Full-thickness versus split-thickness skin graft reconstruction of scalp defects with and without calvarium exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Compare full-thickness skin grafts versus split-thickness skin grafts in scalp reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent scalp reconstruction with skin grafts performed at a single institution from 2011 to 2016. METHODS: χ2 or Fisher exact tests were used to compare graft integration and complication rates. The effects of graft type, defect type, graft size, and patient comorbidities on the likelihood of graft success and complications were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A hundred and twenty-five full-thickness and 93 split-thickness grafts were performed in 200 patients, including 68 defects (31.2%) with exposed calvarium. Full-thickness grafts required fewer average reconstructions (P = 0.002). A 92.8% of full-thickness grafts had complete graft integration compared with 78.5% of split-thickness grafts (P = 0.002). This difference was more evident in defects with exposed calvarium (87.2% vs. 47.6%, P ≤ 0.001). Despite higher rates of minor debridement, full-thickness grafts had less postoperative bone exposure and wound breakdown than split-thickness grafts on intact pericranium and exposed calvarium defects. Preoperative radiation, immunosuppression, and increased graft sizes were significant predictors of graft outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Skin grafts, especially full-thickness, provide a versatile, reliable, and simple approach for reconstructing medium to large scalp defects in the appropriate patient. Even on defects with bare calvarium, full-thickness grafts can succeed when a vascularized recipient bed is prepared. Defects with exposed bone, larger graft sizes, preoperative radiation, and immunosuppression may result in decreased graft take and increased complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.

Outpatient Parotidectomy, a Safety and Financial Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, efficacy, and potential cost-savings of the outpatient parotidectomy procedure. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a parotidectomy at a large academic center from 2015 through 2019 including demographic data, postoperative complications, drain placement, readmission, and financial cost. A comparison was performed between patients who underwent an outpatient vs inpatient parotidectomy. RESULTS: A total of 335 patients underwent parotidectomy (136 outpatient; 199 inpatient). Comparison of patient demographics, common comorbidities, tumor size, tumor type, postoperative complications, and readmission rate was similar between the inpatient and outpatient cohorts. The overall mean cost difference between inpatient parotidectomy and outpatient parotidectomy for all years was $1528.58 (95%CI: $1139-$1916). CONCLUSION: The outpatient parotidectomy procedure has a comparable safety profile to the inpatient procedure while providing a significant cost-savings benefit.

Impact of perioperative pain management protocol on opioid prescribing patterns.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the impact of preoperative education, patient risk stratification, and a postoperative pain management protocol for common head and neck procedures on opioid prescribing patterns and postoperative pain reporting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A postoperative pain management protocol was developed and implemented for patients undergoing head and neck surgical procedures. Medical charts were queried and postoperative patient satisfaction surveys were administered. Opioid prescribing patterns were evaluated in cohorts of patients undergoing procedures with anticipated mild pain (e.g., thyroidectomy, parotidectomy, lymph node biopsy) before and after the implementation of the protocol. Postoperative patient surveys were analyzed in the postimplementation group. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients were included for analysis. One hundred fifty-four patients and 148 patients underwent surgery before and after the implementation of the protocol, respectively. There was a decreased incidence of oxycodone-containing prescriptions (83% to 26%), and tramadol became the most common discharge medication (70%). There was a significant decrease in the total number of pills prescribed after the implementation of the protocol (34.71 to 25.36, P < .001). Ninety percent of patients reported high satisfaction (≥8) with pain management. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a comprehensive pain management protocol can significantly reduce the amount and potency of opioid pain medication prescribed after head and neck procedures while maintaining high patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1180-1185, 2020.