Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 47(3): 390-395, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37185001

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography performed on a detector-based spectral scanner helps more closely approximate severity of stenosis with nuclear medicine and cardiac catheterization tests compared with single-energy CT (SECT) in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher. METHODS: This retrospective trial was conducted between January 2017 and December 2019 and included 52 patients with a CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher. Two reading sessions were performed 6 weeks apart. The first reading session was performed using only conventional images and the second reading session was performed using spectral results. Detector-based spectral CT CAD-RADS scores were compared with cardiac stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results for final characterization of stenosis in 41 segments from 32 patients. The mean CAD-RADS score was calculated for both the conventional images and spectral images. RESULTS: The CAD-RADS score for SECT and the score for spectral CT for the 41 segments were compared. Available associated stress test and/or cardiac catheterization results were also compared with CAD-RADS scores. In 51% (21/41), a diagnosis concordant with best practices results was achieved with the help of spectral CT results. A mean CAD-RADS score of 3.56 was obtained using spectral results, compared with 3.93 using conventional images. A 2-tailed paired t test determined the difference to be significant with a P value of 0.007. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography coronary angiography is feasible on a detector-based spectral CT scanner and can improve diagnostic confidence over SECT angiography in patients with an original CAD-RADS score of 3 and higher.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Constricción Patológica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada/métodos
2.
Psychopharmacol Bull ; 51(3): 125-149, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34421149

RESUMEN

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has become one of the most common psychiatric diagnosis in the United States specifically within the veteran population. The current treatment options for this debilitating diagnosis include trauma-focused psychotherapies along with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI).1 MDMA has recently been shown as a novel therapeutic agent with promisingly results in the treatment of PTSD. MDMA is a psychoactive compound traditionally categorized as a psychedelic amphetamine that deemed a Schedule I controlled substance in the 1980s. Prior to its status as a controlled substance, it was used by psychotherapists for an array of psychiatric issues. In more recent times, MDMA has resurfaced as a potential therapy for PTSD and the data produced from randomized, controlled trials back the desire for MDMA to be utilized as an effective pharmacologic therapy in conjunction with psychotherapy.2.


Asunto(s)
Alucinógenos , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Veteranos , Adulto , Alucinógenos/farmacología , Alucinógenos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina/farmacología , N-Metil-3,4-metilenodioxianfetamina/uso terapéutico , Psicoterapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 11: 2150132720967221, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33111633

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most studies based on self-reported data indicate that female patients more often than males have a same-gender preference for their primary care physician (PCP). Because self-reported preferences may not reflect true preferences, we analyzed objective data to investigate patients' preferences for PCP gender. METHODS: Analyses were performed on 2192 new patients seen within a university-based healthcare system by 13 PCPs (2 male, 11 female) during 2017. New patients were asked about their PCP gender preference when assigned a PCP. We compared the expected prevalence (proportion of males/females in overall patient population) and observed prevalence (gender distribution of patients for each PCP) by PCP gender. A mixed model with PCP as a random effect examined the odds of male and female patients being assigned a same-gender physician. RESULTS: The expected prevalence of new patients was 65% female and 35% male. The observed prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of male patients among male and female PCPs was, respectively, 59.7% (49.0%-69.5%) and 28.0% (24.0%-32.4%), with neither CI containing the expected prevalence of male patients (35%). Similarly, the observed prevalence of female patients among male and female PCPs was, respectively, 40.3% (95% CI 30.5%-51.0%) and 72.0% (95% CI 67.6%-76.0%), with neither CI containing the expected prevalence of female patients (65%). CONCLUSIONS: Both male and female patients often preferred to see a same-gender PCP with this preference more pronounced in males. Future research should seek to clarify the relationships between patients' gender preferences, patient-physician gender concordance/discordance, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Médicos de Atención Primaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prioridad del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA