Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann's reversal procedure

ABSTRACT Purpose Hartmann's procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann's reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. Patient and methods Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. Results Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. Conclusion Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann's reversal.

Robotic-assisted repair of colovesical anastomosis after Hartmann's reversal procedure.

PURPOSE: Hartmann's procedure is the resection of the rectosigmoid colon with an end colostomy formation and closure of the anorectal stump (1). Its reversal has a morbidity rate up to 58% (2, 3) with an incidence of fistulae formation of 4.08% (1). Herein, we present a robotic-assisted repair of a complex fistula that occurred as complication of Hartmann's reversal when the stapler was introduced inadvertently through the vaginal canal. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eighty-three-year-old female with past medical history of hysterectomy and ischemic colitis that required colectomy and colostomy placement in December 2020. In March 2022, the patient underwent a colostomy takedown, after which she reported fecaluria, urine leakage per vagina, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy and vaginoscopy revealed a large colovesical fistula, a staple in the bladder trigone, and several staples in the anterior vaginal wall. Robotically, extensive adhesiolysis was performed, the sigmoid was separated from the bladder, and the intact rectal stump was dissected free. The staple from the bladder trigone was removed. Bladder was closed in two layers with 3-0 V-Loc. Colorectal anastomosis was not feasible due to the short length of both ends. Therefore, a permanent colostomy was placed. RESULTS: Operative time was 454min., and estimated blood loss was 100cc. Discharged on postoperative day 4 with a JP drain and a 20Fr Foley catheter. Drain, and Foley were removed on postoperative days 9 and 23, respectively. No postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted repair represents an effective approach for the management of colovesical fistulae after Hartmann's reversal.

Distal ureter and bladder cuff excision using the "Keyhole Technique" during Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy

ABSTRACT Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5-10% of all urothelial tumors (1). Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard treatment for high, and low-grade UTUC (2). Although the open approach has been considered the gold standard, robotic techniques have shown comparable oncological outcomes with potential advantages in terms of peri-operative morbidity (3). Materials and Methods: We present a novel "Keyhole" technique for management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during robotic RNU. This technique allows the surgeon to directly visualize the ureteric orifices, delineate resection borders, and maintain oncologic principles of en-bloc excision without necessitating secondary cystotomy incision or concomitant endoscopic procedure. Descriptive demographic characteristics, surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Results: Between 2015 and 2020, ten patients underwent robotic RNU with bladder cuff excision using the Keyhole technique (single-dock, single-position). Median age was 75 years. Eight patients underwent surgery for right-sided tumors. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 287 min, 100 mL, and 3 days, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, and one grade II complication occurred during the 90-day postoperative period. All patients had high-grade UTUC, being 90% pure urothelial. Bladder recurrences occurred in 30% of patients with an overall median follow-up of 11.2 months. Conclusions: Keyhole technique for the management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during RNU represents a feasible approach with minimal 90-day complications and low bladder recurrence rate at centers of experience.

Distal ureter and bladder cuff excision using the "Keyhole Technique" during Robotic Radical Nephroureterectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5-10% of all urothelial tumors (1). Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard treatment for high, and low-grade UTUC (2). Although the open approach has been considered the gold standard, robotic techniques have shown comparable oncological outcomes with potential advantages in terms of peri-operative morbidity (3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a novel "Keyhole" technique for management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during robotic RNU. This technique allows the surgeon to directly visualize the ureteric orifices, delineate resection borders, and maintain oncologic principles of en-bloc excision without necessitating secondary cystotomy incision or concomitant endoscopic procedure. Descriptive demographic characteristics, surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Complications were reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, ten patients underwent robotic RNU with bladder cuff excision using the Keyhole technique (single-dock, single-position). Median age was 75 years. Eight patients underwent surgery for right-sided tumors. Median operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were 287 min, 100 mL, and 3 days, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred, and one grade II complication occurred during the 90-day postoperative period. All patients had high-grade UTUC, being 90% pure urothelial. Bladder recurrences occurred in 30% of patients with an overall median follow-up of 11.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: Keyhole technique for the management of distal ureter and bladder cuff during RNU represents a feasible approach with minimal 90-day complications and low bladder recurrence rate at centers of experience.