Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hosp Med ; 19(5): 349-355, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244030

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between inpatient team continuity, defined as the maximum number of days the same student, resident, and attending worked together on the inpatient wards, and the academic performance of students in a pediatric block clerkship. METHODS: We retrospectively identified students who rotated in the pediatric clerkship at a single institution from 2020 to 2022. We used multiple linear regression models to adjust for multiple confounders and used a one-way analysis of variance to compare adjusted outcomes across quartiles of inpatient team continuity. RESULTS: A total of 227 students were included in the analysis. Students' preceptor ratings increased by 0.04 on a scale of 0-4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.06; p = .001), and their final pediatric grade increased by 0.02 on a scale of 0-4 (95% CI 0.01-0.02; p < .001) with each 1-day increase in inpatient team continuity. There was no statistically significant association between team continuity and shelf exam scores or observed structured clinical examination scores. Preceptor ratings and final clerkship grades increased across quartiles of team continuity, with the greatest increase being between the second, 6-7 days of continuity, and third, 8-10 days of continuity, quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Increased inpatient team continuity is associated with students receiving higher preceptor ratings and achieving a higher final pediatric clerkship grade. While the mechanisms driving these associations remain unknown, the results add to the literature base supporting the importance of preceptor continuity in undergraduate medical education.


Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico , Prácticas Clínicas , Pediatría , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pediatría/educación , Rendimiento Académico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Masculino , Pacientes Internos , Preceptoría , Competencia Clínica , Evaluación Educacional
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(6): 1288-1294, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36997151

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mastery learning orientation, conceptualized as a growth mindset, can be beneficial to learners in medical education and is supported by a program...s learning environment. Currently, there are no instruments which reliably assess the learning orientation of a graduate medical education program...s learning environment. OBJECTIVE: To explore the reliability and validity of the Graduate Medical Education Learning Environment Inventory (GME-LEI). METHODS: Leaders of the Education in Pediatrics Across the Continuum (EPAC) project revised Krupat...s Educational Climate Inventory to create the GME-LEI. We investigated the GME-LEI...s reliability and validity through confirmatory factor and parallel factor analyses and calculated Cronbach...s alpha for each subscale. We compared mean subscale scores between residents in traditional programs and the EPAC project. As EPAC is known to foster a mastery-focused learning orientation, we hypothesized differences detected between resident groups would strengthen the instrument...s validity. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven pediatric residents completed the GME-LEI. The final 3-factor model was an acceptable fit to the data, and Cronbach...s alpha for each subscale was acceptable (Centrality: 0.87; Stress: 0.73; Support: 0.77). Mean scores on each subscale varied by program type (EPAC vs traditional) with EPAC residents reporting statistically significant higher scores in the Centrality of Learning subscale (2.03, SD 0.30, vs 1.79, SD 0.42; P.ß=.ß.023; scale of 1...4). CONCLUSIONS: The GME-LEI reliably measures 3 distinct aspects of the GME learning environment with respect to learning orientation. The GME-LEI may be used to help programs better monitor the learning environment and make changes to support mastery-oriented learning.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Niño , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Aprendizaje , Análisis Factorial
3.
Hosp Pediatr ; 13(2): 122-134, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36625076

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the academic performance of students who worked on a longitudinal inpatient team in the pediatric clerkship differed from students on traditional teams. We hypothesized that working on the longitudinal team would be associated with improved performance. METHODS: We retrospectively identified students who rotated in the pediatric clerkship at a single institution from 2017 through 2021. We used multiple linear and multiple ordered logistic regression to examine whether working on a longitudinal inpatient team in which the majority of students work with the same senior resident and attending for the entire inpatient block and function without interns was associated with improved academic performance. RESULTS: We included data from 463 students, 316 in the longitudinal team group and 147 in the traditional team group. Working on the longitudinal team was associated with a higher inpatient preceptor rating (adjusted mean rating 3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97 to 3.03 vs 2.85, 95% CI 2.81 to 2.90; P = .02; on a scale of 0 to 4) and an increased probability of achieving a higher final grade in the pediatric clerkship (adjusted probability of achieving honors 22%, 95% CI 17% to 28% vs 11%, 95% CI 6% to 16%; P = .003). These differences did not persist in the clerkship immediately after pediatrics. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a traditional inpatient team, working on a longitudinal team was associated with achieving a higher preceptor rating and final pediatric clerkship grade. Implementing similar models within clinical clerkships may help foster optimal student performance.


Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Académico , Prácticas Clínicas , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos
4.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(12): 1385-1394, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34849928

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the implementation of clinical pathways, known as pediatric rapid response algorithms, within an existing rapid response system was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes of hospitalized children. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients admitted to the PICU as unplanned transfers from the general medical and surgical floors at a single, freestanding children's hospital between July 1, 2017, and January 31, 2020. We examined the impact of the algorithms on the rate of critical deterioration events. We used multivariable Poisson regression and an interrupted time series analysis to measure 2 possible types of change: an immediate implementation effect and an outcome trajectory over time. RESULTS: We identified 892 patients (median age: 4 [interquartile range: 1-12] years): 615 in the preimplementation group, and 277 in the postimplementation group. Algorithm implementation was not associated with an immediate change in the rate of critical deterioration events but was associated with a downward rate trajectory over time and a postimplementation trajectory that was significantly less than the preimplementation trajectory (trajectory difference of -0.28 events per 1000 non-ICU patient days per month; 95% confidence interval -0.40 to -0.16; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm implementation was associated with a decrease in the rate of critical deterioration events. Because of the study's observational nature, this association may have been driven by unmeasured confounding factors and the chosen implementation point. Nevertheless, the results are a promising start for future research into how clinical pathways within a rapid response system can improve care of hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
Niño Hospitalizado , Hospitales Pediátricos , Algoritmos , Niño , Preescolar , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 49(sup1): 437-444, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34743667

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic error is a prevalent type of medical error that is associated with considerable patient harm and increased medical costs. The majority of literature guiding the current understanding of diagnostic error in the hospital setting is from adult studies. However, there is research to suggest this type of error is also prevalent in the pediatric specialty. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to define the current understanding of diagnostic error in the pediatric hospital through a structured literature review. METHODS: We searched PubMed and identified studies focusing on three aspects of diagnostic error in pediatric hospitals: the incidence or prevalence, contributing factors, and related interventions. We used a tiered review, and a standardized electronic form to extract data from included articles. RESULTS: Fifty-nine abstracts were screened and 23 full-text studies were included in the final review. Seventeen of the 23 studies focused on the incidence or prevalence, with only 3 studies investigating the utility of interventions. Most studies took place in an intensive care unit or emergency department with very few studies including only patients on the general wards. Overall, the prevalence of diagnostic error in pediatric hospitals varied greatly and depended on the measurement technique and specific hospital setting. Both healthcare system factors and individual cognitive factors were found to contribute to diagnostic error, with there being limited evidence to guide how best to mitigate the influence of these factors on the diagnostic process. CONCLUSION: The general knowledge of diagnostic error in pediatric hospital settings is limited. Future work should incorporate structured frameworks to measure diagnostic errors and examine clinicians' diagnostic processes in real-time to help guide effective hospital-wide interventions.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales Pediátricos , Adulto , Niño , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Incidencia , Prevalencia
6.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 49(sup1): 399-404, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35012417

RESUMEN

Rapid Response Systems (RRSs) are an organizational approach to support the timely recognition and treatment of decompensating patients and are used in many pediatric hospitals. These systems are comprised of afferent and efferent Limbs, as well as oversight arms. When incorporated into an RRS, standardized care algorithms can be helpful in identifying deteriorating patients and improving behaviors of the multidisciplinary team. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of pediatric RRS and provide an example in which standardized care algorithms developed for the efferent limb of a pediatric RRS were associated with improvement in early escalation of care.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYThe Rapid Response System (RRS) is used in hospitals to recognize and care for hospitalized patients that are decompensating outside of an Intensive Care Unit. RRSs are made up of two main response components. The afferent limb focuses on the recognition and calls for help; the efferent limb focuses on correcting the deteriorating patient's physiology. Much energy has been put into afferent limb development to identify worsening patients before they progress to full cardiac or respiratory arrest. Standardization of efferent limb care algorithms can assist in developing and maintaining a shared mental model of care to improve communication and function of the multidisciplinary team.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida , Niño , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA