Targeted therapy with a localised abluminal groove, low-dose sirolimus-eluting, biodegradable-polymer coronary stent - five-year results of the TARGET All Comers randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In the prospective, multicentre, randomised TARGET All Comers study, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the FIREHAWK biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) was non-inferior to the durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES) for the primary endpoint of target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months. AIMS: We aimed to report the final study outcomes at 5 years. METHODS: Patients referred for PCI were randomised to receive either a BP-SES or DP-EES in a 1:1 ratio in 10 European countries. Randomisation was stratified by centre and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presentation, and clinical follow-up extended to 5 years. The primary endpoint was TLF (composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [MI], or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation). Secondary endpoints included patient-oriented composite events (POCE; composite of all-cause death, all MI, or any revascularisation and its components). RESULTS: From December 2015 to October 2016, 1,653 patients were randomly assigned to the BP-SES or DP-EES groups, of which 93.8% completed 5-year clinical follow-up or were deceased. At 5 years, TLF occurred in 17.1% of the BP-SES group and in 16.3% of the DP-EES group (p=0.68). POCE occurred in 34.0% of the BP-SES group and 32.7% of the DP-EES group (p=0.58). Revascularisation was the most common POCE, occurring in 19.3% of patients receiving BP-SES and 19.2% receiving DP-EES, of which less than one-third was ischaemia-driven target lesion-related. In the landmark analysis, there were no differences in the rates of TLF and POCE between groups from 1 to 5 years, and these results were consistent across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In an all-comers population requiring stent implantation for myocardial ischaemia, the BP-SES was non-inferior to the DP-EES for the primary endpoint of TLF at 12 months, and results were sustained at 5 years, confirming the long-term safety and efficacy of the FIREHAWK BP-SES.

Healthcare provision of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis in older patients is the standard of care with a well-established supply density in Germany. In the near future, healthcare reform is planned that may affect TAVI capacities. Therefore, it is important to know how political regulations may interfere with access to services and what the need for TAVI will be in the future, based on demographic trends. METHODS: The number of TAVI procedures (DRG F98A +F98) and the in-hospital main diagnoses of aortic stenosis (ICD I35) in 2021 were analyzed at the level of county or federal state based on anonymized data from hospital reports, according to § 21 of the German hospital reimbursement law. The number of TAVI and aortic stenosis cases was projected for 2035 based on data from the German Federal Statistical Office on demographic developments. With quality assurance data from hospitals in 2019 and a route planner, the travel time to the next hospital performing TAVI (OPS 5­35a.0) was calculated, and the consequence of a politically suggested minimum volume cut-off was analyzed. RESULTS: In 2021, a total of 26,506 TAVI procedures were reported with a mean number of TAVI per 100,000 inhabitants of 32 (range between federal states from 25 to 42). Among the 66,045 diagnoses of aortic stenosis, there was a variation per 100,000 inhabitants from 64 to 108 (mean 79) between federal states. Compared to 2021, an additional 8748 (+13%) diagnoses of aortic stenosis and an increase of 4673 (+18%) TAVI procedures is to be expected in 2035. In 2019, 57% of German citizens could reach a TAVI hospital within 30 min and 91% within 60 min of driving time by car (mean time to hospital 31 min). Applying a minimum number of 150 TAVI/hospital per year would increase the driving time to hospital from 33 to 52 min in Saxony-Anhalt and instantly remove six out of eight hospitals from service in Hesse. CONCLUSION: Regulation of TAVI services by minimum volume numbers would arbitrarily interfere with access to services, in contradiction to the medical service assurance tasks of federal state governments. These issues should be considered in the upcoming healthcare system reform.

Development of In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) at an Interdisciplinary Heart Center: A Single-Center Experience of 489 Consecutive Cases.

Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has emerged over time, reflected in appropriate adjustments in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines in 2007, 2012 and 2017. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze in-hospital outcomes after TAVI in the development within a single heart center over a period of 10 years depending on adjustments in the guidelines, infrastructural and procedural determinants. Methods: 489 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 and 2019 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups of different treatment circumstances depending on guidelines adjustments and local infrastructural progress (group 1: 2010-2015 (n = 132), group 2: 2016-2017 (n = 155), group 3: 2018-2019 (n = 202). The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were selected according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of in-hospital mortality. Statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05. Results: 489 patients (346 (70.8 %) transfemoral and 143 (29.2 %) transapical) underwent TAVI. Comparing periods (group 1 vs. 2 vs. 3) age (82.1 ± 6.2 vs. 82.5 ± 4.8 vs. 81.1 ± 5.1 years, p = 0.012) and EuroSCORE II (8.4 ± 6.0 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9 vs. 5.5 ± 5.0 %, p < 0.001) declined over time. Rates of in-hospital mortality decreased significantly (9.1 % vs. 5.8 % vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.029), especially with observed-to-expected mortality ratios indicating a disproportionate decline of in-hospital mortality (1.08 vs. 1.00 vs. 0.45). Furthermore, post-procedural complications, such as acute kidney injury stage 3 (10.6 % vs. 3.2 % vs. 4.5 %, p = 0.016) and bleeding complications (14.4 % vs. 11.6 % vs 7.9 %, p = 0.165) decreased from group 1 to 3. However, rates of permanent pacemaker implantations (7.6 % vs. 11.0 % vs. 22.8 %, p < 0.001) increased, associated with a switch towards self-expanding valves (0.0 % vs. 61.3 % vs. 76.7 %, p < 0.001). Length of hospitalization as well as stay at intensive care and intermediate care unit could be reduced significantly during the observation period. In multivariate analysis age (OR: 1.103; 95 % CI: 1.013 - 1.202; p = 0.025), creatinine level before TAVI (OR: 1.497; 95 % CI: 1.013 - 2.212; p = 0.043), atrial fibrillation (OR: 2.956; 95 % CI: 1.127 - 7.749; p = 0.028) and procedure duration (OR: 1.017; 95 % CI: 1.009 - 1.025; p < 0.001) could be identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: This study identified age, creatinine level before TAVI, the presence of atrial fibrillation and procedure duration as independent predictors for in-hospital mortality. Although these predictors decreased during the observation period, the decline in hospital-mortality was disproportionate, which was indicated by an observed-to-expected mortality ratio of 0.45 for the last observation period. However, it can be assumed that apart from patient-related factors, there were further institutional, technical and procedural developments, which ran in parallel and affected in-hospital mortality rates after TAVI.

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation: procedural hospital volume and mortality in Germany.

AIMS: Studies assessing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) showed lower rates of in-hospital mortality at high-volume hospitals and minimum caseloads were recommended to assure quality standards. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients in the German mandatory quality assurance registry with elective or urgent TF-TAVI procedures in 2018 and 2019 at 81 and 82 hospitals, respectively, were analysed. Observed in-hospital mortality was adjusted to expected mortality by the German AKL-KATH score (O/E) as well as by the EuroScore II (O/E2). Hospital volume and O/E were correlated by regression analyses and volume quartiles. 18 763 patients (age: 81.1 ± 1.0 years, mean EuroSCORE II: 6.9 ± 1.8%) and 22 137 patients (mean age: 80.7 ± 3.5 years, mean EuroSCORE II: 6.5 ± 1.6%) were analysed in 2018 and 2019, respectively. The average observed in-hospital mortality was 2.57 ± 1.83% and 2.36 ± 1.60%, respectively. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly inversely related to hospital volume by linear regression in both years. After risk adjustment, the association between hospital volume and O/E was statistically significant in 2019 (R2 = 0.049; P = 0.046), but not in 2018 (R2 = 0.027; P = 0.14). The variance of O/E explained by the number of cases in 2019 was low (4.9%). Differences in O/E outcome between the first and the fourth quartile were not statistically significant in both years (1.10 ± 1.02 vs. 0.82 ± 0.46; P = 0.26 in 2018; 1.16 0 .97 vs. 0.74 ± 0.39; P = 0.084 in 2019). Any chosen volume cut-off could not precisely differentiate between hospitals with not acceptable quality (>95th percentile O/E of all hospitals) and those with acceptable (O/E ≤95th percentile) or above-average (O/E < 1) quality. For example, in 2019 a cut-off value of 150 would only exclude one of two hospitals with not acceptable quality, while 20 hospitals with acceptable or above-average quality (25% of all hospitals) would be excluded. CONCLUSION: The association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing elective TF-TAVI in Germany in 2018 and 2019 was weak and not consistent throughout various analytical approaches, indicating no clinical relevance of hospital volume for the outcome. However, these data were derived from a healthcare system with restricted access to hospitals to perform TAVI and overall high TAVI volumes. Instead of the unprecise surrogate hospital volume, the quality of hospitals performing TF-TAVI should be directly assessed by real achieved risk-adjusted mortality.

Novel concept of routine total arterial coronary bypass grafting through a left anterior approach avoiding sternotomy.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via full sternotomy remains a very invasive procedure, often requiring prolonged recovery of the patient. We describe a novel, less invasive approach for totally arterial CABG via a small left anterior thoracotomy in a pilot series of 20 unselected patients. From January to March 2020, 20 consecutive patients (mean age 65.9 ± 9.2 years, 100% male, STS-score: 1.6 ± 2) underwent CABG using only arterial conduits via a small left anterior thoracotomy. Patients were operated on cardiopulmonary bypass with peripheral cannulation and transthoracic aortic cross-clamping. Pulling tapes encircling the great vessels, the arrested empty heart was rotated and moved within the pericardium to enable conventional anastomotic techniques especially on lateral and inferior wall coronary targets. In all patients, left internal mammary artery and radial artery were utilized for bypass with 3.3 ± 0.7 distal coronary anastomoses per patient. Anterior, lateral, and inferior wall territories were revascularized in 100%, 85%, and 70% of patients, respectively. Complete anatomical revascularization was achieved in 95% of patients. ICU stay was 1 day in 17 patients, and 14 of patients left the hospital within 8 days. There was no hospital death, no stroke, no myocardial infarction, and no repeat revascularization. In this pilot series of 20 patients, minimally invasive, totally arterial CABG with avoidance of sternotomy was technically feasible with favorable patient outcomes.

Differential impact of abluminal groove-filled biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stent on and off dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention for 6-12 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 3-6 months in those with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Whether DAPT duration has a differential effect on outcomes following treatment of ischemic coronary disease with durable versus biodegradable drug-eluting stent (DES) is poorly defined. METHODS: The TARGET All Comer study was a randomized trial of patients with ischemic coronary artery disease assigned to treatment with either a biodegradable polymer DES (Firehawk) or a durable polymer DES (XIENCE). This pre-specified TARGET AC sub-analysis sought to evaluate the 2-year clinical outcomes before and after DAPT discontinuation. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF). RESULTS: A total of 1,296 (78.4%) of 1,653 randomized patients were included in this substudy, of which 1,210 (93.4%) remained on DAPT at 6 months, 863 (66.6%) at 12 months, and 409 (31.6%) at 2 years. There was no difference in TLF between patients treated with Firehawk and XIENCE stents from index procedure to DAPT discontinuation (8.0 and 7.7%, p > .99) or after DAPT discontinuation (2.9 vs. 3.8%, p = .16). After DAPT discontinuation, target vessel myocardial infarction (1.3 vs. 3.3%, p = .07), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (0.5 vs. 1.9%, p = .06) favored treatment with Firehawk. CONCLUSIONS: Although TLF was comparable for both Firehawk and XIENCE stent groups before and after DAPT discontinuation, after DAPT discontinuation, there was a trend for less target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven revascularization with the biodegradable polymer DES.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular mortality and catherization activity during the lockdown in central Germany: an observational study.

AIMS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital admissions for cardiac care have declined. However, effects on mortality are unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period in central Germany on overall and cardiovascular deaths. Simultaneously we looked at catheterization activities in the same region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 22 of 24 public health-authorities in central Germany were aggregated during the pandemic related lockdown period and compared to the same time period in 2019. Information on the total number of deaths and causes of death, including cardiovascular mortality, were collected. Additionally, we compared rates of hospitalization (n = 5178) for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in 26 hospitals in this area. Data on 5,984 deaths occurring between March 23, 2020 and April 26, 2020 were evaluated. In comparison to the reference non-pandemic period in 2019 (deaths: n = 5832), there was a non-significant increase in all-cause mortality of 2.6% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.06; p = 0.16]. Cardiovascular and cardiac mortality increased significantly by 7.6% (IRR 1.08, 95%-CI 1.01-1.14; p = 0.02) and by 11.8% (IRR 1.12, 95%-CI 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001), respectively. During the same period, our data revealed a drop in cardiac catherization procedures. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19-related lockdown a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality was observed in central Germany, whereas catherization activities were reduced. The mechanisms underlying both of these observations should be investigated further in order to better understand the effects of a pandemic-related lockdown and social-distancing restrictions on cardiovascular care and mortality.

The impact of pre-procedure heart rate on adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from a 2-year follow-up of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prognostic impact of pre-procedure heart rate (PHR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not yet been fully investigated. This post-hoc analysis sought to assess the impact of PHR on medium-term outcomes among patients having PCI, who were enrolled in the "all-comers" GLOBAL LEADERS trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoint (composite of all-cause death or new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI]) and key secondary safety endpoint (bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3 or 5) were assessed at 2 years. PHR was available in 15,855 patients, and when evaluated as a continuous variable (5 bpm increase) and following adjustment using multivariate Cox regression, it significantly correlated with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.09, p < 0.001). Using dichotomous cut-off criteria, a PHR>67 bpm was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.38, 95%CI 1.13-1.69, p = 0.002) and more frequent new Q-wave MI (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.02-1.93, p = 0.037). No significant association was found between PHR and BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.09, p = 0.099). There was no interaction with the primary (p-inter = 0.236) or secondary endpoint (p-inter = 0.154) when high and low PHR was analyzed according to different antiplatelet strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PHR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 2 years following PCI in the "all-comer" GLOBAL LEADERS trial. The prognostic value of increased PHR on outcomes was not affected by the different antiplatelet strategies in this trial.

Clinical outcomes of complex lesions treated with an abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent.

BACKGROUND: The Firehawk stent (Shanghai MicroPort Medical Group, Shanghai, China), a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent has been evaluated in the randomized TARGET I trial in which low-risk patients were enrolled with strict eligibility criteria. Recently, the TARGET All Comers study has shown similar results of the Firehawk compared to the XIENCE stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara). However, clinical outcomes in high-risk patients are unclear. METHODS: The TARGET All Comer study was a randomized trial that assigned patients to either Firehawk or XIENCE implantation. This TARGET AC subanalysis sought to evaluate the 2 year clinical outcomes of patients according to two risk groups; patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria of the TARGET I trial were classified as "low-risk," while their counterparts were classified as "high-risk." The primary endpoint was target lesion failure. RESULTS: A total of 1,585 patients were included, of which 1,334 (84%) were classified as high-risk. At 2 years, the high-risk group had a significantly higher rate of TLF than the low-risk group (9.5% vs. 3.6%, p = .003), mainly driven by increased target vessel myocardial infarction (6.3% vs. 2.4%, p = .02). The Firehawk and XIENCE had no significant differences in TLF among both low-risk (3.1% vs. 4.2%, p = .66) and high-risk (9.9% vs. 9.1%, p = .57) patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients had worse clinical outcomes at 2 years in the TARGET All Comer study. Outcomes with the Firehawk were similar to the XIENCE stent among both low-risk and high-risk patients at 2 years.

2-Year Clinical Outcomes of an Abluminal Groove-Filled Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Compared With a Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the 2-year clinical outcomes of the Firehawk stent (Shanghai MicroPort Medical Group, Shanghai, China), a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting coronary stent, compared with XIENCE (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California), a durable-polymer everolimus-eluting coronary stent. BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of the Firehawk stent have not been evaluated beyond 1 year in a randomized all-comers clinical trial. METHODS: The TARGET All Comers study is a prospective, multicenter, all-comers, randomized, noninferiority trial conducted in Europe. A total of 1,653 patients were randomly assigned to undergo implantation of either the Firehawk or the XIENCE stent. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of target lesion failure was 8.7% in the Firehawk group versus 8.6% in the XIENCE group (p = 0.92). The event rates of individual components of the primary endpoint were comparable for the 2 groups. Landmark analyses between 1- and 2-year follow-up revealed no statistically significant difference of TLF for the Firehawk versus the XIENCE stent. Beyond 1 year, very late definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 3 patients (0.4%) in the Firehawk group and in 7 patients (0.9%) in the XIENCE group (p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year follow-up of the TARGET All Comers study confirms comparable safety and efficacy profiles of the Firehawk and XIENCE stents.

Targeted therapy with a localised abluminal groove, low-dose sirolimus-eluting, biodegradable polymer coronary stent (TARGET All Comers): a multicentre, open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The FIREHAWK is a drug-eluting stent with a fully biodegradable sirolimus-containing polymer coating localised to recessed abluminal grooves on the stent surface. We investigated clinical outcomes with this targeted, low-dose, biodegradable polymer, sirolimus-eluting stent compared with XIENCE durable polymer, everolimus-eluting stents in an all-comers population. METHODS: The TARGET All Comers study was a prospective, multicentre, open-label randomised non-inferiority trial done at 21 centres in ten European countries. Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic coronary artery disease and objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia who qualified for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomised 1:1 to undergo implantation of a FIREHAWK or XIENCE. Randomisation was web-based, with random block allocation and stratification by centre and ST elevation myocardial infarction. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation, but treating physicians and patients were not. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure at 12 months, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation. The control event rate for XIENCE was assumed to be 7%, the non-inferiority margin was 3.5%, and the primary analysis was in the intention-to-treat population, censoring patients who did not have either an event before 365 days or contact beyond 365 days. Late lumen loss was the primary endpoint of an angiographic substudy designed to investigate the non-inferiority of the FIREHAWK compared with the XIENCE stent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02520180. FINDINGS: From Dec 17, 2015, to Oct 14, 2016, 1653 patients were randomly assigned to implantation of the FIREHAWK (n=823) or XIENCE (n=830). 65 patients in the FIREHAWK group and 66 in the XIENCE group had insufficient follow-up data and were excluded from the analyses. At 12 months, target lesion failure occurred in 46 (6·1%) of 758 patients in the FIREHAWK group and in 45 (5·9%) of 764 patients in the XIENCE group (difference 0·2%, 90% CI -1·9 to 2·2, pnon-inferiority=0·004, 95% CI -2·2 to 2·6, psuperiority=0·88). There were no differences in ischaemia-driven revascularisation or stent thrombosis rates at 12 months. 176 patients were included in the angiographic substudy, in which in-stent late lumen loss was 0·17 mm (SD 0·48) in the FIREHAWK group and 0·11 mm (0·52) in the XIENCE group (p=0·48), with an absolute difference of 0·05 mm (95% CI -0·09 to 0·18, pnon-inferiority=0·024). INTERPRETATION: In a broad all-comers population of patients requiring stent implantation for myocardial ischaemia, the FIREHAWK was non-inferior to the XIENCE as assessed with the primary endpoint of target lesion failure at 12 months and in-stent late lumen loss at 13 months. The FIREHAWK is a safe and effective alternative stent to treat patients with ischaemic coronary artery disease in clinical practice. FUNDING: Shanghai Microport Medical.

In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in younger patients less than 75 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.

AIMS: Randomised trials comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have included mainly elderly patients >80 years. The authors investigated comparative in-hospital outcomes of younger patients <75 years undergoing transfemoral (TF) TAVR or isolated SAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 6,972 patients aged 65-74 years undergoing TF-TAVR or SAVR between 2013 and 2014 were identified from the observational German Quality Assurance Registry on Aortic Valve Replacement (AQUA), which comprises all TAVR and SAVR procedures performed in Germany. Analyses were performed for the overall unmatched cohort as well as for 1,388 propensity-matched patients. Overall, 82.4% of patients <75 years needing treatment for aortic valve stenosis received SAVR. Patients undergoing TF-TAVR were older and had more comorbidities with higher predicted risk of death. After propensity-matching, in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.39), neurologic complications (1.0% vs. 2.1%, p=0.09), and myocardial infarctions (0 vs. 0.3%, p=0.16) were not different after TF-TAVR or SAVR. Postoperative delirium was more frequent after SAVR (8.9% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001), whereas the need for new pacemaker was 4 times higher after TF-TAVR (13.3% vs. 3.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients <75 years undergoing TF-TAVR or SAVR had similar outcomes with the exception of more frequent need for new pacemaker implantation and less frequent incidence of post-operative dialysis and delirium in TF-TAVR patients. Whether these similar in-hospital outcomes are replicable in the longer-term events in TF-TAVR and SAVR remains to be proven in future studies.

Gender based differences in drug eluting stent implantation - data from the German ALKK registry suggest underuse of DES in elderly women.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest there are gender based differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease, with women receiving evidence based therapy less frequently than suggested by current guidelines. The aim of our study was to evaluate gender based differences in the use of DES. METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data from 100704 stent implantations in the PCI registry of the ALKK between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS: The usage of DES increased from 16.0 to 43.9%. Although women had smaller vessel sizes, they received DES less often compared to men (28.2 vs. 31.3%), with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.97) at the age of 75, and an adjusted odds ratio of 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.84-0.94) at the age of 80. CONCLUSION: Despite having smaller vessels than men, women were treated less often with DES. These findings apply to women above the age of 75 years. These findings support previous reports, that elderly women with coronary artery disease are treated differently to men.

Real-world use of fractional flow reserve in Germany: results of the prospective ALKK coronary angiography and PCI registry.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for beneficial prognostic and economic effects of FFR-guided treatment of stable coronary artery disease. We sought to evaluate the real-world use of FFR measurements in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed the data of the prospective ALKK coronary angiography and PCI registry including data of 38 hospitals from January 2010 to December 2013. A total of 100,977 patients undergoing coronary angiography were included. In 3240 patients (3.2 %) intracoronary pressure measurement was performed. There was a wide range of use of FFR measurement in the different analyzed ALKK hospitals from 0.1 to 8.8 % in elective patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (median 2.7 %, quartiles 0.9 and 5.3 %), with a successive increase of use over time during the study period. Overall, it was performed in 3.2 % of coronary angiographies. Use in patients with three-vessel disease (2.5 %) and recommendation for bypass surgery (1.6 %) was less frequent. In procedures without PCI, dose area product was higher in the FFR group (2641 cGy × cm2 vs. 2368 cGy × cm2, p < 0.001), while it was lower in procedures with ad hoc PCI (4676 cGy × cm2 vs. 5143 cGy × cm2, p < 0.001). The performing center turned out to be the strongest predictor. CONCLUSIONS: The use of FFR measurement was very heterogeneous between different hospitals and in general relatively low, in particular in patients with multivessel disease or recommendation for bypass surgery, but there was a positive trend during the study period. Technically, FFR measurement was not associated with an increased periprocedural complication rate.

Five-year haemodynamic outcomes of the first-generation SAPIEN balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve.

AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has gained rapid acceptance for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high surgical risk for conventional valve replacement. Although TAVI is now a relatively mature technique, limited data about long-term valvular function are available. Our aim was to report the five-year echocardiographic data evaluating valve performance from three early European feasibility studies designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the first-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN THV). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 410 patients were enrolled in the following single-arm, non-randomised, prospective multicentre clinical studies: REVIVE II, TRAVERCE and PARTNER EU. Five-year follow-up was completed in 114 surviving patients. Mean patient age was 82.3±5.6 years; 63.4% were female. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 28.4±13.3%. NYHA Class III/IV was reported in 92.5%. At five years, the mean effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.6±0.6 cm² (n=34) and the mean gradient was 11.7±5.4 mmHg (n=39). In paired patient data, the difference between discharge and five-year EOA was 0.1±0.7 cm² (p=0.3956) and mean gradient was 2.2±5.7 mmHg (p=0.0900). At discharge and five years, respectively, aortic regurgitation (AR) was evaluated as none/trace in 66.6% (n=162/243) and 55.3% (n=19/38), mild in 28.4% (n=69/243) and 39.5% (n=15/38), and moderate in 4.9% (n=12/243) and 5.3% (n=2/38). No severe AR was reported at follow-up. Valve thrombosis was observed in three patients and occurred within one year. No valve-related explants and no case of structural valve deterioration have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term echocardiographic outcomes in high-risk patients with severe AS suggest stable haemodynamic function of first-generation balloon-expandable SAPIEN THVs at five years, with no worsening of AR severity over time.

Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI.

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: We present a first description of a Heart Team (HT)-guided approach to coronary revascularization and its long-term effect on clinical events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The HT approach is a structured process to decide for coronary bypass grafting (CABG), PCI or conservative therapy in ad hoc situations as well as in HT conferences. As a hypothesis, during the long-term course after a PCI performed according to HT rules, a low number of late revascularizations, especially CABGs, are expected (F-PCI study). METHODS: In this monocentric study, the HT approach to an all-comer population was first analyzed and described in general with the help of a database. Next the use of a HT approach was described for a more homogeneous subgroup with newly detected CAD (1.CAD). Those patients in whom the HT decision was PCI (which was a 1.PCI) were then studied with the help of questionnaires for clinical events during a very long-term follow-up. Events were CABG, PCI, diagnostic catheterization (DCath) and death. RESULTS: A significant number of patients were presented to HT conferences: 22 % out of all 11,174 catheterizations, 24 % out of all 7867 CAD cases and 35 % out of 3408 1.CAD cases. Most of these patients had multi-vessel disease (MVD). Conference decisions were isolated CABG in 46-66 %, PCI in 10-14 %, valvular surgery in 9-16 %, HTx in 10-21 % (Endstage heart failure candidates for surgery) and conservative therapy (Medical or no therapy, additional diagnostic procedures or no adherence to recommended therapy) in 2-3 %. However, most PCIs, ad hoc and elective, were performed under Heart Team rules, but without conference. During follow-up of 1.PCI patients (Kaplan-Meier analysis), CABG occurred in only 15 % of patients, PCI in 37 % and DCath in 65 %; mortality of any course was 51 %. Mortalities were similar in one-vessel disease and in a population of the same year, matched for age and sex (p < 0.057), but mortality was higher in 1.PCI patients with MVD (p < 0.001). Beyond 2 years, Kaplan-Meier curves were linear. CONCLUSION: The structured Heart Team approach is an effective tool for ad hoc and conference-based clinical decision-making with a sustained clinical benefit. This is demonstrated in low late CABG (and PCI) rates after a 1.PCI, without elevated mortality. The all-comer population supports the universal value of these data. Stable annual event rates late after PCI suggest a conversion to stable CAD. Heart Team conferences are also important tools in cases of valvular and end-stage heart disease.

Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the use and outcome of radial versus femoral access in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: The radial approach for PCI in patients with STEMI has been suggested to have a lower rate of complications and bleeding and to improve prognosis compared with the femoral approach. However, there still is a large regional and national variation in its use. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012 a total of 17,865 patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled in the observational German PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Transfemoral (TF) access was used in 15,270 (85.5%), transradial (TR) access in 2,530 (14.2%), and other access in 65 (0.3%) patients. In this analysis, 10,264 patients from 20 centers that had performed at least 5 TR-PCI for STEMI were included. This study compared TR-PCI (n = 2,454 23.9%) with TF-PCI (n = 7,810, 76.1%). RESULTS: Procedural success was high in both cohorts. Hospital mortality (1.8 vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and vascular access complications (0.3 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001%) were lower in the TR group. In the multivariate analysis radial access was associated with an improved in-hospital survival rate (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The radial approach for PCI can be performed with excellent procedural success in selected STEMI patients and is associated with a lower rate of vascular access complications and hospital mortality.

Use and impact of thrombectomy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with persistent ST-segment elevation: results of the prospective ALKK PCI-registry.

BACKGROUND: Data about the impact of thrombectomy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are inconsistent. The aim of our study was an evaluation of both the real-world use of thrombectomy and the impact of thrombectomy on outcome in unselected patients treated with primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the data of the prospective ALKK PCI-registry of 35 hospitals from January 2010 to December 2013. A total of 10,755 patients receiving single-vessel primary PCI for acute STEMI were included. In 2176 patients (20.2 %) thrombectomy was performed. There was a wide range of use of thrombectomy in the different ALKK hospitals from 1.1 to 61.7 % (median 18.6 %, quartiles 6.0 and 40.3 %) with a general increase of use over the first years of the study period. In patients with and without thrombectomy there was TIMI 0 flow present before PCI in 6010 patients, TIMI 1 in 1338, TIMI 2 in 2002, and TIMI 3 in 1405. Patients with acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock received significantly more often thrombectomy. Fluoroscopy time (8.1 vs. 7.3 min, p < 0.0001) and dose area product (5373 cGy × cm(2) vs. 4802 cGy × cm(2), p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in patients treated with thrombectomy. The subgroup of patients with TIMI 0 flow before PCI had significantly higher rates of TIMI 3 flow after PCI when treated with thrombectomy (87.1 vs. 84.1 %, p < 0.01), while there was no difference in post-PCI TIMI 3 flow in patients with TIMI 1, 2 or 3 flow before PCI. Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar in both groups in general and in all subgroups of TIMI flow. CONCLUSIONS: The use of thrombectomy in patients with STEMI is heterogenous between hospitals. Overall, there was no impact of thrombectomy on TIMI 3 patency or mortality after PCI. In the subgroup of STEMI patients with TIMI 0 flow before PCI individualized thrombectomy had a positive impact on restoration of normal blood flow.

Cobalt-chromium KAname™ coRonary stEnt system in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease (KARE study).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Kaname™ cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), thin strut, bare metal stent (BMS) system for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of drug-eluting stents, a certain percentage of patients with coronary artery disease are still treated with BMS. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate their clinical performance. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm study including a predefined subset of 79 patients with small vessels. The primary end-point was freedom from target vessel failure (TVF) at 6 months. Key angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) end-points were late loss, diameter stenosis, binary restenosis, and neointimal hyperplasia volume. RESULTS: Freedom from TVF at 6 months was 93.3% and at 1 year 90.8% in total population, and 92.4% and 87.3% in small vessels, respectively. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 6 and 12 months were 4.3% and 6.4% in total population, and 3.8% and 7.6% in small vessels, respectively. At 6 months in-stent late loss was 0.75 ± 0.43 mm and binary restenosis rate was 16.9% in total population, and 0.64 ± 0.40 mm and 26.1% in small vessels, while IVUS assessed neointimal hyperplasia volume at 6 months was 128.9 ± 42.6 mm(3) for total population. There were no definite and probable stent thromboses up to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate good safety and effectiveness of the Kaname™ stent with clinically equivalent results in small and larger vessels, as such providing useful treatment option for patients with ischemic heart disease considered for BMS implantation.