Real-World Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Symptomatic COPD: The ELLITHE Non-Interventional Trial.

Purpose: Real-life effectiveness data on once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (odSITT) with the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF), the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC), and the long-acting ß2-agonist vilanterol (VI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are important to complement evidence from well-controlled randomized clinical trials. Effectiveness of odSITT was quantified by assessing health status and symptoms in usual care. Patients and Methods: ELLITHE was a single-country (Germany), multicenter, open-label, non-interventional effectiveness study between 2020 and 2022, evaluating the effect of treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg once-daily via the ELLIPTA inhaler on improvements in clinical outcomes versus baseline in COPD patients. The primary endpoint was the change in the total COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score between baseline and month 12. Key secondary endpoints included change in CAT score over time, occurrence of exacerbations until month 12, changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), inhaler adherence, and safety. Results: Nine hundred and six patients were included (age 66.6 years, 55.6% male, mean FEV1 52.6% of predicted, mean CAT 21.5 units, 1.4 exacerbations/year pre-study). About 63.9% of patients were escalated from dual therapies, and 18% were switched from multiple-inhaler triple therapies. Reductions in CAT score at month 12 were statistically significant and above the threshold of clinical importance (-2.6 units; p < 0.0001). CAT score also improved at interim visits. CAT improvements were more pronounced in patients with high baseline scores and better inhaler adherence. Exacerbations during follow-up were rare (0.2 events/year) compared to pre-study (1.4 events/year). FEV1 was improved by 93 mL (p < 0.0001). No new safety effects were observed. Conclusion: In usual care, treatment with odSITT resulted in significant and clinically relevant improvements of CAT score and FEV1 in COPD patients, regardless of the occurrence of exacerbations. These findings challenge the current guideline recommendations for SITT only in patients experiencing exacerbations.

Treatment of postoperative ileus with choline citrate--results of a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVES: This was a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trial to analyse the efficacy of choline citrate in patients with postoperative ileus (POI) after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: From October 2005 until June 2008, 122 patients with POI were randomised to receive choline citrate or placebo. One hundred twenty patients were evaluable for tolerability and 107 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The treatment group, 47% (50/107), received 300.2 mg choline citrate intravenously, while the placebo group, 53% (57/107), received sodium chloride. Injections were performed every 12 h until defecation. RESULTS: Demographic data analysis did not show clinically differences between both groups. Operative procedures included 40% (43/107) hemicolectomy, 38% (41/107) sigmoid resection and 22% (23/107) other colorectal resections. Defecation occurred after an average of 91.8 ± 26.6 h postoperatively in the treatment group, vs. 96.7 ± 35.2 h in the placebo group (p = 0.805). After laparoscopy, defecation occurred after 78.7 ± 25.3 h, vs. 99.2 ± 31.6 h after laparotomy (p = 0.001). Serious adverse effects occurred in 2% (1/60) in the treatment group, vs. 3% (2/60) in the placebo group. None of the events have been assessed as related to the study medication. CONCLUSION: An efficacy of choline citrate in the treatment of POI after elective colorectal surgery could not be verified. The problem of POI requiring drug treatment seems to be less frequent than suggested by the literature. With technical advances in surgery, especially laparoscopic and fast track surgery, the frequency of POI will further decrease in the future.

Efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free eye drops containing a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of preservative-free eye drops (dorzolamide/timolol) in routine management of preservative-sensitive glaucoma patients. METHODS: Data from 2,298 glaucoma patients requiring intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and suffering from intolerance to benzalkonium chloride or active agents of previously used eye drops were valid for baseline and safety analysis in this prospective, open, noncomparative, multicenter, noninterventional study. Patients were treated with preservative-free dorzolamide/timolol eye drops for 12 weeks. Main efficacy endpoint was IOP reduction after 12 weeks of treatment. Two thousand forty-nine patients were considered for efficacy analysis. Tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: Mean baseline IOP was 20.8 mmHg. Baseline IOP was reduced to 16.7 mmHg after 12 weeks of treatment corresponding to a mean absolute (percent) change of -4.1 mmHg (-17.3%). The proportion of patients with IOP ≤21 mmHg increased from 59.9% at baseline to 94.6% after 12 weeks. The most frequently reported ocular adverse drug reactions were burning eyes (2.4%) and hyperemia (0.9%). Local tolerability improved in 79.3% of patients compared to their previous glaucoma therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study confirms the IOP lowering effect of preservative-free eye drops containing the fixed combination of dorzolamide/timolol in a large patient's population. The drug was well tolerated and improved the local tolerability in the vast majority of patients.