with chemotherapeutic agents.

Epithelial ovarian cancer: influence of polymorphism at the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1 and GSTT1 loci on p53 expression.

The importance of polymorphism in the glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTT1 and, cytochrome P450, CYP2D6 loci in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer has been assessed in two studies; firstly, a case-control study designed to determine the influence of these genes on susceptibility to this cancer, and secondly, the putative role of these genes in the protection of host cell DNA has been studied by comparing p53 expression in patients with different GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP2D6 genotypes. The frequencies of GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP2D6 genotypes in 84 cases and 325 controls were not different. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect p53 expression in 63 of these tumours. Expression was found in 23 tumours. Of the patients demonstrating immunopositivity, 20 (87%) were GSTM1 null. The frequency distributions of GSTM1 genotypes in p53-positive and -negative samples were significantly different (P = 0.002) and those for GSTT1 genotypes approached significance (exact P = 0.057). The proportion of patients with both GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null was also significantly greater in the immunopositive (4/22) than in the immunonegative group (1/40) (P = 0.0493). Single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis was used to detect mutations in the 23 tumour samples demonstrating p53 positivity. A shift in electrophoretic mobility of amplified fragments was found in 11 patients (exons 5, 6, 7 and 8) and these exons were sequenced. In eight samples a mutation was found. No SCCP variants were identified in the other 12 immunopositive patients. Sequencing of exons 4-9 of p53 from these tumours resulted in the detection of mutations in two patients (exons 5 and 7). Thus, in 23 patients who demonstrated immunopositivity, p53 mutations were found in nine patients with GSTM1 null (90.0%). In the 13 patients in whom no mutations were identified, 11 were GSTM1 null (84.6%). The data show that overexpression of p53 is associated with the GSTM1 null genotype. We propose the data are compatible with the view that GSTM1 and GSTT1 are critical in the detoxification of the products of oxidative stress produced during the repair of the ovarian epithelium. Thus, failure to detoxify products of this stress may result in damage to various genes in the host cell, including to p53, resulting in persistent expression of mutant protein. In other patients, oxidative stress effects damage to various genes, but not including p53, resulting in overexpression of wild-type p53.

Theta class glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 genotypes and susceptibility to cervical neoplasia: interactions with GSTM1, CYP2D6 and smoking.

The factors that determine progression of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are unknown. Cigarette smoking is a risk factor, suggesting polymorphism at loci that encode carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes such as glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1, GSTM1) and cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) may determine susceptibility to these cancers. We have studied the frequency of the null genotype at the theta class GSTT1 locus in women with low-grade CIN, high-grade CIN and SCC. The control group comprised women with normal cervical pathology suffering menorrhagia. We found the frequency of GSTT1 null in the control and case groups was not significantly different, though frequency distributions of combinations of the genotype with smoking in mutually exclusive groups in the high-grade CIN group and the other case groups were significantly different. Interactive effects of GSTT1 null with the GSTM1 null and CYP2D6 EM genotypes, and cigarette smoking were also studied by comparing the multinomial frequency distributions of these factors over mutually exclusive categories. These showed no significant differences between the controls and SCC or low-grade CIN. Frequency distributions in high-grade CIN, however, were significantly different to the controls, and both SCC and low-grade CIN; frequency distributions of GSTT1 null with smoking and CYP2D6 EM, individually and in combination, were significantly different. However, inspection of our data does not indicate that GSTT1 null is a major factor mediating risk. Thus, comparison of chi 2 values for the differences between frequency distributions in high-grade CIN and other groups shows that values for combinations of GSTT1 null with other factors are lower than those for equivalent combinations with smoking and CYP2D6 EM. Interestingly, the combination GSTT1 null/GSTM1 null did not appear to influence susceptibility to CIN or SCC.