Efeito do nível nutricional antes e após a ovulação sobre a taxa de gestação e a prolificidade em ovelhas Santa Inês / Effect of the nutritional level before and after ovulation on pregnancy rate and prolificacy in Santa Ines ewes

Quarenta e três ovelhas foram distribuídas em quatro tratamentos em um delineamento de blocos casualizados. Os tratamentos consistiram no fornecimento de dietas de flushing, formuladas com farelo de soja (FFS) ou com glúten de milho e farelo de algodão (FGM+FA) por 28 dias antes da ovulação, seguido pelo fornecimento de dietas de flushing ou de uma dieta de mantença (DM) durante 28 dias após a ovulação: T1 - FFS antes e após a ovulação (n=12); T2 - FFS antes da ovulação e DM após (n=11); T3 - FGM+FA antes e após a ovulação (n=10); T4 - FGM+FA antes da ovulação e DM após (n=10). O ganho de peso e o peso final não diferiram (P>0,05) entre os animais dos tratamentos. O ECC final foi maior (P<0,05) nas ovelhas do tratamento T3 do que nas do tratamento T2. A concentração de N-ureico foi maior (P<0,05) nas ovelhas dos tratamentos T1 e T3 do que naquelas dos tratamentos T2 e T4. A taxa de gestação e a prolificidade não diferiram (P>0,05) entre os animais. As dietas de flushing antes da ovulação, seguidas pelo fornecimento destas mesmas dietas ou de uma dieta de mantença após a ovulação, não alteraram a taxa de gestação e a prolificidade.

Forty-tree ewes were assigned to four treatments in a randomized block design. The treatments consisted of two flushing diets, composed of soybean meal (SMF) or corn gluten and cottonseed meal (CG+CMF) furnished for 28 days before ovulation, and feeding with flushing diets or a maintenance diet (MD) for 28 days after ovulation: T1 - (SMF) before and after ovulation (n=12); T2 - SMF before ovulation and a MD after (n=11); T3 - CG+CMF before and after ovulation (n=10); T4 - CG+CMF before ovulation and MD after (n=10). The gain in BW and the final BW did not differ (P>0,05) between treatments. The final BC was higher (P>0,05) in ewes in T3 treatment than in those in treatment T2. The urea N concentration was higher (P<0,05) in ewes in treatments T1 and T3 than those in treatments T2 and T4. The pregnancy rate and prolificacy did not differ (P>0,05) between treatments. The flushing diets before ovulation and feeding with this same diet or a maintenance diet after ovulation did not alter the pregnancy rate and prolificacy.

A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the photovac snapshot portable gas chromatograph and the Dräger Chip Measurement System monitor for benzene in air measurements.

A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of two field instruments, the Photovac Snapshot Gas Chromatograph and the Dräger Chip Measurement System (CMS) Monitor, both capable of specific determination of benzene, was carried out. The evaluation was based on the generation of a test atmosphere of known concentration of benzene in a stainless steel calibration chamber and simultaneous sampling of the test atmosphere by each instrument. At the same time, the chamber atmosphere was continuously monitored by one or two data logging photoionization detector (PID) hydrocarbon analysers. A series of six, 10-minute charcoal tube air samples of the test atmosphere was also collected over the 1-hour run and analyzed by gas chromatography. Nine different concentrations ranging from 0.25 ppm to 8 ppm were used. Accuracy was evaluated using National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) criteria. The Photovac GC consistently met the NIOSH recommended accuracy criteria of +/- 25 percent at or below 1 ppm of benzene, whereas the Drager CMS results generally fell slightly outside this criteria. Compared against less stringent accuracy criteria of +/- 35 percent, all Photovac GC results were acceptable but about 40 percent of Drager CMS results were not. The precision of Photovac GC (CV +/- 10%) is better than Drager CMS (CV = +/- 20% to 40%). Both instruments are, however, good field instruments provided their limitations are taken into account in their use.

A catheter withdrawing apparatus for clinical urethral pressure profile studies.

An apparatus for withdrawing a urethral catheter at a constant speed is described. The motor and the puller assembly are separate components so that the puller assembly can be autoclaved. By matching pulling speed to recorder chart speed a reproducible representation of urethral length can be obtained without using a displacement transducer. The apparatus has been used clinically for measuring urethral pressure profiles.