Effects of decentralization of primary health care on diabetes mellitus in Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of primary healthcare decentralization on type 2 diabetes mellitus mortality and morbidity in different municipalities of a developing country. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study based on a panel of annual data from 5560 Brazilian municipalities from 2000 to 2011. METHODS: The investigation used the staggered municipal adoption of a federal health information program as a quasi-experiment to identify the treatment effects of health decentralization on diabetes indicators. Using Difference-in-Differences models and instrumental variables, we analyzed the effects of primary healthcare decentralization on diabetes rates (i.e. diabetes deaths and hospitalizations by the number of people with a diabetes diagnosis and by population). RESULTS: Evidence suggests improvements in universal access to primary health care and progress in the average health outcomes related to diabetes mortality (reduction of 30%) and hospitalization (reduction of 2.3%) due to decentralization. Effects are further pronounced in developed regions with higher incomes, while the poorest and less developed regions showed virtually no effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that there are particular preconditions for successful primary health decentralization, especially related to returns of scale (big health facilities are associated with low cost per treatment), lack of human and physical capital, and government coordination problems.

Indices for the assessment of nutritional quality of meals: a systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to synthesise information on indices developed to evaluate nutritional quality of meals. A strategy for systematic search of the literature was developed using keywords related to assessment of meal quality. Databases searched included ScienceDirect, PubMed, Lilacs, SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar. The literature search resulted in seven different meal quality indices. Each article was analysed in order to identify the following items: authors, country, year, study design, population characteristics, type of meal evaluated, dietary assessment method, characteristics evaluated (nutrients or food items), score range, index components, nutritional references, correlations performed, validation and relationship with an outcome (if existing). Two studies developed instruments to assess the quality of breakfast, three analysed lunch, one evaluated dinner and one was applied to all types of meals and snacks. All meal quality indices reviewed were based on the evaluation of presence or absence of food groups and relative contributions of nutrients, according to food-based guidelines or nutrient references, adapting the daily dietary recommendations to one specific meal. Most of the indices included three items as components for meal quality assessment: (I) total fat or some specific type of fat, (II) fruits and vegetables and (III) cereals or whole grains. This systematic review indicates aspects that need further research, particularly the numerous approaches to assessing meals considering different foods and nutrients, and the need for validation studies of meal indices.