Risk factors for rebleeding in gastroduodenal ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Rebleeding after hemostasis of the gastroduodenal ulcer (GDU) is one of the indicators associated with death among GDU patients. However, there are few studies on risk score that contribute to rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding peptic ulcers. AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with rebleeding, including patient factors, after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and to stratify the risk of rebleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 587 consecutive patients who were treated for Forrest Ia to IIa bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers with endoscopic hemostasis at three institutions. Risk factors associated with rebleeding were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. The Rebleeding Nagoya University (Rebleeding-N) scoring system was developed based on the extracted factors. The Rebleeding-N score was internally validated using bootstrap resampling methods. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (11%) had rebleeding after hemostasis of gastroduodenal ulcers. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed four independent rebleeding risk factors: blood transfusion, albumin <2.5, duodenal ulcer, and diameter of the exposed vessel ≧2 mm. Patients with 4 risk factors in the Rebleeding-N score had a 54% rebleeding rate, and patients with 3 risk factors had 44% and 25% rebleeding rates. In the internal validation, the mean area under the curve of the Rebleeding-N score was 0.830 (95% CI = 0.786-0.870). CONCLUSIONS: Rebleeding after clip hemostasis of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers was associated with blood transfusion, albumin <2.5, diameter of the exposed vessel ≧2 mm, and duodenal ulcer. The Rebleeding-N score was able to stratify the risk of rebleeding.

A novel self-assembling peptide hemostatic gel as rescue therapy for fistula bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.

The novel synthetic self-assembling peptide PuraStat has been approved for hemostasis in endoscopic procedures. Nakahara and colleagues describe their application of PuraStat for hemostasis of refractory fistula bleeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. The effective and technically easy procedure is a useful option when hemostasis cannot be achieved by other means.

Long-term outcomes of endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage using a novel spiral plastic stent in acute calculus cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (EGBS) is considered for patients with contraindications to early surgery for acute calculus cholecystitis. However, evidence regarding the long-term outcomes of EGBS is insufficient to date. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of EGBS as a bridge to or alternative to surgery when there are contraindications. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of patients who underwent EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent for acute calculus cholecystitis between January 2011 and December 2019. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term outcomes of EGBS using a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The clinical success rate of EGBS was 97%. After EGBS, 25 patients (surgery group) underwent elective cholecystectomy and 24 patients did not (follow-up group). In the surgery group, the median period from EGBS to surgery was 93 days. There was a single late adverse event with cholecystitis recurrence. In the follow-up group, the median follow-up period was 236 days. Late adverse events were observed in eight patients, including recurrence of cholecystitis (four patients), duodenal penetration by the distal stent end (two patients), and distal stent migration (two patient). In the follow-up group, the time to recurrence of biliary obstruction was 527 days. CONCLUSIONS: EGBS with a novel spiral-shaped plastic stent is safe and effective for long-term acute calculus cholecystitis. There is a possibility of EGBS to be a bridge to surgery and a surgical alternative for acute calculus cholecystitis in patients with contraindications to early cholecystectomy.

Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Pseudo-outbreak of an Intestinal Culture Specimen Caused by a Water Tap in an Endoscopy Unit.

Objective Gastrointestinal lesions of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are regarded as opportunistic infections. A large number of positive specimens of NTM were identified in an intestinal fluid culture in the endoscopy unit and it was considered to be a pseudo-outbreak. Methods We reviewed the hospital, laboratory, and colonoscopy records of 263 consecutive patients whose intestinal fluids were analyzed for a mycobacterial culture by colonoscopy at St. Marianna University Hospital, between January 2009 and December 2018. The endoscopy reprocessing procedures were reviewed and samples of water used in the endoscopy unit were cultured. Results An intestinal fluid culture of 154 (58.6%) patients tested positive for NTM (M. intracellulare; 125 cases, M. gordonae; 14 cases, M. avium; 4 cases, M. abscessus; 3 cases, and 8 other cases). In 182 cases (69.2%), an intestinal mucosal culture was performed simultaneously with a fluid culture and tested positive for NTM in 2 cases. Next, we examined the endoscopy unit for any possible environmental contamination. NTM were detected in the tap water used to prepare the antifoaming solution in the endoscopy unit. The water faucets in the endoscopy unit were considered to be the source of the contamination of NTMs. Conclusion We observed that a large number of cases tested positive due to contaminated water that had been used in an endoscopy unit, thus leading to a pseudo-outbreak of NTM.

Intra-abdominal bleeding as a rare complication after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in a patient taking direct oral anticoagulants.

We describe the case of an 84-year old female who was taking rivaroxaban 30 mg/day and had a medical history of atrial fibrillation. She underwent endoscopic mucosal resection of a 5-mm adenoma located in the hepatic flexure of the transverse colon. Following the procedure, she developed gradually intensifying abdominal pain, with the appearance of small amount of blood in the feces. For that reason, she visited our facility on the 5th day post-endoscopic mucosal resection. At the time of the visit, contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography revealed no extravasation or free air; however, bloody ascites was confirmed in the peritoneal cavity. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with post-endoscopic mucosal resection intra-abdominal hemorrhage and hospitalized the same day. After admission, rivaroxaban was discontinued and patient condition monitored. Because subsequent abdominal computed tomography revealed no distinct increase in bloody ascites, no interventional radiological or surgical procedure was performed, and the patient was discharged after providing only conservative treatment. While hemorrhage and perforation are the main complications after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection, so far, there have been a few reports on the occurrence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage following endoscopic mucosal resection. Emergency treatment is sometimes required in patients with intra-abdominal hemorrhage. It is important to keep in mind that this complication, although very rare, may occur, particularly in patients taking anticoagulants.