Technique Survival and Determinants of Technique Failure in In-Center Nocturnal Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-duration (7-8 hours) hemodialysis provides benefits compared with conventional thrice-weekly, 4-hour sessions. Nurse-administered, in-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) may expand the population to whom an intensive dialysis schedule can be offered. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to determine predictors of INHD technique failure, disruptions, and technique survival. DESIGN: This study used retrospective chart and database review methodology. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single Canadian INHD program operating in Victoria, British Columbia, within a tertiary care hospital. Our program serves a catchment population of approximately 450 000 people. PATIENTS/SAMPLE/PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three consecutive incident INHD patients took part in the INHD program of whom 42 provided informed consent to participate in this study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study including incident INHD patients from 2015 to 2017. The primary outcome was technique failure ≤6 months (TF ≤6). Secondary outcomes included technique survival and reasons for/predictors of INHD discontinuation or temporary disruption. Predictors of each outcome included demographics, comorbidities, and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scoring. RESULTS: Among 42 patients, mean (SD) age, dialysis vintage, CFS score, and follow-up were 63 (16) years, 46 (55) months, 4 (1), and 11 (9) months, respectively. 52% were aged ≥65 years. TF ≤6 occurred in 12 (29%) patients. One-year technique survival censored for transplants and home dialysis transitions was 60%. Discontinuation related to insomnia (32%), medical status change (27%), and vascular access (23%). In unadjusted Cox survival analysis, 1-point increases in CFS score associated with a higher risk of technique failure (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-3.31). In an adjusted analysis, higher frailty severity also associated with temporary INHD disruptions (incidence rate ratio: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.55-4.50, comparing CFS of ≥4 to 1-3). LIMITATIONS: The retrospective, observational design of this study resulted in limited ability to control for confounding factors. In addition, the relatively small number of events observed owing to a small sample size diminished statistical power to inform study conclusions. Use of a single physician to determine the clinical frailty score is another limitation. Finally, the use of a single center for this study limits generalizability to other programs and clinic settings. CONCLUSIONS: INHD is a sustainable modality, even among older patients. Higher frailty associates with INHD technique failure and greater missed treatments. Inclusion of a CFS threshold of ≤4 into INHD inclusion criteria may help to identify individuals most likely to realize the long-term benefits of INHD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Due to the retrospective and observational design of this study, trial registration was not necessary.

CONTEXTE: L'hémodialyse prolongée (7-8 heures) offre des avantages comparativement aux séances habituelles de quatre heures, administrées trois fois par semaine. L'hémodialyse nocturne en centre (HDNC), administrée par une infirmière, pourrait permettre de proposer un programme de dialyse prolongée à davantage de patients. OBJECTIF: L'étude visait principalement à déterminer les prédicteurs de l'échec, de l'interruption temporaire ou du succès de la modalité HDNC. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Une méthodologie rétrospective a été employée pour examiner les dossiers médicaux et bases de données. CADRE: Étude menée dans le seul programme canadien d'HDNC, soit celui du centre de soins tertiaires de Victoria, en Colombie-Britannique. Ce programme dessert un bassin d'environ 450 000 personnes. SUJETS: Un total de 43 patients incidents consécutifs ont pris part au programme d'HDNC; 42 ont donné leur consentement éclairé pour participer à l'étude. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons procédé à une étude observationnelle rétrospective examinant les résultats de patients incidents sous HDNC entre 2015 et 2017. L'échec de la modalité dans les six premiers mois constituait l'issue principale. La réussite de la modalité et les prédicteurs d'une interruption temporaire ou complète de l'HDNC constituaient les issues secondaires. Les prédicteurs pour chaque résultat incluaient les données démographiques, les maladies concomitantes et le score sur l'échelle CFS (Clinical Frailty Scale) mesurant la fragilité clinique. RÉSULTATS: L'étude porte sur 42 sujets dont l'âge moyen s'établissait à 63 ans (ET: 16 ans); 52 % étaient âgés de 65 ans et plus. En moyenne, les patients étaient dialysés depuis 46 (55) mois, suivis depuis 11 (9) mois et présentaient un score CFS de 4 (1). L'échec de la modalité est survenu dans les six premiers mois pour 12 patients (29 %). La réussite de la modalité après 1 an, censurée pour les transplantations et les transitions vers la dialyse à domicile, était de 60 %. Les interruptions étaient liées à l'insomnie (32 %), au changement de statut médical (27 %) et à l'accès vasculaire (23 %). Dans l'analyse de survie de Cox non corrigée, des augmentations d'un point au score CFS étaient associées à un plus grand risque d'échec (RR: 2,04; IC à 95 %: 1,26-3,31). Dans l'analyse corrigée, l'augmentation de la fragilité a également été associée à une interruption temporaire de l'HDNC (rapport du taux d'incidence: 2,64; IC à 95 %: 1,55-4,50; comparaison d'un score CFS entre 1 et 3 à un score CFS égal ou supérieur à 4). LIMITES: La conception rétrospective et observationnelle de l'étude a limité le contrôle des facteurs confusionnels. De plus, le nombre relativement faible d'événements observés (échantillon de petite taille) a diminué la puissance statistique permettant d'étayer les conclusions. Enfin, l'étude est monocentrique, ce qui limite sa généralisabilité à d'autres programmes et contextes cliniques, et un seul médecin a déterminé les scores de fragilité clinique. CONCLUSION: L'HDNC s'avère une modalité viable, même pour les patients plus âgés. L'accroissement de la fragilité a été associé à un risque accru d'échec de la modalité et à davantage de traitements manqués. L'ajout d'un seuil de fragilité clinique (score ≤ 4) aux critères d'inclusion pour l'HDNC pourrait aider à identifier les personnes les plus susceptibles de profiter des avantages à long terme de cette modalité. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: Non nécessaire puisqu'il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective et observationnelle.

Geographic and facility variation in initial use of non-tunneled catheters for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-tunneled (temporary) hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) are the least-optimal initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients yet little is known about factors associated with NTHC use in this context. We sought to determine factors associated with NTHC use and examine regional and facility-level variation in NTHC use for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We analyzed registry data collected between January 2001 and December 2010 from 61 dialysis facilities within 12 geographic regions in Canada. Multi-level models and intra-class correlation coefficients were used to evaluate variation in NTHC use as initial hemodialysis access across facilities and geographic regions. Facility and patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest quartiles of NTHC use were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 21,052 patients initiated maintenance hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (CVC). This included 10,183 patients (48.3 %) in whom the initial CVC was a NTHC, as opposed to a tunneled CVC. Crude variation in NTHC use across facilities ranged from 3.7 to 99.4 % and across geographic regions from 32.4 to 85.1 %. In an adjusted multi-level logistic regression model, the proportion of total variation in NTHC use explained by facility-level and regional variation was 40.0 % and 34.1 %, respectively. Similar results were observed for the subgroup of patients who received greater than 12 months of pre-dialysis nephrology care. Patient-level factors associated with increased NTHC use were male gender, history of angina, pulmonary edema, COPD, hypertension, increasing distance from dialysis facility, higher serum phosphate, lower serum albumin and later calendar year. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation in NTHC use as initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients across facilities and geographic regions in Canada. Identifying modifiable factors that explain this variation could facilitate a reduction of NTHC use in favor of more optimal initial vascular access.

Rationale for a home dialysis virtual ward: design and implementation.

BACKGROUND: Home-based renal replacement therapy (RRT) [peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD)] offers independent quality of life and clinical advantages compared to conventional in-center hemodialysis. However, follow-up may be less complete for home dialysis patients following a change in care settings such as post hospitalization. We aim to implement a Home Dialysis Virtual Ward (HDVW) strategy, which is targeted to minimize gaps of care. METHODS/DESIGN: The HDVW Pilot Study will enroll consecutive PD and HHD patients who fulfilled any one of our inclusion criteria: 1. following discharge from hospital, 2. after interventional procedure(s), 3. prescription of anti-microbial agents, or 4. following completion of home dialysis training. Clinician-led telephone interviews are performed weekly for 2 weeks until VW discharge. Case-mix (modified Charlson Comorbidity Index), symptoms (the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) and patient satisfaction are assessed serially. The number of VW interventions relating to eight pre-specified domains will be measured. Adverse events such as re-hospitalization and health-services utilization will be ascertained through telephone follow-up after discharge from the VW at 2, 4, 12 weeks. The VW re-hospitalization rate will be compared with a contemporary cohort (matched for age, gender, renal replacement therapy and co-morbidities). Our protocol has been approved by research ethics board (UHN: 12-5397-AE). Written informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained from participants. DISCUSSION: This report serves as a blueprint for the design and implementation of a novel health service delivery model for home dialysis patients. The major goal of the HDVW initiative is to provide appropriate and effective supports to medically complex patients in a targeted window of vulnerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (NCT01912001).

Use of a national continuing medical education meeting to provide simulation-based training in temporary hemodialysis catheter insertion skills: a pre-test post-test study.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based-mastery-learning (SBML) is an effective method to train nephrology fellows to competently insert temporary, non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs). Previous studies of SBML for NTHC-insertion have been conducted at a local level. OBJECTIVES: Determine if SBML for NTHC-insertion can be effective when provided at a national continuing medical education (CME) meeting. Describe the correlation of demographic factors, prior experience with NTHC-insertion and procedural self-confidence with simulated performance of the procedure. DESIGN: Pre-test - post-test study. SETTING: 2014 Canadian Society of Nephrology annual meeting. PARTICIPANTS: Nephrology fellows, internal medicine residents and medical students. MEASUREMENTS: Participants were surveyed regarding demographics, prior NTHC-insertion experience, procedural self-confidence and attitudes regarding the training they received. NTHC-insertion skills were assessed using a 28-item checklist. METHODS: Participants underwent a pre-test of their NTHC-insertion skills at the internal jugular site using a realistic patient simulator and ultrasound machine. Participants then had a training session that included a didactic presentation and 2 hours of deliberate practice using the simulator. On the following day, trainees completed a post-test of their NTHC-insertion skills. All participants were required to meet or exceed a minimum passing score (MPS) previously set at 79%. Trainees who did not reach the MPS were required to perform more deliberate practice until the MPS was achieved. RESULTS: Twenty-two individuals participated in SBML training. None met or exceeded the MPS at baseline with a median checklist score of 20 (IQR, 7.25 to 21). Seventeen of 22 participants (77%) completed post-testing and improved their scores to a median of 27 (IQR, 26 to 28; p < 0.001). All met or exceeded the MPS on their first attempt. There were no significant correlations between demographics, prior experience or procedural self-confidence with pre-test performance. LIMITATIONS: Small sample-size and self-selection of participants. Costs could limit the long-term feasibility of providing this type of training at a CME conference. CONCLUSIONS: Despite most participants reporting having previously inserted NTHCs in clinical practice, none met the MPS at baseline; this suggests their prior training may have been inadequate.

CONTEXTE: L'apprentissage assuré par la simulation est une méthode efficace pour former les résidents en néphrologie à insérer un cathéter d'hémodialyse non tunnellisé. Des études précédentes sur l'apprentissage assuré par la simulation pour l'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés ont été effectuées à l'échelon local. OBJECTIFS: Déterminer si l'apprentissage assuré par la simulation pour l'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés peut être efficace lorsque les possibilités sont offertes lors d'une conférence nationale de formation médicale continue (FMC). Décrire la corrélation entre les facteurs démographiques, les expériences antérieures d'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés, de même que l'assurance personnelle en matière de simulation de la procédure. Évaluer la perception des apprenants face à l'apprentissage assuré par la simulation dans le cadre d'une conférence nationale de FMC. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Prétest/post-test. CONTEXTE: Réunion annuelle 2014 de la Société canadienne de néphrologie. PARTICIPANTS: Les résidents en néphrologie et en médecine interne et les étudiants en médecine. MESURES: On a effectué un sondage auprès des participants au sujet des caractéristiques démographiques, de leurs expériences antérieures d'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés, de leur assurance personnelle et leur attitude par rapport à la formation reçue. Les compétences en matière d'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés ont été évaluées selon une liste de contrôle en 28 points. MÉTHODES: Les participants ont subi un prétest de leurs compétences en matière d'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés dans la veine jugulaire interne, à l'aide d'un simulateur de patient et d'une machine à échographie. Les participants ont ensuite suivi une séance de formation qui comprenait une présentation didactique et deux heures d'exercices sur le simulateur. Le jour suivant, ils ont subi un post-test de leurs compétences. Tous les participants devaient atteindre ou dépasser la note minimale de passage précédemment fixée à 79%. Ceux qui n'ont pas atteint cette note ont dû effectuer des exercices supplémentaires jusqu'à l'atteindre. RÉSULTATS: Vingt-deux personnes ont participé à la formation sur l'insertion de cathéters d'hémodialyse non tunnellisés. Aucun d'entre eux n'a atteint ou dépassé la note minimale de passage en premier lieu, pour une médiane de 20 (ÉI = écart interquartile, entre 7,25 et 21). Dix-sept des 22 participants (77%) ont terminé le post-test en améliorant leur note, pour une médiane de 27 (ÉI, entre 26 et 28; p < 0,0001). Tous ont atteint ou excédé la note de passage lors de leur premier essai. Il n'existe aucune corrélation significative entre les facteurs démographiques, l'expérience antérieure et l'assurance personnelle, d'une part, et les résultats du prétest, d'autre part. Les participants ont confirmé l'apport de la formation, et qu'elle devrait être intégrée à la formation postdoctorale en néphrologie. LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: Échantillonnage restreint et autosélection des participants. Le rapport coût-efficacité n'a pas été évalué. Les coûts pourraient limiter la faisabilité à long terme de la prestation de ce type de formation au cours de conférences de FMC. CONCLUSIONS: Bien que plusieurs participants aient rapporté posséder de l'expérience antérieure dans l'insertion de cathéters non tunnellisés en pratique clinique, aucun d'entre eux n'a atteint la note minimale de passage en premier lieu; ceci suggère que leur formation antérieure ait été inadéquate. Il est possible d'offrir des possibilités d'apprentissage assuré par la simulation pour l'insertion de cathéters d'hémodialyse non tunnellisés qui soit efficace dans le contexte d'une conférence nationale de formation médicale continue.

The British Columbia Nephrologists' Access Study (BCNAS) - a prospective, health services interventional study to develop waiting time benchmarks and reduce wait times for out-patient nephrology consultations.

BACKGROUND: Early referral and management of high-risk chronic kidney disease may prevent or delay the need for dialysis. Automatic eGFR reporting has increased demand for out-patient nephrology consultations and in some cases, prolonged queues. In Canada, a national task force suggested the development of waiting time targets, which has not been done for nephrology. METHODS: We sought to describe waiting time for outpatient nephrology consultations in British Columbia (BC). Data collection occurred in 2 phases: 1) Baseline Description (Jan 18-28, 2010) and 2) Post Waiting Time Benchmark-Introduction (Jan 16-27, 2012). Waiting time was defined as the interval from receipt of referral letters to assessment. Using a modified Delphi process, Nephrologists and Family Physicians (FP) developed waiting time targets for commonly referred conditions through meetings and surveys. Rules were developed to weigh-in nephrologists', FPs', and patients' perspectives in order to generate waiting time benchmarks. Targets consider comorbidities, eGFR, BP and albuminuria. Referred conditions were assigned a priority score between 1-4. BC nephrologists were encouraged to centrally triage referrals to see the first available nephrologist. Waiting time benchmarks were simultaneously introduced to guide patient scheduling. A post-intervention waiting time evaluation was then repeated. RESULTS: In 2010 and 2012, 43/52 (83%) and 46/57 (81%) of BC nephrologists participated. Waiting time decreased from 98(IQR44,157) to 64(IQR21,120) days from 2010 to 2012 (p = <.001), despite no change in referral eGFR, demographics, nor number of office hrs/wk. Waiting time improved most for high priority patients. CONCLUSIONS: An integrated, Provincial initiative to measure wait times, develop waiting benchmarks, and engage physicians in active waiting time management associated with improved access to nephrologists in BC. Improvements in waiting time was most marked for the highest priority patients, which suggests that benchmarks had an influence on triaging behavior. Further research is needed to determine whether this effect is sustainable.

Temporary hemodialysis catheter placement by nephrology fellows: implications for nephrology training.

The insertion of temporary hemodialysis catheters is considered to be a core competency of nephrology fellowship training. Little is known about the adequacy of training for this procedure and the extent to which evidence-based techniques to reduce complications have been adopted. We conducted a web-based survey of Canadian nephrology trainees regarding the insertion of temporary hemodialysis catheters. Responses were received from 45 of 68 (66%) eligible trainees. The median number of temporary hemodialysis catheters inserted during the prior 6 months of training was 5 (IQR, 2-11), with 9 (20%) trainees reporting they had inserted none. More than one-third of respondents indicated that they were not adequately trained to competently insert temporary hemodialysis catheters at both the femoral and internal jugular sites. These findings are relevant to a discussion of the current adequacy of procedural skills training during nephrology fellowship. With respect to temporary hemodialysis catheter placement, there is an opportunity for increased use of simulation-based teaching by training programs. Certain infection control techniques and use of real-time ultrasound should be more widely adopted. Consideration should be given to the establishment of minimum procedural training requirements at the level of both individual training programs and nationwide certification authorities.

Determinants of training and technique failure in home hemodialysis.

Home hemodialysis (HHD) has clinical and economic advantages compared with in-center conventional hemodialysis. Many health systems wish to broaden the population to which this modality can be successfully offered. However, determinants of successful HHD training and technique survival are unknown. We hypothesize that both medical and social factors play a role when patients fail to successfully adopt HHD. We examined characteristics of consecutive patients who initiated training for HHD between 2003 and 2011. Patients were classified as "failure" if they failed to complete HHD training or experienced technique failure (TF) within the first year of treatment. Remaining patients were classified as "success." One hundred seventy-seven patients initiated HHD training. In the "failure" group (n = 32), 24 did not finish training and 8 had TF. In the "success" group (n = 145), 65 (45%) patients remained on NHD, 49 (34%) discontinued HHD because of renal transplantation and 21 (14%) because of death, while only 10 (7%) eventually transferred to another dialysis modality. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the strongest predictors of "failure" were end-stage renal disease because of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-10.3, P = 0.008) and use of rental housing (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-6.0, P = 0.01). Both medical and social factors are associated with failure to adopt HHD. Enhanced supports or a customized education strategy for these vulnerable patients should be considered.

Current state of intensive hemodialysis: a comparative review of benefits and barriers.

The current interest in intensive hemodialysis (HD) was born out of the impasse in an effort to improve survival and quality of life (QOL) in patients with end-stage renal disease. In this review, we have summarized the emerging data of intensive HD on (i) survival, (ii) cardiovascular outcomes, (iii) phosphate balance and (iv) QOL. Although there is a consistent and compelling signal favoring intensive HD, it is important to balance the enthusiasm with the significant amount of perceived and actual barriers for our patients to overcome to receive or perform intensive HD. For an individual patient, the answer to the question 'What is the best form of intensive hemodialysis?' should be a consideration between the benefits sought and the obstacles in attaining intensive HD. In the future, changes in dialysis technology, healthcare delivery and education strategy are needed to allow the majority of patients to receive optimal renal replacement therapy.

Oral anticoagulants and non-cardioembolic stroke prevention.

The use of anticoagulants for secondary prevention following non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke is controversial. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of oral anticoagulation compared with control and antiplatelet therapy.