RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The initial management of elbow dislocations in children, emergency reduction and brachial-antebrachial-palmar (BABP) immobilization, remains the most widely used method. Osteosynthesis could be associated in case of fractures. On the other hand, there is no consensus on the duration of immobilization in the recent literature. The objective of this study was to describe the medium-term functional results of a prospective cohort of children presenting with an elbow dislocation immobilized for 3 weeks, with or without an associated fracture. The hypothesis of this study was that 3 weeks of immobilization was sufficient and made it possible to obtain a satisfactory, rapid functional recovery without residual instability. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All children with an elbow dislocation with or without an associated fracture were included. The dislocation was urgently reduced and subsequent surgery could be indicated in the event of associated injuries. All the children had 3 weeks of immobilization with a BABP cast. Radiological and clinical follow-up was carried out for 2 years. The parameters evaluated were: 3 functional scores and the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow. Clinical or radiological complications were sought. RESULTS: A total of 50 children were included, the mean age was 10.6 years (± 2.6). Functional score results were "good' or "excellent' at 3 months of follow-up, "excellent' at 6 months and thereafter. The mean limitation in ROM at the last follow-up was 4.7° (± 7.2°) with all ranges combined. Eighty-two percent of children had a mean limitation in ROM of less than 10°. None of the children presented with a recurrence of elbow dislocation and instability. CONCLUSION: Immobilization of elbow dislocations for 3 weeks in children confers good medium-term functional results without exposing them to the risk of instability, whether or not the dislocation is associated with a fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; Prospective cohort study.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand wounds are frequent in children (31% of hand injuries) and one possible mechanism responsible for profound laceration is metal fences while climbing. These injuries usually require a surgical look to explore soft-tissue damages, but the literature is poor regarding surgical findings and outcomes after this kind of traumatism. The aim of the study was therefore to report a consecutive series of hand and finger wounds caused by metal fences in children, focusing on surgical findings and potential complications. METHODS: All consecutive hand or finger deep wounds caused by metal fences treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age below 18 years and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Complications and surgical revisions were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1265 patients were operated for hand or finger deep wounds during the study period, among which 74 were caused by metal fences. The mean age at surgery was 11.3±0.4 years, and the majority of patients were men (80%). Associated injuries were found in 55.4% of the patients including nerves (n=29) or tendons sections/disinsertion (n=6), and sheath (n=16) and pulleys (n=6) tearing. At a mean follow-up of 2.6±0.2 years, 12% of the patients required revision surgery for an irreducible flexion contracture secondary to a contractile scar and consisted of complete scar excision and zigzag flap. Additional tenoarthrolysis was required during the procedure, for 6 patients because of a persisting flexion contracture after excision. CONCLUSIONS: Metal fences surgical palmar wounds in children are impressive lesions by their extended skin damages. Serious associated lesions (collateral pedicle or flexor tendons) were found in 1 case of 3. However, these injuries are not benign and should be carefully monitored clinically during the first postoperative month to look for potential contractile scars that can require revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective cohort study.
