International rare donor panels: a review.

International rare blood donor panels or registries are important in the consistent availability of rare blood for patients who need this scarce resource. In countries where it has been possible to commit resources to this effort and often where the need is great, donors have been entered into a registry. The ISBT leadership recognized the importance of this very challenging inventory management activity and created a Working Party to support it. Individual countries support the WHO International Rare Donor Panel by submitting their donors' phenotype or genotype information to be catalogued into the database. It is extremely important that this database be cultivated and grown. The contributing countries keep their list updated and supply the blood product as they can when requested. It is known that some blood types are extremely scarce worldwide and requests for these are particularly difficult to fulfil. Thus, it is important to have a protocol to identify and recruit donors with rare blood types. It is equally or perhaps more important to ensure that the patients who need the rare blood are being managed appropriately in the presence and absence of rare blood products being available.

Menopausal status affects the susceptibility of stored RBCs to mechanical stress.

The mechanical fragility index (MFI) is an in vitro measure of sublethal injury to RBCs. In our previous experiments, we demonstrated that an increase in sublethal injury (increasing MFI) was a component of the RBC storage lesion, and that the MFI was significantly higher amongst the RBC units from male donors compared to pre-menopausal female donors during storage. It was hypothesized that hormonal or menstrual factors contributed to this difference. In this study, we found that RBC units donated by post-menopausal women demonstrated an MFI that was significantly higher than those donated by pre-menopausal women throughout storage.

The use of the mechanical fragility test in evaluating sublethal RBC injury during storage.

BACKGROUND: The mechanical fragility index (MFI) is an in vitro measurement of the extent of RBC sublethal injury. Sublethal injury might constitute a component of the RBC storage lesion, thus the MFI was determined serially during routine RBC storage. METHODS: Leucoreduced AS-5- and SAGM-preserved RBCs were stored under routine blood bank conditions. The mechanical fragility (MF) of each unit was serially measured during storage. RESULTS: For both AS-5 and SAGM units, male and female RBCs demonstrated statistically significant increases in the MFI during storage. The MFI was significantly lower in AS-5 units compared to SAGM units throughout storage. Female RBCs had significantly lower MFI vs. male RBCs in both AS-5 and SAGM units at all times. No significant differences in MFI were observed between ABO groups for both genders for AS-5 RBCs. CONCLUSIONS: The MF of RBCs increases during storage. Both gender and preservation solution influenced the MFI; however, the male:female MFI ratios were similar at all time-points and remained stable, suggesting that gender-based biological differences exist independent of storage solution. The MF could be a useful test for evaluating the effect of novel interventions intended to mitigate the susceptibility of RBCs to sublethal injury during storage.

Molecular basis of the Rh antigen RH48 (JAL).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: RH48 (JAL) is a low-incidence Rh antigen of unknown molecular background associated with weakened expression of RhCE antigens. The objective of this study was to establish the molecular basis of JAL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen JAL+ samples, from seven black (one of them a Brazilian of mixed race: black/Caucasian), nine European Caucasians and one Asian individuals, were typed with anti-D, -C, -c, -E and -e. Some samples were also tested for V/VS and ce (f). Titration studies and flow cytometry were used to analyse the expression of the JAL antigen and genomic DNA sequencing of all RHCE exons was conducted on all samples. Routine genotyping for RHCE was carried out on all samples. Screening of RHD exons 1-10, which included detection of the DAU allele, was carried out on all except one of the black samples. The Caucasian samples and remaining black sample were screened for the DAU mutation 1136C>T (T379M). RESULTS: Six black individuals had the Dce haplotype with RHCE mutations 340C>T (R114W) and 733C>G (L245V) [V/VS] and the RHD mutation T379M [DAU]. One mixed race individual had the Dce haplotype with the RHCE mutation 340C>T (R114W) but without the V/VS or DAU mutation. Eight Caucasians had the DCe haplotype with the 340C>T mutation. One Caucasian and one Asian had the Dce haplotype with a different mutation in an adjacent nucleotide, 341G>A (R114Q). All Caucasian individuals were negative for the DAU mutation 1136C>T (T379M). Previously described weakness of CE-related Rh antigens when present in single dose on JAL+ samples of DCe and Dce haplotypes was observed. Weak expression of V/VS was observed in the three black samples tested and weakness of JAL was observed in the black samples compared to the Caucasian samples. CONCLUSION: The same mutation (340C>T, R114W) in two different haplotypes (DCe and Dce) and another mutation (341G>A, R114Q) in one of these haplotypes (Dce) are associated with expression of the JAL antigen. One of the RHCE mutations detected in our samples (340C>T) has been previously described but not in association with the JAL antigen. Our results indicate that the previously described RhCeMA and ce(s)(340) alleles encode the JAL antigen. Expression of V/VS antigen is weakened in the presence of JAL and expression of JAL is usually weaker when associated with the Dce haplotype compared to DCe.