Socioeconomic status and fertility treatment outcomes in high-income countries: a review of the current literature.

The association between socioeconomic status and fertility is a subject that has received much attention. Yet, little is known as to whether the socioeconomic status has an impact on the outcomes of fertility treatment. This systematic review aims to assess any possible relationship between socioeconomic deprivation and treatment outcomes. A database search was conducted of all publications in this field up to March 2021. Eleven studies were identified and six of these specifically investigated the impact of socioeconomic status on fertility treatment outcomes. Children conceived following assisted conception are more likely to be born to mothers of a higher socioeconomic status than those conceived naturally. Of the few studies investigating the impact of socioeconomic status on fertility treatment outcomes and the results are conflicting, making it difficult to draw robust conclusions as to its effect. It is unknown which, if any, marker of socioeconomic status is the most significant for fertility patients: whether it is the characteristics of the individual or that of their surroundings. Further research is urgently needed.

Impact of micronised progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in combination with transdermal oestradiol on cardiovascular markers in women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency or an early menopause: a randomised pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference between micronised progesterone (MP) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in combination with transdermal oestradiol (t-E2) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers in women diagnosed with an early menopause and premature ovarian insufficiency (EMPOI). BACKGROUND: The European Society for Cardiology has identified carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) as the gold standard cardiogenic biomarker for risk stratification of arterial disease. Menopause has been shown to augment the age-dependent increase in arterial stiffness, with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) being the mainstay of management of women diagnosed with EMPOI. STUDY DESIGN: A pilot randomised prospective open-label trial. Women were randomised to either cyclical MP (Utrogestan® 200mg) or MPA (Provera® 10mg) in conjunction with t-E2 (Evorel® Patches 50mcg/day) for 12 months. Seventy-one subjects were screened, and baseline data are available for 57 subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). RESULTS: PWV did not significantly change from baseline in either treatment arm. MP + t-E2 demonstrated a positive effect on traditional CVD markers, with a significant improvement seen in cardiac output (CO) (0.71±1.01mL/min, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.21) and reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-3.43±6.31mmHg, 95% Cl -6.57 to -0.29) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) (-0.15±0.19mmHg⋅min⋅mL-1, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.05) after 12 months. MPA + t-E2, in contrast, did not demonstrate significant changes from baseline in traditional haemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSION: The positive changes in traditional markers were not reflected in the cardiogenic biomarker, cfPWV, which has demonstrated a higher positive predictive value for cardiovascular events than traditional measurements.

The effect of micronized progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate in combination with transdermal estradiol on hemostatic biomarkers in postmenopausal women diagnosed with POI and early menopause: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of micronized progesterone (MP) or medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in combination with transdermal estradiol (t-E2) on traditional coagulation factors and thrombin generation parameters in postmenopausal women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency or early menopause. METHOD: Randomized prospective trial conducted in women diagnosed with premature ovarian insufficiency or early menopause and an intact uterus, recruited over 28 months. All participants were prescribed t-E2 and randomized to either cyclical MP or MPA using a web-based computer randomization software, Graph Pad. Thrombin generation parameters were measured at baseline and repeated after 3-months. Traditional hemostatic biomarkers were measured at baseline and repeated after 3, 6, and 12-months. Seventy-one participants were screened for the study, of whom 66 met the inclusion criteria. In total, 57 participants were randomized: 44 completed the thrombin generation assessment arm of the study, whilst 32 completed 12-months of the traditional coagulation factor screening component of the trial. RESULTS: Thrombin generation parameters did not significantly change from baseline after 3-months duration for either progestogen component when combined with t-E2, unlike the traditional coagulation factors. Protein C activity, free Protein S, and Antithrombin III levels decreased with time in both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Fluctuations in traditional hemostatic biomarkers were not reproduced by parallel changes in thrombin generation parameters that remained neutral in both groups compared with baseline. The absence of statistically significant changes in thrombin generation for the first 3-months of hormone therapy use is reassuring and would suggest a neutral effect of both progestogens on the global coagulation assay.

Is the clinician an independent variable in embryo transfer outcomes under standardized direct and indirect supervision? A 5-year observational cohort study.

Objective: To compare the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) for experienced clinicians and trainees naive to the skill of embryo transfer (ET) during an assisted reproductive treatment (ART) cycle. To establish the minimum number of procedures required to achieve consistent outcomes. Method: A non-interventional retrospective observational cohort study looking at all consecutive ETs undertaken over a 5-year study period. The CPR was determined by a self-reported urinary home pregnancy test undertaken 16 days after oocyte retrieval. Results: The CPR did not differ between an experienced clinician (39%) and trainee (45%) for the first 50 (p=0.41) and last 50 (40.7% versus 42.7%) (p=0.81) ET procedures. The CPR for the individuals remained consistent with their peaks and troughs mirroring the overall success rate of the unit. This pattern continued when the data was further stratified for co-variables (age [≤37 years of age], catheter type [soft] and embryo quality [expanded blastocyst of grade ≥2]): CPRs for experienced clinicians was 65.7% (first 50 transfers) and 40.9% (last 50 transfers); CPR for trainees was 66.7% (first 50 transfers) and 53.6% (last 50 transfers); p=0.95 and p=0.37, respectively. The trainees, however, were more likely to use a stylet catheter with a 2-step transfer technique, with a cost over clinical implication. Furthermore, patients expressed a preference for an experienced clinician to perform their procedure, despite being informed that the grade of the clinician had no impact on the cycle outcome after an analysis of the unit's data. Conclusion: The clinician's grade and duration of service have not been shown to significantly impact the outcome of the ART cycle. The findings, however, should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect the culture of training in the unit, where there is a strong emphasis on adequate direct and indirect supervision. Furthermore, the relationship between the volume of work and outcomes is established in postgraduate medical education, with the exact number required to achieve clinical competence being dependent on the procedure and intensity of the workload.