Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of imipenem in neutropenic adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: Imipenem is recommended in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Although alterations of antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters have been reported in such patients, little data is available on imipenem. METHODS: Prospective, single-center, non-interventional pharmacokinetic cohort study in adults with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Critically ill patients were excluded. Imipenem was administered as a 30-min infusion of 1000 mg/8h. Total imipenem plasma concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography during neutropenia and just after neutrophil recovery. We estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters of imipenem by non-linear mixed-effect modelling using the SAEM algorithm. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the study, including nine women (56.3%), median age 37 years (range, 18.3; 78.3). Eight patients had an hematological malignancy (50.0%) and seven had a solid tumor (43.8%). Imipenem pharmacokinetics were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order elimination. Mean values for imipenem were: clearance 14.3L/h and 10.9L/h and volume of distribution 20.7L and 14.5 L during neutropenia and after recovery, respectively. Imipenem plasma area under the curve at steady state was reduced by 23% during neutropenia. However, all patients achieved a pharmacodynamic target of %fT>MIC ≥ 40% with a regimen of 1000 mg/8 h or 500 mg/6 h, for MICs up to 2 mg/L. The pharmacodynamics profile for a target of %fT > MIC = 100% was however less favorable with 500 mg/6 h or 1000 mg/8 h either during or after neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic goals for imipenem were similar in patients during and after neutropenia, despite reduced plasma exposure.

Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure-efficacy and tolerance in metastatic melanoma patients: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic real-life study.

PURPOSE: Dabrafenib plus trametinib combination has greatly improved survival in BRAFV600mut metastatic melanoma patients. However, data regarding the influence of pharmacokinetic markers in real-life patients are lacking. In this study, we aimed to explore dabrafenib and trametinib pharmacokinetic impact on progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) or all grades treatment-related adverse events (ARAE) occurrence in routine care patients. METHODS: BRAFV600mut metastatic melanoma patients initiating standard doses of dabrafenib 150 mg BID plus trametinib 2 mg QD were included. Clinical data were collected via the French biobank MelBase, prospectively enrolling unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Clinical response evaluation, ARAE reporting and dabrafenib and trametinib plasma quantification were performed. Association of individual Bayesian-estimated pharmacokinetic markers (AUC0-τ and Ctrough) and baseline clinical variables with DOR, PFS, clinical response, and ARAE was then assessed. RESULTS: Fifty patients (comprising 4 AJCC stage IIIc and 46 stage IV) were included. Median PFS reached 11.4 months, and overall response rate 70%. Fifty percent of patients experienced ARAE (G3 n = 10, G4 n = 0). In univariate analysis, median dabrafenib Ctrough within intermediate range was associated with a significantly higher PFS (HR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.18; 0.91], p = 0.029) and DOR (HR [95% CI] = 0.39 [0.16; 0.94], p = 0.024), and association with DOR remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR [95% CI] = 0.34 [0.12; 0.95], p = 0.040). Trametinib pharmacokinetic markers were significantly higher in patients experiencing ARAE compared to patients without ARAE. CONCLUSION: In this study, exposure-efficacy and tolerance analysis highlighted the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize therapeutic management in BRAFV600mut metastatic melanoma patients based on trough concentrations of dabrafenib and trametinib.

Mutagenicity assessment of environmental contaminations in a hospital centralized reconstitution unit.

INTRODUCTION: Cytotoxic drug exposure of hospital staff preparing intravenous chemotherapy is a major issue and related mutagenic risks should be more explored. The aim of this study was to assess the mutagenicity of several cytotoxic mixtures prepared at fixed concentrations, and the mutagenicity of environmental samples collected in a hospital centralized reconstitution unit. In parallel cytotoxic exposure in environmental samples was quantified. METHODS: Environmental samples were performed by wiping method using swabs in five critical production unit areas. Mutagenicity was assessed with a liquid microplate AMES test using two salmonella typhimurium strains (TA98 and TA100), in prepared cytotoxic mixtures containing 14 cytotoxic drugs (cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, docetaxel, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, irinotecan, methotrexate, paclitaxel and pemetrexed) according a dichotomous strategy and in environmental samples. Cytotoxic drugs were quantified in samples using liquid chromatography coupled to mass tandem spectrometry. RESULTS: Mutagenesis was observed for the mix of 14 cytotoxic drugs with TA98 strain ±â€¯S9 fraction but not TA100 strain. After dichotomous approach, only doxorubicin and epirubicin exposure were associated to mutagenesis. The mutagenesis observed was expressed at lower concentrations with the mix of the 14 drugs than with anthracyclins alone, assuming a synergistic effect. Despite measurable level of cytotoxic contamination in environmental samples, no mutagenesis was highlighted in Ames tests performed on these environmental samples. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses carried out show the conservation of the mutagenicity of cytotoxic drugs found in very low quantities in the environment. The traces of cytotoxic drugs found in our unit regularly exceed the limits given by some authors. This approach may be considered as a new tool to monitor environmental contamination by cytotoxic drugs.

Cytochrome 2B6 polymorphism and efavirenz-induced central nervous system symptoms : a substudy of the ANRS ALIZE trial.

OBJECTIVES: Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 gene have been associated with high interindividual variation in efavirenz pharmacokinetics. However, clinical data on the relationship of CYP2B6 polymorphisms with the occurrence of efavirenz-induced central nervous system (CNS) symptoms are limited. METHODS: We analysed four polymorphisms in the CYP2B6 (516 G>T), CYP3A5 (6986 A>G) and ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, member 1 (ABCB1) (2677 G>T/A and 3435 C>T) genes in HIV-infected adults virologically suppressed on a protease inhibitor-based regimen who switched to a regimen containing emtricitabine, didanosine and efavirenz in the setting of the ANRS ALIZE trial. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression analysis were used to investigate their association with efavirenz plasma levels and CNS events up to 48 months after switching. RESULTS: In total, 191 patients with a median age of 41 years, who were 87% male and 85% Caucasian, were enrolled in the study. Variant allelic frequencies were 0.49, 0.93, 0.59 and 0.63 for CYP2B6 516, CYP3A5 392, ABCB1 2677 and ABCB1 3435, respectively. The median efavirenz plasma concentration (MEPC) was 2.2 mg/L [interquartile range (IQR) 1.7-2.8 mg/L] and was significantly higher in patients with the deficient CYP2B6 516T. Overall, 242 CNS events were reported in 104 individuals (54%). No correlation was found between MEPC and CNS events. The occurrence of a first CNS event was lower in patients with the CYP2B6 516 G/G genotype vs. CYP2B6 516 T genotypes [50% (IQR: 40-60%) vs. 66% (IQR: 56-75%), respectively; P = 0.02]. In an adjusted Cox regression model, there was a tendency towards a higher risk of a first CNS event among carriers of the variant CYP2B6 516 T allele (relative risk 1.4 [95% CI, 0.99-2.1]; P?=?.06), compared with noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: The deficient CYP2B6 516 T allele is associated with higher efavirenz plasma drug levels and more frequent CNS-related symptoms.

Breakthrough invasive fungal disease in patients receiving posaconazole primary prophylaxis: a 4-year study.

Posaconazole (PSC) is currently recommended as primary prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and in allogenic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) recipients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Studies focusing on breakthrough invasive fungal disease (IFD) upon PSC prophylaxis show disparate results. In order to evaluate the incidence of IFD in patients on PSC prophylaxis and identify IFD risk factors, we carried out a retrospective study of all consecutive patients on PP from January 2007 to December 2010 in our hospital. Breakthrough IFDs were identified from the database of the central pharmacy and the French administrative database (PMSI), registering final medical diagnoses of hospitalized patients. Medical data were reviewed to study proven or probable IFD, according to EORTC/MSG definition. PSC plasma concentrations (PPC) were also retrieved. Poisson models were used for statistical analysis. Two hundred and seventy-nine patients received PSC prophylaxis for a median duration of 1.4 months (range 0.2-17.9). Proven (n=6) or probable (n=3) IFDs were diagnosed in nine cases (3.2%). IFD incidence rate per 100 person-month was 1.65 (95% CI, 0.79-2.97). IFDs were candidaemia (Candida glabrata, n=2), pulmonary invasive aspergillosis (n=3), disseminated fusariosis (n=2) and pulmonary mucormycosis (n=2). Seven deaths were reported, directly related to IFD in three patients (33.3%). First dosage of PPC under 0.3 mg/L was the single significant risk factor for IFD (RR, 7.77; 95% CI, 1.30-46.5; p 0.025). Breakthrough IFD in patients receiving PSC prophylaxis is rare but associated with a poor outcome. Low PSC plasma concentrations are associated with an increased risk of IFD.

Chemical stability of lignocaine (lidocaine) and adrenalin (epinephrine) in pH-adjusted parenteral solutions.

Recent clinical studies have shown that alkalinizing lignocaine (lidocaine) solutions is an effective way of shortening the time of onset and increasing the duration of anaesthesia. However, alkalinizing lignocaine solutions raises the problem of the stability of these preparations. Moreover, the adrenalin usually associated with it is unstable in alkalinized solutions designed for peridural injection. This study was performed to define the range of pH over which lignocaine and adrenalin in commercial solution is stable. The results indicate that it is possible to alkalinize lignocaine solutions and that the solutions prepared are stable for at least 6 h.