Role of allogeneic placental tissues in penile inversion vaginoplasty.

Background: The role of allogeneic placental tissue (APT) in genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is not well understood. Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV), the most common genital GAS, often results in tissue healing- or wound-related complications, including scarring and neovaginal stenosis. Surgical reoperation and revision vaginoplasty are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of APT to postoperative outcomes in PIV. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients undergoing primary PIV during a 6-year period (September 1, 2014 to September 1, 2020). Subjects receiving intraoperative application of an APT biomaterial were compared to those undergoing primary PIV without APT. Postoperative outcomes-including wound healing morbidity and reoperation-were compared between groups. Short- and long-term complications were classified using Clavien-Dindo. Results: A total of 182 primary PIV cases were reviewed (115 conventional PIV; 67 PIV-APT). The postoperative follow-up time for the population averaged 12.7 months. All-cause and wound related complications were significantly lower amongst PIV-APT patients when compared to conventional PIV (P=0.002 and P=0.004, respectively). The rate of long-term complications was significantly lower in PIV-APT subjects: prolonged pain (P=0.001), prolonged swelling (P=0.047), and neovaginal stenosis (P<0.001). The PIV-APT group required significantly less reoperation for vaginal depth enhancement (P=0.007). Conclusions: Though its use in urogenital reconstruction has been limited, this study indicates that the placement of APT during PIV significantly lowered the risk of complications associated with poor wound healing. This supports a novel use for placental tissues in reducing complications in genital GAS.

Gender Affirming Facial Surgery-Anatomy and Procedures for Facial Masculinization.

For some patients, feminine facial features may cause significant gender dysphoria. Multiple nonsurgical and surgical techniques exist to masculinize facial features. Nonsurgical techniques include testosterone supplementation and dermal fillers. Surgical techniques include soft tissue manipulation, synthetic implants, regenerative scaffolding, or bony reconstruction. Many techniques are derived from experience with cisgender patients, but are adapted with special considerations to differing anatomy between cisgender and transgender men and women. Currently, facial masculinization is less commonly sought than feminization, but demand is likely to increase as techniques are refined and made available.

Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: A Comparison of Algorithms, Surgical Techniques and Management Practices across 17 High-volume Centers in North America and Europe.

Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming genital surgery performed around the world. Although individual centers have published their experiences, expert consensus is generally lacking. Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 17 experienced gender surgeons representing a diverse mix of specialties, experience, and countries regarding their patient selection, preoperative management, vaginoplasty techniques, complication management, and postoperative protocols. Results: There is significant consistency in practices across some aspects of vaginoplasty. However, key areas of clinical heterogeneity are also present and include use of extragenital tissue for vaginal canal/apex creation, creation of the clitoral hood and inner labia minora, elevation of the neoclitoral neurovascular bundle, and perioperative hormone management. Pathway length of stay is highly variable (1-9 days). Lastly, some surgeons are moving toward continuation or partial reduction of estrogen in the perioperative period instead of cessation. Conclusions: With a broad study of surgeon practices, and encompassing most of the high-volume vaginoplasty centers in Europe and North America, we found key areas of practice variation that represent areas of priority for future research to address. Further multi-institutional and prospective studies that incorporate patient-reported outcomes are necessary to further our understanding of these procedures.

Improving Gender-Affirming Surgery Terminology: A Multicenter Patient Survey.

BACKGROUND: To promote patient safety and build trust, plastic surgeons must use patient-centered language when discussing gender-affirming surgery. However, the existing terminology has not been evaluated from a patient perspective. This study sought to understand how gender-affirming surgery patients from 3 US geographic regions perceive common terminology. METHODS: An anonymous, 24-item electronic survey was distributed to gender-affirming surgery patients seen in Tennessee, Colorado, and California. After institutional review board exemption, the survey instrument was pretested and piloted with gender-affirming surgery patients. Internal consistency was assessed by computation of Cronbach α (0.87). RESULTS: A total of 306 participants completed the survey: 68 from a Tennessee academic center (response rate, 56%), 131 from a California private practice (response rate, 8%), and 107 from a Colorado academic center (response rate, 53%). A greater proportion of respondents felt the terms "top surgery" and "bottom surgery" were appropriate (83% and 82%, respectively) relative to "chest surgery" and "genital surgery" (41% and 30%, respectively). More respondents favored the phrase "gender-affirming surgery" than "gender-confirming surgery" (86% vs 67%). Nearly half (43%) perceived the phrase "sex reassignment surgery" as inappropriate. Most respondents (80%) preferred their surgeon ask for their pronouns. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing communication is an actionable way for plastic surgeons to improve the healthcare experiences of gender-affirming surgery patients. "Top surgery" and "bottom surgery" are favored terms, and "gender-affirming surgery" is the preferred name for this discipline. Language preferences should be openly discussed with each patient to ensure professional communication.

Face Lift after Facial Feminization Surgery: Indications and Special Considerations.

SUMMARY: Iatrogenic jowling can be an unintended consequence of facial feminization surgery. Reduction of the mandible and chin without overlying changes to the soft tissue can lead to a redundant and deflated soft-tissue envelope, requiring a face lift to address jowling, cervicofacial laxity, and/or lower facial rhytids. Prospective quality-of-life outcomes data support this hypothesis, as patients who underwent mandible contouring with or without angle osteotomies were significantly more likely to express interest in face lift following facial feminization surgery on univariable analysis (90.0 percent versus 10.0 percent, p = 0.038). Patients with inherent skin laxity are at particularly high risk, such as those with advancing age, extrinsic skin damage (e.g., sun exposure, cigarette smoke), and history of massive weight loss. Before facial feminization surgery, the authors recommend comprehensive patient counseling that includes a discussion of the possible future need for a face lift, preferably around 1 year after facial feminization surgery. When performing a face lift after facial feminization surgery, technical considerations include those related to sequelae of prior facial surgery, anatomical differences between cismale and cisfemale facial soft tissue, and the mechanism of jowling after facial feminization surgery versus normal facial aging. The authors believe that these considerations can set more realistic expectations for facial feminization surgery patients, improve surgeons' ability to skillfully execute this procedure, and ultimately contribute to ongoing quality-of-life improvements in facial feminization surgery patients.

Facial Gender Surgery: Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Consensus Guidelines from the International Facial Gender Symposium.

BACKGROUND: Increasing societal acceptance of transgender people has led to broader availability of gender surgery and rapid growth in transition-related operations. Facial gender surgery aims to modify patients' facial features to be more congruent with their physical expression of gender, reducing gender dysphoria and improving quality of life. Growth in research and technique evolution has not kept pace with growth in clinical volume. Therefore, the first International Facial Gender Symposium was held at Johns Hopkins University in 2019, convening surgeons who perform facial gender surgery to share ideas and assess the state of clinical evidence. METHODS: To review the literature on facial gender surgery, the authors developed a search strategy for seven electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Gender Studies) through May of 2019, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review guidelines. RESULTS: Based on the English language literature and clinical experience, the authors suggest guidelines for screening, management, and appropriate surgical technique for patients undergoing facial gender surgery. They highlight facial gender surgery as a medically necessary intervention and identify shortcomings in current guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Facial gender surgery represents a complex array of craniofacial and soft-tissue procedures that require application of advanced skills and decision-making. Facial gender operations are not cosmetic, are medically necessary, and require development of new CPT codes specific to facial gender surgery. It is imperative to create educational programs and methods to define sufficient training for facial gender surgery surgeons. Research priorities include better procedural outcomes data, more quality-of-life studies, and insight into variation in both patient and procedural subgroups.

Assessing Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery Outcomes: Does Gender Identity Alter Gaze?

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of gender-affirming chest surgery can be variable. Placement of nipple-areolar complexes and orientation of scars can drastically affect the aesthetic outcomes of these procedures, as may observer gender identity. Here, we compared attention and perception of outcomes following gender-affirming chest surgery between laypersons, based on gender identity. METHODS: Transgender and cisgender participants were enrolled and shown images of surgery naïve chests and postoperative masculinized and feminized chests, blinded to the gender identity of the photographed subject. Gaze data were captured using the Tobii X2 60 eye-tracking device. Participants scored the perceived gender and aesthetic appearance of each image. RESULTS: Eighteen cisgender and 14 transgender participants were enrolled. When viewing male chests, transgender participants spent significantly longer fixated on the nipples (naïve: 802 vs. 395 ms; p = 0.02, masculinized: 940 vs. 692 ms, p = 0.002). For masculinized chests, cisgender participants spent significantly longer fixated on the inframammary scar (483 vs. 391 ms; p = 0.04). On images of feminized chests, transgender participants spent longer viewing the nipples when compared to cisgender participants (1017 vs. 847 ms; p = 0.04). Cisgender viewers spent longer fixating on the postoperative scar on feminized chests (113 vs. 59 ms; p = 0.02) and also viewed feminized chests as significantly more masculine and masculinized chests as more feminine, when compared to transgender participants (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to use eye-tracking to assess how laypersons assess chests for gender determination. The findings suggest that observer gender identity has an effect on areas of focus and gender perception of chests that underwent gender-affirmation surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Getting to the Bottom of Patient Experiences with Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Online Reviews.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing gender-affirming surgery seek information from online sources including online reviews written by peers. We aimed to conduct a qualitative analysis of the information discussed in online reviews related to genital gender-affirming surgery and evaluate the topics driving positive/negative reviews. METHODS: Reviews for genital gender-affirming surgery (vaginoplasty, metoidioplasty, and phalloplasty) were identified on three popular review platforms: Google, Yelp, and RealSelf. Content was analyzed line by line using a conventional inductive content analysis to identify recurring themes. Individual statements were marked as either having a positive or negative sentiment. Median rating was calculated and compared across platforms (max score 5). Associations between theme/subthemes and sentiment were also analyzed using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: A total of 129 reviews were analyzed and 433 codes were identified, the majority of which were positive (n=372; 85.9%). Three overarching themes described factors important to patient experience: surgeon medical, surgeon non-medical, and non-surgeon; with surgeon medical being the most popular. Fifteen subthemes comprised these themes, the most popular being interactions with supporting staff, surgeon bedside manner, and overall postoperative result. There was no difference in median review ratings between platforms (5 across all platforms; p=0.452). There was no association between sentiment and themes or subthemes (p=0.187 and p=0.578, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to analyze online reviews of genital gender-affirming surgery. The majority of patients gave positive ratings and the qualitative content had mostly positive sentiment. Salient themes not only include surgeon medical care and outcome, but other nonsurgical elements that formulate the patient's experience as a whole. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Labial Fat Grafting After Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) has become the most commonly performed genital surgery for transfeminine patients. However, patients undergoing this procedure may still require revisions to achieve a satisfactory result. OBJECTIVES: The authors report on the utilization of autologous fat grafting to the labia majora to improve results after PIV and complications that may predict the need for grafting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of a single surgeon's patients who underwent PIV between July 2014 and December 2019. Demographic information, operative information, and postoperative outcomes were abstracted from the health records. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and chi-squared test were employed for continuous variables and categorical, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 182 transfeminine and gender-diverse patients underwent PIV, with 6 patients (3.3%) eventually undergoing labial fat grafting. The most common indication for labial fat grafting was flattened labia majora (83%). All fat grafting procedures were performed concurrently with other revisions of the vaginoplasty. There were no demographic or medical history differences detected between the fat grafting and non-fat grafting groups. Patients who underwent labial fat grafting were more likely to suffer from introital stenosis (33% vs 6%, P = 0.007) and prolonged granulation tissue greater than 6 weeks after initial vaginoplasty (83% vs 32%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Labial fat grafting is a safe and effective method to address defects in the labia majora after PIV. Prolonged granulation tissue and introital stenosis may predict the need for labial fat grafting, possibly due to increased scarring and contracture at the surgical site.

Estrogen Continuation and Venous Thromboembolism in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen therapy and penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) are necessary, life-saving interventions for many transfeminine patients. Patients undergoing PIV are generally at low baseline risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) based on Caprini Score. Estrogen therapy may increase VTE risk in surgical patients, but its cessation may be psychiatrically dysphoric for transfeminine patients. AIM: This study examines whether perioperative estrogen cessation impacts VTE risk in patients undergoing PIV. METHODS: This was a pre-post study of patients undergoing PIV. From 2014 through 2018, all patients stopped estrogen therapy for 2 weeks before surgery and resumed 1 week postoperatively (group 1). Starting in 2019, all patients continued estrogen therapy perioperatively, with dose reductions for those whose dose was >6 mg/day (group 2). OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was 90-day VTE rate. RESULTS: 178 patients were included in the study, with 117 in group 1 and 61 in group 2. Median Caprini Score was 4 in group 1 (interquartile range: 3-6) and 3 in group 2 (interquartile range: 3-4) (P = .011). Complications per patient were higher in group 1 (2.2 vs 0.9, P < .001), with a longer follow-up (14.1 vs 10.2 months, P < .001). Rates of 90-day VTE were not different between groups (0.0% vs 1.6%, P = .166). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients undergoing PIV are generally at low risk for VTE, based on 2005 Caprini Scores. This study provides preliminary evidence that perioperative estrogen therapy continuation does not appear to substantially increase VTE risk in transfeminine patients undergoing PIV with low Caprini Scores, although more investigation is needed to establish true safety. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the pre-post design and single-surgeon experience, high proportion of patients with 90-day follow-up, and relatively large series to understand baseline VTE risk by Caprini Score in a PIV population. The main weakness of this study is its limited power to measure true differences in VTE risk based on estrogen continuation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that perioperative estrogen continuation may be safe for patients undergoing PIV, the overwhelming majority of whom are at low baseline VTE risk. However, clinicians should weigh the magnitude of the risks and benefits of estrogen cessation on a case-by-case basis. Nolan IT, Haley C, Morrison SD, et al. Estrogen Continuation and Venous Thromboembolism in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty. J Sex Med 2021;18:193-200.

Social Perception of Facial Feminization Surgery Outcomes: Does Gender Identity Alter Gaze?

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of gender-affirming facial feminization surgery (FFS) outcomes can be highly subjective, which has resulted in a limited understanding of the social perception of favorable gender and aesthetic facial appearance following FFS. Eye-tracking technology has introduced an objective measure of viewer subconscious gaze. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use eye-tracking technology to measure attention and perception of surgery-naive cisgender female and feminized transgender faces, based on viewer gender identity. METHODS: Thirty-two participants (18 cisgender and 14 transgender) were enrolled and shown 5 photographs each of surgery-naive cisgender female and feminized transgender faces. Gaze was captured with a Tobii Pro X2-60 eye-tracking device (Tobii, Stockholm, Sweden) and participants rated the gender and aesthetic appearance of each face on Likert-type scales. RESULTS: Total image gaze fixation time did not differ by participant gender identity (6.00 vs 6.04 seconds, P = 0.889); however, transgender participants spent more time evaluating the forehead/brow, buccal/mandibular regions, and chin (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed significant associations between viewer gender identity, age, race, and education, and the time spent evaluating gender salient facial features. Feminized faces were rated as more masculine with poorer aesthetic appearance than surgery-naive cisgender female faces; however, there was no significant difference in the distribution of gender appearance ratings assigned to each photograph by cisgender and transgender participants. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that gender identity influences subconscious attention and gaze on female faces. Nevertheless, differences in gaze distribution did not correspond to subjective rated gender appearance for either surgery-naive cisgender female or feminized transgender faces, further illustrating the complexity of evaluating social perception of favorable FFS outcomes.

Erratum: Abstract 199: Gender Identity Alters Gaze: The Use of Eye Tracking to Assess Outcomes in Gender-affirming Chest Surgery - Erratum.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000667852.45222.46.].

Prospective Quality-of-Life Outcomes after Facial Feminization Surgery: An International Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: No data exist on the prospective outcomes of facial feminization surgery. This study set out to determine the effects of facial feminization surgery on quality-of-life outcomes for gender-diverse patients. METHODS: A prospective, international, multicenter, cohort study with adult gender-diverse patients with gender dysphoria was undertaken. Facial feminization outcome score was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively (1-week to 1-month and >6 months). Photogrammetric cephalometries were measured at the same time points. Self-perceived preoperative masculinity and femininity were recorded. Externally rated gender appearance (scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being most feminine) and general aesthetics (scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being very good) for 10 facial feminization surgery patients were compared with those of five cisgender controls. Univariate linear regression analyses were used to predict outcomes from facial feminization surgery. RESULTS: Sixty-six consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients noted that their brows, jaws, and chins were the most masculine aspects of their faces (54.5 percent, 33.3 percent, and 30.3 percent, respectively). Median facial feminization outcome score increased from 47.2 preoperatively to 80.6 at 6 months or more postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Mean satisfaction was excellent (3.0 at both 1-month and ≥6-month follow-up; p = 0.46). Cephalometric values were significantly more feminine after surgery. Gender appearance was feminine to very feminine (1.83 ± 0.96) and general aesthetics were good (6.09 ± 2.01) but different from those of cisgender women controls (1.25 ± 0.49 and 7.63 ± 1.82, respectively; p < 0.001 for each). CONCLUSION: Facial feminization achieved improved quality of life, feminized cephalometries, feminine gender appearance, good overall aesthetics, and high satisfaction that were present at 1 month and stable at more than 6 months. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.