[The utility of assaying the N-terminal of brain natriuretic peptide precursor (NT pro-BNP) to predict the clinical outcome in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias observed and treated in the emergency room]. / Utilità del dosaggio del precursore del peptide natriuretico cerebrale come predittore di cardioversione efficace nei pazienti con tachicardie e tachiaritmie sopraventricolari, osservati e trattati in Pronto Soccorso.

Many patients arrive at the emergency room (ER) with recent-onset atrial fibrillation or other forms of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SV Ta) or tachycardia. The restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) is always desirable and, in addition, can enable many hospitalisations to be avoided, thereby achieving considerable savings in financial and healthcare resources. Even in haemodynamically stable cases, it is clearly useful to be able to evaluate which subjects will benefit most from attempts to restore SR, even when few truly diagnostic means are on hand (such as echocardiography, which is not always promptly available in the ER setting). We evaluated the brain natriuretic peptide precursor (N terminal pro-BNP) in 105 patients arriving at the ER. We observed that SR was restored in a low percentage of patients with values > 4500, while the vast majority of those with values < 1500 was normalised even by means of antiarrhythmic drugs alone. It is therefore probable that a medium-low value of the hormone indicates only an acute response to the distension of the atrial tissue induced by the arrhythmia; by contrast, decidedly elevated values are probably also caused by ventricular dysfunction and therefore indicate a lesser likelihood of restoring SR. The routine evaluation of NT pro-BNP could be used as an alternative to echocardiography in order to rapidly select patients in whom cardioversion should be attempted in the ER or Brief Observation Unit.

Experimental assessment of chemotherapy-induced early intestinal damage in colon cancer the lactulose-mannitol permeability test.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy plays an important role in the management and cure of cancer, it has undesiderable side effects mostly affecting the bone marrow and gastrointestinal tract, which greatly limit patient compliance and treatment efficacy. METHODS: The lactulose-mannitol test was used to assess intestinal mucosa damage 48 hours after the end of the first adjuvant chemotherapy cycle with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole in 12 patients with colon cancer. Fifteen age- and sex-matched subjects were studied as controls. The excreted amount of lactulose and mannitol was expressed as the percentage of the administered doses recovered in the urine as well as their ratio. RESULTS: The percent urinary recovery of lactulose was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in colon cancer patients (1.1 +/- 0.5%) than in the control group (0.3 +/- 0.03%), whereas the mannitol recovery was only slightly reduced in the former. As a result, the lactulose/mannitol excretion ratio was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in colon cancer patients (0.07 +/- 0.03) than in the control group (0.01 +/- 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: As assessed by the lactulose-mannitol test, the combined chemotherapy regimen with 5-FU and levamisole affects mainly the barrier function of the intestinal mucosa rather than its absorption capacity. The toxic effect seems to be attributable to the 5-FU molecule rather than to levamisole. The lactulose-mannitol test is a simple, safe and reliable tool to evaluate chemotherapy-induced early damage to the intestinal epithelium, in particular when new kinds of substances are being administered. Its use in clinical practice seems appropriate to establish the correct timing of drug administration, thereby enhancing treatment efficacy and improving patient compliance.

Epithelioid granulomas as main clinical manifestation at the outset of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: report of two cases.

This article describes two cases of malignant lymphoma in which the finding of a striking epithelioid granulomatosis was the main clinical manifestation at the outset of the patients' history. Despite some suggestive clinical and laboratory data, the final diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorder was made only after repeated histological studies in both patients. Although the association between a severe granulomatous reaction and a B-cell neoplasm is rare, the latter should be taken into account as a possible primary disease. The pathogenetic mechanisms postulated by the literature as the cause of granulomatous reactions in lymphoproliferative disorders are reported and discussed in relation to the two cases.