Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) ; 73(3): 276-282, May-June 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1439613

RESUMEN

Abstract Background: Mobile phones in hospital settings have been identified as an important source of cross-contamination because of the low frequency with which mobile phones are cleaned by health workers and cyclical contamination of the hands and face. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the mobile phones of the anesthesia team at a teaching hospital are potential reservoirs of nosocomial bacteria. In addition, differences in device sanitization and hand hygiene habits between attending and resident anesthesiologists were correlated with mobile phone colonization. Methods: A prevalence study was conducted over a 6-month period from 2017 to 2018 that involved the collection of samples from the mobile phones of the anesthesiology team and culturing for surveillance. A questionnaire was administered to assess the mobile phone sanitization and hand washing routines of the anesthesia team in specific situations. Results: Bacterial contamination was detected for 86 of the 128 mobile phones examined (67.2%). A greater presence of Micrococcus spp. on devices was correlated with a higher frequency of mobile phone use (p = 0.003) and a lower frequency of sanitization (p = 0.003). The presence of bacteria was increased on the mobile phones of professionals who did not perform handwashing after tracheal intubation (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Hand hygiene and device sanitization habits were more important than the use behavior, as a higher presence of bacteria correlated with poorer hygiene habits. Furthermore, handwashing is the best approach to prevent serious colonization of mobile devices and the possible transmission of pathogens to patients under the care of anesthesiologists.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Teléfono Celular , Bacterias , Anestesiólogos , Hospitales de Enseñanza
2.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 73(3): 276-282, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34563561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mobile phones in hospital settings have been identified as an important source of cross-contamination because of the low frequency with which mobile phones are cleaned by health workers and cyclical contamination of the hands and face. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the mobile phones of the anesthesia team at a teaching hospital are potential reservoirs of nosocomial bacteria. In addition, differences in device sanitization and hand hygiene habits between attending and resident anesthesiologists were correlated with mobile phone colonization. METHODS: A prevalence study was conducted over a 6-month period from 2017 to 2018 that involved the collection of samples from the mobile phones of the anesthesiology team and culturing for surveillance. A questionnaire was administered to assess the mobile phone sanitization and hand washing routines of the anesthesia team in specific situations. RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was detected for 86 of the 128 mobile phones examined (67.2%). A greater presence of Micrococcus spp. on devices was correlated with a higher frequency of mobile phone use (p=0.003) and a lower frequency of sanitization (p=0.003). The presence of bacteria was increased on the mobile phones of professionals who did not perform handwashing after tracheal intubation (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Hand hygiene and device sanitization habits were more important than the use behavior, as a higher presence of bacteria correlated with poorer hygiene habits. Furthermore, handwashing is the best approach to prevent serious colonization of mobile devices and the possible transmission of pathogens to patients under the care of anesthesiologists.


Asunto(s)
Teléfono Celular , Infección Hospitalaria , Humanos , Anestesiólogos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Bacterias , Hospitales de Enseñanza
3.
J Occup Health ; 63(1): e12234, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33993611

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend that the cleaning area in a Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) maintain a negative pressure of the environmental air, but how much this system can impact the contamination of the air by bioaerosols in the area is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of negative pressure on CSSD by evaluating the microbiological air quality of this sector. METHODS: Microbiological air samples were collected in two CSSD in the same hospital: one with and one without a negative air pressure system. Outdoor air samples were collected as a comparative control. Andersen six-stage air sampler was used to obtain the microbiological air samples. RESULTS: The concentration of bioaerosols in the CSSD without negative pressure was 273.15 and 206.71 CFU/m3 , while in the CSSD with negative pressure the concentration of bioaerosols was 116.96 CFU/m3 and 131.10 CFU/m3 . The number of isolated colonies in the negative pressure CSSD was significantly lower (P = .01541). CONCLUSION: The findings showed that the negative pressure system in the CSSD cleaning area contributed to the quantitative reduction in bioaerosols. However, the concentration of bioaerosols was lower than that established in the guideline for indoor air quality of many countries. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that CSSDs which do not have a negative pressure system in their cleaning area offer occupational risk.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología del Aire , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Contaminación del Aire Interior/análisis , Central de Suministros en Hospital , Ventiladores de Presión Negativa , Aerosoles/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Humanos , Ventilación/métodos
4.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 38(10): 1068-1070, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31568145

RESUMEN

From July 2009 to July 2015, Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pediatric sterile sites were selected. Polymerase chain reaction was used to detect mecA and lukS-PV/lukF-PV genes. The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 37.7%. Ten isolates had the lukS-PV/lukF-PV genes, 2 of which were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Skin and soft tissues infections were significantly associated with lukS-PV/lukF-PV positive isolates, P = 0.008.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Exotoxinas/genética , Leucocidinas/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/enzimología , Adolescente , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...