Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Neurol ; 270(7): 3527-3536, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37022478

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People with epilepsy (PWE) and people with intellectual disabilities (ID) both live shorter lives than the general population and both conditions increase the risk of death further. We aimed to measure associations between certain risk factors for death in PWE and ID. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in ten regions in England and Wales. Data were collected on PWE registered with secondary care ID and neurology services between 2017 and 2021. Prevalence rates of neurodevelopmental, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, seizure frequency, psychotropic and antiseizure medications (ASM) prescribed, and health activity (epilepsy reviews/risk assessments/care plans/compliance etc.) recorded were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: 190 PWE and ID who died were compared with 910 living controls. People who died were less likely to have had an epilepsy risk assessment but had a greater prevalence of genetic conditions, older age, poor physical health, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, polypharmacy (not ASMs) and antipsychotic use. The multivariable logistic regression for risk of epilepsy-related death identified that age over 50, medical condition prevalence, antipsychotic medication use and the lack of an epilepsy review in the last 12 months as associated with increased risk of death. Reviews by psychiatrists in ID services was associated with a 72% reduction in the odds of death compared neurology services. CONCLUSIONS: Polypharmacy and use of antipsychotics may be associated with death but not ASMs. Greater and closer monitoring by creating capable health communities may reduce the risk of death. ID services maybe more likely to provide this holistic approach.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Epilepsia , Discapacidad Intelectual , Adulto , Humanos , Preescolar , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Gales/epidemiología , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Inglaterra/epidemiología
3.
J Neurol ; 269(5): 2750-2760, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35067759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A quarter of people with Intellectual Disability (ID) in the UK have epilepsy compared to 0.6% in the general population and die much younger. Epilepsy is associated with two-fifths of all deaths with related polypharmacy and multi-morbidity. Epilepsy research on this population has been poor. This study describes real-world clinical and risk characteristics of a large cohort across England and Wales. METHODS: A retrospective multi-centre cohort study was conducted. Information on seizure characteristics, ID severity, relevant co-morbidities, psychotropic and antiseizure drugs (ASDs), SUDEP and other risk factors was collected across a year. RESULTS: Of 904 adults across 10 centres (male:female, 1.5:1), 320 (35%) had mild ID and 584 (65%) moderate-profound (M/P) ID. The mean age was 39.9 years (SD 15.0). Seizures were more frequent in M/P ID (p < 0.001). Over 50% had physical health co-morbidities, more in mild ID (p < 0.01). A third had psychiatric co-morbidity and a fifth had an underlying genetic disorder. Autism Spectrum Disorder was seen in over a third (37%). Participants were on median two ASDs and overall, five medications. Over quarter were on anti-psychotics. Over 90% had an epilepsy review in the past year but 25% did not have an epilepsy care plan, particularly those with mild ID (p < 0.001). Only 61% had a documented discussion of SUDEP, again less likely with mild ID or their care stakeholders (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant levels of multi-morbidity, polypharmacy and a lack of systemised approach to treatment and risk exist. Addressing these concerns is essential to reduce premature mortality.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Epilepsia , Discapacidad Intelectual , Muerte Súbita e Inesperada en la Epilepsia , Adulto , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Discapacidad Intelectual/epidemiología , Masculino , Multimorbilidad , Polifarmacia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
BJPsych Open ; 6(6): e123, 2020 Oct 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33059790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected people with intellectual disability disproportionately. Existing data does not provide enough information to understand factors associated with increased deaths in those with intellectual disability. Establishing who is at high risk is important in developing prevention strategies, given risk factors or comorbidities in people with intellectual disability may be different to those in the general population. AIMS: To identify comorbidities, demographic and clinical factors of those individuals with intellectual disability who have died from COVID-19. METHOD: An observational descriptive case series looking at deaths because of COVID-19 in people with intellectual disability was conducted. Along with established risk factors observed in the general population, possible specific risk factors and comorbidities in people with intellectual disability for deaths related to COVID-19 were examined. Comparisons between mild and moderate-to-profound intellectual disability subcohorts were undertaken. RESULTS: Data on 66 deaths in individuals with intellectual disability were analysed. This group was younger (mean age 64 years) compared with the age of death in the general population because of COVID-19. High rates of moderate-to-profound intellectual disability (n = 43), epilepsy (n = 29), mental illness (n = 29), dysphagia (n = 23), Down syndrome (n = 20) and dementia (n = 15) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study exploring associations between possible risk factors and comorbidities found in COVID-19 deaths in people with intellectual disability. Our data provides insight into possible factors for deaths in people with intellectual disability. Some of the factors varied between the mild and moderate-to-profound intellectual disability groups. This highlights an urgent need for further systemic inquiry and study of the possible cumulative impact of these factors and comorbidities given the possibility of COVID-19 resurgence.

5.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(2): 173-181, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31790280

RESUMEN

Introduction: This clinical guidance looks at the specific concerns of delivery of medical treatment for people with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID). People with ID have not been included in licensing drug trials of AEDs. However, this population has an over-representation of seizure comorbidity, treatment resistance, and polypharmacy while also being vulnerable to not having their views considered.Areas covered: This review summarizes the current most robust evidence available for the use of licensed AEDs in people with epilepsy and ID. The article provides practical evidence-based clinical information to help prescribers choose the most appropriate AED from the drugs discussed. The article highlights other important individualized factors to consider before initiating or changing antiepileptic medication.Expert opinion: A 'traffic light' coding system is applied to commonly used AEDs based on the level of evidence and expert clinical experience. Managing epilepsy in the ID population requires specialist care. Treatment plans need to be holistic and tailored to accommodate an individual's comorbidities, concurrent medications, general health, social and environmental status. There is a need for large quality trial data to assess the most suitable AEDs on seizure control and quality of life in this population with complex needs.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Discapacidad Intelectual , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de Vida , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Brain Res ; 1063(2): 180-6, 2005 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16257392

RESUMEN

The therapeutic success of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients remains controversial as many patients become tolerant requiring higher dosage regimens. However, the increase in dosage regimens results in the patients experiencing intolerable side effects. This study sought to investigate whether dopamine (DA) can chemically react with iron to form the potent neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA). Furthermore, rats were treated with L-DOPA for a period of 7 and 28 days to determine whether L-DOPA treatment results in 6-OHDA formation in rat striatum. In addition, this study also investigates the complex interactions of L-DOPA with iron by performing in vitro and in vivo lipid peroxidation studies and the detection of endogenous 6-OHDA in iron-infused rats. In each study, melatonin was used to determine whether it could quench any free radical effects that may occur. The results of the present study show that DA chemically reacts with iron to form 6-OHDA. Moreover, L-DOPA treatment results in endogenous 6-OHDA formation in rat brain as well as enhances iron-induced lipid peroxidation both in vitro and in vivo in the rat striatum. The L-DOPA-induced increase in lipid peroxidation, in iron-infused rats, corresponds with an increase in levels of 6-OHDA in the rat striatum. The use of melatonin significantly decreases the L-DOPA-stimulated 6-OHDA formation in the rat striatum. The present study provides novel information on L-DOPA-induced neurotoxicity and suggests the concomitant use of an antioxidant with L-DOPA in order to enhance the life span of L-DOPA therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/farmacocinética , Antiparkinsonianos/toxicidad , Levodopa/farmacocinética , Levodopa/toxicidad , Oxidopamina/metabolismo , Animales , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Ácido Ascórbico , Cuerpo Estriado/efectos de los fármacos , Cuerpo Estriado/metabolismo , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Ácido Edético , Hidroxilación , Hierro/farmacología , Peroxidación de Lípido/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Melatonina/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Wistar
7.
Curr Opin Neurol ; 16(2): 183-7, 2003 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12644747

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Whilst behaviour disorder is so commonly a challenge to physicians in the field of epilepsy, comparatively little is known of its exact association with the epilepsies. This review highlights advances in knowledge, focussing on a broad definition of behaviour to include psychiatric pathology. RECENT FINDINGS: Differential rates of disturbance appear to be associated with concurrent intellectual disability. Advances in imaging, in particular, suggest that structural brain changes may underlie the increased susceptibility in some epilepsy patients. SUMMARY: Clinical practice should recognize that, with the possible exception of seizure freedom in postictal behavioural disturbance, epilepsy treatment alone is unlikely to treat the associated psychological and behavioural disturbance. Research continues to focus on assessing the correlates of epilepsy and psychopathology whilst the association between epilepsy and behaviour disorder in people with an intellectual disability remains largely unknown.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/psicología , Humanos , Trastornos del Humor/etiología , Personalidad , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Convulsiones/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...