Efficacy of Systemic Bevacizumab for Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis with Pulmonary Involvement.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary papillomatosis is a rare but severe manifestation of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP). Efficacy data of systemic bevacizumab for pulmonary RRP are limited. This study's objective was to characterize disease response of pulmonary RRP to systemic bevacizumab. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with pulmonary RRP seen at three medical institutions. Clinical symptoms, CT findings, and disease response were compared before and after initiation of systemic bevacizumab therapy. Disease response was categorized as complete response, partial response, stabilization, or progression for each subsite involved by papilloma. RESULTS: Of the 12 pulmonary RRP patients treated with systemic bevacizumab, 4 (33.3%) were male, and 11 (91.7%) were juvenile-onset RRP patients. All presented with laryngeal, tracheal, and pulmonary RRP. The median (range) age at first bevacizumab infusion was 48.1 (19.5-70.2) years. Progression to pulmonary malignancy was identified in 3 (25.0%) patients, 2 before initiation of and 1 after complete cessation of bevacizumab therapy. Clinical symptoms such as dyspnea (75.0% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.01) and dysphagia and/or odynophagia (33.3 vs. 0.0%; p = 0.03) were significantly decreased following bevacizumab therapy. Compared with pre-treatment baseline, 9 (75.0%) patients experienced a stable-to-partial response in the lungs to systemic bevacizumab, and 10 (83.3%) experienced partial-to-complete responses in the larynx and trachea. CONCLUSION: Systemic bevacizumab is effective in stabilizing progression in even the most severe cases of RRP, with both a dramatic reduction in laryngeal and tracheal disease as well as a stable-to-partial response of pulmonary involvement in a majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:577-581, 2024.

The Role of Proteomic Testing in Improving Prognosis And Care Planning Quality Measures for Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is a payment model from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services designed to reduce costs and improve quality in cancer care. Key components of quality for the OCM originate from the 13-component cancer care plan. We surveyed the literature to understand the value of prognosis in OCM-directed planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care and to investigate how the results of a prognostic, proteomic biomarker test, the VeriStrat test, can help OCM-participating providers meet the specific quality measures. DESIGN: A targeted literature review was supplemented by real-world author experience. METHODOLOGY: Available MEDLINE-indexed literature on the topic of lung cancer prognosis and cancer care planning (1997-2017) were reviewed. Authors also included relevant commentary based on their own real-world experience with VeriStrat testing and prognostic conversations. RESULTS: There was near-universal consensus in guidelines and literature about the critical importance of early, candid, and ongoing physician-patient discussions about prognosis, which informs most components of the OCM care plan. The VeriStrat test has been shown to provide accurate predictions of outcomes in all lines of therapy and in various treatments for patients with NSCLC, including chemotherapies and EGFR-TKI therapies. CONCLUSION: Accurate prognostic estimates, such as those provided by the VeriStrat test, are useful for predicting and documenting expected response to treatment, avoiding ineffective and costly overtreatment and for facilitating meaningful conversations with NSCLC patients about the timing of best supportive care and hospice care when appropriate, thereby improving cancer care planning and quality scores.

Proactive management strategies for potential gastrointestinal adverse reactions with ceritinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusions occur in 3%-7% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Ceritinib, a once-daily, oral ALK inhibitor, has activity against crizotinib-resistant and crizotinib-naïve NSCLC, including brain metastases. Ceritinib (Zykadia™) was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for treating crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC. Adverse events (AEs), particularly gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, are commonly experienced at the recommended dose of 750 mg/d and ∼38% of patients require dose interruption or reduction for GI AEs. This case study details our experience with the use of proactive GI AE management regimens in patients treated with ceritinib (750 mg/d) across two study sites. Proactive Regimens A and B were implemented in patients with metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC treated with ceritinib to manage drug-related GI AEs. Regimen A comprised ondansetron and diphenoxylate/atropine or loperamide, taken 30 minutes prior to ceritinib dose. Regimen B included dicyclomine (taken with the first ceritinib dose), ondansetron (taken 30 minutes prior to ceritinib dose for the first seven doses), and loperamide (taken as needed with the onset of diarrhea). The proactive medications were tapered off depending on patient tolerability to ceritinib. Nine patient cases are presented. Starting Regimens A or B before the first dose of ceritinib, or as soon as GI symptoms were encountered, prevented the need for dose reduction due to GI toxicity in eight of the nine patients. Using these regimens, 78% of patients were able to remain on 750 mg/d fasting. Two patients received 23 months and 16 months of therapy and remain on ceritinib 750 mg/d and 600 mg/d, respectively. Although not currently recommended or implemented in clinical studies, based on the patients evaluated here, upfront or proactive treatment plans that address AEs early on can allow the majority of patients to remain on the approved 750 mg/d ceritinib dose.