Characteristics of the 100 largest modern zoonotic disease outbreaks.

Zoonotic disease outbreaks are an important threat to human health and numerous drivers have been recognized as contributing to their increasing frequency. Identifying and quantifying relationships between drivers of zoonotic disease outbreaks and outbreak severity is critical to developing targeted zoonotic disease surveillance and outbreak prevention strategies. However, quantitative studies of outbreak drivers on a global scale are lacking. Attributes of countries such as press freedom, surveillance capabilities and latitude also bias global outbreak data. To illustrate these issues, we review the characteristics of the 100 largest outbreaks in a global dataset (n = 4463 bacterial and viral zoonotic outbreaks), and compare them with 200 randomly chosen background controls. Large outbreaks tended to have more drivers than background outbreaks and were related to large-scale environmental and demographic factors such as changes in vector abundance, human population density, unusual weather conditions and water contamination. Pathogens of large outbreaks were more likely to be viral and vector-borne than background outbreaks. Overall, our case study shows that the characteristics of large zoonotic outbreaks with thousands to millions of cases differ consistently from those of more typical outbreaks. We also discuss the limitations of our work, hoping to pave the way for more comprehensive future studies. This article is part of the theme issue 'Infectious disease macroecology: parasite diversity and dynamics across the globe'.

"Motor" impairment in Asperger syndrome: evidence for a deficit in proprioception.

Motor impairment has frequently been described in Asperger syndrome (AS), a pervasive developmental disorder included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV). Previous research focusing on this motor dysfunction has yielded inconsistent results, and the "clumsiness" observed clinically remains poorly defined. To clarify further the issue of motor impairment, we compared a group of 10 children and young adults who met DSM-IV criteria for AS with a control group with no neurological impairment. Subjects were matched on age, sex, socioeconomic status, and Verbal IQ. A broad battery of motoric tests was administered. Subjects with AS were found to perform more poorly than controls on tests of apraxia, one-leg balance with eyes closed, tandem gait, and repetitive finger-thumb apposition. No significant differences were found on tests of finger tapping, grooved pegboard, trail making, or visual-motor integration. The pattern of impairments suggests that a proprioceptive deficit may underlie the incoordination observed in AS and that these individuals may be overreliant on visual input to maintain balance and position in space.

Sensitivity and specificity of a computerized test of attention in the diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is difficult to diagnose due to the subjectivity of its symptoms and lack of specific assessment measures. Computerized tests of attention have recently been used as objective measures that may assist in the diagnosis of the disorder. The present study evaluated consistency between the Conners Parent Rating Scale and the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), which is a computerized test of attention designed to identify symptoms associated with ADHD, in children clinically diagnosed with ADHD (n = 28) and controls (n = 20). Our results showed that both the Conners and the TOVA indicated significant problem areas suggestive of an attention deficit in approximately 85% of children who were clinically diagnosed with ADHD. However, the TOVA also found attentional problems in approximately 30% of control children, whereas none of the controls scored abnormally on the Conners. As computerized measures are administered more frequently, there may be a risk of overdiagnosis and treatment of "ADHD" in normal children. A combined approach using questionnaires, clinical evaluation, and computerized tests of attention in the assessment of possible ADHD may provide the most accurate means of diagnosis.

A hierarchical analysis of block design errors in children with early focal brain damage.

This study investigated the differential effects of very early damage to the left hemisphere (LH) or right hemisphere (RH) on visuospatial processing. Twenty-two children who had suffered either LH or RH strokes in the pre- or perinatal period were included in the study. The Block Design subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (Wechsler, 1974) was used. Each missed item was coded as either a global error (e.g., broken configuration), local error (e.g., incorrect details), or time fail error (i.e., not completed within the allotted time). Results showed that the LH lesion and RH lesion groups had similar full scale IQs, verbal IQs, and performance IQs and were within the average to low average range. Block Design scaled scores were also within the average to low average range and did not significantly differ between the 2 lesion groups. Error analysis revealed, however, that the RH focal lesion group produced a significantly higher percentage of global errors than did the LH lesion group, whereas the LH lesion group produced a significantly higher percentage of local errors than did the RH lesion group. The groups did not differ on their percentage of time fail errors. These results are consistent with previous findings that suggest that the RH is involved in more global aspects of visual processing, whereas the LH mediates the more detailed, local aspects of visual information. The fact that these differences in processing are present after such early focal damage implies that hemispheric specialization for visuospatial processing occurs very early in brain development.