Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 69, 2023 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157081

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We investigated whether twice-daily administration of a bilayer tablet formulation of tramadol (35% immediate-release [IR] and 65% sustained-release) is as effective as four-times-daily IR tramadol capsules for managing cancer pain. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, non-inferiority study enrolled opioid-naïve patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen (paracetamol) to manage cancer pain and self-reported pain (mean value over 3 days ≥ 25 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients were randomized to either bilayer tablets or IR capsules for 14 days. The starting dose was 100 mg/day and could be escalated to 300 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS (averaged over 3 days) for pain at rest from baseline to end of treatment/discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 251 patients were randomized. The baseline mean VAS at rest was 47.67 mm (range: 25.6-82.7 mm). In the full analysis set, the adjusted mean change in VAS was - 22.07 and - 19.08 mm in the bilayer tablet (n = 124) and IR capsule (n = 120) groups, respectively. The adjusted mean difference was - 2.99 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] - 7.96 to 1.99 mm). The upper 95% CI was less than the predefined non-inferiority margin of 7.5 mm. Other efficacy outcomes were similar in both groups. Adverse events were reported for 97/126 (77.0%) and 101/125 (80.8%) patients in the bilayer tablet and IR capsule groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily administration of bilayer tramadol tablets was as effective as four-times-daily administration of IR capsules regarding the improvement in pain VAS, with comparable safety outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-184143/jRCT2080224082 (October 5, 2018).


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Tramadol , Humanos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Comprimidos/uso terapéutico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Pain Pract ; 23(3): 277-289, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478501

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of twice-daily bilayer sustained-release tramadol hydrochloride tablets (35% immediate-release; 65% sustained-release) in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. METHODS: This was a Phase III treatment-withdrawal study with 1-4-week dose-escalation, 1-week fixed-dose, and 4-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal periods performed at 43 medical institutions in Japan. Patients aged ≥20 years, ≥3 months after the onset of herpes zoster with localized, persistent pain despite fixed-dose analgesics for ≥2 weeks before enrollment were eligible. Patients started tramadol at 100 mg/day and its dose escalated to a maximum of 400 mg/day to achieve a reduction in their Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain of ≥2 points. Eligible patients were randomized to continue tramadol or switched to placebo for 4 weeks (double-blind period). Patients were withdrawn due to inadequate analgesia (NRS deteriorated on ≥2 consecutive days) or their request. RESULTS: Overall, 252 patients started tramadol and 173 were randomized (tramadol: 85; placebo: 88). Tramadol was superior to placebo for the primary endpoint (time from randomization to an inadequate analgesic effect) with log-rank test p = 0.0005. The hazard ratio was 0.353 (95% confidence interval 0.190-0.657) in favor of tramadol and fewer patients in the tramadol group experienced inadequate analgesic effects (16.9% vs. 39.8%). Adverse events in ≥10% of patients in the open-label period were constipation (43.8%), nausea (34.9%), somnolence (18.5%), and dizziness (11.6%). The frequencies of adverse events in the double-blind period were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Sustained-release tramadol tablets with an immediate-release component are effective and well tolerated for managing postherpetic neuralgia.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia Posherpética , Tramadol , Humanos , Neuralgia Posherpética/tratamiento farmacológico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Comprimidos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Biol Chem ; 289(38): 26302-26313, 2014 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25100728

RESUMEN

Cofilin plays an essential role in cell migration and morphogenesis by enhancing actin filament dynamics via its actin filament-severing activity. Slingshot-1 (SSH1) is a protein phosphatase that plays a crucial role in regulating actin dynamics by dephosphorylating and reactivating cofilin. In this study, we identified insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-4 as a novel SSH1-binding protein. Co-precipitation assays revealed the direct endogenous binding of IRS4 to SSH1. IRS4, but not IRS1 or IRS2, was bound to SSH1. IRS4 was bound to SSH1 mainly through the unique region (amino acids 335-400) adjacent to the C terminus of the phosphotyrosine-binding domain of IRS4. The N-terminal A, B, and phosphatase domains of SSH1 were bound to IRS4 independently. Whereas in vitro phosphatase assays revealed that IRS4 does not directly affect the cofilin phosphatase activity of SSH1, knockdown of IRS4 increased cofilin phosphorylation in cultured cells. Knockdown of IRS4 decreased phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activity, and treatment with an inhibitor of PI3K increased cofilin phosphorylation. Akt preferentially phosphorylated SSH1 at Thr-826, but expression of a non-phosphorylatable T826A mutant of SSH1 did not affect insulin-induced cofilin dephosphorylation, and an inhibitor of Akt did not increase cofilin phosphorylation. These results suggest that IRS4 promotes cofilin dephosphorylation through sequential activation of PI3K and SSH1 but not through Akt. In addition, IRS4 co-localized with SSH1 in F-actin-rich membrane protrusions in insulin-stimulated cells, which suggests that the association of IRS4 with SSH1 contributes to localized activation of cofilin in membrane protrusions.


Asunto(s)
Cofilina 1/metabolismo , Proteínas Sustrato del Receptor de Insulina/metabolismo , Fosfoproteínas Fosfatasas/metabolismo , Procesamiento Proteico-Postraduccional , Extensiones de la Superficie Celular/metabolismo , Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Células HEK293 , Humanos , Insulina/fisiología , Proteínas Sustrato del Receptor de Insulina/química , Proteínas Sustrato del Receptor de Insulina/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/metabolismo , Fosfoproteínas Fosfatasas/química , Fosforilación , Unión Proteica , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas , Transporte de Proteínas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...