Mid-term outcomes of consecutive 998 cases of coronary atherectomy in contemporary clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and safety endpoints with use of rotational (RA) and orbital (OA) atherectomy in a large patient population with moderate to severely calcified lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) has been recognized as a risk factor for adverse outcomes with coronary artery disease (CAD). Though atheroablative techniques, RA and OA have been used extensively, comparison of their clinical and safety endpoints is lacking. Comparison of these two modalities formed the basis of our study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 12 001 patients who underwent PCI at our institution between January 2013-December 2015, we studied 998 consecutive patients with severe calcification treated with atheroablation. We assessed clinical outcomes including death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30 days and 6 months in addition to post-procedural complications. Device perforation occurred more frequently with use of OA at high burr speed versus RA (1.9%, n = 3 vs. 0.2%, n = 2, P = 0.03). Rates of composite adverse events were similar between groups at 6 months (18.55 vs. 11.46%; P = 0.11) CONCLUSION: In this retrospective, single center study, we observed no significant differences in 6-month rates of adverse events associated with use of OA vs. RA in patients with moderate to severe calcification undergoing PCI. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Clinical and angiographic predictors of haemodynamically significant angiographic lesions: development and validation of a risk score to predict positive fractional flow reserve.

AIMS: Coronary revascularisation based upon physiological evaluation of lesions improves clinical outcomes. Angiographic or visual stenosis assessment alone is insufficient in predicting haemodynamic stenosis severity by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and therefore cannot be used to guide revascularisation, particularly in the lesion subset <70%. Accordingly, we sought to identify independent determinants of angiographic intermediate lesions with haemodynamic significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed consecutive intermediate lesions for patients from January 2014 to April 2015 at our institution. Independent predictors of FFR positivity (FFR ≤0.8) were identified and a scoring system formulated. Of 1,023 consecutive lesions (883 patients), 314 (31%) were haemodynamically significant. Characteristics associated with FFR ≤0.8 include male gender, higher SYNTAX score, lesions ≥20 mm, stenosis >50%, bifurcation, calcification, absence of tortuosity and smaller reference diameter. A user-friendly integer score was developed with the five variables demonstrating the strongest association. On prospective validation (in 279 distinct lesions), the increasing value of the score correlated well with increasing haemodynamic significance (C-statistic 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several clinical and angiographic characteristics and formulated a scoring system to guide the approach to intermediate lesions. This may translate into cost savings. Larger studies with prospective validation are required to confirm our results.