RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To find out clinical features associated with poor response to treatment in vestibular migraine (VM). METHODS: VM patients treated with drugs recommended in migraine prophylaxis were included in this multicenter study. Migraine features including type, age of onset of headache and vertigo attacks, attack frequency, intensity, associated symptoms, triggering factors, presence of interictal dizziness/imbalance, anxiety, depression, history of motion sickness, and family history of migraine were noted. Amitriptyline, flunarizine, propranolol, topiramate and venlafaxine were chosen depending on patients' individual requirements. Maximum dose of each drug was tried for 2 months to decide its efficacy. In the case of inefficacy, it was changed with another preventive drug of different class. If there was still no improvement, two drugs of different classes were combined. ≥ 50% reduction in attack frequency and severity in patients using one drug and a combination of two drugs was compared, with patients showing <50% reduction despite combination therapy, regarding their clinical features. RESULTS: The results of 430 VM patients, 65 men and 365 women with a mean age of 42.2 ± 12.2 years (range: 17-74 years), were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Cutaneous allodynia frequently associated with female sex, comorbid anxiety and depression and interictal dizziness/imbalance enhanced with comorbid anxiety were risk factors for reduced treatment response. Aural fullness might be the clue of impending concomitant Meniere's disease not responding to migraine preventives.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Meniere , Trastornos Migrañosos , Adulto , Mareo/complicaciones , Mareo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Cefalea , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad de Meniere/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Meniere/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Vértigo/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to demonstrate the patient demographics, etiologies and apraclonidine test results in adult Horner's syndrome. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed by the analysis of medical data of patients who were given 0.5% apraclonidine test. Patients' past medical history, demographic data, etiologies, accompanying neurological findings and pharmacological test results were assessed. RESULTS: Forty patients (21 females and 19 males) with a mean age of 50.3 ± 11.6 years were evaluated. Apraclonidine 0.5% test was positive in 37 patients (92.5%). An etiology could be identified in 20 patients (central [9 patients, 45%], preganglionic [9 patients, 45%] and postganglionic [2 patients, 10%]). Neurological findings accompanying Horner's syndrome were present in 8 patients. CONCLUSION: Despite detailed investigations, in a significant number of patients with Horner's syndrome an underlying cause may not be detected. Among the identifiable lesions, central and preganglionic involvements are still the first leading causes of Horner's syndrome. In addition, apraclonidine test may not be positive in all patients and a negative response does not exclude Horner's syndrome.